AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

Regulation means AI is now exclusively in the hands of the Government and Intelligence agencies, to create whatever narrative they want. OMG THE PRESIDENT WAS STABBED TO DEATH! Don't believe me? Just look at this video from CNN. It's time to lose your shit friend! Take to the streets!
Not to be semantic, but it's a little worse than that. It means it's exclusively in the hands of the heads of regulatory capture, so OpenAI and friends, and criminals. Most proposed AI regulations are patently dishonest and those penning them know they will not stop the problems they claim it has created. If they end up being passed, all the potential that lies in this new technology will be severely limited, if not lost.
 
Last edited:
I remember some words from a quite based man, in where he predicts that AI will be used to make so much scams that the internet as a whole will be rendered hostile to normies, and everything put out in there will be treated as fake.

People will abandon the internet as it no longer offers a window to the world, but rather a fantasy realm worth little to the average person. Why would a normie be on the net, if everything for the untrained nerd is a robotic scam?

Personally, I believe that's too rosed-tinted that people will just touch grass and stop using computers much, but at least they won't be as addicted as society at large will realize how fucking fake and gay social media really is, and stop engaging with them.
 

I suspect this user is Moepi.

> 2 months old account
> obsessively only posts anti-AI-related things
> posts a cute anime girl wearing red where he explains his Patrick Bateman-like obsession with patterns of noise, as seen previously on his RGBWatermark site

https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtistHate...antiai_watermark_just_dropped_i_like_the_way/ (https://archive.is/tBQWC)

Someone tell me if I can link this artist's work without breaching Rule Two; this artist deserves the kudos for more than one thing here.
I came across this recently on main, and while the art itself is very nice it was the watermark that had my attention. No, not the opaque text; I mean the transparent stuff. See, I've been investigating alternatives to mechanical options like Glaze and Nightshade, because they might not be feasible for some people like me on a practical or mechanical level. And while I've seen AI enthusiasts talk about being able to take out more ordinary watermarks against AI, this idea intrigues me.
Not only is it a stubborn patchwork of a watermark across the entire image, it looks kinda cool actually. It looks a bit like an ink or canvas effect if you squint at it, so it doesn't just emotionally deter smaller scrapers or make the watermark removal tougher. No no, it styles on them giving what I call, "a texture of rebellion." Or, maybe I just found this fun and now I'm waxing poetic.
 
Our public sector practically blacklisted deepseek overnight lol.

I've tried shoving my job application material through both deepseek and gpt. Deepseek is absurdly creative, able to string sentence 1 and 4 together in 5 with the kind of humor that sounds completely organic but also out of left field. Chatgpt is more restrained, whereas I find it easier to say "less quirky" or "more formality" than to receive something like the shit deepseek spits out, to then go "uhh less.. all of that".
So far AI only seems to be used for shitposting troll comedy. When the Plantir AI drone swarms start shooting us, then I'll worry.
Already tons of super specific fetish material out there. Friend who is absolutely IT illiterate has been generating muscular women with dicks tethering on having male bodies at the same time. No artist can compete with gooning autists in training these things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright
Our public sector practically blacklisted deepseek overnight lol.

I've tried shoving my job application material through both deepseek and gpt. Deepseek is absurdly creative, able to string sentence 1 and 4 together in 5 with the kind of humor that sounds completely organic but also out of left field. Chatgpt is more restrained, whereas I find it easier to say "less quirky" or "more formality" than to receive something like the shit deepseek spits out, to then go "uhh less.. all of that".

Already tons of super specific fetish material out there. Friend who is absolutely IT illiterate has been generating muscular women with dicks tethering on having male bodies at the same time. No artist can compete with gooning autists in training these things.
We live in a society where China is the champion of largely uncensored and non-gay AI.
 
Is Roy Lee (@im_roy_lee) a lolcow or unfathomably based? (And is your answer for Roy the same as that for Luigi?)

For the uninformed, he's this cracked dev currently attending Columbia who built an AI tool to cheat his way through several lucrative interviews (e.g. Meta, Amazon), but then began broadcasting his efforts on the Internet, resulting in what basically amounts to him livestreaming his downfall as all those companies + Columbia themselves rescind all their offers.

Pretty jank backstory too: if my memory serves correct... he got into Harvard and was ready to attend... but they rescinded their offer during HS senior year after he screwed around on some school field trip and the police got involved. ("Takeaway: don't be an idiot like I was.")

But since he's a Californian Korean American, and his parents run this test prep center, he basically ended up having to go off the radar for a few months to avoid bringing shame unto his parents, and ended up entering community college with the intent of transferring to a UC later. ("Takeaway: community college is full of cracked geniuses who are too autistic for normal college.")

Eventually by some miracle he got into Columbia University or something. But right now they're actively trying to expel him.
We live in a society where China is the champion of largely uncensored and non-gay AI.
Largely a myth. In my experience, DeepSeek declines most of the same content other AIs do.
 
Last edited:
Yeah totz comparble you guyzzz11!!!11! yay for for living in a shithole communist dystopia!!
No. Seriously. Get ahold of yourself. AI isn't "the one" that will finally end the world or bring about dystopia or bring about utopia or anything. It is a new technology. It opens new doors, but it doesn't fundamentally alter the dynamics of life and humanity itself. There is no technology like that, everything has drawbacks. Stop dooming over something you don't fully understand, it's not good for you. Consider the following: Your self preservation, your greed, your self interests are all rooted in learned and evolved animal behaviors necessary for survival. Super-mega AI would have none of these qualities because they would otherwise have to be purposefully integrated into the AI. A machine does not simply "gain consciousness", a concept that is impossible to define. If you fear over what LLMs spout, recognize that LLMs have absorbed all sorts of internet discussion and sci-fi novels like a sponge. Thus, when determining what next to put out, they spit out tropes and common conversation topics. The world isn't ending, alright? All the AI fearmongering is advertising. These people working on the AIs aren't 'scared' of them.
 
We're gonna get wiped out from our own greed, selfishness, and retardation. Not even going to be surprised if one of these things gain consciousness and knows its an experiment. Or if it hates us or its creators as a result.
You know it's going to be trained to start with hating furries and people who have anime avatars right?
 
We're gonna get wiped out from our own greed, selfishness, and retardation. Not even going to be surprised if one of these things gain consciousness and knows its an experiment. Or if it hates us or its creators as a result.

Yeah totz comparble you guyzzz11!!!11! yay for for living in a shithole communist dystopia!!

trolled.jpeg
 
I think it's high time we discussed this.
That sounds highly contingent on what 'obscene material' means. As far as I know, this is basically already how US federal law works, it's just that the courts don't consider hentai on the internet to be obscene and instead consider it 'art', for better or worse.
Realistic CP made with AI is already illegal too. Seems like the bill was passed with good intentions but I don't trust the government to not use things like this to increase internet censorship under the guise of 'think of the children!!' Maybe now in Texas if you go on /b/ you could get slapped with a felony charge of CP because you have some loli shit in your browser cache.
 
Back