Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Harm]

The amended complaint felt less like a means to re-focus the case towards copyright infringement and was yet another pathetic strategy to stall and delay this lawsuit's ultimate demise. Seeing that it might blow up in his face is absolutely beautiful.

I doubt even Russell knows what the fuck he's doing anymore. He had this pipe dream that he could have an everlasting gobstopper of a lawsuit that would drive the website into bankruptcy, but now that it seems increasingly unlikely and he's getting monetarily sanctioned, he's flailing in the wind.

 

[Al from Dadeville]

This BLEW THE WIND out of me my sides

 

[Harvey Danger]

This BLEW THE WIND out of me my sides
View attachment 7010429

This is in his Exhibit D. I have no idea how he thinks this makes him look good to the Court.

 

[JustSomeDong]

This BLEW THE WIND out of me my sides
View attachment 7010429

Should have been BLEW ME MY WIND...

 

[Teshub]

This BLEW THE WIND out of me my sides
View attachment 7010429

Ever seen those cop cam videos where the person keeps yelling "I'm not resisting!" when they clearly are?
Something about guilty minds.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

In the case of “Greer cannot process more than one thing at a time, in a strict FIFO”, the prosecution rests.

 

[Dyn]

Russ is too poor to bother suing.

It's not about the money it's about making him suffer for this.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

It's not about the money it's about making him suffer for this.

He's already suffering and when this lawsuit finally ends when the Earth crumbles to dust, his suffering will continue and it will no longer be costing Null anything.

 

[Dyn]

He's already suffering

Not enough for my tastes.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

Given that Russ is the dog that caught the car, I think the Amended is to buy breathing space as part of his kick ass totally awesome strategy.
Alternatively, does he think an Amended is an almost complete do over and will make the sanction disappear?

 

[Iron Hamster]

View attachment 7009248
The abusive messages in question:
View attachment 7009243
View attachment 7009244

HEY! Aren't these Kiwifarms copyright?

So instead of producing the restraining order like you were required to do, you vaguely gestured in the direction of the court you applied to and revealed no such order was ever granted.

You are now filing this motion that forces intervention from the Judge to continue protesting that you are required to produce it because "why can't Hardin get it?"

Holy fuck, you are a retard.

He's just hoping the issue gets dropped.

Do screenshots of random messages on your phone count as evidence in the US courts? Wouldn't it take something a bit more substantial than that to have it entered into evidence? Like some kind of proof of who the sender was?

It should take actual relevance to the copyright claim at a minimum but.........

Somebody taking steps to move on with their life means you never victimised them. Good job, buddy.

Sooooooooooooo......that will work the same way for the farms right?

 

[Magnificent Penis]

So, is Hardin threatening the court with starting discovery all over? Kinda makes sense to me since as far as Hardin is concerned discovery never started because ratface never produced anything, may as well rub into Bennett's face what his own retardation has caused.

 

[Teshub]

So, is Hardin threatening the court with starting discovery all over? Kinda makes sense to me since as far as Hardin is concerned discovery never started because ratface never produced anything, may as well rub into Bennett's face what his own retardation has caused.

It's a request to stay, or hold, until the other parties are served and join the suit. So, as nothing has been done anyway it might as well be a do over.

Question is if as these new defendants make the whole prior discovery process pointless can Hardin ask for sanctions to the preexisting discovery?

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

So, is Hardin threatening the court with starting discovery all over?

I'm not sure if "threatening" is the right word. He is arguing that this amended complaint (which supersedes the original) includes new claims and new defendants. This requires a discovery process. Until Greer completes his due diligence in serving the new defendants, the discovery process should be stayed for judicial economy.

Although IANAL, and I might be misunderstanding something.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

All of you were right to pride me for saying sanctions would serve as a prod to make Russell comply with discovery

He could be $80000 in debt before discovery's finished, and his response to discovery request #9 will still be "There's no reason they COULDN'T find it themselves, it's on PACER!"

 

[David Brown]

Is Greer a unique case or can anyone just tie up a court and hassle some random person for years with zero consequences? Hypothetically could a tiny group of really malicious retards just DDOS an entire county court by filing pro se in retardis over and over and over?

 

[Greasy Goblin]

Is Greer a unique case or can anyone just tie up a court and hassle some random person for years with zero consequences? Hypothetically could a tiny group of really malicious retards just DDOS an entire county court by filing pro se in retardis over and over and over?

No, yes (kinda), yes, and that's (sort of) what being labelled a vexatious litigant aims to mitigate, in that order

 

[Wahgonga]

"Greer is a human being who simply wants to move on with his life."

Yeah, like the idiot bank robber who wants to get ten miles down the road before the dye pack pops.

What a fucking liar he is.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Is Greer a unique case or can anyone just tie up a court and hassle some random person for years with zero consequences? Hypothetically could a tiny group of really malicious retards just DDOS an entire county court by filing pro se in retardis over and over and over?

Acerthorn is (by orders of magnitude) worse IMO.

 

[p1138]

Is Greer a unique case or can anyone just tie up a court and hassle some random person for years with zero consequences? Hypothetically could a tiny group of really malicious retards just DDOS an entire county court by filing pro se in retardis over and over and over?

Yes, it's a method used by sovcit groups on occasion but that's usually against the local government itself. Either by filing so much crap that the local jurisdiction can't handle it and just wants it all tossed out, or dragging shit out needlessly for years to the point where the local jurisdiction again just tosses shit out.

Even with real cases though, it happens with what is basically legal bullying with one large entity harassing a smaller one with bullshit. The problem of course is even if the "little guy" wins and gets their costs back, after a couple years in court depending on what the matter was about and what orders may have been signed by the judge during the case, a small business might basically be fucked after not being able to operate normally for a couple of years. This is basically what happened in the Games Workshop vs Chapterhouse lawsuit years back.