US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That was the "Condoms for Gaza" thing, where the Gaza in question turned out to be another Gaza. You are mixing events up.
FALSE! Stalker, child. He said that about accidentally cancelling USAID's ebola prevention efforts.

Tweet
I am getting events mixed up but also YOUUUU are getting events mixed up, stalker CHILD. You will soon be moved to federal prison where you will be enjoying prison, stalker.

1741236532144.png
Article
Very discouraging to see them claim that mistakes should get you instantly fired. Kind of discourages people from admitting fault and taking accountability, doesn't it?

I could swear he admitted to the vampires being FALSE as well. It was in some article that I read while half asleep.
1741237475103.png
Article
Report

1741238044180.png
REEEEEEE FALSE FALSE FALSE
 
A sad sign of the times. Im convinced theres no redemption for democrats at this point. We've crossed the Rubicon for that many moons ago.
They are cartoonishly evil. Forget the past decade or so; if you proposed a bill against puppy kicking, they’d universally vote to strike it down.
 
Can someone give me the rundown on the whole "Trump's siding with Putin" rhetoric?

Is it really only because he's looking to compromise and end the Ukraine war? And maybe for calling Zelinsky a dictator that one time? (Stupid but whatever) What other evidence is there?

Because to my knowledge, sanctions on Russia are still active. Trump's not making any sort of deals or agreements with them when he could stand to gain a whole lot from doing so.

If there's something more to it, I want to know. I want a real nonpartisan assessment of the situation. But there's been too much "Boy who cried Wolf" over Trump and Russia the past decade that it's hard to get a real feel of the situation.
 
Last edited:
Every day, whether it’s in theaters, movies, or even the gossip columns, people are bombarded with negativity and nonsense, and then they’re shocked by the lack of morals and the apathy of the general public. It’s as if these low-quality films and sensationalist news could somehow teach us about the true greatness of our country, ignoring the importance of proper early education for individuals.
Cool, running parts of Mein Kampf through an AI rewriter can you get you free likes. I bet if you did this for the entire book and released it, it'd be popular.

1741238543020.png

(text isn't exact since I had to run it again after browser crashed)
 
When he first released the info, he said they aren't marked as dead. That's accurate, and if Trump or Twittards said all those people are getting benefits, that's a false extrapolation (probably).
Trump said they were receiving Vampire Welfare in his address to congress, and has been repeating it for a while now. I wonder if Elon just doesn't want to tell Uncle Trump that his DOGE boys made a big oopsie.

However that data still needs cleaning up. It could be used for everything from identity theft to illegal immigrants lying to employer verification systems.
Or perhaps even... undead voting?
 
For my money, the strangest part of the night was watching the dems go sour grapes so hard thart they couldn't even be moved for the cancer kid.
I have very strong feelings on that point. Dems flaunt the idea of universal healthcare. They of anybody should know what that child and his family have gone through. The bills and the stress of it all. It does destroy families I've seen it. Utter silence for him. That if anything should have been a come together moment. Just repugnant
 
I don't see how having the word "loli" in my username makes me a pedophile. But hey, I can think clearly since I'm not a Trump fanboy. But hey, you guys call every political figure you don't like a pedophile. It's like when leftists try and call people Nazis.
searching for lolita clothing (jap fashion) on facebook marketplace pops a csam warning because lolita is flagged as pedophilia. loli is cp
 
FALSE! Stalker, child. He said that about accidentally cancelling USAID's ebola prevention efforts.


View attachment 7060328
REEEEEEE FALSE FALSE FALSE

The little sign thing is soooo dumb. They just look like a bunch of quirky rich people bidding on antiques at an auction house.

Auctioneer: and the antique lawn jockey statue is sold for a whopping 3 "save medicaids":

1741238782501.png
 
Can someone give me the rundown on the whole "Trump's siding with Putin" rhetoric?

Is it really only because he's looking to compromise and end the Ukraine war? And maybe for calling Zelinsky a dictator that one time? (Stupid but whatever) What other evidence is there?

Because to my knowledge, sanctions on Russia are still active. Trump's not making any sort of deals or agreements with them when he could stand to gain a whole lot from doing so.

If there's something more to it, I want a real nonpartisan assessment of the situation. I want to know. But there's been too much "Boy who cried Wolf" over Trump and Russia the past decade that it's hard to get a real feel of the situation.
Everyone you hate wants to use Ukraine to their own end and Trump is screwing that up. Peace is not an option, total Russia death, the US must give Ukraine everything possible to this end, etc etc. US politicians have been involved in Ukraine for over a decade and are mad that their work is being undone and there's probably plenty more. It's just like how Trump was Putin's best friend while sending javelin missiles to Ukraine before the invasion, it's illogical.
 
Because to my knowledge, sanctions on Russia are still active. Trump's not making any sort of deals or agreements with them when he could stand to gain a whole lot from doing so.
Trump being a KGB asset since the mid-80s feels like one of those Big Lies. The kind that a certain Austrian painter liked to talk about. The kind that's too big for the normie mind to challenge because it's so outrageous and keeps getting repeated.
 
Can someone give me the rundown on the whole "Trump's siding with Putin" rhetoric?

Is it really only because he's looking to compromise and end the Ukraine war? And maybe for calling Zelinsky a dictator that one time? (Stupid but whatever) What other evidence is there?

Because to my knowledge, sanctions on Russia are still active. Trump's not making any sort of deals or agreements with them when he could stand to gain a whole lot from doing so.

If there's something more to it, I want to know. I want a real nonpartisan assessment of the situation. But there's been too much "Boy who cried Wolf" over Trump and Russia the past decade that it's hard to get a real feel of the situation.
It's because Russia has most to gain from a peace treaty right now. They have all the leverage and if Trump forces Zelensky to sue for peace now he will lose a good chunk of Ukraine and the Ukrainians can't do anything about it.
 
It's because Russia has most to gain from a peace treaty right now. They have all the leverage and if Trump forces Zelensky to sue for peace now he will lose a good chunk of Ukraine and the Ukrainians can't do anything about it.
But how is it Trump's fault that's the state the war is in, now that he's back in office? Biden (if his brain wasn't a fried 'tato) should have ordered Ukraine to sue for peace when Ukraine would have had the upper hand.
 
There was a poster in (I think) the older version of this thread that alleged his death wasn't a deep state effort. That the plan was always for him to throw some rich guy and celebs under the bus and not say anything about the larger global players. Problem is the rich guy caught wind or got paranoid he'd be named and hired out an assassination. Heavily implied to be bill gates
I heard something like that too, only instead of Bill Gates it was the head of the Victoria's Secrets corporation.
 
Can someone give me the rundown on the whole "Trump's siding with Putin" rhetoric?

Is it really only because he's looking to compromise and end the Ukraine war? And maybe for calling Zelinsky a dictator that one time? (Stupid but whatever) What other evidence is there?

Because to my knowledge, sanctions on Russia are still active. Trump's not making any sort of deals or agreements with them when he could stand to gain a whole lot from doing so.

If there's something more to it, I want a real nonpartisan assessment of the situation. I want to know. But there's been too much "Boy who cried Wolf" over Trump and Russia the past decade that it's hard to get a real feel of the situation.
It's a combination of them trying to prey on Trump's ego, and invoking the Soviet Union. They call him Putin's lackey/whatever despite Putin making military moves when Trump is out of office. Speaking of Putin, there's a reason he was all "You see Tucker, it all started in the Big Bang..." He was a KGB foreign intelligence officer for 16 years, and has been Russia's president (on and off) for a long time. Putin wants to revive the SU to an extent. This is very convenient for the left, who wants to use Cold War memories as a sword of Damocles to make people do what they want. So when glowies and media colluded to make a case out of thin air, it kicked off "Russia Russia Russia!" When it comes to Ukraine, Biden et al. have all sorts of shell companies and money laundering methods over there, another car on the gravy train that the left wants running at all costs. Russia invading Ukraine is one thing, Trump and the scroll boys looking into backroom deals is another. There's a reason they cheered for deaths in Ukraine.

Basically the left is using Russia for Chinese checkers.
 
But how is it Trump's fault that's the state the war is in, now that he's back in office? Biden (if his brain wasn't a fried 'tato) should have ordered Ukraine to sue for peace when Ukraine would have had the upper hand.
It’s not. The people saying that are not honest people. They‘re seething bc Putin IS an aggressor, and somehow that translates to, “Trump must give all our money to Ukraine or else Trump supports Putin and is literally just as bad.”

EDIT TO ADD: They do this deliberately, carelessly, and they don‘t take it seriously.
 
Last edited:
Trump being a KGB asset since the mid-80s feels like one of those Big Lies. The kind that a certain Austrian painter liked to talk about. The kind that's too big for the normie mind to challenge because it's so outrageous and keeps getting repeated.
You'd think if there was any credibility to this they'd have opened up with that instead of fabricating the steel case dossier. I'm more than sure it's completely fabricated. They cried wolf and shat the bed when they tried to fake it, there's no reason to believe it in any capacity.
 
Back