I don't understand the eviction process in this country. You try to be generous and let family stay with you until they get back on your feet, but they end up freeloading in your residence and the law gets involved when you tell them to GTFO. So, you could verbally allow somebody to "live" with you, but if they refuse to leave, you have to legally evict them through the court system.
If your name is in the deed/lease, you should be able to verbally evict them as you've verbally allowed them to stay. Businesses are allowed to issue trespasses, but it's not the same for your own house/apartment.
The law is WAY TOO PERMISSIVE of "squatter/freeloaders" this is true. The eviction process is unnecessarily slow, this is true. In a non-lease, monthly rent situation, the default assumption is the same as a month to month lease. If I want you out on July 12, you have til Aug 31. If I want you out on July 1, you have til Aug 31. If I want you out on June 30, you have til July 31. You have the remainder of the current month (which might be a few hours or a few hours short of a full month) and the entirety of the next month. If I want to institute a hard policy that is of sufficient magnitude to constitute the equivalent of a lease adjustment, it takes effect in the same time frame. The eviction process can begin within a few days of delayed rent or an entire rent period or immediately, depending on the state. If you miss your July 1 payment, I am unsure if I am unable to start until Aug 1 or if I can start the process immediately.
The process often takes AT LEAST two months to get a court date in the BEST CASE SCENARIO, but can run as many as 10 in some nightmare cases. Because of this, most landlords START the eviction process ASAP. If the matter is resolved prior to the court date, it is resolved. Even if the eviction process is started, if it is marked as resolved by the landlord on the day he/she would get his hearing, it isn't going to be a *huge* ding against the renter, who might have just failed to hit the send button on the payment portal and resolved it the moment it was brought to his attention or it might be an attempted debt dodge. If there is literally a hiccup or two over the course of years (e.g. in 5 years of renting, I was 10 days late once and I paid the relevant late fee) it is unlikely to be a significant factor in future landlord considerations if it was not an established pattern or occurred too frequently.
The "all landlords are bastards" crowd needs to grow up, but some landlords legitimately live up to the worst of stereotypes. At the end of the day, it is on the aggrieved party to provide/gather evidence. Tenant protections exist for good reason and the landlord accepts certain obligations by virtue of taking the money. Sometimes a tenant is completely unreasonable, sometimes a landlord is completely unreasonable, I've often seen partial fault on both sides, usually starting from an initial incident causing a series of childish tit for tat shit. Whether tenant or landlord, study your lease very carefully and understand the letter of the law very carefully. Never approach the other party with hostility, start diplomatic and escalate insistence as needed.
If you're a landlord, act promptly and decisively. If you're a tenant, pay promptly. In both cases, be respectful and professional in your arrangements. It is horrible to see a nightmare tenant openly abusing their landlord because they are going to stay in their home until the sheriff removes them and they never plan to catch up on or pay their existing debt. That's fucking horrible to see no matter your situation. Alternatively, it is horrible to see landlords disregard legitimate concerns for months on end. If there is an impasse, do the relevant research and contact the relevant organization. Plenty exist to represent the interests of either party.
Sorry for this sperg fest, but I've been on all sides of these kinds of things at various times in my life. Nightmare tenants are horrible. Nightmare landlords are horrible. If you are dealing with either, bring in some outside help from the relevant agency or organization. Direct conflict only tends to escalate, even if you are 100% in the right.
Thread tax: The above rant should suffice.