Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

>women dominate HR
>women dominate do nothing chair jobs
>women dominate the education system
>women dominate money laundering government agencies

i'm starting to think repeal the 19th unironically because all of this shit is an active detriment to society

that's not getting into social media, e-whores, and just general modern female retardation
 
I saw this post on twitter and it confused me for a moment because she has clearly visible wrinkles and eye bags but then I realized that she's not fat and that's literally the only reason why other women think she's underage.

Because every American is a giant lardass that can't stop freebasing cheeseborger.

It's actually because she's happy. Your average American woman experienced joy for the last time at age 15.
 
For me, the worst thing is the lying. Women will lie about anything even the most superficial and obvious things. It really make any kind of trust impossible and they are so arrogant that they don't even realise how obvious some of the lies are, like a confidence trick. Or they'll say something on Monday and then on Thursday, after you've been operating on Monday's information for 3 days, they'll completely change what's going on and you'll never know until you try to do what was planned Monday and they don't follow though or they pretend the plan had always been something different. It's just plain gaslighting.

I don't know how women rationalise it. Women must just be such total narcissists, that they just don't remember having said the Monday plan or were only agreeing to what was said on Monday to pacify you temporarily. It's all so sickening.

Women are defective.
 
>women dominate HR
>women dominate do nothing chair jobs
>women dominate the education system
>women dominate money laundering government agencies

i'm starting to think repeal the 19th unironically because all of this shit is an active detriment to society

that's not getting into social media, e-whores, and just general modern female retardation

Women voting makes no moral sense whatsoever when you realize the primary purpose of the state is war and law enforcement.

Is democracy a good thing in a village? I would argue, by and large, yes. So imagine we lived in a Stone Age tribal village, with maybe 100 people or so. It's time to vote on whether our brave warriors will go to war against a neighboring tribe. 75% of the men vote, "no," including nearly all the warriors. But 90% of the women vote, "yes."

What do you expect would happen? Would the warriors dutifully trudge off to spill and shed blood out of commitment to democracy and women's equality? Of course not. They'd laugh in the faces of the nattering nags who thought they had power to send men to war, and tell the women to get back to the hut and mind the children and the fire. War is men's work.

Or suppose the women all voted, with a few of the weaker men concurring, that the warriors should no longer defend the tribal hunting grounds if members of rival tribes are poaching game. It's just mean and unfeeling, say the women, with zero awareness that if the rivals aren't kept off our land, they'll quickly hunt all the game. Can you imagine the tribal warriors, all of whom voted to protect the lands, obeying the women?

But this is exactly how modern government works. The men responsible for protecting our land and our laws with their lives ultimately answer to women, who have proven over and over utterly incapable of understanding the need for those men to have a society at all.
 
Alright, I know I've done a lot of low-effort trolling in this thread, but, genuinely, god damn the majority of U.S. women are insufferable: it's a rarity for me to find one who doesn't base much of her literature recommendations, purchasing habits, and conversation topics around what she just saw on TikTok (or Instagram, or Facebook, or...).

Worse still, all social media addicted women I know seem at ease while essentially admitting they are subservient to influencers, algorithms, and the [current thing], whereas - outside of anonymous forums - I don't know a single man who'd willingly, no less casually, let it be known that they simped for Vtubers or (para)socially cared about whatever the fuck Asmongold/Andrew Tate/Null thinks.

Is this the "women are wonderful" effect, where men will get shamed for shit that women won't be? Is it from innate differences in attitude, with fewer men willing to be (or willing to admit to being) so puppeteered by cynical influences? Probably some combination of those and more I haven't thought up yet.

I suppose one rejoinder is that more men will waste their money and lives in P2W gacha/skinner box games than women, and so in some sense we're just prey to different forces, but the point still stands that I don't know a single (IRL) man who would casually, eagerly admit to being wrapped around the thumb of a game publisher either: no man I know is gleefully showing off their gacha pulls or bragging about spending a quarter of their waking lives in World of Warcraft, because that extreme of maladaptive, servile fascination is rightfully seen as embarassing and shameful.
 
Alright, I know I've done a lot of low-effort trolling in this thread, but, genuinely, god damn the majority of U.S. women are insufferable: it's a rarity for me to find one who doesn't base much of her literature recommendations, purchasing habits, and conversation topics around what she just saw on TikTok (or Instagram, or Facebook, or...).

Worse still, all social media addicted women I know seem at ease while essentially admitting they are subservient to influencers, algorithms, and the [current thing], whereas - outside of anonymous forums - I don't know a single man who'd willingly, no less casually, let it be known that they simped for Vtubers or (para)socially cared about whatever the fuck Asmongold/Andrew Tate/Null thinks.

Is this the "women are wonderful" effect, where men will get shamed for shit that women won't be? Is it from innate differences in attitude, with fewer men willing to be (or willing to admit to being) so puppeteered by cynical influences? Probably some combination of those and more I haven't thought up yet.

I suppose one rejoinder is that more men will waste their money and lives in P2W gacha/skinner box games than women, and so in some sense we're just prey to different forces, but the point still stands that I don't know a single (IRL) man who would casually, eagerly admit to being wrapped around the thumb of a game publisher either: no man I know is gleefully showing off their gacha pulls or bragging about spending a quarter of their waking lives in World of Warcraft, because that extreme of maladaptive, servile fascination is rightfully seen as embarassing and shameful.
Because women think it's a good thing to follow mainstream opinions/thought, so by admitting that they follow what popular influencers, big companies, and government think, they are transmitting to the world that they are doing a "good thing" because they are thinking in the approved and most popular way.

As we all know, approval is of utmost importance to women. Often, they don't care about thinking or doing the right thing, they just care about what is considered the normal thing at the time, hoping that this will lead to them having the same opinions as the most people possible.

A lot of men won't brag about the same sort of thing, because they inherently know that just following the opinions a mainstream approved thought leader has no value at all, and that they should form their own opinions from their own experience and thinking. Disagreeable men are normally the most successful.

Of course, there are also many men that don't follow what I just said, due to our increasingly feminised society and culture, but I think most non soy men have a natural aversion to blindly agreeing with mainstream approved opinions just for the sake of comfort and approval.
 
A lot of men are followers, or society wouldn't work at all. But women aren't particularly attracted to followers. They like leaders and trailblazers. That's why guys who just follow the crowd instinctively know better than to shout it from the rooftops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright and qoop
In another important step to equal rights for all, the United Findom abolishes sending girl offenders to correctional institutes, which is part of their ongoing efforts of removing prison sentences for women overall.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/04/girls-young-offender-institutions-justice-minster/

Rationally, there really is no reason for british boys not to start identifying as girls. There are literally zero drawbacks.
But women are totally oppressed and stuff.
The way women and society overall treats lonely men should be considered a crime against humanity.
View attachment 7059147
He made the mistake of assuming women even care about fidelity. If she gets muh tingles over a guy, she’s going to fuck whether she has a boyfriend or not. Just remember that women get literally raped every time a guy talks to her in an elevator. The modern millennial and zoomer woman is one unpleasant interaction away from a total meltdown because they get taught from day one that they deserve to get everything they want on their terms or else it’s oppression. He’d get better answers asking what their bra size is than if they're single.
 
1741487118306.png

 
A lot of men are followers, or society wouldn't work at all. But women aren't particularly attracted to followers. They like leaders and trailblazers. That's why guys who just follow the crowd instinctively know better than to shout it from the rooftops.
Even the most conformist men as a general rule don't advertise or brag about their conformity. "I respect the authority of X normal institutions/people/whatever" doesn't win a man any favor or social praise. "I obey my boss, the police and trust the CDC understands disease better than RFK Jr" is something women say, that nets them social capital, for men it doesn't. Its seen as both pathetic and also a basic necessity at the same time-"I'm not a weirdo and I obey the law"-society sees this as basically saying "I can wipe my ass and know how to put on a shirt correctly" and its seen as effeminate. Its an expectation, and a sign of your lack of individuated worth.

Disagreeable men are only rewarded insofar as they are attractive, successful or rich-or some combination thereof. Try being a man who marches to his own tune and isn't good looking, actually successful at his goals(or at least isn't perceived to be), or doesn't have the resources to shield him from reprisal.

These men get crushed.
 
That women is Acacia Kersey and an OF whore, like every women that is getting a lot of attention on Social Media.
The absolute state of modern women where you got two camps:

- Legbeards who just sucked a lemon and swallowed a shot of vinegar as a chaser. Thinks any man who is attracted to any woman more attractive than her should be prosecuted.

- OnlySimps whores who pretend to care about what you’re going through for $10 a month. Also her account is managed so you’re actually developing a parasocial relationship with some Belorussian or Ukrainian dude.
 
Back