Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
IMG_9244.jpeg
Okay here we go
IMG_9245.jpeg
Man attracted to woman, but in a lesbian way, news at 11.
IMG_9246.jpeg
Don’t worry bro, the troons have long decided that you don’t need to be trans to be trans these days. You got here just in time.
IMG_9247.jpeg
Aaaaand there is is. IMG_9248.jpeg
Bonus: WOW OOF BIG YIKES WHO DOWNVOOTS ME IMMEDIATELY HOW DARE
 
Get a load of this retard
View attachment 7044127
dear cis people. please learn the phrase "assigned sex"

biological sex is not an immutable trait, it is something that is assigned at birth, and more arbitrary than you realize.

You can change your sex, many people do

As an aside, your sex is no more legitimate than trans people's sex. As many of you "cis" people out there don't even realize that you're actually intersex. A TON of people are intersex.

biological sex is not a trait, but a constellation of traits that all vary & aren't always on the same side

*my hot take is also that trans people, in the most technical sense, should be considered under the intersex umbrella because subconscious sex is very much a biological trait (but like any brain trait, there is a social component, but like.. ADHD is still biological for example, just sayin)
(a)
View attachment 7044126
(a)
Biological sex isn't immutable, but them being born trans and how it's "in their nature" to be fucked in the ass and "bred" is.

I'd like to ask this Troon that if biological sex isn't immutable, how can we tell which embryos are male or female in IVF? Sex is assigned at birth, right? Well who assigned a sex to an embryo?
 
I'd like to ask this Troon that if biological sex isn't immutable, how can we tell which embryos are male or female in IVF? Sex is assigned at birth, right? Well who assigned a sex to an embryo?
It always boggles me that people who claim that biological sex doesn't exist, want to identify themselves by the very same very thing.
If there's no male or female at birth, there is no territory to claim "yours" and at this point it just becomes assigning random names to grains of rice.
If such truth exists, people could only be assigned a "3 hole person" or "2 hole person".
 
It always boggles me that people who claim that biological sex doesn't exist, want to identify themselves by the very same very thing.
If there's no male or female at birth, there is no territory to claim "yours" and at this point it just becomes assigning random names to grains of rice.
If such truth exists, people could only be assigned a "3 hole person" or "2 hole person".

It's the old predicament "If the word woman has no meaning, then why do you want to be one?"
 
Sex isn't "assigned" you stupid bastards its observed.
They play language games like this as a way to get you to cede part of the argument to them before you even begin, thats why I reject John Moneys entire philosophy of Gender and the language developed around it.
Sophistry and language games don't change the fact that homo sapiens like the majority of animals cannot change sex. Nobdy is "assigned" anything at birth, a babies sex is observed and identified by clearly recognised features.
Intersex and similar disorders are exactly that, disorders of devolpment, where something has gone wrong, and they are a tiny fraction of the population.
They aren't Trannies and have nothing to do with Trannies and its disgusting and despicable the way Gendershit weirdos try to use them as a shield.
Its a legitimate medical condition that is the result of a mutation, nothing to do with cross dressing because of a fetish or a delusion.
 
Last edited:
So binary sexes are "assigned" but intersex is an objective fact?

"They define sex in a nonsensical way solely to ensure it is not mutable."

These nutters seem to think Biologists deliberately define sex to be immutable just to spite them. My dear hon, I'm pleased to inform you that this is absolutely not the case. As your favorite canard goes, some biological organisms can indeed change sex. Perhaps the solution to the impasse is that you acknowledge that your supposed humanity is just an arbitrary "assigned species", and that you from now on identify as a species that can switch between sexes, such as baking yeast.
 
Last edited:
Get a load of this retard
View attachment 7044127
dear cis people. please learn the phrase "assigned sex"

biological sex is not an immutable trait, it is something that is assigned at birth, and more arbitrary than you realize.

You can change your sex, many people do

As an aside, your sex is no more legitimate than trans people's sex. As many of you "cis" people out there don't even realize that you're actually intersex. A TON of people are intersex.

biological sex is not a trait, but a constellation of traits that all vary & aren't always on the same side

*my hot take is also that trans people, in the most technical sense, should be considered under the intersex umbrella because subconscious sex is very much a biological trait (but like any brain trait, there is a social component, but like.. ADHD is still biological for example, just sayin)
(a)
View attachment 7044126
(a)
"Bennie.gay"
Bengay.
:story:
Just another confused homosexual man.
 
One may argue trannies are the rapiest of apes: over on r/FTMover30, the "hooking up while stealth" debate fires back up, and - horrifically - OP states she considers consent to be "an undue burden"; likewise, the comments are full of genuinely repugnant women justifying their antisocial tendencies. Remember this when people try to paint pooners as being innocent victims compared to the sexually aggressive MTFs, because they are all, at the end of the day, violators at heart.
Link | Archive

Hooking Up While Stealth And Consent

I saw a post about someone wanting to hook up while stealth post phallo.
I didn’t want to start a debate on their post because they were looking for advice.
I saw a few people saying if you are not open about being trans, then the person can’t consent. I don’t know how I feel about that.
I don’t know how practical it would be to hook up stealth post phallo, since the clit might be buried underneath, you’d have to discreetly pump up, etc.
But is it unethical and violates consent? How so? Is it because somebody might not want to have sex with someone with a trans identity?
If I had a racial preference, the burden would be on me to ensure the people I hook up with are “ethnically pure” instead of assuming and getting mad when they have a different heritage than I assumed.

Is it about needing to know what kind of genitals you will be working with and having boundaries about that? I do understand that and have a genital preference myself. But if the person is just gonna get fucked and do nothing else with the dick then there’s not much difference?
Ok as I typed that I am back to thinking it’s just extremely impractical. If I am going to put a dick in me, I get a really good look at the whole package first with the lights on, ensure condom is on, etc.
I’m just not sure how I feel about saying having sex without disclosing you’re trans violates consent. Consent is really important to me but it also feels like undue burden.
[–]epieee
Someone who would like you, including your body and having sex with you, but would change their mind just based on knowing you are trans, is a transphobe. It's not your job as a trans person to protect people who are bigoted against you.
In an encounter with a presumed cis person, they have more power than you do. The more powerful person always has the greater responsibility for managing that power dynamic. Obviously if you're stealth the other person won't know that, but you will. Don't volunteer to take on responsibility and risk that isn't yours.

Every hookup with someone you turn out not to like is not a consent violation. Sometimes people hook up who turn out to have radically, deal breakingly different values when they get to know each other. Unlike being trans, those personal values are chosen. It doesn't mean they tricked each other when they then chose not to talk about that before having sex.
IMO the reason to share this with partners is for your comfort and safety. It's so you don't get into a hurtful or even dangerous situation with someone who is not good enough for you. When that is necessary or desirable is a personal choice, but you absolutely do not owe this type of personal information to partners.
Especially when you're stealth and disclosing to the wrong person could have bigger implications for your privacy and your life. The idea that you have to disclose is a transphobic lie based on the idea that there is something negative or dirty about transness that cis people can have a legitimate objection to. That isn't true and it's none of their business unless you want it to be.

[–]LocutusOfBorgia909
I think a lot of these responses feel kind of... I won't say hetero-coded, but monogamous or operating under an assumption that it's a one-on-one situation or a situation where both parties are having full discussions about one another before engaging in sex? And particularly in gay circles, there's a lot of sex going on that is not happening in contexts like that. If you go into a dark room, and you're post-phallo, and you hook up with someone in that dark room (or bathhouse, or sauna, or other anonymous, cruising environment), it's extremely likely that your gender history would never come up. There's a high probability that few or no actual words would be exchanged leading up to having sex. Consent is based largely or entirely on nonverbal cues.
In an environment like that, I don't think there's any moral issue with choosing not to disclose.
You're having anonymous, casual sex. So is everyone else there. There is no expectation of having anyone's full gender or sexual history in that environment, and if you choose to participate, you're consenting to those ground rules. If you're dating someone or having a one-on-one hookup where you've been talking beforehand? Yeah, in those situations, it's probably best to disclose. But I can think of a lot of situations that are not that in which I wouldn't expect someone post-phallo to announce their trans status any more than I would start grilling some guy in a dark room about his relationship status. It's just not that kind of environment.

[–]slutty_muppet
The concept of "consent" has gotten so incredibly warped in modern discourse. If someone needs to know details of your medical history in order to consent to sex with you then it's on them to ask.

[–]GerudoSamsara
Aint nothing worse than when bigots learn therapy speak. They frame it as a "consent" issue because they know kind-minded folks are gonna get frazzled and get stuck on the defense. Even if theyre just misguided, theyre still reinforcing transphobic behavior by forcing it to be a consent issue because theyre unilaterally deciding your gender (and the gender of all trans persons) to be a sexual act that can be nonconsensual performed on another person.

[–]Autopsyyturvy
Yeah it shows that someone doesn't see trans people who are men or women as being "real" men or women. Personally I'm open about it from the getgo, because I don't want to waste my time and put myself in danger getting close to someone transphobic
But I don't begrudge trans people who are stealth and just don't see being trans as a huge relevent part of their lives that needs to be shared with every Tom dick and Harry at the glory hole
What DID upset me was a dude on this sub referring to sleeping with people while stealth as "stealthing" because stealthing is literally rape by deception - it's taking off a condom when your partner didn't consent to that....
and using the same terminology for being trans and stealth while hooking up has some pretty awful connotations and is literally terf rhetoric about how trans people are going round coercing people into sleeping with us and the tone it was written in seemed to play into that or be oblivious to what "stealthing" actually refers to in wider culture
Some people were never cut out for the debate team in high school and it shows: a MTF asks how to refute common arguments against transgender ideology, and the comments are full of a resounding bunch of... nothing.
Link | Archive

Defending your existence: What are some common arguments transphobes use and how do you refute them?

Hello,
So I want to start off saying that for the sake of my mental health I dont often go into transphobic places, online and in person.
But recently I had a discussion with a former aquiantance (to whom Im not out) about the ethics of being trans. Long story short, he believes trans people are just confused people that transition to cope with other issues.
So for the next time I happen to be in such a discussion I want to be more prepares, so Ive been wondering, what are some common arguments transohobes use and how would you refute them?
[–]h-bot11000
You would have to ask them why they believe that. You can't refute a non-existent argument. A good thing to note would probably be that a lot of trans kids suffered horribly at the behest of them being forced to conform to the wrong gender identity and go through the wrong puberty. This then leads to a plethora of mental issues and not the other way around.

[–]SageWoodward
I just feel like nobody is owed an explanation. If the scenario is this: I disagree with you being trans/i think it’s wrong. Prove me wrong. Then just say no. Part ways. Hang up the phone. Close the chat. Whatever you have to do. The only point of debating who you are with another person is to try to see if they’ll validate you, but you’re already valid. It’s a waste of your energy.

[–]Unethical2564
I prefer not to engage. However, when I do, my favorite go-to is something I borrowed from the counter-apologetics sphere. In that realm, a common tactic of the religiosos is the argument from intelligent design. They love to say, "Look at the human eye. It's so perfect that it had to be designed that way?" The retort is "Then why are you wearing glasses?"
I've heard this same argument used by transphobes, slightly tweaked. "You can't change what god created!" Again, the retort is "Then why are you wearing glasses."
In both cases, it's trite and flippant, which is one of the things I like about it. You're never going to change their minds but these little quick hitters are the kind of things that can plant a seed. Sure you're planting in concrete but every once in a while, it will take root.

[–]SlowResult3047
Trying to reason with transphobes is like trying to reason with a rabid animal. You can’t do it and any attempts to is just going to run make it more deranged than it was before. It’s not worth the energy. People already know the truth about us, they’re simply just choosing to be on the wrong side of history

[–]LockNo2943
Don't waste your time arguing with them, they're not going to change their mind.

[–]GOATmar_infante
"I know I am but what are you"

[–]Jillians
You don't need to refute them. I highly recommend ignoring them because they aren't actually there to understand. If you want to push their buttons though, just make them explain themselves. Refute nothing. Don't offer counter arguments, just tell them you disagree. Don't explain or offer them anything, because they can simply deny it. The moment you try to give them reasonable information, it will be used as proof that you are wrong, like they can just call you a liar or your sources are not trustworthy.
Usually what someone wants from you with these kinds of debates is to feel superior and waste your time. They want you to give them attention, and make you waste your efforts for the power trip. If you really don't care, it sucks the wind out of them. Put them in the position of needing to convince you, not the other way around. That takes away their power.
A TiF acts as if fucking around with her doctor's medical knowledge of male versus female bodies is somehow a mic drop moment instead of embarrassing on her part. This is why we should relabel transgender care as cosmetic, because it is always a cosmetic procedure to induce hormonal imbalances in them for the desired visual outcome - it's not nearly medically necessary the way it is for normal people. Nice try, though.
Link | Archive

Cure for "Trans Broken Arm Syndrome": or, what to do if a medical professional blames T in an unrealistic/spurious way.

The advice I'm about to give has worked for me many times. I'm giving it a new thread instead of posting in the "Trans broken arm syndrome" thread so more people will see it.
It is a form of Socratic questioning: you respond to the situation by asking a question that gets the doctor or nurse to think.
Here it is:
If a doctor tells you to stop taking testosterone for a normal ailment, ask:
"Would you normally recommend T blockers or castration to a male patient for this problem? That seems kind of unusual/extreme."

It won't always work against determined bigots or total quacks, but helps a lot with doctors who are merely clueless/ignorant about trans issues. Something clicks over and suddenly their frame of reference changes. Many providers back down instantly and look embarrassed.
(Also, please note that due to misogyny, many care providers have unquestioned beliefs about male superiority. In this case, that dynamic can help your case for getting medical care. Unfortunately, the transfem version of this easy question - "Would you normally recommend inducing menopause?" - is not quite as socially powerful for our sisters, but is still worth trying.)
Lastly, a tranny novelist is peddling his wares on Reddit. Any curious and bookish Kiwis want to give this piece a read-along? It's available for free on ScribbleHub.
Link | Archive

I'm a late-blooming trans-woman and wrote and self-published my first novel: A biting satire of media exploitation and gender politics called "We Interrupt This Transition." Looking for readers to build WoM.

Howdy. So - this might be a little spammy - and I think it's just slightly on the "good side" of "no advertisements."
I'm a trans woman who just self-published her first novel on Itch.io (digital). The first edition of the book is free on Scribblehub - I published it serially and it was with the help of the Scribblehub community that I was able to get it completed, and it really did make it a better book overall to write that way, so -- first edition? Free. Always.
But I do think the 2nd edition is better, and good enough to pay money for.
So, first of all, I'm fucking proud of being able to write an actual full novel. I used to think that I couldn't write fiction because I couldn't write relatable characters -- as it turns out, the only character I had trouble relating to is myself, and now that I know who I am, I'm surprised that I was able to create these characters and give them full fleshed out personalities, goals, ambitions. If my egg had never cracked, I never would have been able to write it.
It's a comedy and satire, first and foremost. (My dream is for someone to review this book and say something like: "This is what you would get if Douglas Adams wrote queer lit.")
It's a trans-lit book, for sure, but it's based in contemporary realism. No magical girls, potions that trans your gender. Just... people being people, caught up in a whirlwind of events that they just try to do their best in.
As one person puts it, I rapidly switch from 'hilarious-to-heartwrenching' on a dime.
But right now what I'm trying to do is do the self-marketing. Which, is... well, tough. So I'm trying to find people who are willing to actually read the book. And if they read the book, if they like it, to tell people about it and to spread the word of mouth. It's... actually some advice I got from a youtuber who markets books. And I think the people here on /r/trans would be kinda the audience I need to try to reach? And their friends, and word of mouth...
Anyway, here's the thing. I'm not going to link anything here (that would be too 'spammy', I think) but I'll post the blurb below. If you're interested in reading it, send me a message with your email or a DM here on Reddit. I'll give you a free digital copy in PDF or EPUB but you have to promise you'll at least read the first five chapters. Honor system.
Thanks. I'm just really proud of it, and I think we could all use some trans joy right now.

A reality show so exploitative, it was never supposed to happen.
British showrunner Sam Culver and semi-retired game show host Jimmy Howard pitch their latest project to the Garden Alpha streaming service. To make their real proposal look good, they throw in a deliberately outrageous idea: Woman Up!, a reality show where cisgender men compete to transition for a million-dollar prize.
They never expected executive Daria Bryant to say yes.
Now, Sam and Jimmy are stuck producing the most controversial reality show of the decade—dodging scandals, wrangling contestants, and desperately trying to keep their careers intact.
We Interrupt This Transition is a sharp-witted queer comedy that skewers the absurdity of reality TV, media exploitation, and gender politics. It's a book for trans readers who love to laugh—and for anyone who enjoys biting satire.
This Second Edition features refined prose, sharper jokes, and footnotes that unravel queer culture, pop culture deep cuts, and explains that IKEA plushie reference.
 
Economics professor at CUNY:
Cuny.jpg
Link
(a)
Cherrypick the most supported question on trans "rights" so dudes can creep in women's bathrooms and beat up women in sports. His students should get their tuition refunded.

And the BBC promoting sissy camming. Don't know how recent it is but it's outrageous.
Bbc.png


Archive
 
Cherrypick the most supported question on trans "rights" so dudes can creep in women's bathrooms and beat up women in sports. His students should get their tuition refunded.
I'm guessing this is the new Pew Research poll, and there's a reason this lying coward didn't link the full results.

1000008144.jpg


That's an interesting definition of being "unequivocally pro trans," but if Dems wanna keep losing winnable elections then go right ahead.
 
It always boggles me that people who claim that biological sex doesn't exist, want to identify themselves by the very same very thing.
If there's no male or female at birth, there is no territory to claim "yours" and at this point it just becomes assigning random names to grains of rice.
If such truth exists, people could only be assigned a "3 hole person" or "2 hole person".
Don't worry the trannies have a way to identify who is a man or a woman. According to these lunatics, if you took a woman from a different point in time and place her into any country at another point in time, no one would know that its a woman. Also, source to where butch women are assaulted for not being "womenly" enough?
6c45ae8a-7092-581a-ace4-41fcedea1a1c.png
 
Well that's just absolutely insane. Now we are at the level that makeup and wear determines what sex you are. With these lunatics it is actually possible they are thinking like that.
Of course they’re thinking that. It’s the entire tranny schtick, always has been. All the bullshit pseudoscientific stuff was just to try to cover their (flat male) arses.
 
Any curious and bookish Kiwis want to give this piece a read-along?
My review, spoilered for convenience, space-saving, and eventual jumpscare.
It’s poorly written, self-indulgent, preachy drivel. It’s genuinely not even good enough to read just to laugh at. Our author promises a witty satire, which amounts to “guys, greedy companies and da orange man bad!!!”. Brave and controversial, I know.

The entire thing is just dialogue; no introspection, no set dressing. It’s written like fanfiction.

”Blah blah blah blah blah blah.” Said Faggot 1. “Blah bloo bloo blah.” said Faggot 2, eating xir pizza. “Blah blah” replied Faggot 1. “Blah Bla-“

Ad infinitum, ad nauseum. It’s like being at work, stuck between two coworkers involving you in inane conversation about their kid’s sportsball game and what they’re having for dinner. It’s agonisingly boring.

When it’s not that, it’s the author‘s self insert character (who passes perfectly btw) soapboxing about tranny rights and gender in giant walls of text.
There is no attempt to distinguish characters, they all speak with the exact same speech patterns, nothing makes them unique, and it’s all dialogue, so have fun trying to tell anyone apart.

I have a particular bone to pick with the fact the tranny author lived in the UK for two years, and therefore feels qualified to make one of his characters English. Shockingly, he fails miserably, with constant cringey inaccuracies.

It’s incredibly poorly written, the plot is awful, it’s painfully boring and tumblr-humour quirky. I’d rather shit in my hands and clap than read another word.

EC316A8B-03F7-4C52-A820-489C0F7E8068.jpeg


Here is an excerpt from near the end, the true dramatic peak of the “””””””book””””””. Riveting, biting satire here guys. Trannies in the comments of each chapter are glazing it hard, proving their cult’s subzero IQ and window-licking tendencies.

To be fair, the dude looks like he shoves crayons up his nose for the craic, no shock it reads like utter horseshit.
A3C887BA-2C3E-4FD1-A821-1D14A8BB51F2.jpeg

0/10
 
Last edited:
It's poorly written, self-indulgent, preachy drivel. It’s genuinely not even good enough to read just to laugh at. Our author promises a witty satire, which amounts to “guys, greedy companies and da orange man bad!!!”. Brave and controversial, I know.

The entire thing is just dialogue; no introspection, no set dressing. It’s written like fanfiction.

”Blah blah blah blah blah blah.” Said Faggot 1. “Blah bloo bloo blah.” said Faggot 2, eating xir pizza. “Blah blah” replied Faggot 1. “Blah Bla-“

Ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
Pat Tomlinsons new Tiny Tim book is out already?
 
Back