Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

Great job @Jonkler, I've been in that discord looking over shit. She has some strange fetishes and other eccentricities.
  1. she's really self loathing in a sexual manner
  2. Has autocannibalisation fetish,
  3. Has well as a regular cannibalization fetish,
  4. she fantasized about being stabbed in the stomach and having someone fuck the stab wound (she made a xeet about that and had to remove it due to TOS), some weirdo made art of it in which she immediately loved that picture and found it hot.
  5. Could be irony poisoning but seems unhygienic
  6. Really loves rats, I don't know how many she has
  7. Wants a gun to shoot herself, could be more irony posting. Thing is she only walked it back after another user scolded her.
  8. Had an art piece of her made to look like a schoolgirl, she loved it (OFC)
There's probably more but I got tired of looking through it, I'm gonna leave my burner in there for a while longer and if anymore comes up, I'll keep the thread updated.
 
I'm pretty sure this was one of the first excuses when Jim Metokur confronted Jonathan Ross about looking at pictures of naked children in bathtub. "I.. I.. uh.. maybe.. Uh.. just thought they... were... uh.. cute and funny."
Kinda off topic, but this is one of the reasons people shouldn't be putting so much of their family's photo album online, especially if children are involved. The world doesn't need to see bathing pictures ffs. Parents should be aware of the filth using the Internet and cringe at the idea of them looking at their kids.
 
Back on Ririgaki/RiriMiau's discord this was posted
Screenshot_20250313-051253_Discord.jpg
Archive

Look at the fucking replies it's full of weirdos who want to do explicit things to the drawing of a child :cryblood:

Here's the person of interest who shared it to the discord
Discord ID-1339810283459186732
Message ID-1349673682682777621
Screenshot_20250313-052946_Discord.jpg
Archive of Xitter

Archive of Twitch
 
Last edited:
Mushoku Tensei was truly a pioneer in the wish fulfilment "my life is fucked and need a new universe to start over" genre.
It is a fucking blight on Anime as a whole. I am not surprised that 99% of its fans are gross pedophiles like the protagonist of that series.

Speaking of, would anyone here be interested in a sporking of the light novel as a separate thread? I skimmed through it in the past after an ex-friend of mine practically begged me to read it, and was disgusted by it (not just by the pedoshit, but also the terrible writing).
That series and how it's discussed is one of the biggest blackpills on anime as a whole to me. I saw the high praise and production value and genuinely thought that meant it was going to go the direction of "disgusting pedo gooner weeb gets a second chance at life and breaks out of his past life's mindset after experiencing the joy of earnestly living life". There's even a point in the story where the protagonist's dad slaps the shit out of him for happily fucking around on a goofy romcom adventure when most of his family is missing after fantasy 9/11.
There is a difference between having a shit plot (Franxx and Shinkai movies) and crossing the line of pedophilia. Mushoku managed to be both a shit plot AND crossing the line.
 
Ive changed my mind. I post a local of the leaks but it will be a screencap of the full webpage, so you can read what she titled each post that was leaked
WARNING: Feet pics, barely clothed, drawn nudes.
And no im not going to censor any of it.
Excellent work lad. Truly a disgusting individual.
Great job @Jonkler, I've been in that discord looking over shit. She has some strange fetishes and other eccentricities.
  1. she's really self loathing in a sexual manner
  2. Has autocannibalisation fetish,
  3. Has well as a regular cannibalization fetish,
  4. she fantasized about being stabbed in the stomach and having someone fuck the stab wound (she made a xeet about that and had to remove it due to TOS), some weirdo made art of it in which she immediately loved that picture and found it hot.
  5. Could be irony poisoning but seems unhygienic
  6. Really loves rats, I don't know how many she has
  7. Wants a gun to shoot herself, could be more irony posting. Thing is she only walked it back after another user scolded her.
  8. Had an art piece of her made to look like a schoolgirl, she loved it (OFC)
There's probably more but I got tired of looking through it, I'm gonna leave my burner in there for a while longer and if anymore comes up, I'll keep the thread updated.
She sounds like some goth NEET that also got into pedophilia. The suicide bait with the gun takes the cake for me. She's some sort of BPD.
 
GET YOUR DAMN D!RTY HANDS OFF MY APE GAME!!!!!


There ARE people that do werd possble projecton sh!t and act l!ke anyth!ng that has a k!d !n !t !s pedosh!t though, but l!ke ! sa!d earl!er sh!t gets really fuck!ng muddy due to !t be!nd a m!x of dumbasses, redd!t bra!nworms sufferers, or actual pedos w!th MAP !n the!r b!o on occas!on. the lol!sh!t !s un!ron!cally a "! can't tell who's jew!ng who anymore" sh!t onl!ne half the t!me these days but !t's pedos !nstead of jews.
There definitely are people that enjoy muddling the waters just to cover their asses and cause chaos. It's a effective tactic against normies. I'd argue it's how the Lolicons have evaded detection for so long.
 
The Texas Senate has passed [A] a bill banning obscene material that appears to depict a child "regardless of whether the depiction is an image of an actual child, a cartoon or animation, or an image created using an artificial intelligence application or other computer software":
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.

The main part of the bill [A]:
SECTION 1. Subchapter B, Chapter 43, Penal Code, is amended by adding Section 43.235 to read as follows:

Sec. 43.235. POSSESSION OR PROMOTION OF OBSCENE VISUAL MATERIAL APPEARING TO DEPICT CHILD. (a) In this section:
(1) "Promote" has the meaning assigned by Section 43.25.​
(2) "Visual material" has the meaning assigned by Section 43.26.​

(b) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly possesses, accesses with intent to view, or promotes obscene visual material containing a depiction that appears to be of a child younger than 18 years of age engaging in activities described by Section 43.21(a)(1)(B), regardless of whether the depiction is an image of an actual child, a cartoon or animation, or an image created using an artificial intelligence application or other computer software.

(c) An offense under this section is a state jail felony, except that the offense is:
(1) a felony of the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the person has been previously convicted one time of an offense under this section or Section 43.23, 43.26, 43.261, or 43.262; or​
(2) a felony of the second degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the person has been previously convicted two or more times of an offense under this section, Section 43.23, 43.26, 43.261, or 43.262, or any combination of those offenses.​
(d) If conduct constituting an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another law, the actor may be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.

I think this could potentially apply to lolicon/shotacon as well as AI-generated images, since it covers "cartoons". Guess we'll have to wait and see.
 
I think this could potentially apply to lolicon/shotacon as well as AI-generated images, since it covers "cartoons". Guess we'll have to wait and see.
It mentioned cartoons specifically. While I'm no lawyer, it's generally assumed by the judiciary that what is written in a law holds meaning. It quite well could be. It will need to be tested though against lolicon, specifically the non AI variety.
 
It is quite incredible how little thought lolicons have put into the implications of AI when it comes to legislation. For as fanatical as they are, they are also often incredibly lazy and complacent - feeling safe on the basis of legal decisions made prior to the rise of generative AI. Even someone 100% on board with all drawn material has to wrestle with the idea that materials generated with tech, utilising images of real children, may be indistinguishable from other digital art; forgetting generative tech, even 'filtered' abused materials may be indistinguishable from a total fabrication if one is unaware of the context of its creation.
The choice, when it comes to policy, may come down to sacrificing cartoons to make sure the other material can be purged or protecting abuse material and porn generated with images of actual children in order to keep the more fictional depictions safe. An ironic flip of their usual rhetoric about people 'protecting cartoon children.'
 
It is quite incredible how little thought lolicons have put into the implications of AI when it comes to legislation. For as fanatical as they are, they are also often incredibly lazy and complacent - feeling safe on the basis of legal decisions made prior to the rise of generative AI. Even someone 100% on board with all drawn material has to wrestle with the idea that materials generated with tech, utilising images of real children, may be indistinguishable from other digital art; forgetting generative tech, even 'filtered' abused materials may be indistinguishable from a total fabrication if one is unaware of the context of its creation.
The choice, when it comes to policy, may come down to sacrificing cartoons to make sure the other material can be purged or protecting abuse material and porn generated with images of actual children in order to keep the more fictional depictions safe. An ironic flip of their usual rhetoric about people 'protecting cartoon children.'
They have pushed AI to its legal limits. This was inevitable. Cartoons and other forms of art getting caught in the crossfire was going to happen. As you said, they got lazy. When all it took for infinite AI CSAM was a decent PC, it was fucking over.
 
They have pushed AI to its legal limits. This was inevitable. Cartoons and other forms of art getting caught in the crossfire was going to happen. As you said, they got lazy. When all it took for infinite AI CSAM was a decent PC, it was fucking over.
They ruin everything they touch because of their lust for cartoon children.
 
I think this could potentially apply to lolicon/shotacon as well as AI-generated images, since it covers "cartoons". Guess we'll have to wait and see.
Okay i dislike texas treatment of women , but this if fucking based and everything is forgiven .
For final touch i reccomend woodchipper execution for pedos livestreamed in 4k . Thats all I am asking
 
Back