Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

So, what makes transpeople "real"? I guess they say they're real. There's fact that a tiny number of them detransition, and if they do it's because of social pressure. There's all the medical literature on the subject. There's the consensus opinion on the matter from both American and world doctor associations, minus a few people with political or religious agendas. The fact that clinics that offer these services are so abundant as to be mundane. Since you asked.
I agree. Its very clear Transpeople are real, just as much I am really Napoleon. With the same evidence, we both say we are and we threaten suicide if anyone questions it.

It is super bigoted to QUESTION me being Napoleon, or say I need therapy and not surgery and installment as Military Governor of Elba to be able to live the life as the Napoleon I feel - that I KNOW - I am inside. To not grant me sovereignty over Elba, for my state-funded medical insurance to not cover a 300-strong personal guard, is to DENY my existence as a real Napoleon. So what if 30,000 people will have their lives disrupted by Elba no longer being an Italian territory and being its own soveriegn entity under my complete unimpeded rule; isn't a small inconvenience to 30,000 people worth validating my identity as Napoleon so I don't kill myself?

Oh and I didn't "become" Napoleon. I always WAS Napoleon.
 
The problem was these were nuclear people. You don't see those people often as few schools offer nuclear options (Berkeley where the American nuclear science was founded, doesn't even have a reactor anymore). From what ive gathered, over 300 people were fired and most rehired (HR from the looks of it). The Trump admin fucked up on this as people in those departments have probably lost the confidence and might actually start looking at the private sector since you make more there.
1) Is nuclear even that available in the private sector? Every time I've looked at it there's a lot of complaining that it's being stifled and nobody is allowed to build new plants any more. Did that finally get fixed and new plants are going up all over the nation?
2) Wait... do we... NOT want the inspectors working in the private sector? Here, let's assume Alan is a dunce, and Bob is the brilliant nuclear scientist. We either have Alan working in the private sector on reactors and Bob inspects him... or why not just have Bob do Alan's job directly? If these people are so good and important, it strikes me that they would do more good in the private sector than government.
3) I still want more solid sources on this. So far all I keep finding is ABC reporting on what 1 dude said. That dude could be Alan the fuck-up who got let go and is just claiming it was 300 people. Mistake? Sure. Fuck up? Only if you can show me what exactly went wrong during the time period this was rectified.

Besides, we all saw how much the government fucked up when it shut down the economy during COVID, and they never went "oops, maybe we should open back up ASAP" but kept doubling down and stretching out the issue. And it's still ongoing because right as the supply chains start to recover from that crisis, something new immediately comes along (like fucking pirates).

There's all the medical literature on the subject. There's the consensus opinion on the matter from both American and world doctor associations, minus a few people with political or religious agendas. The fact that clinics that offer these services are so abundant as to be mundane. Since you asked.
Remember all the times there was medical consensus on lobotomies? Smoking? How about we check old textbooks and their opinions on the races of Man?

You may want to be reeeeeeeeal careful about bringing out consensus opinions in medicine, because history has a long list ready to make a fool of you.
 
1) Is nuclear even that available in the private sector? Every time I've looked at it there's a lot of complaining that it's being stifled and nobody is allowed to build new plants any more. Did that finally get fixed and new plants are going up all over the nation?
Yes. Westinghouse, academia, medical institutions all have nuclear experts. While Radiological substances are controlled the private sector does do a lot.
2) Wait... do we... NOT want the inspectors working in the private sector? Here, let's assume Alan is a dunce, and Bob is the brilliant nuclear scientist. We either have Alan working in the private sector on reactors and Bob inspects him... or why not just have Bob do Alan's job directly? If these people are so good and important, it strikes me that they would do more good in the private sector than government.
Government inspectors make sure there is no danger to the public. An internal inspector would make sure you don't get caught. Internals job is to make sure you report problems to a direct supervisor who will make a choice, and at the end people care about their source of money first.
3) I still want more solid sources on this. So far all I keep finding is ABC reporting on what 1 dude said. That dude could be Alan the fuck-up who got let go and is just claiming it was 300 people. Mistake? Sure. Fuck up? Only if you can show me what exactly went wrong during the time period this was rectified.
350 NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration) staff were fired and then immediately rehired. That's a fact. The issue now lies that many of these people are doing something so damn specific that they might not have a private sector counterpart. Anyone who replaces them and is still young and sees this route as a dead end if Musk's teams decides to just fire people in an area where he and his cohort have no expertise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghostse
It's boycott day. Hope everyone is doing their part to tank the economy because the TV says orange man bad!

FB_IMG_1740762223685.jpg
 
And yet by the time April comes and goes, they'll have learned nothing and they'll all be back to those companies they claim to despise.

All because there's almost no other alternative.

Whereas the Bud Light boycott, there's a reason that actually went well and is still used as an example and a meme ("we'll Bud Light you next"). Because we all knew we could just switch to a different beer since there's so many different ones in the marketplace.
Which also shows the need to Theodore Roosevelt a few corporations. If a company is too big, and owns all the competition, they KNOW you don't have a choice but to buy from them. So they can get away with whatever price-fixing or globohomo schemes they desire.

The beer market is saturated enough that this was avoided, and resulted in a major loss for Anheuser-Busch.

Granted, I ain't some "own the means of production" commie, but most economists worth listening to, (Including Adam Smith) have warned how oligopolies and market consolidation is bad for not only consumers, but national economies as well.
 
There was however a point in your development in the womb where you could have gone either way with being male or female, and in some cases intersex
Intersex conditions have almost nothing to do with troonery. The mental illnesses and fetishes that produce trans people are very, very obviously separate issues, and the trans movement uses rare genetic mutations as a cope and/or shield to claim wanting to hack one's tits off is totally different from wanting to cut your arms off.

The medical community needs to expel the trans activists from the APA and properly classify these disorders as separate instead of squashing a series of clearly different issues into "trans".
 
There was probably never any possibility you'd turn into Napoleon. That would have been a mix of (partly probably genetic) temperament, the environment you grew up in, and the conditions facilitating a Great Man to have that distinction.

There was however a point in your development in the womb where you could have gone either way with being male or female, and in some cases intersex. I'm just explaining why biologists and doctors don't agree with you since this seems to be causing years worth of clearly anxiety-inducing confusion for some people.
Excuse me, I am Napoleon in all aspects. I shouldn't have to be medically transition, learn French, or prove myself militarily to be recognized as Napoleon and granted sovereignty over Elba any more than a Trans-Woman should need to prove that she's experiencing a girl-day when she goes and hangs ladydong in the women's lockerroom. My claim to being Napoleon is just as heckin' valid as any trans-woman's claim if not more so.
Seriously i am some extremely distance relative of Napoleon, the common ancestor was Napoleon's grandfather

Your post has been reported to bigotry and I'm doxxing you on bluesky right now. Enjoy being a pariah forever, bigot.

Lefties are losing their minds over Zelensky getting told off today and getting sent home without our tax money.
I am so mad over Zelensky going full-throttle into Typical Slav Behavior.

Also it wasn't charges against Joe Biden, it was Joe Biden's son, the one he pardoned despite him being totally innocent. The one who escaped any consequences when, as Biden bragged in public, Daddy who was the VP got the prosecutor fired.
The one Biden gave a blanket pardon for all crimes committed. You know, as you often do with completely innocent people. (and before lefties start: No one is saying the J6 tards were innocent. Just the charges & sentences laid on them were complete bullshit)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Flexo and Coldgrip
Lefties are losing their minds over Zelensky getting told off today and getting sent home without our tax money.
You really think they invited all the cameras in for a fight for real? It's like Trump doing his old WWE before fight scene. I'm surprised they just didn't go full Vince Mcmahon to cover up how embarrassing the Epstein "reveal " looked earlier.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Ghostse
There's fact that a tiny number of them detransition, and if they do it's because of social pressure.
So being a tranny is biological, but de-transitioning is because of social pressure? That doesn't make any sense. If social pressure can stop you from being a tranny, it wasn't real condition in the first place. Society can just de-transition all of them.
 
gibbonstrong said:
Imagine you grew up in a universe where your parents dressed you as the opposite gender. All your toys and entertainment were geared for the opposite gender, wider society outside your family also expected you to live as a (presumably) a girl, for your behavior and sexuality to be feminine as well. Would you have felt comfortable with this? Now what if you wanted to change and nobody around you accepted it?
You're essentially saying gender is a social construct, so if that is the case, society can decide to de-transition people. Its not biological then.
 
Imagine you grew up in a universe where your parents dressed you as the opposite gender. All your toys and entertainment were geared for the opposite gender, wider society outside your family also expected you to live as a (presumably) a girl, for your behavior and sexuality to be feminine as well. Would you have felt comfortable with this? Now what if you wanted to change and nobody around you accepted it?
There's XX female and XY male. Anything else is insanity. You're just a groomer.
 
Back