thats the problem, ONCE IT BECOME OBVIOUS, he changed
i can't believe once he learned what epstein was he changed his opinion. what a retard.
Im saying based on what I can find from the TIME, trump had NOTHING but oddly good things to say about him
we are trying to explain to you, and you are failing to understand, trump had nothing but platitudes and empty statements about him. where are the descriptions of him in detail? where is any mention of what kind of person he is other than 'great guy'? where is any personalization at all? if you look at what he actually says, it is a substanceless asskiss statement of a guy he barely knew, in an interview where there was no reason for him to say anything other than neutral or positive things.
trump is a guy who dosent flatter people needlessly,
are you serious? trump is CONSTANTLY calling people amazing. did you not read his tweet about wayne gretzky just recently? or listen to how he talks about other world leaders? have you ever listened to trump speak at any length about people he doesn't have any active reason to hate? (which trump did not at the time, because as has been explained to you, epstein's behaviors were only really learned about outside his circle in 2006)
Im just curious as to either, how trump could be unaware of his actions or ok with them, one is incompetence the other is evil.
if you're not going around asking everybody who they're fucking, you're not going to know. if you're not asking people where to get child sex slaves, you're not going to know they know where. you're basically trying to ask why trump didn't just figure out epstein was a predator through osmosis before it was revealed to the public.
this is the point I feel people dont want to adress they simply want to take it to "your saying he did what epstien did"
literally no one is saying that except you. we're all addressing it. trump did not know epstein any more than he knows adam schiff today. the difference is adam schiff is an adversary, and epstein was a potential ally for him in the business world. again,
before it was known that he was the proto-diddy.
not at all what im saying, I think there is just some uncomfrtable connectiosn
the connections would be uncomfortable if it wasn't for his behaviors afterward, where he banned epstein from his properties after he got handsy with a mar-a-lago employee's daughter.
not to mention you fail to address why he was the only one out of all these sorts of people in this world of high society to come forward and help the victims, why he was specifically said NOT to have been there by victims giving testimony.
this has played itself out entirely. there's nothing else that can be said that hasn't already. i apologize for derailing the thread further.
