Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

Question for anyone familiar with the region:
View attachment 7031551
What goes on down there? Is there anything important in that area? In the semi-likely event that Russia takes Odessa city it seems like this region would be available to also take because of Transnistria being just north of it. But I might be retarded cause I don't know anything about war, I'm just curious
The area has a notable Romanian minority and Romanian irredentists still want to retake it alongside Moldova.
Before WW1 the area was known as Bessarabia and belonged to Russia. When the empire imploded Romania annexed it. After ww2 the Soviet Union reabsorbed it and divided it between the Romanian majority parts that would become Moldova and gave the other parts to the Ukrainian SSR.
As for Transnistria that strip of land you circled isn't actually connected to the state (except by river), and its actual border is further up.
Funnily enough Transnistria makes up almost entirely the entire western border of the red state except for the circled part
 
Last edited:
Sigh.. After Trump rejected sending peacekeepers and not allowing NATO membership.
1740629166663.png
Putin- "European politicians will stand at Trump's feet and "wag their tails" He was correct about that with france, britain and poland's recent visits. Can the Europeans stop humiliating themselves, and at least try to pretend they look strong to carry Ukraine to victory?
 
Sigh.. After Trump rejected sending peacekeepers and not allowing NATO membership.
View attachment 7031716
Putin- "European politicians will stand at Trump's feet and "wag their tails" He was correct about that with france, britain and poland's recent visits. Can the Europeans stop humiliating themselves, and at least try to pretend they look strong to carry Ukraine to victory?cide by iskander.

Trump has said multiple times that
1, US will not send troops there,
2, if someone else sends troops there it will be as individual states and not from NATO,
3, if the fucking frogs or other faggots gets blown up it is their own fault and US will not care and nor will be involved.
4, Article 5 is not going to be in play if euro faggots go there and die from suicide by iskander.
5, do it if you want, faggots, but you will be on your own.

What is so fucking hard to understand?
 
I think it's time for the boys to pack it up and switch to next gear, gotta speed up the processes a wee bit.
 
It's a rather lopsided deal, to be honest. America acquires shares in Ukrainian infrastructure, invests Ukrainian half of the profits into upgrading and maintaining it, and keeps the American half of the profits for itself.

Ukraine ends up with no rights to its infrastructure (it belongs to America due to the shares) and no dividends (they are invested in upgrading said American-owned infrastructure), so America gets to keep all the actual profits.

It's colonization 101, really. China is doing the same to Africa.


I read the agreement and...meh.
it institutes a fund 50/50 between US and Ukr, where the >future< revenue from exploitation of directly and indirectly controlled urk resources will go.
now, i would be curious to know what the ukr govt currently owns or controls that can generate revenue. also curious to what seed money will go into this fund to start reconstruction and resources exploitatin.
plus, is not clear what the Us govt will do with its part of the fund profits, if any.
give it back to the US taxpayer, who footed the bill of the Ukr adventure to the tune of a couple hundred billions or more? doubt it.
plus, the agreement mut be ratified by the Rada, which is only logical, and that will have to be seen.

in this case the devil is really in the detail. but even in the best of scenarios, it will be years or decades before the fund generates profits, assuming the ukros will not steal everything even before that.

i will add that if Ukr wants to enter EU, government owned economy is nogo.

as for EU, it is clear that whatever they gave and will give, they will get jack in return. how sad :smug:
 
Last edited:
The top 3 militaries in the world do show how big the gap is to any rank below them which we thank the Europeans for demonstrating that.
Soft political power is dead, it has only ever been maintained by the hard power of the American Empire and since they're somewhat overstretched and regrouping the illusion of the post modern world order has been shattered, We once again are living in reality. A multipolar world where great powers decide how things are run
 
Whatever comes next it's amazing what Trump has done so far. I mean at some points in the last two years you had reason to be legit scared of WW3 breaking out because of a zombie in the white house being propped up by warmongering libtards and all the russophobes riding on their coattails.

Now we've got "Fuck you, you ain't going to be NATO" as clear as it gets. And even tho' some Euros still try to posture everyone and their grandma knows that there's nothing behind those barks.

The EU will have to deal with countries like Hungary, Slovakia and even Poland being more vocal about getting their share. And that will destabilize the EU from within because they will have to make amends.
 
Soft political power is dead, it has only ever been maintained by the hard power of the American Empire and since they're somewhat overstretched and regrouping the illusion of the post modern world order has been shattered, We once again are living in reality. A multipolar world where great powers decide how things are run
Not sure the "soft power" ever existed at all.

Thing is, for a long time being in the orbit of US/west would bring many benefits for everyone.

Even Russia liked the idea of ending up in the economic orbit of the west.

But the US, in the last, dunno, 20/25 years, from being a force of good, has become a force of bad and an economic drain to the whole planet. and EU was created on the same premise: suck the blood of everyone through blackmail and extortion.

No wonder many try to get out of this orbit.
 
Not sure the "soft power" ever existed at all.
In Europe specifically it did, by soft power I mean snivelling left-wing bureaucrats entrenched in the various establishments running the show. Soft power is through various agreements with very little to truly back them up, most of europe has effectively disarmed itself becasuse it has blanket protection from its hegemon which is becoming less apparent now. Its been the defacto means of operating in Europe since the Suez crisis.
Even Russia liked the idea of ending up in the economic orbit of the west.
This is it though, they squandered that opportunity back when they didn't allow the Russians into NATO. On the flipside there are significantly less subversive's in the Russian federation, if you took a look at the USAID spending most of it was going to 5th columnists to disable functioning societies. Putin doesn't allow American and European NGOs to operate in Russian and they are stronger for it. You cant be in their sphere of influence without the faggotry sadly.
But the US, in the last, dunno, 20/25 years, from being a force of good
There are large portions of east Asia and south America that would beg to differ but I understand the sentiment and don't entirely disagree.
 
Question for anyone familiar with the region:
View attachment 7031551
What goes on down there? Is there anything important in that area? In the semi-likely event that Russia takes Odessa city it seems like this region would be available to also take because of Transnistria being just north of it. But I might be retarded cause I don't know anything about war, I'm just curious
It's the Budjak region of Bessarabia, which as others have said, was long contested by the various countries in the region from the Ottomans (who gave it its name, 'bucak' translating to borderland - not dissimilar to the origin of Ukraine's name - because it formed part of their northern border in Europe, duh) to Moldavia to, of course, Russia itself (followed by the USSR and finally Ukraine in the modern day). Its most important city is IIRC Izmail, a huge former fortress & current river port in the Danube Delta which was famously successfully stormed by Aleksandr Suvorov (despite it supposedly being impregnable and being defended by a larger Ottoman garrison than the attacking army) in 1790. As can be expected from a historically contested border region, the Budjak is also quite the ethnic checkerboard, albeit it hasn't been nearly as volatile as Transnistria or the Donbass to my knowledge.

Bugeac-etnic.png

Also it was the homeland of the ancestors of Aleksandr Kolchak, the Russian polar explorer & naval hero who led the White Army in Siberia and later became the ill-fated nominal leader of all the Whites during the Russian Civil War. On the flipside, it's also where Ukraine's Poroshenko was born.
 
Ruschinks nabbed a Leopard 2 tank.



Yakuts hijacked a German Leopard-2 tank

Yakuts are rightfully considered the best hunters in Russia, who are ready not only to kill wild fowls and the enemy, but also to hijack military equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine! Link

1740667818031.png

Also today is Special Operations Forces' Day in the RF. The choice of date is timed to coincide with the events of February 2014 in Crimea, when our soldiers ensured order at strategic facilities and peace on the peninsula. At the same time, their special politeness towards the local population was especially noted. Link
 
Last edited:
Back