Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
If Nick really believed that Aaron gave his daughter Cocaine then he wouldn't be implying it from the side-lines, he'd be outright calling Aaron out, he's acting too weaselly, like he's seeing if the lie can stick first before fully committing to it. But at least he admits that the tests were real now, that's progress I guess.
If you are a father and you think somebody gave your 9 year old daughter Cocaine anything less then murderous intent doesn't compute with me.
 
I have no doubt that Nick has some sort of sleep disorder, but it's not because of an unavoidable disease, it's just that he's an alcoholic who stays up late to avoid his wife and kids, and that habit has ruined his internal rhythm. He is the disorder.

I doubt this 'narcolepsy' existed when he was studying/working and (tenuously) part of the real world. And if a doctor has diagnosed him with it, it's because of the symptoms rather than the cause.

One time when he was describing taking his narcolepsy medication (modafinil), the things he said seemed to indicate that he was explicitly abusing it and its interactions with alcohol. He described taking it at the end of his day (a time at least when he streamed when he was drunk) using it to go to sleep. Presumably through the alcohol interaction,
 
I can't believe there wasn't more done to investigate how a kid that young ended up testing positive for cocaine. I know CPS is shit, but you'd think that would be serious enough to insist on some answers before the kid gets sent back to the parents? Maybe the answer is actually in the CPS file and since it's sealed Nick can insinuate whatever bullshit he wants.
 
If you are a father and you think somebody gave your 9 year old daughter Cocaine anything less then murderous intent doesn't compute with me.

If someone gave your nine year old a bunch of cocaine to consume, that nine year old would almost inevitably be able to recount what happened and that "someone" would be going to prison for a long time.

If all your children offer instead rehearsed identical accounts of how "if I have ever been exposed to illegal drugs, it happened at a location other than the home of my loving parents. who love me"......that would probably indicate the parents are total monsters.

I can't believe there wasn't more done to investigate how a kid that young ended up testing positive for cocaine. I know CPS is shit, but you'd think that would be serious enough to insist on some answers before the kid gets sent back to the parents? Maybe the answer is actually in the CPS file and since it's sealed Nick can insinuate whatever bullshit he wants.

CPS kept the kids away from the parents for just about six months which is the longest it can be done without starting very serious legal proceedings to take them away permanently. The CPS process is always designed to re-unite the family if it all possible because the alternatives are usually far worse for the kids (foster care).

The positive test would have bothered CPS (probably). But if the kid didn't provide actionable information for the cocaine exposure, they can't do more than force the parents through drug treatment and keep the kids away for the full six months.

CPS would have equally or even more been bothered by Nick and Kayla's initial refusal to cooperate in any way with CPS or admit to even having used drugs. In the family court proceedings we cannot see, what eventually (probably) happened is that Nick realized he was not going to get his kids back at all unless he went through drug treatment and the other things CPS wanted he and kalya to do.
 
Last edited:
The positive test would have bothered CPS (probably). But if the kid didn't provide actionable information for the cocaine exposure, they can't do more than force the parents through drug treatment and keep the kids away for the full six months.

Didn't Nick's parents step in to foster/take custody of the kids around June where we saw in the CPS hearing transcript Bob & Celeste shamefully sweeping for their fuck-up son? Did they lean on/coach the 9 year old (similar to theories that they may have done with April) to STFU whenever Mr. Gubbermint does a checkup?
 
Huh. He's stayed at The Venetian before.
View attachment 7089977
I think there's far more to this Love Cloud thing than we're assuming.
I'm not trying to suggest he boned some gook escort in the sky or something, but we know he's been to Las Vegas at least twice.
Now with fat nonce's shitty Daddleverse hookup, there's a nonzero chance for this decrepit plane to take off again, with some peculiar passengers. :really:
Let's hope it crashes into a casino.
I hope the DEA interdicts it mid flight.
 
I have no doubt that Nick has some sort of sleep disorder, but it's not because of an unavoidable disease, it's just that he's an alcoholic who stays up late to avoid his wife and kids, and that habit has ruined his internal rhythm. He is the disorder.

I doubt this 'narcolepsy' existed when he was studying/working and (tenuously) part of the real world. And if a doctor has diagnosed him with it, it's because of the symptoms rather than the cause.
Nick's claimed that his obvious signs of cocaine use totally weren't cocaine use until he was essentially forced fo admit it, so I just assume that everything he says about anything is a lie.
 
Nick's claimed that his obvious signs of cocaine use totally weren't cocaine use until he was essentially forced fo admit it, so I just assume that everything he says about anything is a lie.
I believe him when he says he was gay with Aaron and that they traded bodily fluids.
 
CPS kept the kids away from the parents for just about six months
I think you might be mistaking months for weeks.

Not to nitpick, but it was seven weeks for some 'back-to-home supervised-of some-sort (grandparent?)' thing, and about a month after that, he completed "recovery" and the case was "closed" (Rekieta's words), which isn't really closed for anyone who knows how CPS works.

Edit. On this stream at 1:11:40 on Aug. 3, he said the kids would be home (permanently) in two weeks (that happened). I believe that was after supervised at-home something. I can look up the details at some point. It's ITT.
 
Last edited:
I think you might be mistaking months for weeks.

Not to nitpick, but it was seven weeks for some 'back-to-home supervised-of some-sort (grandparent?)' thing, and about a month after that, he completed "recovery" and the case was "closed" (Rekieta's words), which isn't really closed for anyone who knows how CPS works.

Edit. On this stream at 1:11:40 on Aug. 3, he said the kids would be home (permanently) in two weeks (that happened). I believe that was after supervised at-home something. I can look up the details at some point. It's ITT.

Nick muddled the timeline with lies. His first announcement of 'muh keeds ar bak!' made to his LOCALS was during a time of supervised home visits--and they lived full-time with extended family. He later admitted (months later) that it was only supervised home visits, but moved om to claim the 'CPS case [was] closed' at about the 6-month mark from his arrest.

People ITT called Nick out for his... exaggerations... at the time and noted the 6-month CPS time limit as the likely factor why he got them back ik the hosue kong-term. They also noted his confession of the first lie.
 
Nick muddled the timeline with lies. His first announcement of 'muh keeds ar bak!' made to his LOCALS was during a time of supervised home visits--and they lived full-time with extended family. He later admitted (months later) that it was only supervised home visits, but moved om to claim the 'CPS case [was] closed' at about the 6-month mark from his arrest.

People ITT called Nick out for his... exaggerations... at the time and noted the 6-month CPS time limit as the likely factor why he got them back ik the hosue kong-term. They also noted his confession of the first lie.
Yeah, I believe they did the supervision for the full six months. In one capacity or another.

See, the thing is, Nick could prove otherwise by unsealing his case file, but I don't think he ever will. Because it probably looks like shit, and would not support any of his lies. What got out before it was sealed certainly wasn't good.

Opacity benefits Nick. Particular among the gullible. Transparency does not.
 
think you might be mistaking months for weeks.

Not to nitpick, but it was seven weeks for some 'back-to-home supervised-of some-sort (grandparent?)' thing, and about a month after that, he completed "recovery" and the case was "closed" (Rekieta's words), which isn't really closed for anyone who knows how CPS works.

The issue here is that you choose to believe what Nick says. If Nick says the kids were home in August, then I guess we are unquestionably supposed to believe that the children were there. Just as we are supposed to accept unchallenged multiple other things for whom Nick was the only source.

I'll point out that Nick started making these statements about the kids being home in the aftermath of the case being sealed and nobody being able to prove him wrong.

Month 1 (June) - Nick is not cooperating with CPS.
Month 2 (july) - Nick is not cooperating with CPS and is challenging everything about the entire process.
Month 3 (August) - Nick says the kids are back. Having done no chemical assessment or treatment plan, we are supposed to believe that the kids were returned to Nick and Kayla.
September-October - Nick disappears. Nick changes address temporarily. Nick is clearly doing things for CPS. The type of things are inevitably pre-conditions to getting custody back.
c. November - The first actual evidence of the children being home appears and nick makes a big deal of it.
 
The issue here is that you choose to believe what Nick says. If Nick says the kids were home in August, then I guess we are unquestionably supposed to believe that the children were there. Just as we are supposed to accept unchallenged multiple other things for whom Nick was the only source.

I'll point out that Nick started making these statements about the kids being home in the aftermath of the case being sealed and nobody being able to prove him wrong.

Month 1 (June) - Nick is not cooperating with CPS.
Month 2 (july) - Nick is not cooperating with CPS and is challenging everything about the entire process.
Month 3 (August) - Nick says the kids are back. Having done no chemical assessment or treatment plan, we are supposed to believe that the kids were returned to Nick and Kayla.
September-October - Nick disappears. Nick changes address temporarily. Nick is clearly doing things for CPS. The type of things are inevitably pre-conditions to getting custody back.
c. November - The first actual evidence of the children being home appears and nick makes a big deal of it.

I think @Himedall All-seeing Waifu summary is most accurate on the facts.

The specifics are not worth arguing about because we'll never know until Kayla, April, one of the kids (one day), or a Woltjer/Sletta family member speaks up. (Someone will at some point, I'm sure.)

I believe that in mid-August a grandparent (probably Shari) moved in. As a registered foster parent, the State likely verified that she would be a responsible supervisor. The kids were home (per Nick) for either daytime hours or Mon-Fri and then went back to the grandparents for the weekends for church - we know the kids attended throughout the summer.

This allowed Nick and April to do their thing on weekends (many receipts on that). Pathetic when one considers the circumstances.

The kids returned full-time, relatively unsupervised by the State, starting in Nov.
 
I'm gonna call bullshit on this, never mind the "secured curtain", is anyone believing that the pilot isn't going to be jerking it with one side of the headset off, if he wears it at all? It just brings up more questions what kind of creep pilot would take this job, or if it's some desperate schmuck who couldn't get hired anywhere else and has to put up with it.
I have to be real here for a moment: What the fuck is this post? Rekieta is a pathetic degenerate, but this just seems like the other side of the coin.

Who cares if two adults to the dirty? What do you think goes on in hotel rooms all the time?
Do you also assume everyone working in a hotel is either a voyeur busting nut after nut on the clock, or a disgusting reject that couldn't find work outside the hospitality business?! People fuck a lot in hotels, nobody wears noise canceling headphones, and normal people don't rub one out whenever they hear sex noises through the wall.

Sounds like a cozy gig as a pilot, compared to stressful airline work.
 
I have to be real here for a moment: What the fuck is this post? Rekieta is a pathetic degenerate, but this just seems like the other side of the coin.

Who cares if two adults to the dirty? What do you think goes on in hotel rooms all the time?
Do you also assume everyone working in a hotel is either a voyeur busting nut after nut on the clock, or a disgusting reject that couldn't find work outside the hospitality business?! People fuck a lot in hotels, nobody wears noise canceling headphones, and normal people don't rub one out whenever they hear sex noises through the wall.

Sounds like a cozy gig as a pilot, compared to stressful airline work.
I'd rather be telling people I know that I work in housekeeping at a hotel than that I work as a pilot who caters to people who want to fuck in a plane specifically.
 
Telling people you pilot a sex plane sounds kind of funny though. Nick seems to think it’s “funny & weird.” He’s using the sex plane as a pick up line on random stream chat guys, too. This will continue to get gayer & gayer. Maybe he’s hit the rebound arc, post Toe.
 
Back