Razörfist / The Rageoholic / xRazorfistx / Daniel Paul Harris - Hipster Metalfag. Game Journo-Doesn't Play Games He Reviews. Thief Fanfic Author. COOMER AND GROOMER.

I hate to be that one guy
But 007 hasn’t had a great film since Skyfall, Spectre was a huge fucking waste of time, No Time to Die was okay, & two of the worst 007 films came out before Skyfall, those obviously being Quantum of Solace and Die Another Day.

I hate Amazon, but I doubt any company, even current MGM, could keep the steam running in 007 after 62 years.
Nobody wants to hear this as well, but Spy films like 007 are gonna be a hard sell to a new generation, and this is coming from somebody who owns a fuckin’ box set because I enjoyed the series so much, and I usually pirate my shit.
007 is just one of those film franchises that should have ended.
 
Do you think he has any self‐awareness when he posts shit like this?

bro.png
 
Do you think he has any self‐awareness when he posts shit like this?

View attachment 7013295
Hot take time

I remember so many people making fun of Steve Shives for always blocking people, and in all fairness, he is a faggot.
But more often than not, people looking for debates on social media never want it to finish, if they’re just being an annoying faggot pestering you for a debate you don’t want to give them, blocking is there whenever you want it.

But, in the case of RazorFist, he is a faggot for blocking people AFTER starting shit, & acting like it was uncalled for.
Razor would be that one little shit to laugh and poke a stick through a fence at a Pitbull, and proceed to cry like a bitch when that Pitbull jumps over the fence.
 
Even the Christian Right will tell him to fuck off since he's just a dick-rider for whatever fancies him at the moment. Telling people he's "Christian" while still wearing Death Metal shit is just him begging people that "I'm on your side gaiz, please accept me in your group." "Intellectually caustic" is the correct term for Danny Boy's constant autistic sperging of everything Asian. Dude seethes so much against anything Asian that he'd rather embrace Western gay shit than read a manga.
Wearing metal shirts isn't really a disqualifier for Christians. There's plenty of Christian metal bands of all subgenres including black metal, afterall. Many of these bands are open about also enjoying the secular extreme metal bands. I don't think the current incarnation of the Christian Right is particularly anti-metal. Dan's problem is he's a chronic contrarian riding a contrarian bandwagon.
 
Do you think he has any self‐awareness when he posts shit like this?

View attachment 7013295
No. If the dude had any self-awareness, he wouldn't be doing half the shit he's doing. Or.......

As a Christian, he'd renounce Ayn Rand's selfish ideology.
As a hater of plagiarism, he'd swear off capeshit as a genre, because it's plagiarism central.
As a hater of "spiritually caustic" games, he'd be condemning Baldur's Gate 3 for the bestiality and gay sex.
As a hater of censorious leftists, he'd hate Michael Moorcock, who wants to censor books offensive to feminism.
As someone who likes anti-woke shit, he'd love anime, especially since some anime use the Noir style.

That's what Razorfist would be doing if he had self-awareness.
 
Last edited:
You know. Amazon controlling James Bond wouldn’t be an issue if the series entered the public domain.
I hate to be that one guy
But 007 hasn’t had a great film since Skyfall, Spectre was a huge fucking waste of time, No Time to Die was okay, & two of the worst 007 films came out before Skyfall, those obviously being Quantum of Solace and Die Another Day.

I hate Amazon, but I doubt any company, even current MGM, could keep the steam running in 007 after 62 years.
Nobody wants to hear this as well, but Spy films like 007 are gonna be a hard sell to a new generation, and this is coming from somebody who owns a fuckin’ box set because I enjoyed the series so much, and I usually pirate my shit.
007 is just one of those film franchises that should have ended.
The Bond series could go on forever. The issue is, with the Daniel Craig movies, they were trying to be too smart, where as the late Brosnan movies were written to try too hard to appeal to the early 2000s crowd (hence why Die another Day is fucking painful).

Pick one to three exotic locations. Develop your bad guy, and don't cast the actor before you make your bad guy (like with Skyfall and the latest one), develop a threat (could be small like For Your Eyes Only or Large like Goldfinger or The Spy Who Loved Me). Get a couple of Bond girls, set up a few action pieces, get a decent musician to do the title sequence (not fucking Madonna) and cast a reliable actor.

Writing Bond movies isn't high art. They are slop, and should be unapologetic slop, and that is why they work. And in saying this I am not condemning them, I love well done slop. The big problem with modern writers (including Razor with his comics) is they think they are doing something more meaningful or impactful than it actually is. The art with slop is, and will always be, in the execution. The more complicated and "deep" you try and make slop the shittier it is going to be.
 
Razor has yet to opine on all the Trump voters v-logging about how they're regretting their votes. But then again, this is the same blind idiot who defended Melanie Mac because she was a fellow right-winger and pseudo-Christian grifter. God knows an actual Christian who wants to help the poor would disgust Razorfist, and I can hardly imagine him going off the party line and recognizing that a good chunk of his political co-believers are having second thoughts.

The Bond series could go on forever. The issue is, with the Daniel Craig movies, they were trying to be too smart, where as the late Brosnan movies were written to try too hard to appeal to the early 2000s crowd (hence why Die another Day is fucking painful).

Pick one to three exotic locations. Develop your bad guy, and don't cast the actor before you make your bad guy (like with Skyfall and the latest one), develop a threat (could be small like For Your Eyes Only or Large like Goldfinger or The Spy Who Loved Me). Get a couple of Bond girls, set up a few action pieces, get a decent musician to do the title sequence (not fucking Madonna) and cast a reliable actor.

Writing Bond movies isn't high art. They are slop, and should be unapologetic slop, and that is why they work. And in saying this I am not condemning them, I love well done slop. The big problem with modern writers (including Razor with his comics) is they think they are doing something more meaningful or impactful than it actually is. The art with slop is, and will always be, in the execution. The more complicated and "deep" you try and make slop the shittier it is going to be.
It's basically the same thing as the Star Wars Expanded Universe; it can go on forever so long as competent people remain at the helm. All you need to do is make sure it's competently made, and it can go on and on forever. There's an endless amount of stories that can be told with the Bond character and franchise, especially if you buy into the idea that the name "James Bond" is more of a code name rather than a person's actual name.

There could have been a James Bond in operation during the First or Second World War, there could be countless Bond stories that can be told that set place in the Cold War, or even the modern era. James Bond can go up against Krauts, Turks, Japs, Hindu extremists, African warlords, Soviet agents/officers, Red Chinese, North Koreans, Latin American nationalists/commies, corrupt American businessmen/mercenaries, the list goes on and on.
 
Last edited:
Writing Bond movies isn't high art. They are slop, and should be unapologetic slop, and that is why they work. And in saying this I am not condemning them, I love well done slop. The big problem with modern writers (including Razor with his comics) is they think they are doing something more meaningful or impactful than it actually is. The art with slop is, and will always be, in the execution. The more complicated and "deep" you try and make slop the shittier it is going to be.
Unfortunately a lot of these artistic hacks think they're doing something deeper than wallowing around in an intellectual kiddie pool. It's like that Redditor I messaged you about who claimed to be the greatest filmmaker of a generation and nigger made some movie about a reindeer that was a hit man. It's why we have these Marvel capeshit movies telling the audience "do better," whatever that means. These people want to be Satyajit Ray but they make slop. It's not a problem as long as they can accept that's their lot in life.
 
Unfortunately a lot of these artistic hacks think they're doing something deeper than wallowing around in an intellectual kiddie pool. It's like that Redditor I messaged you about who claimed to be the greatest filmmaker of a generation and nigger made some movie about a reindeer that was a hit man. It's why we have these Marvel capeshit movies telling the audience "do better," whatever that means. These people want to be Satyajit Ray but they make slop. It's not a problem as long as they can accept that's their lot in life.
I remember when these "artistic" media types got pissed when Disney Star Wars did the right thing for once and brought Luke Skywalker back for The Mandalorian's Season 2 finale, with these critics saying that Star Wars won't be as "deep" as the MCU if they keep pandering to fans. Meanwhile, the MCU is the equivalent of cotton candy; sweet for a time, but lacking depth and meaning. The MCU movies are not like the old Batman/Spider Man movies of the 2000s where there were messages about morality and ethics in them.

That was back then when I was a Razorfist fan, and boy did I enjoy him tearing these journos a new asshole to breathe out of. If he kept to that lane instead of getting political or getting too obsessed with bad video game/literature takes, weeb-bashing, or moralizing, I reckon I'd probably still be a fan of his to this day.

Net East CEO confirms cracking down on what he calls western devs and Japanese studios pandering to Americans for being entitled, lazy and woke. Another blow to Danny's narrative is the China behind DEI and ESG. China's big tech is now getting pissed that apolitical games are being used to promote BLM and pride month in the west.
Like I said before, China fucking hates the woke and even blames America for it:


The Chinese business class know that SJW pandering is poison to any enterprise, and the older Chinese Commies see the SJWs in the same way JK Rowling sees trannies. They see them as posers and as fake commies; they even call them "Baizuo", or "White Left", a term that signifies someone who pretends to care for the normies but only wants to make himself/herself look virtuous. The fact that Razor blamed them for DEI goes to show that he does no research on his enemies. China's strategy for the woke mind virus is to combat it in all its forms and blame America for its spread, which, given DOGE's revelations on the matter, is not entirely inaccurate.
 
Last edited:
Net East CEO confirms cracking down on what he calls western devs and Japanese studios pandering to Americans for being entitled, lazy and woke. Another blow to Danny's narrative is the China behind DEI and ESG. China's big tech is now getting pissed that apolitical games are being used to promote BLM and pride month in the west.

Marvel RIVALS is owned by China. So it makes it more likely that they fund DEI ESG to Western companies. Its Western companies they want to gobble up, why would China want to lose money on DEI to begin with? That would go against their interest of trying to look like they are doing it right.

The number 1 rule of a dealer. Dont consume the stuff you are selling.
 
Marvel RIVALS is owned by China. So it makes it more likely that they fund DEI ESG to Western companies. Its Western companies they want to gobble up, why would China want to lose money on DEI to begin with? That would go against their interest of trying to look like they are doing it right.

The number 1 rule of a dealer. Dont consume the stuff you are selling.
They removed DEI stuff from the shit they were selling to the West. It's like finding out that there's some coke on your cookies, then throwing that shit out and replacing it with coke-free cookies.

China's version of right is a DEI-free world. That means even the products they sell to the West must be free of DEI. That, and as DOGE has already shown to the world, it was the US government that primarily funded DEI.
 
Last edited:
They removed DEI stuff from the shit they were selling to the West. It's like finding out that there's some coke on your cookies, then throwing that shit out and replacing it with coke-free cookies.

China's version of right is a DEI-free world. That means even the products they sell to the West must be free of DEI. That, and as DOGE has already shown to the world, it was the US government that primarily funded DEI.
Blackrock does yes. But China does invest in ESG money heavily while moderating (aka banning it at home). Why would they do that if they dont like DEI? Answer: Its to expose Western markets to DEI. Ergo it makes it easy suck up a company thats failing. Recently a TenCent investor in France tried to do that with Ubisoft.

But generally i avoid any China products (Made in China hardware electronics doesnt count). Or any Western company that is heavily in bed with it interms of Soft Power.
 
Blackrock does yes. But China does invest in ESG money heavily while moderating (aka banning it at home). Why would they do that if they dont like DEI? Answer: Its to expose Western markets to DEI. Ergo it makes it easy suck up a company thats failing. Recently a TenCent investor in France tried to do that with Ubisoft.
I haven't seen any proof of that. There's no Chinese firm that makes it a condition that a company must do DEI stuff for them to give money. Last I checked, the Chinese lend money to anyone who's willing to take it up, woke or non-woke. It's not like Blackrock or Vanguard where they make it a condition that you MUST be woke in order to get investment funds. Hence why I don't buy that line which says that China funds DEI.
 
I haven't seen any proof of that. There's no Chinese firm that makes it a condition that a company must do DEI stuff for them to give money. Last I checked, the Chinese lend money to anyone who's willing to take it up, woke or non-woke. It's not like Blackrock or Vanguard where they make it a condition that you MUST be woke in order to get investment funds. Hence why I don't buy that line which says that China funds DEI.
But dont you think its too perfect, when Western company fails due to DEI. Suddently who is there to save the day? TenCent.
So i dunno, seems to check out with the funding Blackrock guess. But in the end i guess this doesnt matter if Trump will ban it. However this wont stop Canadian DEI or elsewhere.
 
Back