Business February consumer confidence posts biggest drop since 2021 in latest sign of slowing economy - You voted for this

Article/Archive
PUBLISHED TUE, FEB 25 202510:05 AM EST UPDATED 21 MIN AGO
Jeff Cox


KEY POINTS
  • The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index slipped to 98.3 for the month, down nearly 7% and below the Dow Jones forecast for 102.3. It was the largest monthly drop since August 2021.
  • The Expectations Index tumbled 9.3 points to a 72.9 reading, the first time since June 2024 that the measure has fallen below the level consistent with recession.
No Eggs.WEBP
Empty shelves of eggs are seen in a supermarket in the Manhattan borough of New York City on Feb. 20, 2025.

Consumers grew more pessimistic about the economic outlook in February as worries brewed about a slowing economy and rising inflation, the Conference Board reported Tuesday.

The board’s Consumer Confidence Index slipped to 98.3 for the month, down 7 points and below the Dow Jones forecast for 102.3. This was the lowest reading since June 2024 and the largest monthly drop since August 2021.

“Views of current labor market conditions weakened. Consumers became pessimistic about future business conditions and less optimistic about future income,” said Stephanie Guichard, the board’s senior economist for global indicators. “Pessimism about future employment prospects worsened and reached a ten-month high.”

The decline in consumer confidence comes with President Donald Trump threatening additional tariffs against U.S. trading partners. Trump said Monday that duties against Canada and Mexico “will go forward” in March after a delay in February.

Economists worry that the tariffs could spark another round of inflation at a time when the Federal Reserve is considering whether to lower interest rates further or hold steady as policymakers weigh the impact of Trump’s aggressive fiscal and trade policy moves.

Consumer are worried as well: 12-month inflation expectations jumped to 6%, up from 5.2% the prior month and well ahead of the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal.

“This increase likely reflected a mix of factors, including sticky inflation but also the recent jump in prices of key household staples like eggs and the expected impact of tariffs,” Guichard said. “There was a sharp increase in the mentions of trade and tariffs, back to a level unseen since 2019. Most notably, comments on the current Administration and its policies dominated the responses.”

“We should expect some short-term behavioral shifts within the consumer,” wrote Jeffrey Roach, chief U.S. economist at LPL Financial. “Consumers are increasingly nervous about the unknow impacts from potential tariffs and could pull forward consumer demand as they anticipate higher prices for imports in the near future.”

Stocks briefly moved lower following the release while Treasury yields added to a sharp slide on the day. The 10-year Treasury yield, a traditional barometer for growth expectations, fell nearly 10 basis points, or 0.1 percentage point, to 4.29%.

Though most economic indicators reflect continued growth, the Conference Board gauge matches other recent surveys showing waning confidence. Last week, the University of Michigan reported a larger-than-expected monthly decrease of nearly 10% in February while the five-year inflation outlook among respondents hit its highest level since 1995.

In the Conference Board survey, the decline came across age groups and income levels. The survey covered the time period up to Feb. 19.

Along with the overall drop in confidence, the Expectations Index tumbled 9.3 points to a 72.9 reading, the first time since June 2024 that the measure has fallen below the level consistent with recession. However, the current conditions measured improved somewhat, with 19.6% saying conditions are “good,” up 1.1 percentage points from January.

However, a closely watched measure of the labor market saw a worsening, with 33.4% saying that jobs were “plentiful” while 16.3% said positions are “hard to get.” That compared to respective readings of 33.9% and 14.5% in January.
 
Most retail stores have been on the way out, even as early back in 2014. Why go to Joann's, JC Penny's, or other brick & mortar store when you can order stuff online?
The concerning aspect is more so the restaurants. On the merchandising side of things brick and mortar make money by competitively offering sales on clothes a year out from time of purchase. They’re no longer able to do this because the government has effectively allowed online mega retailers to front load normal goods at cents on the dollar. The only person who actually has to pay the duties now is the average Joe who wants to have something like shirts in their store by paying 30% to move it from an Amazon warehouse to their store. It’s robbery.
 
Your arguement is equivalent to the news articles fearmongering that labeling cartels as terrorist organizations will cause them to commit terrorism, so we should leave them alone. Where was this fear when the USA began outsourcing jobs and labor abroad?
Whataboutism doesn’t really work or fix the issue barreling down on us. There’s gonna be lots of people unemployed and without avenues to find work. Is there a plan to fix that? I dunno, everyone seems too busy getting boners over smashing things instead of fixing things. That’s not fearmongering it’s not blinding oneself to practical concerns. Some of us like to remain skeptical and observant about worrying trends even during the orgy over epic lulz. But don’t take me for 100% doomposting I’d say it’s more 60-40 yay posting to doom. But it’s funny how intolerant some are to any criticism of negative news even if it’s not bullshit but valid objective reality. I guess that’s just how much the MSM inoculated people to any bad news with their histrionic gesticulating.
 
What evidence can you provide? I would like real datasets as well, no articles that utilize anecdotal experiences with a hint of pathos to tug on the heart strings
It’s the basic principle that if restaurants are failing the issue is either a business’s personal ability to stay above debt or it’s the consumer not being able to afford a meal. I’ve watched dining prices nearly double in the last year in my entire area.

Economically it’s hard to pinpoint multiple points of fluctuation but on a macro scale this indicates that the food service industry is not the only one lagging but energy and agriculture. It helps to think of restaurants being the front end of this production cycle. In a healthy economy a middle class family with children can go out to eat once or twice a week. In a recession that same family will only be able to go out once every other week.

I’m sorry if this is confusing to talk in a broad scale like this. There are plenty of economic indicators tied to foodservice https://restaurant.org/research-and-media/research/restaurant-economic-insights/economic-indicators/
 
Whataboutism doesn’t really work or fix the issue barreling down on us. There’s gonna be lots of people unemployed and without avenues to find work. Is there a plan to fix that? I dunno, everyone seems too busy getting boners over smashing things instead of fixing things. That’s not fearmongering it’s not blinding oneself to practical concerns. Some of us like to remain skeptical and observant about worrying trends even during the orgy over epic lulz. But don’t take me for 100% doomposting I’d say it’s more 60-40 yay posting to doom. But it’s funny how intolerant some are to any criticism of negative news even if it’s not bullshit but valid objective reality. I guess that’s just how much the MSM inoculated people to any bad news with their histrionic gesticulating.
The deportations would also increase job availability.
But at the same time I don't see how useless degree having government moochers would find a job any which way without nepotism.
Also I don't see how retail, a sector mired by high turnover would be that impacted by a company going under. There is always some retail chain going under.
 
There’s gonna be lots of people unemployed and without avenues to find work.
I already mentioned new avenues of work, and you responded saying that they won't be productive, like they were even productive in their current jobs in the first place. And it is fearmongering when you said that if they don't have these retail jobs, they'll resort to crime and violence, acting like retail even pays well in the first place.
 
It’s the basic principle that if restaurants are failing the issue is either a business’s personal ability to stay above debt or it’s the consumer not being able to afford a meal. I’ve watched dining prices nearly double in the last year in my entire area.

Economically it’s hard to pinpoint multiple points of fluctuation but on a macro scale this indicates that the food service industry is not the only one lagging but energy and agriculture. It helps to think of restaurants being the front end of this production cycle. In a healthy economy a middle class family with children can go out to eat once or twice a week. In a recession that same family will only be able to go out once every other week.

I’m sorry if this is confusing to talk in a broad scale like this. There are plenty of economic indicators tied to foodservice https://restaurant.org/research-and-media/research/restaurant-economic-insights/economic-indicators/
don't worry bro, you can't do anything about them. They said so in 2024: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnma...high-and-why-you-cant-do-anything-about-them/
 
I already mentioned new avenues of work, and you responded saying that they won't be productive, like they were even productive in their current jobs in the first place. And it is fearmongering when you said that if they don't have these retail jobs, they'll resort to crime and violence, acting like retail even pays well in the first place.
You think everyone losing a job lives in farm country? That’s not likely. And you don’t think some won’t turn to crime? Also unlikely. That‘s not fearmongering. Agree to disagree though.

The deportations would also increase job availability.
But at the same time I don't see how useless degree having government moochers would find a job any which way without nepotism.
Also I don't see how retail, a sector mired by high turnover would be that impacted by a company going under. There is always some retail chain going under.

It‘s not just one company it’s pretty all but the biggest. Target, Red Lobster, 7/11, CVS, Walgreens, Rite-Aid, the list goes on. Amazingly somehow Barnes & Noble is going to be opening 60 stores though, so that’s a small positive.
 
You think everyone losing a job lives in farm country? That’s not likely. And you don’t think some won’t turn to crime? Also unlikely. That‘s not fearmongering. Agree to disagree though.
There's a shit ton of jobs that is unskilled other than farmhand, you know. Janitor, landscaping, busboy, kitchen-aide(aka dishwasher), stockroom(loading and unloading trucks), etcetera.
 
Back