US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's the thing: Trump isn't immune to criticism. It's just that people tend to be emotional, relies on hypotheticals, way too angry, and dehumanizes their opponents in order to score a gotcha.
Yeah he fell for Kamala's bait really hard during a debate where she mocked the size of his rallies. Only win she scored the entire night.
 
I am not saying I am a huge Vance fan, but I feel like Maga people unfairly criticize him to avoid critiquing Trump and he is being set up as the fall guy if Trump's presidency gets worst (as in the economy crashes or a major war starts).
I would say it's the other way around. Believe President Trump, with nothing to lose, would take the hits/fall, protecting Vice-President Vance as he learns the job and prepares for 28. Suggest Vice-President Vance knows this, which gives him room to learn and make his mistakes now instead of when he is the occupant of the Oval Office. Believe the two of them worked it out early on during the campaign.
 
Can this fat orange fuck please just sit on his ass and play golf for the next four years. Don't even go in the white house. I'm so tired of the news cycle and reading about what stupid shit he's said or done this time.
Are you seriously the type of NPC who gets stressed out when your slop news media churner talks about thing you don't like or did you just want to seethe about Drumpf without seeming too partisan about it? Either way the solution is simple, kill yourself.
 
It's not Trump's fault that the media has terminal TDS. They would just report Trump played golf everyday for the next 4 years because anything Trump does gets them clicks.
If he hid in the basement for four years, that would just mean more Biden. It’s damned if we do and damned if we don’t, so fuck them.
 
Can this fat orange fuck please just sit on his ass and play golf for the next four years. Don't even go in the white house. I'm so tired of the news cycle and reading about what stupid shit he's said or done this time.
There's an easy fix for that. Do a 360 and walk away from your computer screen every once in a while.
 
Resistance shouldn’t feel this futile
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Monica Hesse
2025-03-05 21:32:38GMT

Please tell me that Democratic lawmakers have a plan up their pink sleeves.

Democratic Response to Trump Shows a Party Divided on How to Resist Him
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Annie Karni
2025-03-05 21:45:02GMT
More:

In Trump’s America, trolling is governance
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Shadi Hamid
2025-03-05 15:33:00GMT

The president’s address to Congress wasn’t about policy. It was about power.
President Donald Trump has been in power only six weeks, but it might as well have been six years. Through his flurry of decrees and provocations, Trump has compressed time, bringing to mind the Russian dictator Vladimir Lenin’s adage: “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.”

In his address to Congress Tuesday night, Trump tried to capture and reflect the seemingly limitless energy of his first 44 days. He boasted of “swift and unrelenting action.” But as far as such speeches go, there was little in the way of legislative priorities or practical governance. There was no talk of unity. In this sense, it was a performance as radical as it was unusual. Bulgarian political scientist Ivan Krastev has noted, I think correctly, that Trump 2.0 is not a normal administration. It’s a “revolutionary government.” Revolutions, it turns out, are dangerous. They’re also exhausting.

The near-entirety of Trump’s speech consisted of elaborate (and not-so-elaborate) attempts to troll Democrats. How did “owning the libs” become a substitute for anything resembling a legislative agenda? Presumably, it will get old eventually. But it also speaks to a genuine anger and frustration many Americans felt during the Biden era on cultural flash points such as gender identity and so-called wokeness, themes that Trump homed in on with relish. He spoke at length about the need to ban transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports, for instance.

Some of the cultural shifts promoted by liberals during “the great awokening” did indeed go too far. It shouldn’t be too controversial to say that at this point. Minorities in America tend to be more socially conservative than White liberals, and left-wing cultural commitments — particularly on gender identity — did, in fact, alienate Hispanic, Black, Asian and Arab voters (and voters more generally).

On transgender issues, Trump is mostly aligned with public opinion. According to a New York Times-Ipsos poll, 71 percent of Americans oppose prescribing hormone therapy or puberty-blocking drugs to anyone younger than age 18. Meanwhile, only 18 percent — including just 31 percent of Democrats — believe transgender female athletes should be allowed to participate in women’s sports.

But the question remains: What exactly was the point of relitigating such grievances? As the New Yorker’s Susan Glasser noted, “Not a lot of new ideas or plans in this speech. Mostly warmed over talking points, culture wars, and Biden bashing.” But I think this misunderstands the psychology of Donald Trump, who is indifferent to norms on what a speech to Congress should entail.

In this new Trumpian era, a Republican-led Congress is no longer a coequal branch of government. Instead, it has been refashioned as an enabler of Trump’s whims, resentments and obsessions. Trump’s objective is less to pass legislation — he seems to be relying primarily on executive orders, so far — and more to troll Democrats and assert his dominance over a feeble opposition party that doesn’t quite know how to play its role. This is what an “elected monarchy” looks like.

Of course, this approach is fundamentally at odds with the American constitutional system, which was designed precisely to prevent the concentration of power in a single individual. But Trump’s supporters — including his cheerleaders in Congress — don’t seem to mind. The appeal of strongman politics has always been its directness and simplicity: a leader who acts rather than deliberates, who decides rather than compromises. The messiness of democracy — with its endless negotiations and inevitable disappointments — pales in comparison with the emotional satisfaction of watching your champion vanquish his enemies, or at least, in this case, humiliate them.

The policy priorities, as always with Trump, are secondary. The dominance is the point. In this sense, Trump’s address wasn’t just a trolling exercise; it was a statement of intent. This is what American politics will look like for the foreseeable future — a series of stunts and provocations masquerading as leadership.
In just five days, Trump has set the country back nearly 100 years
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Dana Milbank
2025-03-05 04:36:00GMT

The president’s new slogan might as well be “We were better off 95 years ago than we are today.”
With a modesty we have come to expect of him, President Donald Trump informed Congress on Tuesday night that he had already ushered in “the greatest and most successful era in the history of our country.” He told the assembled lawmakers that he “accomplished more in 43 days than most administrations accomplished in four or eight years.”

Armed with a portfolio of fabricated statistics, Trump judged that “the first month of our presidency is the most successful in the history of our nation — and what makes it even more impressive is that you know who No. 2 is? George Washington.”

Republican lawmakers laughed, whooped and cheered.

Usually, such talk from Trump is just bravado. But let us give credit where it is due: Trump has made history. In fact, it’s not much of an exaggeration to say that, over the course of the last five days, he has set the United States back 100 years.

Trump on Monday implemented the largest tariff increase since 1930, abruptly reversing an era of liberalized trade that has prevailed since the end of the Second World War. He launched this trade war just three days after dealing an equally severe blow to the postwar security order that has maintained prosperity and freedom for 80 years. Trump’s ambush of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, followed by the cessation of U.S. military aid to the outgunned ally, has left allies reeling and Moscow exulting. The Kremlin’s spokesman proclaimed that Trump is “rapidly changing all foreign policy configurations” in a way that “largely aligns with our vision.”

And our erstwhile friends? “The United States launched a trade war against Canada, its closest partner and ally, their closest friend,” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Tuesday. “At the same time, they’re talking about working positively with Russia, appeasing Vladimir Putin: a lying, murderous dictator. Make that make sense.”

It only makes sense if, against all evidence, you believe, as Trump apparently does, that Americans were better off 95 years ago than they are today.

We’re apparently going to have to re-learn that lesson the hard way. The blizzard of executive orders that Trump has issued, though constitutionally alarming, can be rescinded by a future president. Elon Musk’s wanton sabotage of federal agencies and the federal workforce, though hugely damaging, can be repaired over time. But there is no easy fix for Trump’s smashing of the security and trade arrangements that have kept us safe and free for generations.

“We’re certainly not in the postwar world anymore,” Douglas Irwin, a Dartmouth College economist and fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, tells me. He calculates that Trump’s hike in tariffs is the largest since the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 accelerated the nation’s slide into the Great Depression. And Trump’s current tariffs, which in Irwin’s calculation affect imports worth about 4.8 percent of gross domestic product, will have an even greater impact on the economy than did Smoot-Hawley, which affected imports worth 1.4 percent of GDP, and the McKinley administration’s tariffs during the 1890s, which affected imports worth 2.7 percent of GDP (and which also were followed by a prolonged depression).

Irwin figures the current tariffs “are likely to be much more disruptive” than those historical cases because the U.S. economy is much more dependent now on “intermediate goods” — meaning materials such as auto parts, needed by American businesses to make finished goods. Trump has brought the average tariff on total imports to 10 percent, a level not seen since 1943, in Irwin’s analysis.

Late Tuesday, after stocks plunged for a second day, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick appeared to signal a retreat, saying the administration would “probably” announce Wednesday that it was meeting Canada and Mexico “in the middle some way.” Yet even if Trump were quickly to abandon the trade war he just launched, the effects will probably be long-lasting, because he has upended the gradual liberalization of trade that has been underway since 1932.

Trump, in imposing 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico, has violated the spirit, if not the letter, of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement he negotiated during his first term. “So, going forward, what country would ever sign a trade agreement with the United States knowing that we can find some sort of excuse that’s outside the agreement to raise the tariffs?” Irwin asks. Instead, he expects a return of the “corrupt process” that existed before the 1930s in which tariffs remain on the books and businesses try to curry favor (in this case, with Trump) to win exemptions.

Inevitably, the retaliation has already begun. Canada is imposing 25 percent tariffs on $155 billion of American goods — and the premier of Ontario, vowing to “go back twice as hard” at the United States, is slapping a 25 percent tariff on electricity going to the United States, while threatening to cut the lights off entirely. China is imposing tariffs of up to 15 percent on U.S. imports and banning some exports. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, calling Trump’s justification for the tariffs “offensive, defamatory and groundless,” has said she would announce her country’s retaliation plans this weekend.

And Trump keeps escalating. After Trudeau said on Tuesday that Trump wants “a total collapse of the Canadian economy, because that will make it easier to annex us,” Trump mocked “Governor Trudeau” on social media and vowed that “when he puts on a Retaliatory Tariff on the U.S., our Reciprocal Tariff will immediately increase by a like amount!”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed more than 1,300 points. Inflation forecasts are increasing (the free-trading Peterson Institute says Trump’s tariffs will cost the typical American household $1,200 per year). Retailers such as Target and Best Buy are warning about higher prices. The Atlanta Fed’s model of real GDP growth, which a month ago saw 2.3 percent growth in the first quarter, now sees a contraction in the first quarter of 2.8 percent. And Trump is threatening to hit more countries with more tariffs, on metals, cars, farm products and more, in the coming weeks.

During his first term, Trump tweeted that “trade wars are good, and easy to win” — but he had the good sense not to test this in a major way. Now, we all get to experience what actually happens when we launch one.

Trump’s moves to dismantle the trade architecture of the last century is all the more destabilizing because he is simultaneously moving to knock down the alliances that maintained security for most of that same period. As The Post’s Francesca Ebel reported from Moscow, Putin’s government sees Trump’s humiliation of Zelensky as a “huge gift” that furthered Russia’s ambitions of dividing the West. Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev called it a “proper slap down” of “the insolent pig” Zelensky. Hungary’s repressive leader, Viktor Orban, also celebrated: “Thank you, Mr. President!”

And while Trump blames the victim for Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, China is growing bolder in its desire to take Taiwan. Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post quoted analysts calling the Trump-Zelensky rift part of a “systemic reordering” of geopolitics in which “Beijing was positioned to capitalize on the ‘rapid disintegration of the West’ that legitimizes ‘Beijing’s vision for a post-American world order.’”

As the authoritarians celebrate, freedom’s defenders weep. Lech Walesa, the celebrated champion of Polish democracy, joined other former political prisoners in a letter to Trump expressing “horror and disgust” at the American president’s treatment of Zelensky, saying they were “terrified by the fact that the atmosphere in the Oval Office during this conversation reminded us of the one we remember well from interrogations by the Security Service and from courtrooms in communist courts.”

Democratic leaders across Europe, and across the world, spoke up in defense of Ukraine. “We must never confuse aggressor and victim in this terrible war,” wrote incoming German chancellor Friedrich Merz.

Now, these democratic leaders must contemplate rebuilding what Trump has destroyed. “Today,” European Commission Vice President Kaja Kallas wrote on the day of Trump’s betrayal of Ukraine, “it became clear that the free world needs a new leader.”

In the House chamber on Tuesday night, there was little sign of the United States that until now has led the free world.

Republicans, once the party of free trade, applauded Trump’s vows to impose tariffs — or additional tariffs — on Canada, Mexico, the European Union, China, India, Brazil and South Korea.

“We’ve been ripped off by nearly every country on Earth, and we will not let that happen any longer,” he said. As for the pain his trade policies are already causing, he said: “There’ll be a little disturbance, but we’re okay with that. It won’t be much.”

Trump spoke — repeatedly — about his election victory, about the “radical left lunatics” who prosecuted him, and about his culture-war battles against transgender Americans and against “diversity, equity and inclusion.” With taunts and nonsense claims (more than 1 million people over age 150 receiving Social Security!), he goaded the Democrats, who answered him with messages (“False,” “No Kings Live Here”) on signs and on T-shirts. When Al Green, a 77-year-old Democratic lawmaker from Texas, waved his walking cane and shouted at Trump that he had “no mandate to cut Medicaid,” Republican leaders, who allowed members of their party to shout “bulls---” at President Joe Biden from the House floor, called in the sergeant at arms to evict him.

It took nearly an hour for Trump to talk about trade. He didn’t get to Ukraine until nearly an hour and 20 minutes into his speech, and then it was to level the false claim that Ukraine had taken $350 billion from the United States, “like taking candy from a baby,” while Europe spent only $100 billion on Ukraine — dramatically overstating the U.S. contribution and understating Europe’s.
“Do you want to keep it going for another five years?” he said, looking at the Democrats. “Pocahontas says yes,” Trump added, referring contemptuously to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts).

At this, Vice President JD Vance chortled — and the Republican side, once the home of proud internationalists, responded with derision, cheers and applause.

And so collapses the architecture of freedom and prosperity: with a lie, a taunt and a guffaw.
 
Are you seriously the type of NPC who gets stressed out when your slop news media churner talks about thing you don't like or did you just want to seethe about Drumpf without seeming too partisan about it? Either way the solution is simple, kill yourself.
Brother - both of his running mates have openly talked shit about him. This man has a stand that gives everybody around him dementia so that you magically forget all the stupid retarded shit. If nixon got impeached for watergate, and clinton for getting a BJ, jan 6 has to have some sort of consequences, or else the system is busted. Which it clearly is. I would be an NPC if I just sat around while everything gets worse and acted like it's fine. Being anti-troon does not mean I'm comfortable with our country becoming an isolationist wreck that cannot support basic standards of living.
 
Back