Can a medfag please explain why so many 'ditches get that scalloped look around the edges of the "labia" (more like labi-ain't amiright)? It's like fuckin ravioli.
View attachment 7001257
Is it because SRS butchers give no shits about making neat sutures? Or something with the healing process?
I'm a medfag so I'll have a go at answering this:
1. The histology (microscopic structure) of the scrotum is very different from the female labia. Think about how your balls feel on your skin compared to the labia of a lady friend. It's not just different on a microscopic scale, but you can feel the difference with your own hands (macroscopic structure).
2. The labia majora and scrotum are homologous structures. As in, they both have the same embryological origin during fetal development: the labioscrotal fold. This is what trannies use to justify their rearranged scrotums as being real labias. However, just because something has the same embryological origin doesn't mean it's the same thing, as I'm about to explain by diving deeper in the histology.
3. As a precursor, you need to know that there's two layers when we talk about this. Press the skin on your arm. The top layer is the epidermis, there is no blood vessels or anything else on that very thin top layer that you see (other than openings for sweat glands and hair follicles). Underneath it is the dermis, which is rich in sensory receptors, blood vessels, etc.
Skin = epidermis + dermis. Underneath that is an even
deeper layer called the subcutaneous tissue. Your skin and subcutaneous tissue vary widely depending on the area of the body. Your palms have a very thick, hairless skin, while your eyelids are very thin.
With that in mind, let's check out the differences:
Organ | Skin | Subcutaneous Tissue |
Scrotum | thin, delicate, sebaceous glands, sweat glands, more smooth muscle fibers to allow reflexive contraction/relaxation in response to temperature (to keep sperm viable) | loose connective tissue with lots of collagen fiber, almost no fat cells (don't want the balls to be too warm, fat is insulating) |
Labia Majora | thick, sebaceous and sweat glands | lots of fat for cushioning |
Now let's answer your question of why so many 'ditches get that scalloped look around the edges of the "labia" making them look like ravioli:
1. The labia in ditches is made of scrotal skin so let's refer to the information you now know to explain the disgusting puckering present in stinkditches. Loose connective tissue heals by using collagen in a disorganized manner. This is what can lead to keloids (scarring that is not flat and builds up beyond the boundaries of what was previously normal). Keloids are also more likely to form under tension, which is what happens when the surgeon cuts the balls open and lays them flat across the groin and sews them down. Keloids are also caused by an excess of collagen (the scrotum has a lot of collagen fiber-- its intercellular matrix is dominated by it). Furthermore, the large open wound and trauma to the body causes an immense immune response, upon which lots of fibroblasts are released, which throw even more collagen at the wound. You usually only need 1 of the aforementioned factors to get a keloid scar, but in this scenario there's 4 factors at play, a quadruple whammy that will lead to that type of scarring regardless of surgical skill.
2. Natural labias have adipose tissue, making them plump, soft, and squishy (I don't know how to explain this any better). Scrotal pseudolabias do not have this adipose layer, which makes them look even more abnormal and causes a gap. The skin in the female labia is filled with the fat, making it taut, while the scrotum, when sewed down, doesn't have this "filling" (imagine a teddy bear with lots of stuffing versus a bear with minimal stuffing-- the filled bear will be plump while the other one will be deflated). When the surgeons stitch the scrotum down, they are sewing down an empty sac, which is what leads to the "ravioli" appearance. After all, ravioli is also a pocket/sac.
3. The surgeons who do these surgeries are morally corrupt. They know the results will be horrible and they don't care because they're getting a good payday. Most of these surgeons are careless on purpose. However, for the reasons I already described, EVEN IF A SURGEON REALLY TRIES TO HAVE A GOOD RESULT, there are just too many anatomical and physiological factors that combine to create grotesque final results.