War Top US Senator Has ‘Never Been More Worried About Syria’ - Lindsey Graham says the US-backed jihadists that now control the country are causing more concern than ever

Article (Archive)

After a decade-long American effort to remove Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power in Damascus, Senator Lindsey Graham says the US-backed jihadists that now control the country are causing more concern than ever.

In an interview on Fox News Sunday, Graham explained that he had “never been more worried about the deterioration of Syria than I am now.” The senator was discussing an outbreak of violence in the country, where forces aligned with the new government are conducting mass executions targeting the Alawites and other religious minorities.

Under President Barack Obama, Washington provided training and arms for Assad’s opposition, hoping to remove him from power and undermine Iran’s regional influence. However, the most powerful rebel factions were violent jihadists, a fact acknowledged in a 2012 internal memo circulated by Obama’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).

During Trump’s first administration, he ended US support for the Sunni opposition, but enforced sweeping sanctions on Damascus that prevented the government from crushing Syrian al-Qaeda, led by Abu Mohammad al-Jolani and then concentrated in the country’s Idlib province.

At least some support for the rebels resumed during the Joe Biden presidency. In 2024, equipped with Ukrainian drones, Jolani’s forces went on the offensive, capturing Damascus and forcing Assad to flee the country.

Jolani and his organization – Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a jihadist umbrella group – then seized control of the country. After dubbing himself the new Syrian leader, Jolani was embraced by Washington and its allies. Last week, when violence broke out in Syria’s coastal region, HTS responded by killing hundreds of Alawite civilians.

The events of the past weekend left Senator Graham questioning whether the US could still work with Jolani and HTS. “Is this al-Qaeda or ISIS-light or is this some new form of Islam that we can all live with?” he asked, adding that before any sanctions were removed, Jolani must comply with unspecified conditions.

Graham has supported the regime change operations against Assad for well over a decade. In 2012, he argued, “We need to form a coalition to help arm the rebels, as well as create no-fly and no-drive zones to stop the slaughter by the Assad regime. I cannot say with certainty what will follow Assad but I can say with certainty that Assad must go, sooner rather than later.”

“If America is seen as being helpful in ending the slaughter of the Syrian people, it will allow us to have a stronger, future relationship with Assad’s eventual successor,” he continued. “Replacing Assad in Syria is critical to regional stability, a major blow to the Iranian regime and will bolster our national security interests.”

The next year, the senator acknowledged that “radical Islamists are hijacking [the Syrian] revolution.” However, that did not sway Graham’s support for regime change.

In 2015, the South Carolina lawmaker argued that the US should prioritize taking out Assad to fighting the jihadists. “How can we train a Free Syrian Army or send any other force into Syria if we don’t first deal with the Assad air threat?” he said, referring to the country’s supposedly “moderate” rebel FSA faction.

During the first Trump administration, in 2020, Graham called for the creation of a no-fly zone in Idlib to protect HTS and its jihadi allies from Syrian government airstrikes. “The world is sitting on its hands and watching the destruction of Idlib by Assad, Iran, and the Russians. This is one of the greatest humanitarian disasters in decades and the brutal aggression of Assad supported by Iran and Russia needs to come to an end,” he said at the time.

“I very much appreciate Turkey’s intervention in Idlib. It is now time for the international community to establish a no-fly zone to save thousands of innocent men, women, and children from a horrible death.” Graham added.
 
After a decade-long American effort to remove Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power in Damascus, Senator Lindsey Graham says the US-backed jihadists that now control the country are causing more concern than ever.

In an interview on Fox News Sunday, Graham explained that he had “never been more worried about the deterioration of Syria than I am now.” The senator was discussing an outbreak of violence in the country, where forces aligned with the new government are conducting mass executions targeting the Alawites and other religious minorities.
Almost like this is what fucking happens when you meddle, and these fucktards learned NOTHING from Afghanistan (either our embarrassment this century, or the Russians' in the 80s).

TFW you realize "Mossad the Assad" was a bad idea.
 
Everyone in America knows this is a bad idea. The problem is that the Lindsey Grahams of the nation don't care. His defense-industrial-complex butt buddies need to make line go up, so somebody has to create mayhem in order for things that go boom to be bought by the US Taxpayer, and distributed exclusively to fanatic muslims who would take no greater joy than in using said things that go boom ON the US Taxpayer. Like I said, someone please help us get this ghoul out of the senate!

Nah, this isn't as much about defense contracts as it is actively trying to keep the region destabilized. That region of the world, should they actually put down their weapons and work together, would rival the US in terms of GDP for oil. They could literally destabilize the oil market, petro dollar, and tank the US government within a decade if they actually worked together.
 
When is the U.S. going to learn that deposing a secular dictator in a region lousy with heavily armed religious fanatics is maybe not a great idea?
After they learn they work for Israel.

The previous senator in his seat (Strom Thurmond) was senator for nearly 50 years. He was so old that he ran in the 1948 presidential election and later voted for the Iraq War. Lindsey has some big high heels to fill.
He is the longest serving senator in American history. He remained in office til the ripe old age of 101, a lot like his close friend Joe Biden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Nah, this isn't as much about defense contracts as it is actively trying to keep the region destabilized. That region of the world, should they actually put down their weapons and work together, would rival the US in terms of GDP for oil. They could literally destabilize the oil market, petro dollar, and tank the US government within a decade if they actually worked together.
Why are the US even intervening then? Those people kill each other for goatfucking wrong.
 
Only the good die young. I'm half convinced LG made a pact with the devil, no one likes him, yet he keeps getting re elected, and has been old as hell for the last 20 years.
I just had a Mandela effect, because I thought he had retired a decade ago, and been replaced with his son, like Jerry Falwell. Nope.
 

Top US Senator Has ‘Never Been More Worried About Syria​

The thing is, I personally have never been worried about Syria. Nor should I be.

My thoughts on Syria or basically any country that isn't America:
m3dmoa22nk5c1.jpeg
 
I think we got into Syria more to keep the Russians from backing Assad and then being allowed to set up a warm water port on the Med than anything, but the Russians barely have a sea worthy navy in the first place. And it isn't like the Russians can't go from the Black Sea or Atlantic to the Med in any event.

You may think you hate Neocons and their Cold War mentality enough, but you don't.
 
Neocons are insane. Has this shit ever worked? It seems to end exactly the same way every time and these same motherfuckers come out wondering what went wrong.
It works every single time.

Lindsay Graham doesn't give a shit about the Middle East, but the people who give him kickbacks (the Military Industrial Complex) want instability in the region to constantly have wars going on and this is a really easy way to do exactly that. America meddling in the Middle East is good for business if you sell weapons - and Senators and such get a substantial (under the table) cut of it.

He can't just walk into a press conference holding bags of money - so on occasion they have to do this performative "Oh no, what happened" song and dance so they can do it again in the next country two years later.
 
He is a snake but at least he's not quite as disgusting as the other Al Qaeda fan in Congress, Joe Wilson.
 
Nah, this isn't as much about defense contracts as it is actively trying to keep the region destabilized. That region of the world, should they actually put down their weapons and work together, would rival the US in terms of GDP for oil. They could literally destabilize the oil market, petro dollar, and tank the US government within a decade if they actually worked together.
Are Arabs even capable of working together?
 
Back