US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Make fun of him all you want but the man literally cracked the code for getting rid of Cancel Culture and he did it almost 10 years ago.

Just ignore it until it goes away, and it WILL go away.
He may have cracked the code, but Doug Walker perfected it. He had an entire deluge of ex-coattail riders trying to get him cancelled, and he managed to survive just by ignoring it for two weeks.
see also: JonTron.
He HATES Kash cause Kash was a staffer for Devin Nunes, when Devin launched the investigation that exposed him for lying publicly that there was definitive evidence of Trump colluding with Russia

Kash was there, he knows all the fuck about Schiff

IMG_7535.jpeg
watch him squirm:
 
Feds realizing that the general public views them as a waste of taxpayer money. Searching for a new narrative to run with.
View attachment 7008067
View attachment 7008066
View attachment 7008065

Maybe if they didn't have a massive subreddit where they're spending all day bitching and moaning and spouting their inane opinions, the public might not have come to that perception.

What they all truly fear is that a year from now everything will not only be running fine, but that it might even be running even better than it ever has been even though they've been gone. They fear that the public will realize that the emperor never had any clothes and how badly they were being robbed for all of those years. Never let these parasites forget what a blight they were on our great country.
 
>Trump tells Hamas to return the dead hostage toddlers
>oh yeah we'll totally return the dead hostage toddlers
>parades the bodies around Gaza before returning them
>it's actually not the bodies of the hostage toddlers in question

Trump's head's gotta be spinning at this. As others have pointed out, he's actually just a New York businessman. He wants to cut you a deal, maybe you end up giving him 25% of what he asked, it's still a deal baby!

They tried to give him FAKE DEAD TODDLERS. What the fuck.
There are no ethical reasons to use nuclear weapons, but the mudslime durka-durka donkey fuckers are really trying to change that.

Leave it to the Jews though, America should really stay out of it.
 
some bitches are babbling about shit in Halifax, looks like a big globohomo circlejerk given the shit audio and buzzword orgy
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
He may have cracked the code, but Doug Walker perfected it. He had an entire deluge of ex-coattail riders trying to get him cancelled, and he managed to survive just by ignoring it for two weeks.
I m way behind on my channel awsome lore. What did they do to try to get him canceled?
 
Core values are not something to compromise on.

Take it from an older dude who’s been there. It’s easy to easy to let mundane resentments manifest into drifting apart over time. This kind of thing is a bit more acute than “you know what, I don’t actually like your favorite show”

If it clicks with a girl, they have the superpower to just change their fucking mind and go with it. It’s like an evolved trait from when our cavemen ancestors just carried them off. You don’t have that power.

Edit: the shortcut is to find a girl who likes her dad. If she hates her dad, that tends to indicate there’s gonna be some problems
Probably off-topic but this is so fucking true.

I can still remember the feeling of being on the first date with a woman I almost married. I was making a point to be bluntly transparent about my beliefs, talking about stuff like how I don't date blacks because they have statistically higher rates of STDs, or the threat of armed revolution being necessary to keep a government from oppressing its people, shit that would normally make people uncomfortable to say the least but which I feel strongly about, trying to cut to the chase and figure out where we deviate and whether we were right for each other, and feeling so refreshed and hopeful because she was onboard with everything I said. I felt like I finally found one who gets it.

Years later after we realized we wanted different things in life, I reminisced about that conversation on our first date and she told me she doesn't remember a single thing we talked about that day, she just thought I was charming. And I guess that was enough for her to abandon her convictions and adopt mine, at least nominally.

Like, I don't even know what lesson I'm supposed to take away from that. In my mind the entire point of a first date is to figure out if you share the same goals and desires in life, but if they're just going to blindly agree with you then what's even the point? Do you have to constantly remind them what you believe so they know what to believe, like they're a child with no inherent agency? Or do you have to wait until they get over their initial infatuation with you before you can even try to determine whether your morals align? Those both sound wrong to me but what other option is there? Look for a woman who already belongs to a group that reflects your beliefs, and hope she's sincere about it and not just conforming to the social pressures around her? It's just demoralizing.
 
Alternately, you don't need either of those two things if you have drugs, or manage to score well on the attractive/not unattractive scales. Remember that felon that had model tier facial structure and pretty blue eyes? Drowning in
Retarded
pussy. Women, man, they're something else.

There is kind of a two sides situation

The hottest women I’ve known seemed to specifically like ugly yet masculine men, because being pretty was their “thing” or something like that, and they figured they had it covered.

Women have a way easier time wanting to have sex because of emotional reasons than we do, so if you can just pull off being plausibly masculine, you have a shot at 9/10’s

And teenagers are retarded, so yeah. Like 99% of female opioid use is because they got with a guy who was into it. That’s tragic, and largely a result of libshit parenting
 
I'm extremely hyped for the beef tallow too, that's why it's so jarring to see these good ideas served with a side of retarded bullshit.

But even retarded bullshit is way better than what we've been getting up until now, so bring it on I guess. As long as he can make a dent in the insane state of our food and obesity situation.
Like I said when Argentina elected Millei, when the past several decades have had nothing but evil sociopaths working night and day to harm you and your family, anything is better. Even a completely random number generator is going to, by the odds, deliver some good decisions, a retarded but good natured idiot will at least feel bad when he fucks up trying to do well, and both of which are preferable to an evil person deliberating harming you while enjoying it. Considering the last half century of American politics being such a shit show, I'd even take the retarded parody version presented here.

Its nice to have people in government that don't hate the nation and see you only as a tax slave.
 
Like, I don't even know what lesson I'm supposed to take away from that. In my mind the entire point of a first date is to figure out if you share the same goals and desires in life, but if they're just going to blindly agree with you then what's even the point? Do you have to constantly remind them what you believe so they know what to believe, like they're a child with no inherent agency? Or do you have to wait until they get over their initial infatuation with you before you can even try to determine whether your morals align? Those both sound wrong to me but what other option is there? Look for a woman who already belongs to a group that reflects your beliefs, and hope she's sincere about it and not just conforming to the social pressures around her?
yeah I never really thought about it much but the wife and I are generally on the same wavelength socio/policial
enough variation to have conversations get a little hot but yeah, it just storta worked out that way
she was more liberal but between girldick and the traditional "wait, the democrats are assholes!" realization for her and her mom around Obama round two
the only reason she doesn't rock MAGA shit these days in the irls is because she works in a very blue area of one of the few blue islands in Florida

also watching the Japanese dudes talking the DEEPU SUTEETTO is fun
TRUMP KAKUMEI!!!!!!
 
The problem is, it seems to over represent girl code. I thought Elon said he wanted to help America make some fucking babies
Oh that's easy, act like the guys who get laid. The angry meatheads who constantly get laid despite being total retards? Yeah, act like that. They do it for a reason.

You don’t have to open doors for them, but you do have to have a job and a place to live. If you have those, just ignore the looks because none of us really know what’s behind them, and say “hey what’s up”.
PFFFFFTTTT, no you don't. You don't have to have anything to get laid. Chicks sleep with broke jobless losers all the fucking time. You can be living out of your car and still find someone to bone. If you're attractive and meaty enough, women fly continents to see you. If you're hot enough, they won't give a shit if you're a convicted murderer. If you don't believe me, find a local Hippie Fest. Those faggots live out of fucking tents and always have a harem of girls. Thug niggers are never short of bitches either.

Also, if your response to this is "Well those aren't kind of girls you want" or some variant, just know that's fucking cope. How many good girls did you know in school that dated the ass holes? I bet it's a lot. Women date losers all the fucking time. Women drain their bank accounts, tank their credit score, and will literally ruin their bodies and lives for the right scumbag. If being successful was a requirement to getting laid, humanity would've died off years ago.
 
Like, I don't even know what lesson I'm supposed to take away from that. In my mind the entire point of a first date is to figure out if you share the same goals and desires in life, but if they're just going to blindly agree with you then what's even the point? Do you have to constantly remind them what you believe so they know what to believe, like they're a child with no inherent agency? Or do you have to wait until they get over their initial infatuation with you before you can even try to determine whether your morals align? Those both sound wrong to me but what other option is there? Look for a woman who already belongs to a group that reflects your beliefs, and hope she's sincere about it and not just conforming to the social pressures around her?
You're approaching this from the idea that a woman is supposed to be your equal, even though she immediately abandoned everything she believed in for what you did.
It's just demoralizing.
Cognitive dissonance between what you think it's supposed to be and what it actually is will do that.

I can't tell you what you should've done because this is just a glimpse into your relationship. Just sounds like you got a woman that was into you for all the wrong reasons. And you were unsure what to do at the end of the day because you said it yourself: you wanted different things and the way things played out didn't feel like they were supposed to.

Women will do a thing and want something that thing goes against. Getting an education and a good job while seeking to be a fucking house wife being the worst and an all too common one. Making friends with all the wrong people and not wanting stress in their life. Going out on expensive vacations and wanting to save up money. Voting for people who import rapists and wanting to feel safe enough to walk alone at night.

It's all so tiresome.
 
Feds realizing that the general public views them as a waste of taxpayer money. Searching for a new narrative to run with.
View attachment 7008067
View attachment 7008066
View attachment 7008065

Archived it for you.

"More people are likely to be disturbed if they believe that laws are being broken"

This is like watching robots trying to understand humans. These Redditors actually think saying 'I got fired, but actually it was illegal!' is going to get the average person fired up on their behalf. As if the average American isn't just going to wonder why the fuck there were laws in place that apparently stopped these fed workers from ever getting fired, given that normal Americans don't have that protections like that.

It really reveals this snivelling hall-monitor attitude they have, where they think rules must be followed just because they are rules, and can't imagine anyone thinking differently. They don't understand that most people feel strongly about laws because those laws reflect their values; they think that just the existence of a purported law is enough to make people rush to its defence.
 
So what's the bug up everyone's ass about USPS? Apparently that's their next target and it would be awful having to rely only on FedEx and UPS. Complaining about the postal service losing money is dumb because it's a service, it's not meant to be profitable. Kind of like complaining that the military runs at a loss.
 
This is an inaccurate TL;DW. The dark enlightenment techbros don't want people to live in pods and eat bugs.
I don’t agree with her and I know she’s fear-mongering, but the idea of small and fractured city-states controlled by a Sillicon Valley elite does sound like a rehashed globohomo. Especially the concept of a “network state.”

Trump 45 and Trump 47 are very different and Trump 47 has been funded by some Dark Enlightenment acolytes who clearly have influence. The most prominent ones are JD Vance and Elon Musk. However, I can’t personally say I truly know their politics or end goals.

Like you said not all of their ideas are bad, and I believe what the administration has done so far is really good. I love seeing feds cry. However it’s been only one month and all I’m asking is for my fellow kiwis to keep their eyes open and remain critical.

I acknowledge that in the end Dark Enlightenment is a think tank and I’d do the same warning for any other group bending the President’s ear. I do think that they have sufficient influence to implement their agenda but I really don’t know if Trump is willing to go with it or just happy to take their money.

And I agree that fearmongering about the lolbertarian crypto cities is stupid because they’re a retarded concept to begin with.
 
Oh that's easy, act like the guys who get laid. The angry meatheads who constantly get laid despite being total retards? Yeah, act like that. They do it for a reason.
That’s a good Cliff Notes summary
PFFFFFTTTT, no you don't. You don't have to have anything to get laid. Chicks sleep with broke jobless losers all the fucking time. You can be living out of your car and still find someone to bone. If you're attractive and meaty enough, women fly continents to see you. If you're hot enough, they won't give a shit if you're a convicted murderer. If you don't believe me, find a local Hippie Fest. Those faggots live out of fucking tents and always have a harem of girls. Thug niggers are never short of bitches either.
If we want to go deep, sure.

Axis 1 is a girl’s ability to fantasize/romanticize
“Drug addicts are like vampires, right? The crack sprinkles kinda look like sparkles in the right lighting..”

But really, that comes from the same place that makes US retards when we’re young. When the cerebral cortex is fully developed at about 25, druggies and hood rats aren’t going to cut it anymore unless they’re grandfathered in.

Axis 2 is role models. You fundamentally model your conception of relationships, what they look like and how they function, from watching your parents when your parents aren’t fucking divorced. So don’t get divorced, your kids will then do the black people thing and model their conception of life from the media they consume. This is what’s going on when Miss Daddy Issues dates druggies and hood rats into her 30’s
 
1740146851413.png
Senate Republicans scored a win over their House counterparts in the early morning hours of Friday, officially passing their preferred budget resolution to tackle some of President Trump's priorities, such as securing the southern border. After hours of back-to-back voting on Democratic amendments, the bill to fund border security, energy and defense finally got its vote on the chamber floor.
"[T]his particular budget resolution… addresses the president’s priority, top priority, which is securing the border and implementing and putting in place his immigration policies, rebuilding our military, and creating energy dominance for this country," Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters on Wednesday, previewing the eventual vote. The leader and Republicans in the upper chamber started to move forward with the all-important budget reconciliation process earlier this month, pushing their preferred plan through a key committee and clearing a procedural hurdle.
The move came despite House Republicans being expected to take the lead on passing a budget bill first. Thune and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., also pressed on even after Trump came out in support of the House's proposal, endorsing it earlier this week on Truth Social. The decision to move forward with the Senate's alternative budget plan, which is two-pronged as opposed to the House's effort to pass one large bill, was blessed by Vice President JD Vance on Wednesday, a source told Fox News Digital. Trump himself did not seem bothered by their effort either, posting on Truth Social, "Thank you to Majority Leader John Thune, and the Republican Senate, for working so hard on funding the Trump Border Agenda. We are setting records, the likes of which have never been seen before, on stopping criminal illegals aliens from entering our Country. Put simply, we are delivering for the American People, far faster and, more successfully, than anyone thought possible. Your work on funding this effort is greatly appreciated!"
 
Back