UN ‘White genocide’ claimed by Elon Musk is imaginary, says South African court - A legal case over a bequest to a paramilitary group ends with judge noting that claims supported by the billionaire are untrue

1.png
White South Africans gathered at the US embassy in Pretoria this month to demonstrate against alleged ‘genocide’
Credit: Marco Longari/AFP


A South African high court has ruled that claims backed by Elon Musk of a “genocide” targeting white people are imaginary.

A judge in the Western Cape high court said that claims black people intended to wipe out white South Africans had historically been used to bolster white nationalism in the country.

The ruling came as the court set aside the will of a man who had left £1.7 million to be used by a Right-wing paramilitary group for illegal training.

Judge Rosheni Allie ruled that the bequest to the Boerelegioen by Grantland Michael Bray was invalid because it “promoted racial hatred” and was contrary to public policy.

The self-styled civil defence group says on its website it aims to “enable the citizens to resist the promised slaughter of whites in [the Republic of South Africa] as well as the theft of their property”.

Mr Musk, who was born in South Africa, has in recent years used social media to repeatedly warn of a genocide threatening its white population.

He has accused the country’s radical Marxist Economic Freedom Fighters party of “openly pushing for genocide of white people in South Africa” and accused the African National Congress government of doing too little to stop it.

Donald Trump, who recruited Mr Musk to his administration, has cut aid to South Africa in recent weeks, accusing it of discriminating against whites and offering white South Africans the chance to resettle in America.

Judge Allie said in her ruling that the Boerelegioen activities glorified apartheid.

She said: “The only expression of the testator’s intention that is evident is the intention for the funds to be used for ‘training’, as well as the testator’s own assertions that he wanted the funds used to benefit an organisation which he deemed to be one which will ‘exterminate every black person in SA’ and will be used to defend or ward off a white genocide, which is clearly imagined and not real.”

She said in her ruling, which made no reference to Mr Musk, that “fearmongering” about the threat from black people “now takes the form of persuading white people that farm murders are the designed commencement of a white genocide, which is, allegedly, imminent”.

Article Link

Archive
 
"They only raped, horrifically tortured and killed white people. Nothing is wrong here. Ignore our starving population, world record rape stats and no go zones. Pay no mind that the only livable places in our country are where armed white people live"
 
Admittedly I find it a bit hard to sympathize about stopping Apartheid 2.0 when everyone in the photo is old enough to have benefitted from Apartheid 1.0. I don't really like the idea of anyone gaining preferential benefits or treatment on the basis of race or ethnicity.

You shouldn't be surprised when the oppressed become the oppressors, especially with the demographic weight behind them you ignored.

The pagans learned this very well during the 4th and 5th centuries AD
 
A white man gives a political group in South Africa money in his will.

A court in south africa rules that he cannot do this and invalidates the will based on the idea that giving money to what appears to be a legal political organization is illegal because the judges disapprove of the group.

The judges then offer their own political opinions on the organization which are transformed through media magic into "facts".
 
Admittedly I find it a bit hard to sympathize about stopping Apartheid 2.0 when everyone in the photo is old enough to have benefitted from Apartheid 1.0. I don't really like the idea of anyone gaining preferential benefits or treatment on the basis of race or ethnicity.

You shouldn't be surprised when the oppressed become the oppressors, especially with the demographic weight behind them you ignored.

The pagans learned this very well during the 4th and 5th centuries AD
Wow man it's almost like Apartheid 1.0 was set up by people who knew Apartheid 2.0 and its accompanying dismal state of ruin with all its horrors was what awaited if Apartheid 1.0 wasn't put in place or was ever ended.

Do tell me if you think the people who were 'oppressed' under Apartheid 1.0 are doing better before, or after, its cessation. I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on that.
 
Wow man it's almost like Apartheid 1.0 was set up by people who knew Apartheid 2.0 and its accompanying dismal state of ruin with all its horrors was what awaited if Apartheid 1.0 wasn't put in place or was ever ended.

Do tell me if you think the people who were 'oppressed' under Apartheid 1.0 are doing better before, or after, its cessation. I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on that.
Why would I care about the well being of South African whites? They went there of their own free will and proceeded to implement a system of oppressive segregation that turned around to bite them in the ass. They could have done things differently but fucked it up, many such cases.

For your second question, that depends on whether you'd rather be a palace slave or a free beggar.
 
Why would I care about the well being of South African whites? They went there of their own free will and proceeded to implement a system of oppressive segregation that turned around to bite them in the ass. They could have done things differently but fucked it up, many such cases.

For your second question, that depends on whether you'd rather be a palace slave or a free beggar.
South Africans of all stripes were better off under Apartheid 1.0.

Kill yourself you stupid fucking nigger.
 
Why would I care about the well being of South African whites? They went there of their own free will and proceeded to implement a system of oppressive segregation that turned around to bite them in the ass. They could have done things differently but fucked it up, many such cases.

For your second question, that depends on whether you'd rather be a palace slave or a free beggar.
South Africa was extremely prosperous under apartheid 1. It is failed state under apartheid 2. How does this translate to you as "all segregation is bad mmm'kay?"
 
You shouldn't be surprised when the oppressed become the oppressors, especially with the demographic weight behind them you ignored.
In this case, the original "oppressors" built a country from wilderness, didn't think to make its borders impermeable, and found itself surrounded & outnumbered by Bantu tribes migrating to the civilization they built. Despite this, they performed the world's first heart transplant, launched a space & fighter jet program, and built nukes.

The successor regime, after 30 years, can barely keep lights on or water running, sees people living in walled compounds to avoid some of the world's highest rape & murder rates, and is rapidly going the way of every other post-European society (Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, Haiti, Detroit, Baltimore, etc).

Perhaps SA should've built a massive wall and deported every Bantu, but short of that, what exactly would've prevented the entirety of Africa from flocking to the civilization the Boers built and picking it clean?
 
Back