- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
So the Defendants must be sanctioned for violating Russ's Opinion?
That's a whole new level.of narcissistic crazy.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
That's a whole new level.of narcissistic crazy.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
You realize you can copy paste the thread link into a private window and find out?
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Of course. He's now determined to erase his Sanctions debt by getting Hardin Sanctioned. This is classic Russ. "Nuh uh! He did it too!!!"
What would a motion to request the court "please wrangle this autistic retard" fall under?
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2025
If he's not reading the SPO he himself asked for, he's not reading the judge's explanation that Hardin didn't violate it. He probably only skims these documents or only reads the conclusions.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
It does make me wonder just how many users visit this thread from Las Vegas, Nevada.
Just y'know, as a thought.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
That's because he already addressed the accusations of lying about witnesses, so he assumes it's moot and he doesn't need to respond again.
Sure, but he's spiraling now. This document is even more unhinged than usual for him. He's probably actually going to do it. Most likely this week, to give the judge a chance to sanction Hardin for a thousand dollars so he won't have to pay his own sanction.
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
If Null blocked every visitor from Las Vegas with an iPhone user-agent, I bet Russ wouldn't get help from this thread any more.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
It's highly likely that when Greer signed up he used an easily traceable email address. Null probably knows his account. But he also knows not to divulge that he knows Greer's account.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2022
"Yeah, don't worry about my eager, yet dead witness. Sanction the shit out of me for that, but Hardin definitely violated the SPO based on my OPINION of the FACTS I continue to refuse to read because my pro se time is precious."
Rather than slapping on more insurmountable debt, could the court withdraw his access to ECF and force him to seethe ineffectually through the postal service like Stabby? That would be extremely fucking funny.
Rather than slapping on more insurmountable debt, could the court withdraw his access to ECF and force him to seethe ineffectually through the postal service like Stabby? That would be extremely fucking funny.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
>Make assumption about how things work instead of just reading it
>Insist it works the way you think it does, even after being told it doesn't
>I shouldn't be punished for asserting facts based on this faulty assumption, even though I've been told I'm wrong
Top tier legal argument there.
>Insist it works the way you think it does, even after being told it doesn't
>I shouldn't be punished for asserting facts based on this faulty assumption, even though I've been told I'm wrong
Top tier legal argument there.
I mean Russ has literally said that's what he thinks. This email was included by Mr Hardin as an exhibit to ECF 196:
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
He has no access to ECF, but he was granted access to email his filings to the clerk
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2022
Oh, doy.
I meant his means of instantly firing off these fillings freely and electronically, so that.
There need to be more cruel and unusual punishments for being a burdensome retard on purpose.
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
When this is all over, I want Josh to interview Hardin on a special MATI episode, and I want to hear how he reacted to this specific email.
waffle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
If the discovery death-march makes it that far I predict some really funny stuff comes out about that. I suspect Russ has done provable things on the computer/forum that are too late to hide and would be detrimental to his case.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
This is insanity
Now Russ'tard is going to try to sanction Hardin? For what? Defending his clients interests? For Farmers reading the court case documents?
This case is a massive joke without a punchline
Now Russ'tard is going to try to sanction Hardin? For what? Defending his clients interests? For Farmers reading the court case documents?
This case is a massive joke without a punchline
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
I like the way he himself explains why his assertion is wrong. Masterful paralegal skills, very special.
That's odd. On Linkedin, he lists processing his own legal bullshit as a full time job.
Though, going by the "opinion" thing, he hasn't read doc 234, either.
That's odd. On Linkedin, he lists processing his own legal bullshit as a full time job.
It's quite an admission, considering the SPO is so easy to find, half the people in this thread have read it.
Though, going by the "opinion" thing, he hasn't read doc 234, either.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
There's basically no advantage to actually getting diagnosed (before you're in criminal court) unless you're angling for tardbux or tardwranglers in school. People know this and there's a lot of jockeying around to get diagnosed (if needed) with something "minor" that doesn't trigger other shit later, but still gets you special classes. So not being a diagnosed mental retard doesn't mean you're not actually retarded.
Facts can be decided in at least three ways I know of:
- Both parties agree to it in discovery. E.g., if plaintiff says X was posted, and defendant agrees but 230 allowed it, then X was posted is a fact the Jury isn't supposed to disregard or investigate themselves. (This can result in fun.)
- Judge lays something out as fact. This is usually for interpretation of the law. Plaintiff may say that because X, you must Y, so if not Y it can't be X. Judge can say that's bullshit, if it's a legal interpretation. They will do this in Jury instruction.
- Jury decides disputed facts, and (dirty secret) since they can't be punished, they can override the above.
This is exactly it. He things he got a win that means his win is inevitable, so just settle already!
He brought it up as a "don't you sanction me, I'll sanction you" - he STILL doesn't realized that the sanction he received was FROM THE COURT and actually never really involved Hardin at all (because the one thing they asked for, a list of costs, was explicitly ignored).
I really hope the bailiff is ordered to whack his peepee for this SPO sperging continuing at this late date. But for him to tease a motion for sanctions, my goodness, I can't stand it!
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
You say that, but Trump's Congress is starting to write up articles of impeachment against some judges.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
For a long time, I thought the highlight of the pre-trial proceedings in this case would be the deposition of Russtard.
But after watching too much MATI and thinking about it, I think the highlight will be Russtard trying to depose Dear Feeder. For all his seething hatred, Dear Feeder always has a calm demeanor and doesn't rise to the bait. Russtard will get absolutely nothing from him but calm and focused hatred and that will drive him completely nuts.
But after watching too much MATI and thinking about it, I think the highlight will be Russtard trying to depose Dear Feeder. For all his seething hatred, Dear Feeder always has a calm demeanor and doesn't rise to the bait. Russtard will get absolutely nothing from him but calm and focused hatred and that will drive him completely nuts.
koos koets
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 25, 2016
The Judge when ordering monetary sanctions argued those would make up for the time/money wasted so no other sanctions where needed. His boss changed that to just pay an arbitrary amount as punishment. I have the feeling the Judge is waiting to see if the drooler is going to pay up next week, for he has a whole list of new sanctions to order but if money does not work he might decide other sanctions.