Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Goliath-Casket-Company-Indianna-getty-subscription.jpg
 
Milo is basically a trending human right now, why wouldn't Bill want to have him on? It's like he has no actual faith in his own sides ability to make fun of Milo and make him look ridiculous and unlikable as he's suppose to be. So instead he expects the left to just blacklist him and ignore his existence.

This describes the entire left. They arent confident enough in their own viewpoints to actually engage with other viewpoints, so they just completely avoid any kind of conflict. The best part is how they twist it into some kind of proof of their superiority. "Dont validate Milos beliefs", like theyre the arch-dukes of public opinion and merely gracing you with their presence is an honor too great for such a lowly wretch as you. Then they obsess about Milo, and write thinkpieces about him, and come up with witty ironybro tweets about him, you know because they dont want to give him a platform.
 
This describes the entire left. They arent confident enough in their own viewpoints to actually engage with other viewpoints, so they just completely avoid any kind of conflict. The best part is how they twist it into some kind of proof of their superiority. "Dont validate Milos beliefs", like theyre the arch-dukes of public opinion and merely gracing you with their presence is an honor too great for such a lowly wretch as you. Then they obsess about Milo, and write thinkpieces about him, and come up with witty ironybro tweets about him, you know because they dont want to give him a platform.

No, they're actually just afraid of him. That's the cover story for being pathetic cowards without the courage of their convictions. Actually, that's even being charitable. To have the courage of your convictions, you have to even have convictions in the first place, which they lack. Gutless cunts the lot of them.
 
This describes the entire left. They arent confident enough in their own viewpoints to actually engage with other viewpoints, so they just completely avoid any kind of conflict. The best part is how they twist it into some kind of proof of their superiority. "Dont validate Milos beliefs", like theyre the arch-dukes of public opinion and merely gracing you with their presence is an honor too great for such a lowly wretch as you. Then they obsess about Milo, and write thinkpieces about him, and come up with witty ironybro tweets about him, you know because they dont want to give him a platform.

You're on the right track, but it's more than that.

The extremists took the left over, and chased off everyone to the right of Eleanor Lamb. They did this through the usual cycle on almost every community they captured, and in a relatively short period of time (about 3-4 years), they overtook every major platform that the left held, and, subsequently, chased off everyone who was remotely sane or reasonable.

They pulled this coup off effectively enough, but when they locked down the communities they took over with their little ideological hugboxing, they also wound up with the terrifying realization that they'd driven off about 92% or so of the userbase - there's nothing Social Justice warriors hate like a Left-winger who won't fall in line. You didn't hear about most of this because they literally control the mainstream press and have massive influence on Social Media. Attempts to try to rally were immediately shut down, and we didn't really see any recovery at all until around 2013.

The long and short is that they've never had the numbers to push their shit. They have no mandate, facts aren't on their side, and popular opinion has been against them since this shit started, but they successfully intimidated a lot of people into shutting up with threats and abuse. That shit is starting to fail because everyone can now see that they never had even a shred of the power they claimed they did.

So now, you get to see something very rare, and to be treasured: People, regardless of political orientation, uniting to make fun of these fucks.
 
You're on the right track, but it's more than that.

The extremists took the left over, and chased off everyone to the right of Eleanor Lamb. They did this through the usual cycle on almost every community they captured, and in a relatively short period of time (about 3-4 years), they overtook every major platform that the left held, and, subsequently, chased off everyone who was remotely sane or reasonable.

That's a pretty interesting model of how a internet cultures turn to shit, but I'd like to comment on a slight caveat. This actually occurs organically SJW's don't really plan to shit up the forums they join, it's just their nature ensures it will escalate to that point. They actually think the dumb shit they're doing improves things and don't really pre-meditate any of it.
I recall a right wing forum I used to visit got hollowed out by the opposite side, in fact the only ones who put up a fight to stop it was left/centre wing devils advocates/trolls, by the end of it all the site did was shit post about hillary clinton conspiracies and try to disprove global warming as the market crashed during the end of the Bush administration. This stuff has precident in history when groups become convinced of their own rightiousnesss. A lot internal religious/political struggle either boils down to the radicals taking control or the moderates trying to reign them in and then it all spiralling out of control.

to quote from another forum section

Back on subject


Bob's defence is undercut by his distate for fanboys.....despite being one of the worst fanboys I've ever seen.
 
Last edited:
That's a pretty interesting model of how a internet cultures turn to shit, but I'd like to comment on a slight caveat. This actually occurs organically SJW's don't really plan to shit up the forums they join, it's just their nature ensures it will escalate to that point.

It doesn't matter whether they specifically intend to screw the pooch and kamikaze whatever they take over straight into the ground. They intend to do the things that inevitably lead to that, so they can't be really let off the hook as innocents. It's like shooting at someone with a gun, while claiming you have nothing but the best intentions.
 
If he ever croaks I hope they make caskets big enough for him.

I'm sure whomever has to do the deed would likely save far more money by burning his dead corpse - while still in his house, preferably. Would be doing the neighborhood that has to put up with the figurative and literal smell a huge favor, as well.
 
It doesn't matter whether they specifically intend to screw the pooch and kamikaze whatever they take over straight into the ground. They intend to do the things that inevitably lead to that, so they can't be really let off the hook as innocents. It's like shooting at someone with a gun, while claiming you have nothing but the best intentions.

If Bob & SJW's teache us anything, it's incorrect assumptions about your opposition will result in your downfall.
 
Which incorrect assumptions are those? Name a single entity that remains functional after being taken over by these clowns.

Listen to AnOminous, children, because he speaks true.

Social Justice has a well-established history wherein media designed to appeal to it fails, miserably. There's a few reasons for this.

First and foremost: SJWs are not numerous. They are grossly outnumbered, and they know it. Community after community, compare a Social Justice hive to another community that isn't infested and the non-SJ site will have more traffic, more content, and generally be better. The easiest way to see this is to take a community dominated by Social Justice and check the status of its direct opposition; as an example, Gamerghazi has a userbase of over 12000 users. KotakuInAction, the GG subreddit, has a userbase well over 6 times its size.

The second reason is because media and communities that appeal to Social Justice tend to alienate everyone else. What's that? You disliked a movie because it made something shit out by Happy Madison look good in contrast? You fucking misogynist. You obviously hate women and also are a racist. On Social Media, they're no more elegant and pull the same shit. Bobby, give me a good example, if you'd kindly:

59ZI3XZ.png


"Everyone who disagrees with me is the enemy" in four tweets. No one wants what Adolf Chipman is selling except the true believers, and Trump himself gets more likes and retweets from a single shitpost in an hour than Chipman will get in weeks.

The third, final, and frankly, fucking funniest reason is because they don't consume the media they advocate for. Because of these three reasons, going after them actively and expecting a profit is an economic death sentence and any company doing so deserves what it gets. Doesn't matter whether you're a hobby site or a major movie company; bank on Social Justice being a win for you, and you will lose.
 
bank on Social Justice being a win for you, and you will lose.

@Jaimas speaks the truth. Catering specifically to social justice isn't a profitable venture - and the SocJust cult knows this. That's why they have focused these recent years on individuals already in established media to spout their bullshit. The business still runs (thanks to an actual working business model) while higher profile people in the business spew their bullshit.
 
Which incorrect assumptions are those? Name a single entity that remains functional after being taken over by these clowns.

well...the one we've been discussing, that they're a manevolant organized campaign

Isnt that the problem with them? I really wouldnt care if they did a great job when they took over Marvel, something awful, the occupy movement etc etc.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MeefaZeTroll
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back