Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

"Quality of life" crimes need to be enforced to make public transit more palatable.

NYC Subways need to be renovated.

The transit system and it's employees need to be audited.

The current NYC system is mostly composed of cars from the 1980s and early 1990s that replaced the graffiti'd up cars from the 1960s. While not as extensively tagged, these ex-"modern" cars look crummy today.

They are replacing these cars but when the 1980s cars went into service, it was part of a larger effort to make New York better, not worse.

"Traffic calming" statistically does nothing for safety.

Traffic calming makes no sense for larger roads and main thoroughfares. It just makes things worse. If it comes to streets being used as impromptu thoroughfares, that only happens when the existing road network is insufficient, and when that happens you should actually fix the problem instead of making more people miserable.
 
Traffic calming makes no sense for larger roads and main thoroughfares. It just makes things worse. If it comes to streets being used as impromptu thoroughfares, that only happens when the existing road network is insufficient, and when that happens you should actually fix the problem instead of making more people miserable
They think that somehow by making traffic worse eventually people will look into doing what they want.

In reality it's more like a kid destroying their own shoes to try to get new ones, but what ends up happening is they get uglier hand me down shoes as a replacement that are arguably worse than what they replaced.

These people cannot create. They can only throw tantrums and destroy what already exists in hopes someone will cave in to do what they want for them.
 
Cyclists are a race
I'm not white (Native American - red skin & all) so using libshit logic, it's impossible for me to be racist 🧐

In fact, I feel marginalized by the white man cyclists trying to take away my indigenous rights to ride horses on trails that haven't been colonized by their bedeviled 2-wheeled European contraptions 🤬

🚬If I had the free time, I'd put on regalia and make a satire tiktok calling out the inherent colonialism of fuckcars. (i.e. your way of living is wrong/backwards so we're going to take it away/outlaw it, and force you to conform to our standards, even if you don't want to).
 
I'm not white (Native American - red skin & all) so using libshit logic, it's impossible for me to be racist 🧐

In fact, I feel marginalized by the white man cyclists trying to take away my indigenous rights to ride horses on trails that haven't been colonized by their bedeviled 2-wheeled European contraptions 🤬

🚬If I had the free time, I'd put on regalia and make a satire tiktok calling out the inherent colonialism of fuckcars.
I'd support it. You live on the rez at all?
 
I'd support it. You live on the rez at all?
Not anymore (in fact, I live in relatively major city with many fuckcars folks, public transport & an increasing amount of bike lanes). But I do have family still on the rez/go back when I can.

I hate the fuckcars notion that if rural folks (& even suburban folks!) could just see how amazing liberal city life is, they'd abandon their terrible car driving ways, embrace bikes/public transportation and become bugmen. I hate living in a big coastal liberal city. Everything is more expensive, everything (from running errands to booking a simple dr's appointment) is vastly more difficult because of overcrowding, people are less kind/more apathetic, there's way more crime, way more junkies (rural methheads are a pain in the ass, but they're not passed out on the street/pooping on the street/living in visible encampments like liberal city fent addicts!) and the entertainment benefits of living in a city are overblown (unless you're a degenerate that's into weird sex clubs, orgies, or drugs. Casual drugs use seems to be much more acceptable amongst city folks).
 
YouTuber Commie and Anti-car Adam Something has done a propaganda piece on Why US Airlines Suck:
  • Minimizes the true cost of flights before deregulation which could be 5 to 7 times as much.
  • Suggests that US airlines are bad but doesn't give a comparison to a good airlines.
  • Some other BS talking points.
This is probably both an attempt to poorly push communism and raise the cost of air travel.

The whole speed of the narration on his points makes it seem like he doesn't want to give the viewer time to think and come to a conclusion.
 
An honest question I've had about many of the younger anti car crowd, how much of it is sour grapes? For well over a decade at this point the price of a car has gotten obscene while the youngins have gotten poorer. Gas, insurance, repairs (and many modern cars being difficult to repair yourself), the car itself. All far more expensive now. This is ignoring in the US many states have made it a bastard for teens to get licensed, regulations vary by state but in mine it made me appreciate Franz Kafka's works.
Throw in youngins having to move to cities frequently for whatever jobs they can scrounge up where cars are at a disadvantage compared to bike/transit. The environmentalist argument fits conveniently when car ownership is far above your subsistence living.
This is ignoring the petty leftist crowd aka redditors who are content to hold a cudgel against anyone who has more than them and the disgusting overlap between anti car and reddit.
It's absolutely a sour grapes thing. A lot of peoplemy age have had their markers for adulthood (Moving out, getting a car, etc) stripped away from them, so they will tend to take up a mental stance to dismiss or downplay them, that they were just a boomer thing and were never important. You can tell it's a cope, because if these markers are obtained later this form of cope disappears.
 
I used to ride a bike combined with a high speed rail to commute to work daily. The only thing was this was SLC where it was 90% white people who also rode it. It was clean and incredibly safe. Was a nice way to get exercise but I couldn't imagine building my whole goddamn personality over it. I'm also in a liberal city for work now for a little bit, and there's no way in hell I'd do that here. The libs even hate the public transportation here and say it's not safe...yet their voting being the problem doesn't click with them.
 
/r/fuckcars decides that they no longer like dining sheds taking up bike lanes in the road:
1740247178505.png

1740247192787.png

1740247228611.png
1740247235320.png1740247235320.png
1740247400468.png
1740247413159.png
1740247420701.png
1740247432808.png
1740247444124.png
1740247462984.png
1740247482249.png
Link in comment (Archive)

Source (Archive)

Remember, /r/fuckcars LOVED crap like this:
1740247626921.png1740247651744.png
 
/r/fuckcars decides that they no longer like dining sheds taking up bike lanes in the road:

I thought the Streets Belong to the People?
View attachment 7013076
People are done caring about le coof so they cant virtue signal about how they're magically safer, trust the science chuddy!

That and by "the people" they mean ideologically pure, temporarilly embarrased nobles like them
 
Hopefully this means total toll death in the near future. Urbanists want every road to be tolled for every reason.
 
I've noticed a pattern, all bike faggots I came across were only the kind to ride road racing bicycles with tiny thin tires, and wear lycra pants. I've never had an MTB or cross user not yield in traffic or run a red light, or be butthurt about anything, its always the middle aged men (and women) in lycra (MAMILs)
I love Jamie Zawinski's bike advice (a) because it's practical, for people who cycle because they actually need to get places, not because they're dumbass eco hippies or anything like that.

Jamie Zawinski is an old school, influential tech dipshit (like he worked on Mozilla in the early days and was a big contributor to the tech underlying the early web) and nowadays he's a huge, huge, huge sjw. But I always go back to his cycling advice.

I posted most of this as a comment in someone else's LJ who was thinking of buying a bike, but perhaps it is of more general interest.
I've been using a bike as my exclusive transportation in SF for about ten years. I've always ridden, but that's when I stopped driving a car except under extreme duress.

Here's how to begin your adventure as a commuter-bicyclist in San Francisco:

  1. Never take bike advice from anyone who owns bike shorts, clip shoes, a messenger bag, or a fixie. That's like taking car advice from someone who enjoys rebuilding carburetors.

    (Update: If you are this person, you need not reply with your indignant "corrections". You are not the person to whom this advice is addressed.)
  2. "City bikes" and "road bikes" are designed for some Jetsons-slick hypothetical future city that I've never seen. Or maybe for the bike paths in Los Altos or something. Here in real cities, roads are shit, and if you want your wheels and tires to survive curbs and potholes, you need a hybrid. They're a little heavier and a little slower. Are you racing? No? Then you don't care.
  3. So, get the cheapest hybrid you can stand. Shocks are a waste of money. You should be able to get a pretty nice brand new hybrid for $370 or so. You can probably get a used one for a hundred bucks.
  4. If you feel like you want a lighter bike so that it's easier to carry up stairs: don't bother. That's optimizing the wrong thing. You'll get used to it (by which I mean: become stronger).
  5. Get a bike that's the right size for you, and has properly adjusted handlebars and seat. The shop will adjust it for you. If they won't, or if they tell you it doesn't matter, go to a different shop.
  6. Get a u-lock. Lock through the frame and the back wheel. Your bike will be stolen, so don't get too attached to it. This also means, don't waste your money on junk like baskets and lights. Just get a backpack.

    It doesn't matter how crappy your bike looks: any bike is worth stealing for $2 worth of crack. Your bike is temporary. Accept this and move on.
  7. I always replace my front wheel and seat quick-releases with $2 worth of hardware store bolts, and then bend the ends over. This might have some negligible effect on theft. I refuse to be one of those people who lugs around 3 chains and disassembles their bike every time they park, so that's the trade-off I make.
  8. The bike-nerd at the bike shop will try to give you smooth, high-pressure (110psi+) tires, because they are more efficient. But if you don't air them up weekly or more often, you'll get pinch-flats every time you hit a pothole, which is always. Also, the gas station air pumps often only go up to 60psi anyway. Get knobby low-pressure (60-80psi) tires and they'll last a lot longer. (If you do end up with stupid tires, you might want to get one of these.)
  9. Likewise, make sure the tubes you get have the kind of connectors that the gas station air pumps take. Bike shop nerds like to fuck you with goofy connectors sometimes, out of sheer mean-spiritedness.
  10. Bike maintenance: don't do it, ever. It's not worth your time. Just take it to the shop. Getting them to replace a flat for you costs $20 and takes 10 minutes, including the tube, and you don't get dirty.

    It's a good idea to know how to change a flat, but why do it yourself when you can pay someone else almost-nothing to get greasy on your behalf?
  11. Safety: I follow the Zodiac approach: always assume the cars can see you perfectly, and are trying to kill you. If an intersection seems iffy, use the sidewalk and crosswalks. If big streets like Market and Van Ness freak you out, there are always less traficky ways to go, or just stay on the sidewalks.

    Do whatever you need to do to feel safe. You have nobody to impress.
  12. Grocery shopping: yes, you really can do it with a single backpack. The trick is, shop small once a week instead of big once a month.
  13. If you try to dangle bags on your handlebars, you will die.
  14. Cross train and trolley tracks at a 45° angle or more, or you will die.
  15. You really do need to tuck in or roll up your right leg. (You probably won't die, but you'll shred your pants.)
  16. You don't need to ride up Haight. Take Fell or Fulton and then go through the Panhandle.
  17. The City is only 7 miles across. Nothing is as far away as you think it is.
Update 2: Oh great, here comes the peanut gallery. Thanks, Cory Rob, srsly. I'd recommend against reading the comments here unless you're the type who reads comments on Youtube. Or maybe you just want to hear a bunch of fixie-hipsters with sand in their vaginas tell me how wrong I am and how you should spend a fortune and do all your repairs yourself.

Update 3: After getting 200ish comments on day one, I went through and deleted most of the redundant ones, and most of the ones from butt-hurt bike-nerds and mechanics. I've also turned on comment screening, and won't be approving new comments here unless you really have something new to say.

I'm a little (just a little!) surprised at the level of vitriol this one provoked. It's like I farted in bike-church. You'd think I was making fun of Linux or something.
 
"No European would ever buy American cars even if the EU got rid of its tariffs":

Europeans buying American trucks really fucks with them since they believe that getting trucks was some sort of psy-op with infinitely funded oil/car companies.

I love Jamie Zawinski's bike advice (a) because it's practical, for people who cycle because they actually need to get places, not because they're dumbass eco hippies or anything like that.
That actually sounds closer to my college bike experience (though I was impressionable to nonsense) and more grounded in reality than anything I've read on bike subreddits. Fixies are for hipsters, city bikes are completely useless (and most city streets are useless—the ONLY streets that they're good for is dry, concrete roads that were built in the last ten years), the temporary nature of bicycles (I did a bike stolen), train tracks will flip over your bike if you approach them at an angle, bike maintenance is overrated...

The only thing I really take issue is "do whatever you need to do to feel safe" because most cyclists take this to mean "run every red light and be a problem". I'm not sure if he meant it that way or not, but there's always the compatibility with the rest of society. An extreme example would be that to feel "safe" you have to shoot every non-white you see to feel "safe", and if that's wrong, than what is the line drawn?

Any time you almost see the gears start to turn in their head, but they're too selfish to concede.

You could propose the question, "would you agree someone should stay off the railroad tracks"

"Yes"

"Should pedestrians be restricted from walking in the bike lane"

"Yes"

"So if that's the case you acknowledge that certain infrastructure is designed for a specific purpose and impeding its function is wrong"

"That makes sense to me"

"Then you should stay off the road"
That doesn't work because the narrative is that cars "stole" the streets from bicycles, so it is their God-given SCIENCE-given right to "take back" the streets. It doesn't matter if those streets predated the bicycle or were never built with bicycles in mind, all streets, from the past, present, and future, BELONG to bicycles.
 
Europeans buying American trucks really fucks with them since they believe that getting trucks was some sort of psy-op with infinitely funded oil/car companies.
Trucks are awesome though. I am a big guy and I hate all the compact city cars where you sit all squished because the designers wanted a sleek turd on wheels. Station wagons are better because they are a two-box design, the ceiling in the back row is not as low. But trucks and vans, especially the kind where the console is on the front and not stretched into between the front seats are the best. If I had space and money I would totally buy an F100 series X-type car or a Ford Galaxy. These are real trucks or vans.

If there is one thing I agree with fuckcars on, it's the SUV hate. But not because SUVs literally kill people, thats bullshit, it's because that the SUV is a retarded design. It's not sports and its hardly any utility, it's a large toy car used by the southern US or european countryside housewife to take kids to school and bring groceries. It sucks at offroad because it's too much like a station wagon, it sucks to drive in the city because it's unnecesarily large and it sucks for highways because the shape gives it a horrendous fuel efficiency above 100kph. It's a cancer of automotive design created because of cost-cutting in the industry, because it was too expensive to have separate city car and utility car range. The only psyop there is is the one that makes people believe a SUV is the best car. My main problem with the auto industry is that you can't buy anything new other than these types of engineering turds, and I can't drive 2000's cars forever.
 
Europeans buying American trucks really fucks with them since they believe that getting trucks was some sort of psy-op with infinitely funded oil/car companies.
Funny thing last time I was in Japan I saw a non insignificant number of imported US trucks too (namely Fords)
412515.png

Trucks are awesome though. I am a big guy and I hate all the compact city cars where you sit all squished because the designers wanted a sleek turd on wheels
I agree, one thing the truck market has consistently done well for tall people like me is actually have a vehicle thats comfortable to sit in and get in to. It's also why the tall boxy form factor is making a comeback and I'm all for it, since it literally is the ideal form factor for comfortably being on the roads and being able to see around without potential dangers that an unergonomic design brings to such a high-stress environment.
 
Back