To explain what I mean, I'll answer your rhetorical question with another question, which I'll answer in turn with a third question:
- You ask, "Where do I think the Satanism fetishism in trannies comes from?"
- To answer that, we need to ask, "What makes sex satisfying?"
- To answer that, we need to ask, "What makes sex unsatisfying?"
The answer to that third question, of course, is that sex is unsatisfying when there's no sense of potency—no change; no transformation. Unsatisfying sex is sex that doesn't "do" anything: you don't grow closer to each other; you don't learn anything new about each other; there's no sense of virility or fertility; nothing "happens" other than an empty and disappointing orgasm. There's dopamine, but it's spayed and neutered. There's no meaning—no "purpose".
What makes sex satisfying, then, is potency: change; transformation; the sense of "virility" and "fertility" in a real or metaphorical sense. Even if you're alone masturbating in a dark room, it feels better—more potent—to be changed in a negative direction than not at all.
Now, where do I think the Satanism fetishism in trannies comes from? I think that it comes from using antinomianism, dissolution, and annihilation (collectively, "taboo") as the sexual and spiritual transformation-gradient; I think that it comes from using the Satanic ideal (and reality, if unknowingly) as the sexual-spiritual vector of change. It's the same thing that makes bug-chasing work: you get "pregnant" with death—the potency of poisoned semen.
A pleasant photograph of an anole, to break up this large post and make it easier-on-the-eyes.
You may be asking, "How is what you're saying any different from what I'm saying?"
Here's the answer: my point is that the fetishistic downward spiral we're seeing
doesn't even necessarily depend on the hedonic treadmill in terms of raw dopamine. I'm saying that it's baked into how these people are approaching sexuality, regardless of any dopamine involved. Did a dopamine feedback loop play a part? Certainly, in many cases—it's a common on-ramp; that doesn't mean that it's
causal in the sense of being the determining factor behind the structure of the phenomenon
. The determining factor is the
vector of change—purpose's arrow
.
The next question is, "Why, for them, does purpose's arrow point downward?"
There are two main reasons:
- The nihilistic contemporary milieu—if there's no upward trajectory (or any trajectory, really) in the external world, how can there be in their internal spiritual-sexual world?
- Their sex is impersonal and sterile—pregnancy and personal union are the only positive, constructive sexual change-vectors; if you're not getting someone pregnant or getting to know them better, then that "potency" has to come from somewhere else. Add to that, pregnancy's change-vector is stable in a way that others' aren't: you can just keep spamming kids, and the potency remains the same.
That first reason was the thrust of my original point—gooning viscerally confronts the vacuity of the modern world. You talk about "projects", and about doing "hobbies"—who cares? Why not—and forgive me for my language—just jerk off and kill everybody? Can you think of a real, rational reason? That's my point.
(Channel Archive)
emoji like it's a magical charm that wards off children if you stick it in your bio.