Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[AnOminous]

The world has gone to hell in a hand basket since we stopped forcing the clever kids to learn Latin in high school.

I took Latin but never saw this word outside of a legal filing.

 

[Your Starter for 10]

The worst part about this is that the next time the judge responds, which could be months (and God knows how many more filings), it will be a response to some minor and meaningless shit filed in January.

 

[The Man With No Name]

*raises hand* Three years of High school Latin reporting for duty! Put me in coach! Villa est villa Romana. Villa lacunem habet.

Russell est puer molestus.

 

[Magnificent Penis]

I choose to believe this is Hardin throwing some shade at the court for allowing the retard to smear shit all over their walls with little to no consequences.

 

[Thomas Talus]

Russell est puer molestus.

"Sextus molestus!"

 

[jerkstore]

hardin really took the gloves off this time. let us hope this strategery was the right one (it HAS to be the right one - if not, judges are complete jokes).

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

But it always makes me nervous when his prose begins to get florid and sarcastic. It's great entertainment for us, but I recall the judge in the Melinda case not finding things funny as the electronic record continued to grow and grow and grow (as usual it was largely the judge's own fault for refusing to act, but whatevs).

I wouldn't call it sarcastic. Hardin's right: Greer's story changed from "My witness is ready, willing, and able!" to "I can't get in touch with my witness because we had a falling out!" to "Turns out my star witness is dead!" And this is on top of Greer not understanding deposition and witness tampering. It's maddening. Hardin's responses provide a much-needed comic relief. Besides, given how the court has gone to bat for Greer, Hardin has to respond to every little thing Greer finds, lest the court seize upon that to rule against Josh.

 

[a hapless toad]

Oh, YUMMY:
View attachment 7067238

Omg senpai noticed me...

I've fallen into a case law rabbit hole tonight and I'm going to take a moment to fangirl Justice Gorsuch again.

https://casetext.com/case/lee-v-max-intern-llc

ARGH, can't somebody please hire a proofreader for Hardin?
View attachment 7067247

I'd gladly do it, ngl.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Thus spake GORSUCH, wise in such matters but still not realizing the depths of hell:

As happens in these things, much motions practice followed.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

I think Hardin really should've pushed back on Russell's accusation that Hardin and Null have been recording and posting their private meet and confers

 

[RodgerDodger]

I think Hardin really should've pushed back on Russell's accusation that Hardin and Null have been recording and posting their private meet and confers

That would not be this motion.

 

[Kosher Dill]

I love the Gorsuch citation. You want to play 10th Circuit? Fine, here's a 10th Circuit AND Supreme Court judge's ruling.

The only trump card for that would be a President-Chief Justice, but Taft was a 6th Circuit man.

 

[a hapless toad]

@Potentially Criminal, I love that you're catching up on the past six weeks of filings. More Greer streams please!

https://www.youtube.com/live/5PGWx1yj2ys

 

[Old English Roast Beef]

Hardin obviously had fun with this filing:
View attachment 7067282
But it always makes me nervous when his prose begins to get florid and sarcastic. It's great entertainment for us, but I recall the judge in the Melinda case not finding things funny as the electronic record continued to grow and grow and grow (as usual it was largely the judge's own fault for refusing to act, but whatevs).

Ideally, a response would narrowly frame the issue to make it easy for the judge to ignore Greer's rambling motion and deny it for the reasons Hardin stated. But a short motion like that often takes more time to write than a long one.

 

[DJ Grelle]

Russell est puer molestus.

Quo usque tandem abutere, Russell, patientia nostra? Quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet? quem ad finem sese effrenata iactabit audacia?

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

Just smacking the crybully goalpost-moving straight down.

 

[h3catoncheries]

For the slowpokes like me that have a hard time keeping track of this mess:

ECF 227 motion to compel on the first request for production

Don't mind me, just uploading the Magistrate Judge's ruling on the motion to compel.

ECF 243 is Greer's delirious motion to reconsider

View attachment 7009248

ECF 250 latest defendants response to 243

attached

 

[Sneed Force One]

Greer's mental narrative is going to have a tough time with this one lol

I expect more "I'm just a retard your honor, I can't keep up with my own evidence, please pull Mr. Moon's servers."

 

[Pee Cola]

Audio-only archive of @Potentially Criminal's latest stream. Video archive pending. Note that the stream ran for over 4.5 hours, so I had to break the audio up into 2 chunks to get it uploaded (and I'll need to break the video up into several chunks for the same reason, unless someone with a better Internet connection beats me to it).

Part 1 (first 2 hours)

Part 2 (last 2.5 hours)

 

[Two by Four]

ARGH, can't somebody please hire a proofreader for Hardin?

There are two defendants in the case (Jersh and Lolcow LLC). " _s' " is the correct way to write the possessive form for words ending in "s"; One defendant's, two defendants'. Most commonly occurs for plurals, but also applies to singular nouns which end in s (Russ', Skordas', the class', etc.)

I am dumbass who cannot grasp context.