US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does this mean Americans are fleeing to Mexico or something? A 100% reduction means from whatever arbitrary number down to zero. More than 100% means the reverse is happening. Or am I mathing wrong?

View attachment 7060938
i'd say since the daily amount of crosses are in the low hundreds, subtract all the illegals being deported and you got a negative number.
i'm not up to date on the daily ICE deportations but even if it plumetted to 300 it should be enough to get in the negatives
 
Man, this is like when I was the janitor at Rape_Nigger CO and everyone was cheering people on when the business got shut down just because thier business plan and product line was questionable. I lost my job and the world revolves around me! It’s not fair, people should have supported the business for me!!
Man companies need to use that as marketing, “watch out shit or little Timmy will loose his job”
 
Seeing the Democrats grandstand last night reminded me of how this "controversial" moment during Obama's first SOTU address now pales in comparison.

I'm literally late to this since I've been catching up (still 50 pages behind reeeee), but someone many posts back asked if the Republicans ever acted like how the Democrats have in the past, and while the answer is "yes", there were still moments where the R came out on top in hindsight. I remember when this speech was live and hearing Joe Wilson shout "You lie!" that everyone (who wasn't a politician/sucking D cock) literally went "Ooo-hoo-hoo!" and smirked about it for the next year, though the media memoryholed it since they didn't want people to look more into it. 'Course, hindsight's 20/20 and we learned that indeed Obama was lying through his teeth, but the common folk all knew that because politicians who get that kind of power always lie to the American people.

Trump has tried to reach across the aisle since he's the master at making deals, but they've made it clear ever since they "won" in 2008 that they have that "For us or against us" mentality and will not budge, especially not towards an "outsider". That's why he was more hostile towards them this SOTU than before, he's done being Mr. Nice Guy and is shining a light on them and chortling over how they squirm and hiss. The American people literally need to clean house in order for actual honest-to-God bipartisan cooperation to occur ever again, but that's only after a decade-or-so of a single group of people (which happen to be Republicans atm even though they need to clean up their act, too) repairing the system.
 
I need to know the team of Millennials/Zillennials that the Dems have making their viral videos and publicity campaigns because the "Sh*t that isn't true" videos and their poorly coordinated disruptions/protests at the SoTU were all pure cringe. The need to be fired and replaced if this the really the best talent that our young marketing girlies have to offer.

Was the USAID money really proping the Democrats that much? I know a lot of big donors aren't interested in supporting as much, but this is really pathetic. :story:
You know the cringe theater kids who got way too involved whenever a teacher decided to put improv/roleplay into a class activity back in high school?
They went on to become DNC staffers.
 
I need to know the team of Millennials/Zillennials that the Dems have making their viral videos and publicity campaigns because the "Sh*t that isn't true" videos and their poorly coordinated disruptions/protests at the SoTU were all pure cringe. The need to be fired and replaced if this the really the best talent that our young marketing girlies have to offer.

Was the USAID money really proping the Democrats that much? I know a lot of big donors aren't interested in supporting as much, but this is really pathetic. :story:
I think it was basically the Democrats purity spiraled out everyone who was halfway competent, but because they were in power the competent had no choice but to continue working for them. It's like that humiliation ritual where they tell blatant lies that are obviously lies but you have to pretend they are truth otherwise you get excommunicated and fired and so on. Now that the Democrats lost power there is no reason to prop up that insanity. I think most of the competent people the Democrats relied on are either stepping back from politics, staying neutral, or joining the Republicans.
 
Well, he’s a fag and so are his fanboys, so I think you’re onto something

In other news. it looks like we’re buying up Switzerland’s gold bullion

View attachment 7061255
Soft confirmation Knox was fucking empty, then. Who wants to bet that it'll have been refilled on loan when the auditors arrive, then it'll all go back where it came and we'll be a few billion in borrowing costs poorer.
 
I can't find the post, but somebody asked why the Democrats are so publicly and vocally doubling down on illegal aliens. The reason is the left has a Pavlovian response to any conflict involving white people and coloreds of any kind, and instinctively takes the side of the coloreds. Since the people flooding across the border are brown, that means they're the Good Guys, and anyone in conflict with them is the Bad Guy. It's why they sided with Muslims after 9/11, or Arabs whenever they're fighting Jews.

Moreover, they do not understand that only overeducated, oversocialized white college graduates think this way. It should be a slam-dunk winner to defend poor, brown illegals against mean, white fascists, but for some reason, it's not working.
 
Trump going over the Jewish guy talking to actual Ukrainians.


BREAKING: TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IN DIRECT TALKS WITH UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION—IS ZELENSKY ON HIS WAY OUT?

A MAJOR SHAKE-UP IN UKRAINE’S LEADERSHIP COULD BE UNDERWAY! Senior members of President Donald Trump's team have reportedly met with key Ukrainian opposition leaders to discuss the future of the country and the potential for early elections to replace President Volodymyr Zelensky.

With ongoing conflict, economic struggles, and political fatigue setting in, Ukraine’s future leadership is now a central topic of discussion. The meetings suggest that a new path forward is being explored—one that may involve a ceasefire and a vital minerals agreement with the U.S.

A NEW ERA FOR UKRAINE?

WHAT THIS MEANS:

RESHAPING UKRAINE’S LEADERSHIP: With growing dissatisfaction over Zelensky’s handling of the war, opposition forces are gaining traction.
POTENTIAL CEASEFIRE AGREEMENT: Talks of a negotiated settlement could mean a shift in strategy—one that prioritizes stability over endless conflict.
SECURING UKRAINE’S FUTURE WITH U.S. SUPPORT: The Trump administration’s involvement signals that Ukraine’s future could be forged through stronger U.S.-backed leadership.

IS THIS THE END OF THE ZELENSKY ERA?

The coming weeks could define the future of Ukraine. Will a new leader emerge to bring peace and prosperity? Or will Zelensky cling to power despite growing calls for change?

Guys, we have a whole ass thread about lolicon if you must.
What is ass-thread? Like spider silk?

Edit to add: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/has-the-world-loli-always-had-pedo-connotations.213743/
 
Last edited:
Back