I think him having a collection of magazines containing real and fictional depictions of children might be direct correlation. Perhaps giving a person with pedophilic tendencies an outlet to express their desires might lead them to committing such acts? But y'know... it doesn't matter, I guess. Because there's just no way you can connect the two together.
What makes this any different than other Kiwis who mock, lets say, trannies? Or furries who're into bestiality (fictional or real)? This is no different than any other thread on the forum, neither should it be treated differently. Of course people are gonna be disturbed or MATI when it contains degenerates acting like degenerates, or call for the ban of certain things, because the entire point is to document them, and mock them for their absurd behavior. This has been the forum's hook since its inception as the CWCForums. The thing I find strange is why does this attitude suddenly change when the topic is about lolicons/shotacons, and some users take it seriously?
I dunno about you, but I've seen more people here get more heated about trannies, saying way worse stuff about them and how they should be killed & exiled from every country on Earth, than I do with lolicons/shotacons.