Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

I have quite a few things that pissed me off during Zack's 'speech'. There were so many things said that if not outright lies, definitely skirted the truth. I cant be bothered going back and re-watching to remind me of all the things he said, but the one that pissed me off the most, was when he started going on about being a parent, walking his precious son to school each morning and how the bill would criminalized this. He went on about how how it is based on the lie that this is a fetish, and that they are trying to make him living a normal life as a parent into a sexual crime. 🥺😢
Firstly Zack, this absolutely is a fetish. Just because you live it 24/7 and no longer get as much of a thrill because it's no longer illicit doesn't make it any less of a fetish. The fact that you act out your fetish in front of Tony's son and make him believe this is normal, is just one of the reasons I hate you.
Secondly, The bill doesn't say anywhere that the scenario you just put to the floor could happen. And you know this.
I'm sure that deliberately misleading your fellow representatives is against the rules somewhere. Especially when your particularly emotive lie was followed immediately by the vote you were aiming to sway, without a chance for opposition to point out the lie, was pretty suspect Zack. You should probably stop thinking about all the dick you're not getting and get to working on your actual job.
athough, if you want to get that thrill from illicit behavior that you no longer get with Tony, some sneaky dick will probably get it back. I'mjust saying...
OK.
Zac's speech was taking up actual bandwidth in my brain so I'm going to sperg about it a bit.

@0.47s- Force-teaming with the LGBTQ community. These bills are focused on transgender issues alone, Not the LGB or Q.
@0.56s- "at its very core, Drag is Art" No Zack. At its very core, Drag is Parody.
@0.56s- "Drag is a beautiful Art". Weeeell, that's debatable...
@1.04s- "Drag has a deep history in this country" What deep history? Why is it important? Most early Drag Queens were women-hating faggots, openly mocking women, not cross-dressers.
@1.16s- "if you are a woman in this body wearing a suit, then you are challenging gender norms that existed long ago" So fucken what?? if you are a black man in this body today, you are challenging laws that existed long ago...see how stupid this is?
@1.30s- 3 articles of clothing law was the reason for Stonewall. Is this true? TBH I can't be bothered researching, but its Zack, so I'm gonna say probably not.
@2.02-> Yes, absolutely, especially in light of your harping on about the past. Drag performances were definitely risque and were usually held in bars, clubs, and other adult-only venues for this reason. Not in libraries in front of toddlers. (Not to mention the child sex offendors who were the ones 'educating' the children about good, loving human relationships.
@2.07s- NO!! They are nothing like Disney Prncesses! Just look at the faces of the children in the promotion photographs, they look terrified half the time. And those are the good photos, the ones worth publishing...
@2.32s- "and to hear stories told by members of my community" NO FUCKEN WAY! There is nothing about any Tranny's life that is appropriate for small children.
@2.46s- "that this art form, because it is connected to the transgender community, is not allowed" Now you're getting it! You fucked everything up so badly that anyone associated with you is poison.
@3.05s- "to prevent a transwoman from giving a history lesson in a library" this is so, so, obviously only giving a twisted version of what really happened that it makes me curious to know how bad the truth really was.
@3.15s-"applied as an attack against the transgender community" except the bill is pretty clear, some inoffensive tranny (I know, I know, just go with it for now) some inoffensive tranny just quietly going about his life (the life they pretend to lead anyways) is not going to fall under the provisions of this bill.
@3.30s- "this bill is needed because transgenderism is s fetish based on crossdressing" close, but it's mostly porn addiction.
@3.56s- "my life is not a fetish" This here is a lie, Zack
@3.58s- "to have my son..." No Zack, He is not your son.
@4.05-> His emotionally manipulative lying about how the bill will supposedly affect his life. All of it is bullshit and he knows it...
Then TismKid needed attention and I got over being infuriated with Zack's performance enough to have a stiff drink and ignore the rest of the 'speech'
Despite what Tony says, I don't see his lies and whining as 'Powerful'
 
@3.05s- "to prevent a transwoman from giving a history lesson in a library" this is so, so, obviously only giving a twisted version of what really happened that it makes me curious to know how bad the truth really was.

This is what Zack is lying about. Why does any child need to a "history lesson" about native american troons (that never existed) from a "flamboyantly dressed" tranny?

Butte library cancels event with transgender speaker

This is pure fantasy Zack.

You barely got 2,000 votes in the primary and 5,000 in the general. You are the LAST person anyone should talk to about getting involved in politics.

Screenshot 2025-03-08 204807.png

Zooey Zephyr

This is not true Snaggle Tooth

Screenshot 2025-03-09 093758.png

This really debunk's Tony's claims.

"Germany's draft recommendations immediately drew international attention for their marked departure from England's Cass Report recommendations. The divergence between the two is remarkable. The Cass Report recommended withdrawing puberty blockers from commissioned treatments for youth gender dysphoria, advised extreme caution regarding cross-sex hormone use, did not consider surgery as a possible option for minors, and asserted that most gender dysphoric youth should be treated psychotherapeutically. In contrast, Germany's draft recommendations relaxed the prior age and eligibility requirements for minors wishing to access body-modifying endocrine and surgical interventions, and asserted that the requirement that minors undergo psychotherapy prior to accessing body-modifying procedures is "not ethically justified for reasons of respect for the dignity and self-determination of the person."

Having analyzed the two sets of recommendations and the processes used to create them, it is apparent that their divergence can be largely explained by the difference in the assumptions about the role of evidence in the process of making the recommendations. The Cass Report started with the assumption that the best treatment approach for gender dysphoric youth is unknown and commissioned 8 systematic reviews of evidence to develop its recommendations. In contrast, the German guideline update started with the assumption that the reclassification of the ICD diagnosis of "gender incongruence" from a mental to a physical health condition (which itself reflected a "societal paradigm shift") demands that body-modifying procedures are available to all those who desire them—including minors. The intention to align treatment recommendations with the "societal paradigm shift" is stated in the guideline registration with AWMF in 2020, and is apparent in the approach that the guideline development team took toward the evidence, which appears to have served as a mere backdrop to an a priori decision to liberalize access to medical intervention for minors.

Originally, the updated German guidelines for treating gender dysphoric children and adolescents were supposed to carry the classification of "S3," which signifies the highest level, evidence-based guidelines. However, the guideline development team abandoned the systematic evidence search after 2019, stating it was no longer "feasible with the Commission's resources." The decision to stop systematically searching for the evidence during the last four years (2020–2023) resulted in a failure to systematically appraise 50% or more of the relevant evidence, depending on the topic (as the recent UK York systematic reviews commissioned by the Cass review demonstrated, more than 50% of the relevant studies were published after 2019). After the final draft was completed in early 2024, AWMF downgraded it from the originally intended highest-level "S3" evidence-based guidelines to their current lower status of S2K "consensus guidelines."

The German Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Gender Incongruence and Gender Dysphoria of Childhood and Adolescence

Tony does love garbage research.


S2K guidelines: S2K guidelines are developed by a committee of specialists in the medical field in question. The recommendations made are consensus-based. Because medical information isn’t systematically collected and assessed here either, the information that the recommendations are based on isn’t very reliable.

In brief: What are clinical practice guidelines?
 
Last edited:
Weird that he chose a totally male faced photo. Very passive agressive.

You mean like "genocide?"

Fucking idiot.

View attachment 7070245

I like how he's giving us the Erin Reed journalistic research experience (tm) by posting an image so blurry nobody can read the source, just like how Tony never reads his sources either

10/10 very authentic
 
Yes, absolutely, especially in light of your harping on about the past. Drag performances were definitely risque and were usually held in bars, clubs, and other adult-only venues for this reason.
This is a big sticking issue that is never addressed

I've been to drag shows and club nights in gay bars where drag queens have been MCing, doing karaoke, and generally running the night
They've been hilariously cutting and risque and I doubt any of the ones I've seen would want to perform their act to children, anymore than swingers want to invite their children to their parties or psychonauts think children should be present as trip sitters. These are all ADULT events, and all the parents I know attend these events because they relish ADULT time away from their children, so they can have ADULT fun

Anyone who'd bring children to even nonsexual type events like these would be committing a serious faux paux even before you add on any kind of sexual dimension to this. Then it just gets actually disturbing.

The fact that these people want to bring children into an event where any normal parent hires a babysitter and thinks "thank fuck I can have a day off and have some time with other adults" and instead gets their dopamine release from children being involved raises a lot of questions, and all of the answers to those questions end up in some dark places

And I'm not some reactionary evangelical bible basher. I think "Uncle Rodger and his husband love each other just like aunty Megan and her husband love each other" is totally fine for kids. "Uncle Rodger likes being led around on a dog leash and bummed while barking" is not, just like it wouldn't be if it wasn't aunty Megan dressed as a dog being bummed by her husband in a park. Do all the freaky shit you want and have fun, but when you're determined to tell kids about it the only reason I can think of for that is because you want kids to be INVOLVED in it. And then that's when I pick up my torch and pitchfork
 
"Illegal conversion therapy" is not a real thing Snaggle Tooth.

This is another reason why you can tell the German "guidlines" are little more than a copy and paste of WPATH pseudoscientifc drivel adopted by heavily conflcied activists on a "consensus" model (where no actual consensus exists) instead of an evidence based model.

Screenshot 2025-03-09 124944.png

The whole tranny myth of a "scientific consensus" was completely destroyed during the Supreme Court proceedings with the simple question "if there is such an overwhelming consensus why does the FDA still refuse to endorse these treatments?"
 
Last edited:
🎶Bow down
Bow down
Before the smell of my stinkditch
Or be crushed
Be crushed
Byyyyy
My boyfriend's stinkditch too
🎶
I don’t get it. Why does he want to take over women’s spaces so badly? What does he have to gain, or to loose!?! And the mechanizations of this malfunctioning amhole completely elude me!

I’m human!
I've been to drag shows and club nights in gay bars where drag queens have been MCing, doing karaoke, and generally running the night
They've been hilariously cutting and risque and I doubt any of the ones I've seen would want to perform their act to children, anymore than swingers want to invite their children to their parties or psychonauts think children should be present as trip sitters. These are all ADULT events, and all the parents I know attend these events because they relish ADULT time away from their children, so they can have ADULT fun
I like drag shows but they are not for kids. To me, it’s like the difference between taking your kids to a ballet and taking them to a strip club. While they both involve dancing, one is definitely NOT for children. And that’s fine! Not everything needs to be for everyone.
 
Is one of Tony's favorite talking points about to bite the dust?

View attachment 7076253
Typical of these fucking animals.

"Conversion therapy" to prevent kids getting cocks\tits lopped off - EVIL
"Conversion therapy" to persuade kids to get their cocks\tits lopped off - GOOD

If this insanity carries on, then it should just be a blanket ban on all gender surgeries and hormones regardless.
 
If you want to laugh at how incredibly stupid Tony is, all you have to do is click over to the "last 6 months " tab.

Screenshot 2025-03-10 111330.jpg
Screenshot 2025-03-10 103928.jpg

Its up about $50 over the last one year.

Screenshot 2025-03-10 111543.jpg

And about $200 over the last 5 years.

Screenshot 2025-03-10 111557.jpg

You are not "Independent" Snaggle Tooth. You are beholden to a pseudoscience sex cult out of fear of cancellation and shunning.

Furthermore, the primary reason you identify with the "independent" label is because no legitimate outlet will hire you because you are too much of a risk for tort liability, the trash that you publish is very poorly reasoned, you are incapabale of meeeting minimal ethical or editorial standards, and more often than not your "source documents" do not say what you claim they do.

Screenshot 2025-03-10 115317.jpg
 
Last edited:
@0.56s- "at its very core, Drag is Art" No Zack. At its very core, Drag is Parody.
@0.56s- "Drag is a beautiful Art". Weeeell, that's debatable...
@1.04s- "Drag has a deep history in this country" What deep history? Why is it important? Most early Drag Queens were women-hating faggots, openly mocking women, not cross-dressers.
I still LOL at how quickly the whole "drag is transphobic" meme has been memoryholed, when even up to a few years ago it was still coming up in "discourse".

I've been to drag shows and club nights in gay bars where drag queens have been MCing, doing karaoke, and generally running the night
They've been hilariously cutting and risque and I doubt any of the ones I've seen would want to perform their act to children, anymore than swingers want to invite their children to their parties or psychonauts think children should be present as trip sitters. These are all ADULT events, and all the parents I know attend these events because they relish ADULT time away from their children, so they can have ADULT fun
This x1,000. Apart from any question of trying to groom kids or whatever, the whole Drag Queen Story Hour phenomenon is mindboggling to me because it completely neuters what drag was about in the first place. It's some weird attempt to make an inherently adult, transgressive form of subcultural performance art family- and corporation-friendly.

Divine's turning over in his grave, I swear.
 
Tony lost a “friend” to trans genocide last night.

View attachment 5597968
View attachment 5597970
View attachment 5597971
I’m sure Tony is going to run this into the ground for sympathy and queer outrage points.
Since Tony’s brand of journalism gives literally no explanation of this story here is the one article I found regarding the murder.
Murdered by a food delivery driver. (A)
I am sure there is more to this story than chasing a Door Dasher down for misgendering.
Update on this, btw, is that the food delivery driver was recently found guilty and sentenced for second-degree assault (a). Acquitted of murder.

No new mention from Tony about this case about his beloved friend?
 
The whole tranny myth of a "scientific consensus" was completely destroyed during the Supreme Court proceedings with the simple question "if there is such an overwhelming consensus why does the FDA still refuse to endorse these treatments?"
The argument I herd is that proceedings like these take years if not decades for the FDA to get passed. The thing is though, TRAs argued that research about transgender people has been going on for decades that has only supported them. Obviously I dont believe this, but for arguments sake lets say it is true, what the hell do the people working at the FDA do all day that it takes decades for them to endorse something that (according to TRAs) has decades of research backing it? How does any work get done at the FDA if something that was supported decades before doesn't get endorse until decades later? I dont work for the FDA but if this is the troon argument then what makes them believe the FDA will at some point endorse these treatments in the next 10 years?
 
Apologies reply button was not working for me.
-
@1.16s- "if you are a woman in this body wearing a suit, then you are challenging gender norms that existed long ago" So fucken what?? if you are a black man in this body today, you are challenging laws that existed long ago...see how stupid this is?
-

This shit is a constant refrain from them that women who wear suits are 'cross dressing'. ZHack, traditionally mens suits button on the left, womens on the right. The women you’re so desperate to emulate? They’re actually wearing the correct clothes, not playing dress-up as you do for your fetish.

1741649460775.png
1741649494093.png
1741649870077.png
1741649906336.png
vs
1741650998826.png

My power pants suits are tailored to 1.5 inches of life. My female ass looks great in them. 😍

1741650409800.png

The more this poof talks the more I am confused. Is he really a true and honest fairy? He dresses like a blind grandma looting Lane Bryant with a shopping cart and no plan. He let his 'wife' get married with back fat showing. The fags I know would never stand for this.

-
@3.56s- "my life is not a fetish" This here is a lie, Zack
@3.58s- "to have my son..." No Zack, He is not your son.
-

It is 1000 percent fail male feminine fetish, nothing more.
 
Back