YABookgate

Nothing to do with YA, but this made me laugh. You want a publishing contract at Random House? Maybe you should check what's upcoming on their list... Just be an empathetic deviant.😐

‘Sky Daddy’ Takes Airplane Fetishization to New Heights
Reminds me of those weird porn drawings of anthro planes that were spammed on /k and associated boards years ago on 4chan. I thought there was some erotic story associated with them as well, like the planes were all military aircraft and the guy was a military test pilot that flew them or something. Anyone know what I am talking about?
 
Reminds me of those weird porn drawings of anthro planes that were spammed on /k and associated boards years ago on 4chan. I thought there was some erotic story associated with them as well, like the planes were all military aircraft and the guy was a military test pilot that flew them or something. Anyone know what I am talking about?
Aeromorphs, which I believe is the first case of people irony poisoning themselves into developing a fetish. I always thought it was a woman's DA account which was ground zero.
 
Nothing to do with YA, but this made me laugh. You want a publishing contract at Random House? Maybe you should check what's upcoming on their list... Just be an empathetic deviant.😐

‘Sky Daddy’ Takes Airplane Fetishization to New Heights




Wonder how much the advance was? 🙄
Sad thing is that writing has been reduced to this. You could 100% make a novel about sexualization of planes but 50 years ago it'd be a male pilot relating his childhood pique of a pilot career to the distance he felt from the world of woman-seducing and how he yearns for a way to get to appreciate women the same way he does planes, bringing up concepts of asexuality and what have you.

This is just gonna be "THAT BIG FAT FUCKING COCKPIT. I WISH HE PITTED HIS COCK INTO ME!". No matter how bad a book is, there's a tiktok community for it. And it has more members and mainstream grift than KF.
 
The one book by Maberry I started I didn't like and dropped it shortly after I started, something about zombies in Colorado.

Beyond that, the only Howard Jones I know is the '80s pop star, beyond what I've read in this thread. I'll have to look up Howard Andrew Jones. Sad he is deceased.


Since you can typically only get in the door at the Big 4 and a half if you have an agent and the agent is the one who negotiates with them...I guess this is in theory possible but pretty unlikely given it means they would have to defer their 25%-ish cut. Plus, most books don't come close to earning out their advance, from what I understand. So maybe they never get it. Especially if you're pushing airplane fetish bean flicking or something similar (see above).

Literary agents are like home inspectors of new construction. They're supposed to put you first, but you're typically no higher than third on their priority list: (1) Themselves, (2) Publishers/Builders and (3) author/home buyer. Probably agents have some sort of DEI checklist in front of (3) at this point, dropping the author to (4), even for those who check most of the boxes, but not all of them. e.g. a black female who is a devout Christian, etc.


For no reason I can fathom (a) YouTube started suggesting this guy's videos to me and (b) watching them is weirdly addictive. (He's been dragged before his state professional board at least once and threatened with lawsuits multiple times. Pity I doubt you'd ever see a literary agent equivalent. Would be funny if it happened.)
So, what I'm hearing, is that Amazon's bullshit's kinda fed this pigeon-holing of fantasy into gooner/coomer-slop.

Better coverage and more attention to the classics and works faithful to them is one critical one. There's a reason I hype up GOOD authors as much as shit on bad ones.

How many people here took part in hate reading Manhunt, or crapping on Pat Tomlinson, as opposed to reading Christopher Ruocchio or Howard Andrew Jones, who wrote the best works of fantasy and science fiction I read last year?
Is Baen shitting itself? If so, then I better get vol 2-3 of Hanuvar in HC before the prices spike.

But yeah, I do try to hype up good stuff. I'll try to chit chat about tastes and try to recommend stuff based on it. I'm consistently surprised at all the fine and entertaining genre fic that's been seemingly overlooked and forgotten. James White, Charles Sheffield, and Ben Bova are just some names I got introduced to and now I'm mildly curious as to what their work's like. They don't seem to be A or even B listers in the mid-late 20th century SF writer list.

Ruocchio seems to be everywhere on lists of "rising star" SF writers, along with the guy who wrote the Red Rising books. I've been told that John C. Wright is another name? I've not been into modern SF much. I just know that Neal Stephenson/Cixin Liu/Adrian Tchaikovsky/Alastair Reynolds/JackMcDevitt keep getting brought up as modern SF writers that could be worthwhile.

I like crapping on bad writing but it's so easy to find examples now. I'd rather just try to sperg about how fun L. Sprague de Camp or Robert Sheckley are. It sucks, but there's a lot of vintage genre fiction that's barely getting attention. NESFA has pumped out so many attempts at preserving stuff, but there's a limit. Same with Gollancz's SF Masterworks line (I hear the main mover behind that has left the company).

Who do we have left for preserving classic genre fiction that's not PD? Tor, Daw, and Baen seem to not be doing amazingly. Open Road Media's kept shit in print on Amazon's store, but they're barebones. Then you have the fuckton of smaller presses like Haffner, Phoenix Pick, Caezik, Hippocampus Press, Armchair Fiction, Steeger Books, and Night Shade Press that do things in very limited numbers or via PoD. I mean, hell, print on demand may as well be the big new thing for physical editions.

I mean, the big time names will find a way. Asimov, Heinlein, Clarke, Dick, Herbert, Vonnegut, le Guin, Tolkein, etc. They'll all wind up being sorta evergreen.
Another is a publishing industry that actually bothers selling to boys again. Both these imitator genres, and to a lesson extent, manga, bank on filling that void.
The thing is, boys fiction gets tossed to the side nowadays because of all the genderspecial nonsense. I've heard that some schools have gotten rid of Treasure Island and Call of the Wild, for various wokescold reasons. Other classic boys fiction's also being tossed. Then you have manga existing, but there's going to come a point where the bad actors have taken over and we wind up with kids getting access to inappropriately adult material.
Trad publishers will drag thier feet on that, so that's up to mid majors and independents. Which comes to the BIGGEST problem.

Amazon.

Not only have the imitators genres built themselves on hacking the Amazon algorithm in a way most publishers and authors only dream of, but Amazon's own rankings and searches are a mess.

Take a firm subgenre like sword & sorcery. Wanna take a guess what books fill the rankings of the subgenre?

Dragonporn Romantasy. You don't actually get a non Romantasy book until #20, with The Two Towers. AKA The Lord of the Rings, godfather of epic fantasy.

In fact, in the top 100, aside from MAYBE John Gwyne, there isn't a single work of what one could recognize as sword-and-sorcery. Romatasy, epic fantasy, Tolkien, Sanderson, LitRPG and Progression Fantasy... but not one work of Robert E. Howard, Michael Moorcock, or even modern authors like Jonathan Maberry, Larry Correia, or Howard Andrew Jones.

And why would Amazon bother fixing it? What are people going to do, buy books elsewhere?
You gotta do word of mouth and all that. God, I try. But it's just sad. The good stuff will always be there, but I've met quite a few intelligent adults that want to get into reading more and don't even know where to go with their interests. They only know that they don't really gel with Amazon's algorithm because it's so fucking centered on romantasy slop.

and, I get it, reading ain't a big hobby any more, which is sad.

It sucks even harder because there's so much garbage being published just because some shitlib wants to push an agenda, and that then turns off younger readers. Surprise! A kid doesn't want to read about weird degenerate stuff. Traditional demographics existed for a reason.


Also, like, there are so fucking many used books that it's staggering. The general reading as a hobby population seems to be growing older and older. I see thrift stores and used bookstores load up fairly often. We don't even have enough resellers running through these because there's just a ton. You can pirate a copy of something like The Book of Earthsea, or rummage through enough used bookstores/thrift stores to find a used copy. The issue is that people just aren't reading as much as they used to.

That being said, maybe a modern non-woke version of the Stratemeyer Syndicate could work. Get ghostwriters to pump out YA mysteries/adventures/etc. by the dozens. For those who don't know, the Syndicate was the group that pumped out all those Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew books for decades (along with Tom Swift, Rick Brant, Bobbesy Twins, etc.)

Maybe we just need a bunch of average writers to pump out entertaining stuff for kids. Captain Underpants and etc. Hell, give us Harry Potter but in a sci-fi setting. Just give the kids something that'd kick off.


I swear, normal YA shit nowadays seems to be attuned for millennial women. I'm guilty of being another dude who just doesn't buy new copies of anything. Maybe this mindset's way more common than I think. I don't necessarily like Libraries because I'll be reading and rotating through stuff based on mood.
 
Maybe we just need a bunch of average writers to pump out entertaining stuff for kids. Captain Underpants and etc. Hell, give us Harry Potter but in a sci-fi setting. Just give the kids something that'd kick off.
I have a nephew who loves Captain Underpants. When asked what he wants to read or have read to him—because his parents make him read at least a little bit everyday—it's almost always Captain Underpants.

Left to his own devices, however, he'd spend every waking moment watching Minecraft streamers on YouTube. TV killed the pulps. YouTube, etc. could very well kill reading as a hobby, especially among young boys. I have no idea what could be done about this. Some parents will encourage or even enforce reading as a pasttime among their kids and some won't. Schools are basically powerless to do anything, which is a mixed blessing. On one hand, no one has to worry about some danger-hair forcing kids to read Genderqueer or some Bible thumper doing likewise with scripture; but on the other hand, teachers who just want kids to shut up and read any book for half an hour a day don't have the authority or parental backing to enforce it.

And in a school system in which large numbers of parents don't teach their kids to value reading and teachers are hamstrung, the publishing industry has all but abandoned boys. There's no stick, and the shrinking variety of carrots are losing flavor season after season.
 
I have a nephew who loves Captain Underpants. When asked what he wants to read or have read to him—because his parents make him read at least a little bit everyday—it's almost always Captain Underpants.
It's a fine comedic kids series. You could do far worse.
Left to his own devices, however, he'd spend every waking moment watching Minecraft streamers on YouTube. TV killed the pulps. YouTube, etc. could very well kill reading as a hobby, especially among young boys. I have no idea what could be done about this. Some parents will encourage or even enforce reading as a pasttime among their kids and some won't. Schools are basically powerless to do anything, which is a mixed blessing. On one hand, no one has to worry about some danger-hair forcing kids to read Genderqueer or some Bible thumper doing likewise with scripture; but on the other hand, teachers who just want kids to shut up and read any book for half an hour a day don't have the authority or parental backing to enforce it.
Yeah, modern entertainment supersedes older forms in general. Shame that kids don't really want to read often any more. Youtube AI slop really fucks it all over.
And in a school system in which large numbers of parents don't teach their kids to value reading and teachers are hamstrung, the publishing industry has all but abandoned boys. There's no stick, and the shrinking variety of carrots are losing flavor season after season.

Boys just don't get much luck. I know Minecraft novels exist but I feel like boys aren't interested.
 
On one hand, no one has to worry about some danger-hair forcing kids to read Genderqueer or some Bible thumper doing likewise with scripture
"Not muh Bible!" 😆

If some thumper is what it takes to get children to pick up a book, and read, so be it. The Bible should already be required reading due to its central place in the history of European peoples.
 
That being said, maybe a modern non-woke version of the Stratemeyer Syndicate could work. Get ghostwriters to pump out YA mysteries/adventures/etc. by the dozens. For those who don't know, the Syndicate was the group that pumped out all those Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew books for decades (along with Tom Swift, Rick Brant, Bobbesy Twins, etc.)
They still make the Hardy Boys but now it's woke. I think they're just "The Hardys" now because one of them trooned out (and also because you can't have "Boys" in your title because that isn't inclusive). And I know they turned one of their friends into a gay black dude. Modern day Nancy Drew is just as bad.

Although they've been censored since the 50s because they got an editor who removed all references to race. The Hardy Boys used to come across low-life "colored people" every now and then.
I have a nephew who loves Captain Underpants. When asked what he wants to read or have read to him—because his parents make him read at least a little bit everyday—it's almost always Captain Underpants.
The guy who wrote it is a far left communist who had the two boys in Captain Underpants get gay married and I think he put some troons into it too.
 
Would it be possible to forgo an advance for better royalties? Has anyone done that?
The issue here is that once they make their money back off a title, there's not much of an impetus for publishers to market a book any more. Royalty-only is pretty much the worst for an author, they can honestly release it piecemeal and not have a ledger that needs balancing out within a financial year. This happened to a friend of mine. God it was a death knell.

With a large advance, that's money they need to recoup in sales, so they at least make an "effort".

There's a similar thing in Hollywood where writers will charge thousands - sometimes millions in advance-fees for a script.

Joe Esterhaus (Showgirls, Basic Instinct, et al) said that charding the high price for a script meant the studio was more likely to put it in to production as an actual movie. (He also mentioned that there were screenwriters who were multi- millionaires but who'd never had a movie produced. I remember going to a convention 15 years ago and this guy was being interviewed as a big hotshot screenwriter - his IMDB only had like one credit for an episode of a dorky TV show!)

Weirdly this was juuuust before the big franchises like Marvel and Transformers were obliterating the landscape. Post mid-1990s Tarantino, there was still the posibility of a small indie script or movie hitting it big.
 
They still make the Hardy Boys but now it's woke. I think they're just "The Hardys" now because one of them trooned out (and also because you can't have "Boys" in your title because that isn't inclusive). And I know they turned one of their friends into a gay black dude. Modern day Nancy Drew is just as bad.

Although they've been censored since the 50s because they got an editor who removed all references to race. The Hardy Boys used to come across low-life "colored people" every now and then.

The guy who wrote it is a far left communist who had the two boys in Captain Underpants get gay married and I think he put some troons into it too.
you're talking about the retarded TV show from a while back. the one where they made Tom Swift pop up as a black faggot and where the Nancy Drew one was a girlboss, right? It popped up in the 2010s.

The issue here is that once they make their money back off a title, there's not much of an impetus for publishers to market a book any more. Royalty-only is pretty much the worst for an author, they can honestly release it piecemeal and not have a ledger that needs balancing out within a financial year. This happened to a friend of mine. God it was a death knell.

With a large advance, that's money they need to recoup in sales, so they at least make an "effort".

There's a similar thing in Hollywood where writers will charge thousands - sometimes millions in advance-fees for a script.

Joe Esterhaus (Showgirls, Basic Instinct, et al) said that charding the high price for a script meant the studio was more likely to put it in to production as an actual movie. (He also mentioned that there were screenwriters who were multi- millionaires but who'd never had a movie produced. I remember going to a convention 15 years ago and this guy was being interviewed as a big hotshot screenwriter - his IMDB only had like one credit for an episode of a dorky TV show!)

Weirdly this was juuuust before the big franchises like Marvel and Transformers were obliterating the landscape. Post mid-1990s Tarantino, there was still the posibility of a small indie script or movie hitting it big.
The intensely corporate focus of american media's led to a lot of fucked up shit with all the IP shilling. I think it was tolerable until everything became intensely woke.
"Not muh Bible!" 😆

If some thumper is what it takes to get children to pick up a book, and read, so be it. The Bible should already be required reading due to its central place in the history of European peoples.
It's got its place. I do think it needs to be handled carefully. But bible thumpers and creationists feel like a big strawman now instead of being relevant.
 
Just saw this:

I love seeing normal people slowly realize that the schizophrenics who rant about piracy and ownership and software as a service were absolutely and totally 100% correct about everything. TLDR Amazon is taking away Kindle users ability to backup their "purchased" books.

This person is nigger cattle unaware that he actually owns nothing, and so is every single other Kindle user that doesn't use it as a means to secure local copies of books that are hard to find otherwise.
See Ross from Accursed Farms attempting to navigate the legality of challenging this notion, while trying to solve the problem of games as a service being shut down with no copy of the game distributed or made available in any way to customers who paid for the experience. He figured out that there is basically nothing consumers can do, because they literally never bought anything, and so have no legal recourse at all. Very similar to Kindle, Amazon has already taken down numerous books and not been required to make copies available for people who paid for them, because they were never selling products, they only sell the limited right to use them which can be revoked at any time.
I am far, far behind, but I just want to say, I am glad I never got on the digital media train. Even things I read digitally, like manga, if I like it, I always end up getting a hard copy because of this shit. You never know when a server can go down, your hard drive might fry, or the copyright monster might strike. Paper is forever. Suck my nuts Amazon.
 
you're talking about the retarded TV show from a while back. the one where they made Tom Swift pop up as a black faggot and where the Nancy Drew one was a girlboss, right? It popped up in the 2010s.
Yeah I guess GNAA member Tom Swift was from that TV show but I thought they made some fucked up changes to the actual Hardy Boys books too like making one of them gay/a troon and all their friends are blacks now who do BLM shit.
 
I only brought it up because I see them as two sides of the same coin—unquestionable dogma in which zealots want to marinate the next generation.
You can sort of use them, but the issue's that now we've seen how bad it gets when you let leftist zealots do it and I can safely say that I'd prefer the christian kind.

Yeah I guess GNAA member Tom Swift was from that TV show but I thought they made some fucked up changes to the actual Hardy Boys books too like making one of them gay/a troon and all their friends are blacks now who do BLM shit.
It doesn't show up on the wikipedia article, so IDK what's up. They're an IP that's close to being totally public domain, right?
Whatever happened to the idea of the young detective. It feels like a dead genre.
 
Paper is forever

100%. Even when I pirate audiobooks I always buy a physical copy just to have if I enjoyed it.

You don't want them editing your books on the sly.

I've been tempted to upload a 1.1 version of a manuscript to Kindle to fix some minor things that annoy me when rereading my own work, but I have no idea how that works client-side. Do you get a prompt to update the Kindle copy? Do you have to buy a new Kindle copy to update? Does it just do it automatically without telling you and things just change mysteriously?

You could do a Kindle ARG art piece where the characters are impacted by the amount of people reading their story. I'd read something like that.
 
Maybe we just need a bunch of average writers to pump out entertaining stuff for kids. Captain Underpants and etc. Hell, give us Harry Potter but in a sci-fi setting. Just give the kids something that'd kick off.
There is a lot of that stuff though. Last Kids on Earth, Shiver Point, the Minecraft novels, even Wimpy Kid. But as has been mentioned, kids have so much other stuff, you pretty much have to make them read, especially boys. I have a book a week rule, and my son mostly enjoys what he reads. But if I didn't make him, he wouldn't feel personally compelled.
 
There is a lot of that stuff though. Last Kids on Earth, Shiver Point, the Minecraft novels, even Wimpy Kid. But as has been mentioned, kids have so much other stuff, you pretty much have to make them read, especially boys. I have a book a week rule, and my son mostly enjoys what he reads. But if I didn't make him, he wouldn't feel personally compelled.
This just made me wonder how people might get young boys to actually enjoy reading for its own sake rather than as a chore. The first thing that comes to mind is to encourage them to read the books that get adapted into movies and shows they show interest in.

They might—hopefully—find that the original book is better than the adaptation in at least some cases.
 
Back