Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Lunduke is getting stagnant recently. 6/8 most recent videos have the "disbelief with a veneer of derision" face in their thumbnails.

View attachment 7060830
1741303617846.png
 
Considering Gardiner's thoughts about the Trump assassination being staged, the weird comments about the FSF and Richard Stallman, alongside a bunch of other crap, why am I not shocked that he's defending Mozilla of all things?

He's subtweeting Bryan Lunduke and calling him a grifter. He's claiming he wants to destroy open source software while also being the one that was fine with the shit going on with the free software foundation. And of course because he's too much of a soy bitch pussy, he doesn't mention Lunduke by name, only says "you probably know who I'm talking about".

And we got another anti-RMS anti-Lunduke shill in the open source community that is shilling for Mozilla's piss poor management now:
1741355845143.png

 
> Mozzilla is not selling your data
So why did they have to change the ToS to remove that claim?
I don't buy the "complicated legal field" explanation because that begs the question, if they're not selling it, why are they collecting it and sharing it?
To have a charitable reading, I'd assume they have new lawyers or had a quarterly review of their ToS and other legal documents and somebody raised a point that technically the current wording puts them in jeopardy in various niche cases, so they decided to change it. And because they have autists for PR people, they decided to do it at the very worst time, in the very worst way, and couldn't even do damage control right.
 
To have a charitable reading, I'd assume they have new lawyers or had a quarterly review of their ToS and other legal documents and somebody raised a point that technically the current wording puts them in jeopardy in various niche cases, so they decided to change it. And because they have autists for PR people, they decided to do it at the very worst time, in the very worst way, and couldn't even do damage control right.
Assuming all of that is true, who are they giving my data to that it would be a remote concern?
 
Is there a single honest women in Open source contributing meaningfully?
I feel like any chick with the 'tism to program realized they'd be better off in the industry working on commercial software.
There probably is, they just don’t want their identity out because computer science is the field filled with the most creepy dudes.
If there isn’t, the last ones were alive 100 years ago. Grace Hopper, Lillian Schwartz, the age of a programmer like that has gone by.
 
And we got another anti-RMS anti-Lunduke shill in the open source community that is shilling for Mozilla's piss poor management now:
Nico is an absolute eurocuck faggot. He's an open antifa, wore cat ears in multiple videos and I wouldn't be surprised if he's into crossdressing or trooning out. He made a statement in his lunduke dedicated video that questioning electoral results is litteraly fascism and pure evil when biden won. He also works on KDE.
 
They probably have some analytics enabled on the new tab page and the services they run like Relay or VPN and that's what it means.
Or they're doing what they say they're doing. Or to be more literal, they no longer promise not to do the thing you don't want them to do.
Regardless of whether they do or don't, that's not even the point. The point is they CAN - the canary in the coal mine is dead.
 
There probably is, they just don’t want their identity out because computer science is the field filled with the most creepy dudes.
If there isn’t, the last ones were alive 100 years ago. Grace Hopper, Lillian Schwartz, the age of a programmer like that has gone by.
Also, a competent woman would not want to associate herself with the stereotypical "woman in tech". By that I mean the feminist who is only in the field for trying to prove that women are as capable as men (see ISAIF 14), without putting in the effort to *actually* get good in the field.
(PS. this isn't an incel take, I believe women can be good in tech, just there's not a lot of them and you'll have a hard time finding them.)
 
All the dotnet shills are just microsoft's C# dev team sockpuppets, right? Real people aren't that emotionally attached to a microsoft java knockoff, right?
 
Back