Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Either way it's time to regulate and license them solely to piss off these 'more government, please' types.
It reminds me of that 4chan greentext that was posted here before. Eventually we're getting there to a bicycle congestion tax. Reminder this isn't about safety or efficiency or whatever other cope they mention this is about control.
 
Another thing about public transit that irritates me is that urbanistfags want to have it both ways; they want a giant train line that spans the entire continent and they want all cities to have their own subsystems for bicycles and buses but they don't want to help build a high-trust society where people can use those things without fear of personal harm or injury. They want their bus lines but they want the homeless people to be free to openly shoot up, jack off, and threaten people with knives due to libshit toxic positivity. They want their trains that go everywhere but they don't want to make any effort to curbing crime because of aforementioned libshit toxic positivity.

I remember when I was young and living in Bumfuck Nowhere, USA I dreamed of having a big ol' train line that would allow me to go to all of the populated places with the fun stuff and people without having to ask my parents to drive me there. As I grew up I realized it was a terrible idea because it'd be a great excuse for all of the criminals from the city (the city in my state was one of the worst for gang crime at the time) to have free access to the entire state to violently shit up as they pleased. It was an unavoidable obstacle because cities by and large refuse to do anything about crime, and that's not even factoring the cost or metrics of such a project.

Urbanists are their own worst enemy because they insist on acting like freaky bugmen and they don't even realize it. They don't compromise and they don't ground themselves in reality. The me me me millennial stereotype is real.
 
They want their bus lines but they want the homeless people to be free to openly shoot up, jack off, and threaten people with knives due to libshit toxic positivity.
It's even dumber, they believe that all social issues can be resolved with no physical intervention. Everyone is a victim of something and society will self regulate itself because no one has bad intentions.

I remember that one time someone asked some sort of communist subreddit what they would do if a drug addict broke into their home to rob them and one of the responses was that the robber can go to a soup hotel care facility and get free food and mental help and that there is no need to rob because of the magical abundance.

They unironically believe this.
 
I remember when I was young and living in Bumfuck Nowhere, USA I dreamed of having a big ol' train line that would allow me to go to all of the populated places with the fun stuff and people without having to ask my parents to drive me there. As I grew up I realized it was a terrible idea because it'd be a great excuse for all of the criminals from the city (the city in my state was one of the worst for gang crime at the time) to have free access to the entire state to violently shit up as they pleased.
A train isn't that big of a problem as Amtrak does a fairly good job of keeping the true riff raff off their cars.

Though it still allows some bums that have collected enough cans to ride but that's true of hobos riding freight too.

The biggest danger is regional transportation, especially at the terminus or if your community is welcoming:
 
/r/fuckcars user is thinking of breaking up with his girlfriend because she drives:
1739935535796.png

Your girlfriend is "cooked":
1739935566291.png
Also "her son". 🤔

I suspect this user is single:
1739935546297.png

Deal-breaker if she expects him to drive:
1739935582834.png

Yes, it's the carbrains who are selfish...:
1739935602219.png

This user is thinking of divorcing his wife and abandoning his child because she drives:
1739935617225.png

Car owners are MAGA:
1739935644522.png

Another wants his girlfriend to sell her car:
1739935700848.png

This user's is worried that his car-free girlfriend is a secret carbrain:
1739935978006.png

Even gays don't want car-free losers (his most recent comment is about sunbathing his balls (archive)):
1739936111084.png

Source (Archive)
 
/r/fuckcars user is thinking of breaking up with his girlfriend because she drives:
View attachment 6998913

Your girlfriend is "cooked":
View attachment 6998919
Also "her son". 🤔

I suspect this user is single:
View attachment 6998915

Deal-breaker if she expects him to drive:
View attachment 6998922

Yes, it's the carbrains who are selfish...:
View attachment 6998925

This user is thinking of divorcing his wife and abandoning his child because she drives:
View attachment 6998927

Car owners are MAGA:
View attachment 6998928

Another wants his girlfriend to sell her car:
View attachment 6998932

This user's is worried that his car-free girlfriend is a secret carbrain:
View attachment 6998950

Even gays don't want car-free losers (his most recent comment is about sunbathing his balls (archive)):
View attachment 6998960

Source (Archive)
Why haven't any of these people brought up safety?

It's not just the crimes that are recorded but what about all the instances a few years ago where staring at a woman is sexual harassment?
 
Also "her son". 🤔
There's a lot of cope in these sorts of things but I want to think that the "my girlfriend drives a car" is a desperate cope to the fact that he knows deep down but can't admit--doesn't want to be the cuck dad and raise his GF's (possibly mixed-race?) son.

People were brainwashed by corporations to like houses:

I've talked about it before but I'm SURE they wouldn't like college dorms if they allowed literally anybody to rent rooms there, as real apartment complexes are legally obliged to do.
 
Last edited:
/r/fuckcars user is thinking of breaking up with his girlfriend because she drives:
View attachment 6998913

Your girlfriend is "cooked":
View attachment 6998919
Also "her son". 🤔

I suspect this user is single:
View attachment 6998915

Deal-breaker if she expects him to drive:
View attachment 6998922

Yes, it's the carbrains who are selfish...:
View attachment 6998925

This user is thinking of divorcing his wife and abandoning his child because she drives:
View attachment 6998927

Car owners are MAGA:
View attachment 6998928

Another wants his girlfriend to sell her car:
View attachment 6998932

This user's is worried that his car-free girlfriend is a secret carbrain:
View attachment 6998950

Even gays don't want car-free losers (his most recent comment is about sunbathing his balls (archive)):
View attachment 6998960

Source (Archive)

I will never understand the obsession redditors have with dumping/divorcing their romantic partners over petty shit.
 
It's even dumber, they believe that all social issues can be resolved with no physical intervention. Everyone is a victim of something and society will self regulate itself because no one has bad intentions.

I remember that one time someone asked some sort of communist subreddit what they would do if a drug addict broke into their home to rob them and one of the responses was that the robber can go to a soup hotel care facility and get free food and mental help and that there is no need to rob because of the magical abundance.

They unironically believe this.
You are getting at a very core problem to a lot of communist thinking and it's offshoots. It only looks at things from it's view on economics. In their fairy land, no one ever chooses to be evil. It's all bad circumstances and "lack of material possessions." And that's why it will never be as popular as fascist or libertarian movements. Their models has no explanation for some rural hick with gets paid 50¢ a day being perfectly happy, or someone like nick rekeita imploding his life despite having all the "material wealth" he could need.
 
Another wants his girlfriend to sell her car:
1739935700848.png

This user's is worried that his car-free girlfriend is a secret carbrain:
1739935978006.png
JFC they are cultish af, firstly if you buy used or plan to keep the car for as long as possible(so you know you don't waste all the energy that went into making) depreciation doesn't matter, speaks volumes how about their environmental concerns are a bullshit cover.

Secondly the whole 'secret carbrain' is definitely a fucking insane idea, most people do not give a fuck and use their cars to get from a-b, if you gave them an easy, clean, safe option they'd take it(why I'm pro good PT, gets the phone pilots off the road so you don't have to dodge their shitty distracted driving)

The issue is that option doesn't exist for most people, it's not 'car-brain' it's called 'the non-retarded option'
 
Secondly the whole 'secret carbrain' is definitely a fucking insane idea, most people do not give a fuck and use their cars to get from a-b, if you gave them an easy, clean, safe option they'd take it(why I'm pro good PT, gets the phone pilots off the road so you don't have to dodge their shitty distracted driving)
It's like they legit think every single car in existence is inherently evil/haunted by a demon that mind controls the car's owner - like in that Stephen King book Christine.
 
Trump has revoked the federal approval for NYC's congestion pricing:
1739988420657.png
1739988445502.png1739988452253.png1739988456835.png1739988480209.png1739988486533.png
Source (Archive)

The concerns in the letter are that federal law only allows tolled roads if there is a non-tolled alternative route available and that the tolls must be for the purpose of congestion management, not raising revenue (and NYC's tolls are meant to fund the MTA).


Obviously, the urbanists are very mad about it:
1739988560488.png
1739988580614.png
1739988612715.png
1739988637536.png
Source (Archive)

1739988686577.png
1739988711445.png
1739988722037.png
1739988731291.png
1739988741528.png
1739988759426.png
Source (Archive)

1739988806906.png
1739988873158.png
1739988901195.png
1739988894420.png
1739988923030.png
Source (Archive)

1739989081127.png
1739989091522.png
1739989107952.png
1739989120802.png
Source (Archive)
 

Attachments

Funniest shit ever is when these knobs tout their AICP cert. as proof of being Right on Everything(tm)
Here's the base requirement to quality to get the AICP
1739991784981.png
So it's not really a challenge. I know my college's graduate program helps students prepare for the exam (it's not like grad students have to care about classes), but other than that this seems nebulous as to what it actually offers in terms of skills taught. One of my professors calls it the "APA seal of approval" which seems more accurate than some objective measure of theory and practice knowledge
1739991945631.png
Unless it just gives you a pass to repost shit like this?
 
>Same area, different population
This got to be the most retarded shit I've ever seen. Yes, various places on Earth have different population densities, that's not a revolutionary observation
You can put 50,000 people in a stadium that only occupies about four city blocks. And they won't die, they won't suffocate, they can use the restroom without causing outbreaks of disease, they even have the ability to get some food and water if they want.... but they can't LIVE there.

Density by itself with no qualifiers is not the human be-all end-all.
 
Last edited:
Back