Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Not a bee]

Judge ain't gonna be pleased with that

 

[GrandDriveAuto]

I'm assuming the appeals court will find some reason to toss this just so they don't have to deal with it, but my desire to see shitlips talk his way back into a $5,000 sanction outweighs any amount of stickers I could possible receive.

Remember, he may be facing 2 new sanctions due to all the other idiocy he tried to pull off. He will likely not get more sanctions because of this but he is pissing off the court at a really, really delicate time.

 

[East_Clintwood]

I love hoe he's adopted this as some sort of mantra to try and avoid consequences. Kinda reminds me how literally every nigger that now gets arrested immediately starts yelling about how they can't breathe.

I resent Greer's notion that we are all "insane [people] with no assets."

I have plenty assets, thank you very much.

Same. I love how he's now bitched that we raised all that money for the legal fund while also insisting we're all broke ass weirdos with no assets. I think a lot of people see this place as basically being like 4chan ie filled with kids and/or legit retards living in their parents basement.

 

[obsdj]

Judge ain't gonna be pleased with that

GOOD. The judges are the ones dragging this farce out. Tard coming home to roost.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

GOOD. The judges are the ones dragging this farce out. Tard coming home to roost.

The vicious feral litigant bites the hand that feeds.

 

[Sneed Force One]

This Nevadian pseudo-semite got a statutory $5000 sanction reduced to $1000 and he's still jewing the court for every sheckle.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

He makes a subtle play - he’s asking for a stay until the case is over - and then he doesn’t have to appeal now.

Had he offered to post a $1k bond they’d probably have taken it and stayed. But a $74.75 bond is an insult to the court.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

This Nevadian pseudo-semite got a statutory $5000 sanction reduced to $1000 and he's still jewing the court for every sheckle.

What he actually said was Null and his pet shitstains are mean to me, so the way I act shouldn't be sanctionable. He is offering to pay 75 as a gesture of good will so that we can mooooooove on.

 

[oh no its pipkun]

Russtard thinks that taking 10% means lobbing off the $700, resulting in 74.75 instead of shifting the decimal to the left which would result in 77.47. He can't even math
View attachment 7081773

the real crime is the "since the defendants subtracted the amount owed to me, they clearly don't need the money and wont mind this 10% bond (gamed at 9.xx% because the judge isnt going to check the maths)."

This deduction shows that Defendants won’t be hurt if the full amount is not posted in a bond. Lastly, it took defendants a year to agree to pay any kind of amount that they were ordered to pay by this Court, so only posting 10 percent is fitting to how they view honoring monetary judgements.

russell needs the money more than nuuuuuuuuuulll

 

[Captain Manning]

Eye twitch emoticon.

View attachment 7081748

If Null has no assets, how the fuck is he paying Hardin?

Like I'm sure Null is not driving around in a Bugatti, but come on.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

His discovery behavior needs to change now. Not after the case. Delayed punishment don’t work.

 

[Harvey Danger]

I declare myself a poll loser. Back to the 10th it goes (eventually). The truly shocking part of this filing is that he actually realized he can't appeal it until the case is over.

Also, severe doubt on this one:



Doesn't his IFP status automatically throw this into doubt? Especially for a retard who has claimed, on the record, that he is too poor to keep an apartment and some laptops.

You know, Hardin could probably request a debtor's examination to determine if this is true. In Greer's own words, that would be "fitting to how [Greer] view honoring monetary judgements".

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Is there any chance that Hardin can use this to argue that the $1,000 was inappropriate and that the appeals court decides to reinstate the original amount?

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.231.0.pdf

Could the judge come back and reimpose the originally proposed $5,000 that Hardin requested?

Not based on this motion, but there is another two sanctions pending for Russ.

The truly shocking part of this filing is that he actually realized he can't appeal it until the case is over.

Mr. Hardin told him.

Doesn't his IFP status automatically throw this into doubt?

I don't believe so. If Mr. Hardin wanted to call his finances into doubt, he'd be better off using the Gilman case

 

[DragoonSierra]

I love hoe

So does Russ

 

[Harvey Danger]

Mr. Hardin told him.

You say this as if that has ever worked before.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You say that as if this has ever worked before.

First time for everything

 

[LOWERCASE LETTERS]

Can you even appeal sanctions?

 

[Throwing Romans]

Even assuming a monetary discovery sanction is a judgement and automatically subject to FRCP 62 (X), he has zero reason to request a partial bond.

 

[Sexy Potoo]

Like I'm sure Null is not driving around in a Bugatti...

Not yet anyways.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Can you even appeal sanctions?

You can, but not always immediately (and Russ wants to appeal after the case is over)