- Joined
- Jan 14, 2023
Yeah sandniggers have the lowest recruitment numbers. They truly do not give a fuck about the country they live in. Anywhere.With what? With who? Abdul isn't fighting for the EU lmao
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah sandniggers have the lowest recruitment numbers. They truly do not give a fuck about the country they live in. Anywhere.With what? With who? Abdul isn't fighting for the EU lmao
Not even would Abdul laugh right in their Globohomo faces, if they’d suggest he’d fight for “our democracy”, Europe also lacks the industrial capacity to militarize.With what? With who? Abdul isn't fighting for the EU lmao
The problem is that they feel no loyalty to those so-called leaders, and EU leaders are so weak that the Arabs would immediately, and successfully, stage a coup.So this is the thing actually, having an armed force made of primarily Arab immigrants actually would be a smart move if the eu’s goal is to oppress the native European population. Putting refugees in power means they would have complete loyalty I would assume and would follow the globohomo elites in lockstep.
Ouch. Someone got scared he is going to end up holding the bag and pay for the war in Euros as well as manpower, neither of which he has.
As it should. Other nations' wars and welfare shouldn't ride on the backs of any taxpayers other than their own.After the UK Z visit. Rachel Reeves is now going to give UK Russian frozen assets to Ukraine. Guess they know the US piggy bank is going bye. https://archive.ph/MDEE6
If they use the money, eurofags will have no more leverage and it would essentially equate total war minus America.As it should. Other nations' wars and welfare shouldn't ride on the backs of any taxpayers other than their own.
Or just Rutte being indecisive. Didn't he spend like 2 years in the Netherlands failing to form a government?I can't tell if this is NATO panicking or finally coming to their senses. Maybe both, probably not.
Not workable. The Eurocracy is vehemently opposed to Trump, not just his political positions, but the fact of him as the avatar of the Great Unwashed that they see it as their duty to manage, not represent.The only way to truly end the war without the express permission of Kiev would have been to sever the connection with the European enablers. If God Emperor Trump knew what he was doing, he could have orchestrated a deafening rejection of Zelensky's stance, and sent a clear signal that the war itself is over, not just American involvement in it.
So this is the thing actually, having an armed force made of primarily Arab immigrants actually would be a smart move if the eu’s goal is to oppress the native European population. Putting refugees in power means they would have complete loyalty I would assume and would follow the globohomo elites in lockstep.
I will say that US completely pulling support gives the eu an excuse to completely militarize, and for the poor fuckers living in Europe, have fun with that. Now any chance of creating any sort of conservative government in Europe will be impossible because they would now have the teeth to crack down on it. So have fun being arrested for tweets and having your women raped by Abdul Muhammad from Syria.
I think russia does not care at this stage. they already working on a worst case scenario. they have been cheated and lied to for decades and now they are going their way.I'm going to swim against the tide here: this is not the outcome that Moscow actually wanted.
Give me all the stickers that you want, but the way I see it, Russia wanted one of two things from the American/Ukrainian process. First, they wanted a Ukrainian counterpart that would could be induced by the DC to sign an armistice similar to that put forward in Istanbul, albeit much more punitive. Preferably, that would also include a Europe that was also willing to suspend hostilities and come to some form of modus vivendi with the Russian Federation.
snip
You are wrong he said the opposite but Mark Rutte is a typical bureaucrat that towes the 'middle' line in terms of politics, if the left gets popular he will be a faggot, if the right gets popular he will be a freedom loving businessman.Didn't he up until days ago go on and on about how no one needs the US and the future of NATO is Europe? Now is your chance. Go for it.
This was always the case, nothing new here. "Europe" (the EU) and the UK want to egg it on while avoiding getting dirty themselves. Before yesterday they were still talking big and tough about how there must be security guarantees with the US.but Europe appears to be rallying around the Ukrainian project, having chosen to express its newfound independence from DC by prolonging this conflict forever and a day.
nato can't fight a war without us. all this backstop talk will translate to the US being the tip of the spear when some europoor fucks around and a kills some russian continuing the conflict.I can't tell if this is NATO panicking or finally coming to their senses. Maybe both, probably not.
Your logic might be sound, if not for the "Arab" part. Arab armies never work long term. They need strong top down command and control to micromanage them and commanders at the local level to beat them with sticks to get anything done. With out that they fall apart.So this is the thing actually, having an armed force made of primarily Arab immigrants actually would be a smart move if the eu’s goal is to oppress the native European population.
Agreed.With out that they fall apart.
Oh noes. YouTube and BigMac's Battlelog are upset with my comments ;-;
View attachment 7042991