Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
Late from the weekend, cant wait to see what today brings.. That said a lot of posts I marked to quote/reply to boil down to me tapping the sign about helping Greer. This thread is different than some of the others, because our analysis, speculation and conjecture can all impact the case itself. We are the poo, touching ourselves. Luckily Greer is too rustarded to use a fraction of what's mentioned here.
The issue is that Greer is so fuckin retarded that even basic common sense speculation or questions can help him. Like a normal person in a lawsuit would probably call someone up before naming them as "eager to testify" but that's too much work for Greer.
 
No, he already responded with his motion to reconsider (Docket 243) the judge's memorandum to produce the restraining order and explain why he shouldn't get his pee pee whacked (Docket 227)
Really when you think about it, the Judge should intuitively know that when Shitlips says he's "happy to provide", what he actually means is "I expect literally anybody else to incur the time and expense in retrieving my shit for me".

Easy mistake to make.
 
Really when you think about it, the Judge should intuitively know that when Shitlips says he's "happy to provide", what he actually means is "I expect literally anybody else to incur the time and expense in retrieving my shit for me".

"Greer notes that the Court has misinterpreted his filings in an unsympathetic way. Greer meant to say he is happy to point in the general direction of the documents. This was a good faith mistake and excusable neglect, and shows GREER IS TRYING TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES."
 
"Greer notes that the Court has misinterpreted his filings in an unsympathetic way. Greer meant to say he is happy to point in the general direction of the documents. This was a good faith mistake and excusable neglect, and shows GREER IS TRYING TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES."
This is going to show up verbatim in the next round of plightsperging. :story:

"I wasn't trying to cockblock your access to the documents or jip (sic) you in any way, so no harm no foul! Greer humbly asks the Court to just mooove on from this isolated faux pas."
 
No, he already responded with his motion to reconsider (Docket 243) the judge's memorandum to produce the restraining order and explain why he shouldn't get his pee pee whacked (Docket 227)
But I don't think that counts.
He was ordered to show cause. If you file a motion saying "Wahhhh, I don't wanna show cause." You need to do it early enough the judge can respond before the due date. Otherwise the show cause, or any other order, is still due. You can't just file the something else at the last second and assume it's going to be approved. I don't think this is useful advice since I believe this exact thing has happened in this case before.

Even Stebbins has gotten this right lately, he had something due, whined about it asking for something else, didn't get a reply and still produced the correct, but retarded, response by the due date.
 
Last edited:
Whoever taught Greer the term excusable neglect but not what it means or how it does/does not apply to him at his college must struggle with overwhelming amounts of guilt.

Google Scholar is a remorseless automaton that feels no pangs of guilt. When it sees the stress its algorithm causes to The Internet's Nigger, its cold robot heart reports an approximation of satisfaction.
 
Remember that this man, this legal deity, thinks that filing something puts an automatically granted pause on any and all other issues on the table until the new thing is dealt with.
And he's already claimed ignorance about that in the past when he was called out on it by the judge. So if he does it again, I'm hoping Hardin will point out that he previously acknowledged his "mistake"
 
He is clearly very well aware of the fact that lawyers work for the best interests of the party that retains them. He had lawyers, he aimed them at Null and they gave him what he asked for. He subsequently discovered that nothing is free and immediately did what he always does when he doesn't get what he wants from someone.
I honestly don't know what to think anymore, see below:
View attachment 6769175
So Greer thinks the defendant's lawyer should be a "neutral third party"?

View attachment 6769181
View attachment 6769180
That must really suck for Mr. Hardin. I hope he gets properly compensated for all these wasted hours by Greer.
 
I honestly don't know what to think anymore, see below:

That is hilarious. Greer actually thinks opposing counsel should be a unbiased mediator, instead of a strong advocate for his client.

Why should Harden ever comprise? This case was a cunt's hair away from being dismissed before. Greer has no witnesses, no real evidence, just "ah bloo bloo, I'm a Shitlips retard and I deserve to automatically win against the Internet's banana pepper pizza nigger by default".

This case is never going past discovery. I bet my bottom dollar on it. Greer is going to mald hard.
 
Why should Harden ever comprise?
Hardin does have the duty to Null to lay out the options, costs, and expected results. A good attorney will tell you that suing 50 John Does and a quasi-server operator has risks that may be not in proportion to the rewards. I'm absolutely sure that Null is aware of Greer's settlement offers and has chosen, after deliberation with counsel and a website, to reject them. That is his right, even if this were a case where settlement made sense.

See Walmart taking everyone all the way through court even when they're horribly obviously in the wrong and it costs them more than settling.
 
1740420054849.png

Russell either doesn't read the thread or is actively lying about what's on it since he claims Hardin and Null are recording and posting their meet and confers.

Hardin should ask him to answer under oath which it is, is he lying about what is being posted in the thread, or is he claiming privileged information is being posted in the thread without even reading it, which would still be lying about the thread since he doesn't even know if what he's claiming is true
 
I am curious what makes one "a kiwi farms person"? Is it a state of mind? Does it require one to register, read and post on the notorious stalker website? Is anyone who ever trolled on the internet a kiwi farms person? If Shannon Howe has never visited the Farms would Russ' statement be considered defamatory? If a clerk at a mail store won't comply with Russ' request to defer payment on his box does he accuse him of being a kiwi farms person?

Are kiwi farms people in the room with you right now Russ?

I have so many questions.
A "Kiwi Farms person" is a servant of the Dark Lord Hardship.
 
Whoever taught Greer the term excusable neglect but not what it means or how it does/does not apply to him at his college must struggle with overwhelming amounts of guilt.
I doubt they taught him that there. It's legal theory stuff not really relevant to most of what a paralegal actually does.

I'm pretty sure he only started using it after the judge in this case mentioned it, because of his cargo cult level understanding of law.
 
But I don't think that counts.
He was ordered to show cause. If you file a motion saying "Wahhhh, I don't wanna show cause." You need to do it early enough the judge can respond before the due date. Otherwise the show cause, or any other order, is still due. You can't just file the something else at the last second and assume it's going to be approved. I don't think this is useful advice since I believe this exact thing has happened in this case before.

Even Stebbins has gotten this right lately, he had something due, whined about it asking for something else, didn't get a reply and still produced the correct, but retarded, response by the due date.
Oh, I completely agree with you. But Russ will obviously believe that what he filed complies with the order. Because he's such a special boy he gets to make the court do a do-over and just pat him on the head instead of whacking his pee-pee. Because he's the magical star buddy, natch.
 
Will Dildo Saggins make the deadline today? We'll find out, but my gut says he will not. And when Hardship Hardin calls him on it by filling a new motion for sanctions, Russ will whine and bitch that since he filed a motion to amend his complaint that he assumed it was a do-over and put a halt to everything that came before it.
 
Will Dildo Saggins make the deadline today? We'll find out, but my gut says he will not. And when Hardship Hardin calls him on it by filling a new motion for sanctions, Russ will whine and bitch that since he filed a motion to amend his complaint that he assumed it was a do-over and put a halt to everything that came before it.
At this point I'm convinced he habitually files one day late as a yank on the judge's ball and chain, reminding him who's boss. They're in a sub-dom relationship.
 
Will Dildo Saggins make the deadline today? We'll find out, but my gut says he will not. And when Hardship Hardin calls him on it by filling a new motion for sanctions, Russ will whine and bitch that since he filed a motion to amend his complaint that he assumed it was a do-over and put a halt to everything that came before it.

I really thought the judge would've chimed in by now on his stupid request. But I guess we still have a few hours before close of business in Utah (office of the Clerk closes at 4:30 Mountain time).
 
Back