US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Once I saw Posobiec was involved with this, I knew nothing of worth would be released today.

Wake me up when some actual dirt gets slung around.
The people involved are like a who's who list of faggots:
1740685369542.png

Guaranteed none of these faggots are going to take a bunch of pics and just dump them straight away because the folder contains nothing.
 
Nigger you are repeating 80 IQ 2016 ShareBlue /pol/ shitposting talking points. Even fucking libtards nowadays don't bother with this cause it's been debunked about 100000 times.

Pitiful to see posts like this on fucking Kiwifarms.
im a little at a loss for words right now, are you guys trying to say the new york article from 2002 is somehow false or "made after the fact" for the sole purpose of discrediting trump?

All im doing is posting what a well know news organization has published, did he say those words or not?

why are you guys acting like democrats? you can call me wrong but dont just say "its been debunked" tell me how and why

Im a big fan of the current trump admin but that dosent make me blind, this is very strange as to why the admin is provaricating around this issue and then to find those genuine statements from so long ago paint a strange picture
 
The people involved are like a who's who list of faggots:
View attachment 7034507

Guaranteed none of these faggots are going to take a bunch of pics and just dump them straight away because the folder contains nothing.
That is a bit cringe for sure. Like if Biden released something and Harry Sisson and Ron Filipkoswki were waiving it around first.
 
im a little at a loss for words right now? are you guys trying to say the new york article from 2002 is somehow false or "made after the fact" for the sole purpose of discrediting trump?

All im doing is posting what a well know news organization has published, did he say those words or not?

why are you guys acting like democrats? you can call me wrong but dont just say "its been debunked" tell me how and why

Im a big fan of the current trump admin but that dosent make me blind, this is very strange as to why the admin is provaricating around this issue and then to find those genuine statements from so long ago paint a strange picture
no, you actual buffoon. we're saying that trump didn't know anything about epstein at all, and besides this interview and one picture of a party in the late 90s, there is almost no evidence of them having ever even interacted. trump and his family were clearly, based on the other contextual evidence, not involved with epstein. even the one time trump touched something epstein owned, it was an in-country flight from one US state to another, on a plane that isn't the lolita express, and in every single deposition trump was either never mentioned, or the one time he was mentioned by a victim, it was to say that she had never seen him involved with anyone that epstein peddled.

we're calling you retarded because the first time you were called out, you didn't immediately start fact checking yourself and understand that you were spreading liberal talking points from nearly 10 fucking years ago.

Niggas ITT acting like they don't understand the reality TV arc with these files.
fuck that we don't want reality tv we want the fucking information.
 
Back