What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

As if the psychologists are not in on the grift. It's lucrative to get people hooked on the Tranny Train.
Tchoo Tchhoooooo!
psychologists and psychotherapists are the biggest grifters in the medical industry regardless of whether or not they're prescribing drugs
they're the ones teaching naive people how to pathologize every part of the world around them, telling healthy individuals surrounded by good friends and family that they were abused and have PTSD even if they don't think so and convince them to drop all connections with people who love them, trick them into thinking they have disorders that they don't and ultimately cement themselves as their only 'friend'
 
psychologists and psychotherapists are the biggest grifters in the medical industry regardless of whether or not they're prescribing drugs
they're the ones teaching naive people how to pathologize every part of the world around them, telling healthy individuals surrounded by good friends and family that they were abused and have PTSD even if they don't think so and convince them to drop all connections with people who love them, trick them into thinking they have disorders that they don't and ultimately cement themselves as their only 'friend'
IMG_4752.jpeg

sorry I couldn’t resist a little based Liviapoasting
 
psychologists and psychotherapists are the biggest grifters in the medical industry regardless of whether or not they're prescribing drugs
they're the ones teaching naive people how to pathologize every part of the world around them, telling healthy individuals surrounded by good friends and family that they were abused and have PTSD even if they don't think so and convince them to drop all connections with people who love them, trick them into thinking they have disorders that they don't and ultimately cement themselves as their only 'friend'
Modern psychiatry is nothing but the mass application of MK Ultra. It's why none of the studies about SSRIs can be replicated.
 
Halloween being snow-time was normal in my neck of the woods as well, fwiw.
The weather was definitely colder in the early 80s. We had great snow then. Also some hot summers
Considering they die at 41% rate minimum this is a direct violation of the Hippcratic Oath all US doctors must take.
They no longer take the Hippocratic oath, my friend and they haven’t done for a long time. They take the declaration of Geneva or whatever it is, or at some places they can make their own up
Modern psychiatry is nothing but the mass application of MK Ultra. It's why none of the studies about SSRIs can be replicated.
SSRIs studies are fascinating. The actual data for them is pretty shocking. The placebo effect has been increasing ‘for unknown reasons’ for decades as well.
What seems to be the case is that they work really well for a small group if people, maybe 20-30 percent. For the rest they have no or negative effect, and their list of side effects is terrible.
Obviously I am Not Your Doctor so nobody stop taking prescribed meds please, but I truly believe that the next few medical scandals (or the next but a few, I give it a few years yet before thee wheels fall off) are going to be SSRIs, and statins. And then atypical antipsychotics.
 
SSRIs studies are fascinating. The actual data for them is pretty shocking. The placebo effect has been increasing ‘for unknown reasons’ for decades as well.
What seems to be the case is that they work really well for a small group if people, maybe 20-30 percent. For the rest they have no or negative effect, and their list of side effects is terrible.
Obviously I am Not Your Doctor so nobody stop taking prescribed meds please, but I truly believe that the next few medical scandals (or the next but a few, I give it a few years yet before thee wheels fall off) are going to be SSRIs, and statins. And then atypical antipsychotics.
The only way I see these scandals occurring is when the patents expire and they have a new round of freshly patented medications. There's too much money in psychiatry for it to blow up.
 
they work really well for a small group if people
they don't "work" for anyone, at least not in the sense that they solve any kind of illness related symptoms
most SSRIs as well as any other medication prescribed for common "ailments" like depression, anxiety, ADHD and the likes, don't actually address the core reason for a person's ailment, there's no hooha brain molecule magic like people want to believe, most illnesses can't simply be boiled down to 'you don't have enough of chemical X, here's chemical X in a pill' or 'your brain can't make the doodad connect with the wirlyworly correctly, here's a pill that does it and that's all it does', that doesn't exist for any complex mental disorders that aren't directly caused by physical disorders which CAN be solved chemically
fact of the matter is most medication is just one of two things- uppers, or downers, the quack will either give you drugs that make you energetic in hopes that you'll forget about the symptoms, or too sleepy to notice them, that's it

in the case of people it helps, it's only either because the actual cause for their problems isn't the stated illness, but just an excess of energy that needs to be calmed or a lack of energy that needs a pickup, in which case they have a 50/50 chance to get the right drug and be ok with it, or they're just mindless zombies who don't care if they don't accomplish anything and have no emotions
 
most SSRIs as well as any other medication prescribed for common "ailments" like depression, anxiety, ADHD and the likes, don't actually address the core reason for a person's ailment, there's no hooha brain molecule magic like people want to believe,
Yes I agree. What I mean is that if you look at the trial data, and see the primary endpoints, you’ll see the required criteria met for about 20% of people. That primary endpoint is usually a scale like the MADRS or the HAMD and the criteria is usually a set number of points improvement. Patients report an improvement= working well.
What you also see, when you look at the data is that some doctors have massively outlying improvements across the bulk of their patients. To the point I’ve seen one start to be investigated for fraud. It turned out that the guy and his team were dead honest, and they used non standard(!) methods like ‘spending enough time with the patients , treating them like human beings and working with them on diet, excercise and lifestyle interventions. ‘
The whole SSRI field is a complete disaster. As are the bulk of mental health meds. We can’t define biomarkers or diagnostic lab tests for a disease but hey! We can’t definitely treat it will a chemical! Pull the other one.
And what nobody can explain is why the placebo effect is increasing year by year. It’s almost as if it’s all a fraudulent system…
 
the trial data
Fun fact- the "effectiveness" of most psychological medication is overblown as a result of them including criminals and people incarcerated or institutionalized who were literally forced to take medication and say it helped them, or risk further and worse punishment
Literally told to state what the studies want them to state under duress
Imagine that in any other industry
>Now sir, did that cigarette help?
>No, I think smoking is disgusting and unhealthy-
>Uh uh uh, if it didn't calm you down we'll have to put you back in the straightjacket! Now... Did that cigarette. calm. you. down?
>Y-Yes?
>Perfect! Write that down Geoffrey the masses love us!
 
Fun fact- the "effectiveness" of most psychological medication is overblown as a result of them including criminals and people incarcerated or institutionalized who were literally forced to take medication and say it helped them, or risk further and worse punishment
They aren’t allowed to these days for major depression studies. Incarcerated people are deemed to be at too high a risk of coercion and you’d not get that past ethics. Ditto institutionalised involuntarily.
I’ve seen some schizophrenia studies as well and none allowed involuntarily committed or prison population. Is there one currently running you’re thinking if specifically?
 
They aren’t allowed to these days for major depression studies. Incarcerated people are deemed to be at too high a risk of coercion and you’d not get that past ethics. Ditto institutionalised involuntarily.
I’ve seen some schizophrenia studies as well and none allowed involuntarily committed or prison population. Is there one currently running you’re thinking if specifically?
Even then it's easy to get around by just very strongly implying to someone that they'll be in big shit if they don't comply
A person who has technically not yet been incarcerated can still be told by the judge "fine, you're off the hook but you have to take these meds" and it doesn't take a wink and a nod for the guy to understand that if he says the meds are shitty shit, they WILL proceed to incarcerate him as the next course of action
 
I have doubted the medical establishment for years and even less today they are not a collections of companies seeking to help peoepl and make a profit doing such.

If you wanna talk about the US Medical Establishment being garbage you need to talk about Vioxx.

In the late 1990s the pharmaceutical company Merck announced a new anti-inflammation medication called Vioxx. It was a particularly good drug for arthritis and such joint pain. After being released in 1999 it quickly became one of the most popular anti-pain medications around due to not having some of the issues the likes of Aspirin had and quickly became a massive success generating some 2 Billion in profit for Merck.

In September 2004 Merck suddenly announced they were gonna recall it, and put a stop to production. This came after they became aware that a big journal was about to publish a massive peer-reviewed study with large amounts of data and the help of a senior FDA official backing it showing that this anti-pain drug had a very large chance of increasing the risk of fatal strokes and heart attacks on people using it. Again: this was a drug being given to elderly people in particular, who already are at risk of such. Data on the study proved that Vioxx was provably linked to at least some 55 thousand deaths since it entered the market in 1999 until the paper was finished in mid 2004.

Merck knew Vioxx was possibly dangerous. They had internal data from as early as 1997 pointing to issues. They ignored the data, the concerns of their own labcoats and instead went ahead with the new product with a massive ad campaign and push to capitalize on the aging population and the need for a better pain medication.

There were of course lawsuits, big drama, but very little of substance. The entire thing did not actually get that much traction on the media. A eerie calm over the knowing endangerment of so many people, maybe it didn't really feel real or it was hard to prove now that Vioxx was responsible for granny's stroke so long after she was buried.

A few months after the recall, a small article was published on the USA Today newspaper having to do with some new statistics published for the year of 2005 by government statistic people. "USA Records Largest Drop in Annual Deaths in at Least 60 Years.” During 2005, American deaths had fallen by 50,000 despite the growth in both the size and the age of the nation’s population. Government health experts were quoted as being greatly “surprised” and “scratching [their] heads” over this strange anomaly, which was led by a sharp drop in fatal heart attacks.

Sixty thousand Americans died fighting in the Vietnam War, the vast majority of them being Baby Boomers. Using the data from the study which exposed Vioxx and Merck it is safe to assume that they killed four times as many boomers, and no one gave a shit. And those are just general numbers from extrapolation of the data, it is impossible to known how many other deaths from strokes and heart attacks in the USA in the period of 1999 to September/October 2004 were directly caused by a use of Vioxx. The most conservative estimates put the number of deaths from Vioxx at 200 thousand, with higher estimates going as far as half a million dead from it.

The Merck stock tanked following the drama, but simply recovered. The company was the target of lawsuits, but nothing really came from it with most of the money being pocketed by the lawyers and most of those affected by the death of loved ones likely never even knowing about the issue or not even being close to able to go along with the justice system to demand some sort of retribution.

Ironically enough, the suits and such drama would almost fully end at around the same time the scandal of Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family were exposed for over-prescription of addicting opioids for pain and the massive issues it caused. Unlike Merck they went with just selling regular hard and addicting drugs and relying on getting their customers addicted to make money.

Remember this every time some faggot demands you accept medical and pharmaceutical claims and pushes without question because "muh sciens".

Source
 
Wait, are you're telling me that people questioning COVID in early 2020 weren't just crazy people thinking children were being rescued from tunnels under Central Park?
Nice try shill, the kids were in tunnels under Crown Heights (Yeah yeah, Jews. But even still, I'm amazed how fast that got swept)
 
SSRIs studies are fascinating. The actual data for them is pretty shocking. The placebo effect has been increasing ‘for unknown reasons’ for decades as well.
That's because we're all shaped by the collective human unconsciousness, which is why TPTB spend so much time trying to control the narrative and our collectives expectations for reality.
If we all woke up tomorrow "knowing" that a certain drug made people giddy and make "wooop" noises when they take a shit, that would become a common side-effect.
 
Oh, they are very much still handing out scripts for benzos. You probably know people who are on it they just don’t talk about it. Slight PL but my manager at one of my wagie jobs was just moonbeamed 25/8 on xannys, we all dreaded working with her bc we’d inevitably have to keep catching her up on what was going on, she just wasn’t there. I think they have “guidelines” that they’re supposed to follow but Jeet Doctors don’t give a fucking shit.

I wouldn't worry about it I power level like a retard on xanax here. IMHO just don't reveal anything objectively undeniably linked to your identity, that can ONLY be linked to your identity at least that's my opinion, I may be wrong.

Regarding benzos, respectfully I disagree. Should I wanted to I can always find a Dr that can "play ball", they are typically are Russian and Armenian, get you a 60 day run of .5 MG footballs for the cost of the 15 minute consultation fee , walk-ins welcome of course. The legit Drs at least in the states, I have found are extremely afraid of giving out even Ambien. I find it all kind of stupid considering other means of procuring these things and far worse have never been easier/cheaper than ever. Means I'm sure you are aware of I will not post here for ethical reasons. Knowing what I know about alcohol at this point I don't even like the idea of drinking beer. The effects of just beer on the body regularly are no where as damaging as we are warned about. I'm a libertarian for lack of a better term I don't care if people knowingly ingest rat poison to get a buzz going. That being said the public mandated warnings of tobacco VS booze alone are staggeringly different. I never made it through med school but the general public consensus of "cigarettes=cancer VS alcohol is just fine in moderation" concerns me and its obviously motivated by the industries selling booze and all related industries making money off of booze from Coors (btw technically isn't even beer) to brand name to high end alcohol it costs around IDK what ? 3.50$ to make a $200.00 bottle of Grey Goose and it still just tastes like Vodka. Then there are the bars/nightclubs etc. I don't want gov intervention but, the average joe is far uninformed about what that are ingesting and the repercussions.


psychologists and psychotherapists are the biggest grifters in the medical industry regardless of whether or not they're prescribing drugs
they're the ones teaching naive people how to pathologize every part of the world around them, telling healthy individuals surrounded by good friends and family that they were abused and have PTSD even if they don't think so and convince them to drop all connections with people who love them, trick them into thinking they have disorders that they don't and ultimately cement themselves as their only 'friend'

Psychologists are at best 50% a scam. it's an industry where should they "fix" the problem they will no longer have the client and income, an obvious conflict of interest. The moment I realized this is when I wasn't older than maybe 12 when I learned people "shopped" for a shrink that would validate their personal views and bullshit instead of giving advice they didn't want to hear helping them progress as human beings. A ridiculous number of people just lie or omit important info to their psychologists anyway. At the very best private practice psychology is 50% a scam.

In an medical field that is "corrected" by the holy doctrine of the DSM every 20-30 years and conditions described within are purely motivated by politics it's all nonsense if you can have a shrink that advises you to cut your dick and change your name to "Sally" and another shrink that tells you mutilating your body with drugs and surgery are NOT a good idea; can the industry be trusted in the least bit?
 
The legit Drs at least in the states, I have found are extremely afraid of giving out even Ambien
Well then to fully power-level, I was actually put on Clonazepam for two years straight, one mg per day (half in the morning half at night). By a legit Doctor at a walk-in clinic. He was a jeet to be fair, and he retired soon after, but he was VERY pushy and brought up how he has tons of other patients taking this drug for 5-10 years etc. The bottle said “take twice daily as needed.” which I always found weird: shouldn’t it be either twice daily OR as needed?
Anyway that’s all I’ll say on the situation other than I’m clean now. But yeah everything I have to say about benzos is from a 1st hand perspective.

ETA to add thread tax: This might also go a long way in explaining the competency crisis. You have secret zombies walking around doing their jobs badly because they are so barred-out they can’t walk straight. And it’s all legally prescribed so nobody bats an eye.
 
Last edited:
Even then it's easy to get around by just very strongly implying to someone that they'll be in big shit if they don't comply
A person who has technically not yet been incarcerated can still be told by the judge "fine, you're off the hook but you have to take these meds" and it doesn't take a wink and a nod for the guy to understand that if he says the meds are shitty shit, they WILL proceed to incarcerate him as the next course of action
Yeah absolutely, medical coercion is a thing. They won’t (shouldn’t, who the fuck knows these days) be in clinical studies -
Vioxx should have resulted in jail terms.
They had internal data from as early as 1997 pointing to issues. They ignored the data, the concerns of their own labcoats and instead went ahead with the new product with a massive ad campaign and push to capitalize on the aging population and the need for a better pain medication.
See this is the thing; the lab monkeys are the honest ones usually. They’d diligently work up their report and pass it upwards and then marketing and legal and the people who earn fifty times what the lab monkeys do just squelch the report. Sometimes the lab monkeys have mysterious accidents and die
People should have swung for vioxx. That’s just the one we know about.
Atypical antipsychotics are used to cosh the elderly into submission of they have ‘agitation’ from dementia (or just being mistreated in awful care homes. ) but those drugs have black box earnings and increase ALL CAUSE mortality massively in the elderly. And u doubt it’s just the elderly. But again, massive money spinners so dose em up!
Statins I think cause muscle weakness, which in the elderly starts you off on the path to frailty and death. And the lipid soluble ones strip cholesterol from your brain, and I believe they cause or exacerbate dementias.
SSRIs we’ve already talked about.
There are entire classes of drugs bring given out like candy that I think are harming people. It’s disgusting
Remember this every time some faggot demands you accept medical and pharmaceutical claims and pushes without question because "muh sciens".

The bottle said “take twice daily as needed.” which I always found weird: shouldn’t it be either twice daily OR as needed?
No, BID is twice daily and as needed means as you need it, so the two together means as needed but no more than twice daily. BID is twice daily no matter what and as needed is ‘whenever.’ It does make sense. Well done on getting off the benzos- that’s not easy
 
Isn't the medical industry based on the Rockerfellers and Rothschilds basically buying out the medical system in the early 1900's? I imagine they wouldn't make any money if they cured you, mentally or physically. So just like planned obsolesence in products, they need you to keep breaking down to keep getting repeat business. Maybe we've all been subtly poisoned our entire lives. Maybe not one thing by itself, but death by a million cuts.
 
Back