Grace Lavery / Joseph Lavery & Daniel M. Lavery / Mallory Ortberg - "Straight with extra steps" couple trooning out to avoid "dwindling into mere heterosexuality"

Joe's latest Instagram post that i completely, 100%, fully agree with
reconnect with the working class // avoid divisive social topics // focus on bread-and-butter issues // nobody wants to hear about your nephew’s pronouns // there’s nothing wrong with women wanting their own spaces // women’s sports and also lesbians // nobody is born in the wrong body you are perfect the way God made you // start making sense // avoid divisive social topics // they look freakish anyway // the topics i mean // also you know who 🤡 🤡 🤡
483511358_18489327787029726_2386902099667906051_n.jpg

I remember thinking how Joe's constant edgier than thou oneupmanship will likely mean a change in his retard opinions, but If democrats do get their shit together enough to pivot into something more electable he may just remain in this Tumblr, mid 00's proto embryonic state where tranny stuff is the end all be all.
I know that not having practical politics is almost a point of pride for him, but his writing is so out of date (like that sitcom book could have been topical 15 years ago) that surely now is the time to put some fresh ideas forward.

How is it that Vulture and Vogue and N+1 are putting out more radical shit then Joe ever did. How hard is it to lick your finger and figure out which direction the wind is blowing?
 
Last edited:
surely now is the time to put some fresh ideas forward.
Not happenin'. Not when you've spent many years shoveling bullshit up to make the hill you're going to stand, defend and die on. Or in Joe's case, that you made your name from.
How hard is it to lick your finger and figure out which direction the wind is blowing?
Ew. That's not something I'd like to see Joe do. Or any tranny or Lefty, for that matter.
 
The latest Chatner (archive). Full text is under the spoiler below; there are a few different segments separated by a horizontal line. The segment about the guy telling her her backpack is open: what?! I see what she's trying to do, taking a moment from her day and expanding it into a funny vignette, but she clearly had real trouble getting through the interaction. She comes off looking like an austistic freak/tard baby.

: I’m going to be in Tucson this weekend for the Tucson Festival of Books. Come by and see me if you’re in town! I’ll be on a panel about storytelling at 11:30am on Saturday the 15th, and another on writing about women at the same time on Sunday the 16th.

You had better believe I am prepared to talk for precisely my allotted time as “the only guy on the panel about women,” and not a second longer. I know what I’m about! You won’t catch me going over time!

I’ll also be at the L.A. Festival of Books next month, and will drop in more details as the date approaches.


This Yahoo! interview with Richard Kind about guest starring is laser-tailored to my interests, and possibly to yours:
Tell me, what’s going on with Sy Hoffman in this episode of Night Court?
You have to speak a little louder.
What is it? Can you hear me?
I can hear you. It’s me. I’m driving through Palm Springs, and it’s windy outside.


Earlier today a guy on the street told me an objectively helpful thing I didn’t know about myself, only he got my attention in a way I considered so offensive that I refused to take his advice, to my own detriment.

In his defense, I had my headphones in, and moreover I was actively ignoring him. It’s difficult to get someone’s attention politely when they have their headphones in, and even more so when they’re tuning you out on purpose. But he had opened with “Hey. Hey, guy,” which has never once in my life served as the preliminary to a pleasant conversation, so I ignored him. He tried a few more “Hey, guys” before he started waving his hand in my peripheral vision.

In retrospect this is where I should have answered him. “Hey, guy” isn’t the warmest of greetings, but it’s perfectly neutral, and I am not a marquis, that I can expect perfect strangers to approach me with reverence and solicitude. It was beneath both of our dignities to pretend not to notice he was waving at me. But I wanted him to give up!

What I had failed to take into account was that someone who tries to get your attention with “Hey, guy” and then waves their hand around your temples is not someone who can be put off by chilly reserve. Chilly reserve and frozen hauteur are all well and good in their place, and are very effective against the right sort of person, but they were the wrong tools for this job,1 because he only started whistling at me. The kind of two-toned, high-low whistle you use to get a dog’s attention, at which point I recognized that he was willing to go much further than I was in this game of chicken, and took my earbuds out.

“Your backpack is open,” he said to me.

Now, he was perfectly right to say this. My backpack was open. I had not realized this when I left the house. But this awoke a spirit of perversity in me, because I did not want to accept help from someone I thought was rude, and I did not want to “give him the satisfaction” of admitting my backpack was open, or that it might have been an oversight on my part not to close it. I merely looked at him with what I hoped was an expression of untroubled placidity, but which almost certainly looked like remarkable stupidity, because he added, “Wide open,” in a tone of real concern.

What could I do? I had already committed to playing a petty, stonewalling part in our little tableaux. I said to him, “That’s fine. That’s no problem.” I suppose the effect I was going for was one of aristocratic unconcern: Why should I concern myself with the zippers of a backpack? If someone steals my things out of it, I shall simply call Grandmama and have her replace them. At this he looked at me with something less than annoyance but stronger than pity before giving up and walking away.

And of course when he was safely out of sight I did zip up my backpack. He was perfectly right to tell me about it, because it was also raining, and my books were getting soaked. But I wasn’t about to let that son of a bitch have the satisfaction of seeing me do it.


I always like when people are writing about Greek and Roman mythology, and they try to break through the tyranny of familiarity by throwing a few extra ks back into the mix.

Hercules: Ah, my old friend and little buddy! Hercules and his big chores, yes sir, I know everything there is to know about him, all right. I could draw him as a cartoon in my sleep!

Herakles: We are standing in the presence of a mighty, nameless tomb…we must speak in hushed tones, lest we disturb the sleep of our alien, soi-distant forebears…the past is a different country, and they do things differently here…
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/557da6b7-8136-4ff3-8aab-018cc2706c65_1920x1859.jpeg

The baby is at a really terrific age just at present. If you have a baby who is big enough to sit up in a high chair, but little enough to still be entertained by merely being handed new objects every time minutes, I recommend taking the skin off of a mango and handing the whole thing to the baby (be sure to put down a tray first and either divest the baby of its clothes or put a big rubber smock over him, so you don’t have to spend ten minutes cleaning him properly afterwards). It’s too soft to run any risk of choking him, but also crucially too big for him to drop below the tray without serious effort. You don’t want to do this every day, of course. You’re not made of money, and whole mangos aren’t free. But it’s a lot of fun every once in a while.


A year or so ago I was at a client’s house while New York One was on in the background, and they teased an upcoming segment on proposed updates to the NYPD facial hair policy with the following line: “New York’s FINEST may soon become New York’s…SMOOTHEST?” I still think about it all the time.

1
Similarly, I think most people nowadays can be roughly slotted into one of two categories: people who would be more offended by being called “deeply unserious,” or by being called “a fucking bitch” during an argument on the internet. Those are the two predominating types of online name-calling, I think, and while I don’t think most people like being called either, you tend to know right away which one would bother you more.
 
The segment about the guy telling her her backpack is open: what?! I see what she's trying to do, taking a moment from her day and expanding it into a funny vignette, but she clearly had real trouble getting through the interaction. She comes off looking like an austistic freak/tard baby.
She comes across like a full on lunatic. She's so hostile to this guy who is just trying to be helpful and neighborly. He's rude, he's a son of a bitch, he's this, he's that. Meanwhile she has to pretend not to care and stand there letting her stuff get soaked until he can no longer see her zip it back up. This is a level of pettiness and self-consciousness most normal people grow out of before they graduate middle school. What the fuck is wrong with her, for real?
 
Similarly, I think most people nowadays can be roughly slotted into one of two categories: people who would be more offended by being called “deeply unserious,” or by being called “a fucking bitch” during an argument on the internet. Those are the two predominating types of online name-calling, I think, and while I don’t think most people like being called either, you tend to know right away which one would bother you more.
Hey, how about most people aren't bothered by either because twitter isn't a real place?
 
You had better believe I am prepared to talk for precisely my allotted time as “the only guy on the panel about women,” and not a second longer. I know what I’m about! You won’t catch me going over time!
I'm Not Like Other Dudes! (But I am like other Doods.)
In that backpack encounter she comes across as both deeply unserious and a fucking bitch, so Tard Baby FTW I guess?
Maybe our humble and cheerful trans man was tired and touchy because she didn't get a good and restful night's sleep the night before due to staying up far too late cleaning up the kitchen after Joe's latest multi pot and pan gourmet dinner and then being subject to Joe and LaLa making the sounds of enthusiastic sexual congress in the other room of their 700 square foot cabin. A 700 square foot cabin is a small cabin indeed, and enthusiastic sexual congress sounds can (boy, can they ever!) can travel across it very easily and very audibly. So very easily and so very audibly that a humble and cheerful trans man found herself lying awake for hours thinking ungenerous and unforgivable thoughts about her fellow BPT members long after their sexual congress had finished and they were peacefully sleeping it off. Those ungenerous and unforgivable thoughts stressed a humble and generous trans man out and lingered like stale cigar smoke in a 19th century library room which made her peevishly ignore and irritably snap at an unsuspecting but friendly stranger trying to be objectively helpful while she was out and about in the streets the following day. Rainy and forlorn streets, that mirrored the mood of our humble and cheerful trans man....
 
You had better believe I am prepared to talk for precisely my allotted time as “the only guy on the panel about women,” and not a second longer.
"The only guy on a panel about women" is very close to "the only 'guy' on a panel about women." It just feels so much like no one actually believes in self-identity, even the people who are self-identifying.

She comes across like a full on lunatic. She's so hostile to this guy who is just trying to be helpful and neighborly. He's rude, he's a son of a bitch, he's this, he's that. Meanwhile she has to pretend not to care and stand there letting her stuff get soaked until he can no longer see her zip it back up. This is a level of pettiness and self-consciousness most normal people grow out of before they graduate middle school. What the fuck is wrong with her, for real?
I've lived in the East Bay and and can completely understand her reaction. Someone in the Berkeley/Emeryville/Albany area who tries to get the attention of a stranger in public is twice as likely to be a crazy person or a panhandler, as they are to be imparting useful information. And of the remainder that are imparting useful information, there's still a decent chance that they're a crazy panhandler.

This does not excuse Mal for being the kind of absent-minded that will leave the house with their backpack unzipped - who just puts stuff into a backpack and then neglects to close it? (It's a rhetorical question, because the obvious answer is 'tard babies'.)
 
Funny, guess which crazy I found in the wild the other day?
View attachment 7092824
Some things just don't change, apparently.
It’s extra funny because his response has nothing to do with the comment about opting out of your “potential”….its just narc fantasy. I bet he still has elaborate fantasies about his funeral and all the grief, sorrow and regret everyone will have upon his tragic demise. All his enemies finally admitting the revolutionary voice of a generation has been silenced and they are consumed with regret.
 
I can almost see what she was going for, though of course Mal fumbles both the interaction and the re-telling.

If you live in the kind of city where taking public transit makes more sense than driving and finding parking, ignoring any random trying to talk to you at the bus stop or train platform is just good sense. Nine out of ten times, they're a lunatic or con-artist taking advantage of people unlikely to walk away and acknowledging you saw them is handing them an opening. But, very occasionally, they're a normal person who just wants to say "hey you dropped this" or whatever. If you've been avoiding eye contact as if they're a crazy bum, it's awkward to shift your attitude and say thanks. But either you go "thanks" and shrug it off, or you say something like "oh man I was spacing out so hard, thank you" offering the polite fiction that you weren't ignoring them on purpose. It's the exact kind of minute social friction that I'd expect the author of Texts From Jane Eyre to fixate on. But pretending to be too cool to care and leaving your backpack open because "nuh-uh, you don't tell me what to do" is just juvenile.
 
While Mr. Lavery mans it up in Tucson with joy at being out and about, Mrs. Lavery appears to be risking it all by defiantly shouting a defiant demand on Instagram. Lily's on the down low per usual.
thing.png
thing4.png
text: Human wig on a cactus...welcome to Tucson baby
484250566_18472592494067089_8096252503185611214_n.jpg
Caption: big storm
thing2.png
crowd goes wild:
thing 3.png
484009622_18472819318067089_221812372405094846_n.jpg
caption: it's so beautiful in Tucson!! you can just walk around
cap 1.png
So Oakland's that bad afterall??? Kinda wasn't believing the horror stories til now. One comment:
com 1.png
And now for the input of academe's brightest light, copypasta of the Martin Niemöller classic:
485180577_18490672756029726_972933978977026000_n.jpg
Followed by Mrs. Dr. Lavery's personal message:
cap.png
Text: "speaking up" is not the most important thing. FREE MAHMOUD KHALIL NO W.


ETA - Joe is planning a trip to NYC in mid-April. He may have other business there but has a backstage pass to a performance of João Florêncio and Liz Rosenfeld at the Bureau of General Services, Queer Division. Joe will be attending with Tavia Nyong'o, Yale prof currently on leave.
book 1.pngbook2.png
Last year I was moved and delighted to accept an invitation from João Florêncio and Liz Rosenfeld to contribute a foreword to their dripping-wet book CROSSINGS: CREATIVE ECOLOGIES OF CRUISING. Queer theory has gotten good at a lot of things over the last two decades, but I would maintain that it has not, generally, helped us to understand the mechanics (affective and, uh, somatic) that make queer sex a thing. How glorious, then, that João and Liz have given us a book of dicks in the dark, fingers in the bushes, vinyl on the butt, and smooth, metallic pressure all over our words and faces. CROSSINGS is out on April 10th, but you can already preview it now on any of the douchebag websites, and pre-order it from Rutgers University Press. Please do! And if you happen to be in New York City on April 18th, João and Liz are going to be performing their work at the Bureau of General Services, Queer Division, with me and Tavia Nyong’o cheering them on. Come through. I’ll have the (light blue) backstage passes in my back-right pocket. xoxo
Liz is a performance artist in his mid-40s who "addresses the sustainability of emotional and political ecologies, cruising methodologies, past and future histories in regard to the ways in which memory is queered." Would be very successful at cruising, I'll just betcha. Distinct resemblance:
wow this is liz.png
The other two look less like Joe but also focus their speshul academic work on queer sex and porn. Not a fetish.

Mallory, meanwhile, continues her astute cultural observations in Tucson:
dannyboy.png

Text: Tucson is really a place, man. Just walked past a fire truck blasting Sublime

Is Tucson's own Tommy Tooter a free man, errrm, woman at the moment? Can I imagine the wit and insights to be shared at a meet-up?
 
Last edited:
Happy 42nd birthday to Joe! From his Instagram:
Screenshot 2025-03-17 160911.png
Full pics (he also did include one of Rocco and one of himself with Rocco so it wasn't ALL selfies):
485079939_18491081527029726_886978972288206870_n.jpg484790796_18491081596029726_5936435854223860669_n.jpg485027840_18491081566029726_4055594878451961585_n.jpg
Screenshot 2025-03-17 161108.png
You know he's a real wamman because he does this with his lips:
Screenshot 2025-03-17 161211.png

Full caption:
Forty-two. Funny to reflect on my birthday last year, when I felt certain I would remain in NYC forever. Now, we’re back in the Bay Area, staying in a tiny portable cabin, a redwood box that was used as temporary housing following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. We’re not going to be in the shack for long, and our medium-range plan is to buy somewhere to live out here for a little while. Like many people since the election (Fabian Schmidt, a German green card holder, reported being “violently interrogated” while entering the US at Boston Logan airport last week), the our plans are hedged by great fear for our safety, and what choices we are making are partly determined by that fear. It is strange and isolating to feel afraid every day—a fear that sometimes generates bravado, sometimes a desire to hide, sometimes a seething hatred of those who have allowed this state of affairs to develop. My fear operates on a grand scale, and I’m not always very good at communicating it without seeming paranoid, and sometimes I feel those around me—who love me and share my fear, at least abstractly—come to wonder, to themselves, whether my fear itself is the problem. It makes sense that they would do so. Fear splits us, and it is difficult to share. I do versions of the same thing—questioning the fears and anxieties of those around me, attempting to corral them, nudge them towards something I recognize.

What is the relationship between this fear, and the appearance of Rocco Joseph Ozymandias Lavery-Woodruff, who is also (among other things) a complex structure of hypothetical anticipation? I don’t want Lee Edelman to be right, especially since J. D. Vance takes essentially the same position, that an investment in the fate of a child, or children, or The Child, circumscribes the totality of what is imaginable for the future. Rocco isn’t a future—he’s shockingly present, and his material here-ness is perhaps his most striking quality. (Other contenders: kindness, courage, chillness, curiosity, and passions for the exploration of toilet bowls and the consumption of reconstituted paper products.) There is a desire to protect him, and also a desire to protect the world that makes him possible—this is an eco-spin on reproductive futurism, I guess. I want to invest in the self-immolating jouissance of the present (this, give or take a shift in register, is what Rocco does) and I think I can still finger something that feels like it, when I write (eg) or in certain kinds of cooking projects.

I’ve become much better at cooking, again, over the last year. I’ve got it in mind to write a cookbook, and I’m planning to do so. I have an angle, and it will only be a few recipes, along with some criticism and memoir. I’m not sure that anything feels as rewarding at the moment as preparing food for people I love. Today, for example, I’m making a roast chicken dashi (!) adapted from a recipe of David Kinch’s, along with some chicken croquettes of my own. Elsewhere in the pipeline for the week I’m going to be doing a navarin-style roast lamb dish (also Kinch) and a kiwi and shiso sorbet (my own). I want a big table in the woods, where i can feed people, where people can come and be fed. And eat together, not just passive. Best of times, worst of time—thank you all for including me in your lives.

Highlights:
Now, we’re back in the Bay Area, staying in a tiny portable cabin...We’re not going to be in the shack for long, and our medium-range plan is to buy somewhere to live out here for a little while.

our plans are hedged by great fear for our safety, and what choices we are making are partly determined by that fear.
Why does Joe fear for his safety? He never said he was a woman and he never said he was trans!

I’ve become much better at cooking, again, over the last year. I’ve got it in mind to write a cookbook, and I’m planning to do so...I want a big table in the woods, where i can feed people, where people can come and be fed. And eat together, not just passive.
You come to Joe's table, you eat Joe's food, and you PRAISE JOE. It's not just passive, you see.
 
Happy birthday and many happy returns Joe, especially when you are still churning out bangers like this.

our medium-range plan is to buy somewhere to live out here for a little while

A sound idea. If only one of the throuple had bought a house there years ago.

I want to invest in the self-immolating jouissance of the present

I’d stick with tech stocks, and of course some bonds.

I think I can still finger something that feels like it

Tard Baby must be grateful for the attention

it will only be a few recipes, along with some criticism and memoir

Poisoning body, mind and soul all at once.
 
a few recipes, along with some criticism and memoir
Surrrrprise! The cookbook will not be about cooking. It will be about Joe.

Good news really since he's got one whole year of trying to cook to inform him (and we know how that year's gone). Aside from elocuting with grandiose fatheadedness as Criticism, he doesn't have anything to pass along about food.

Will Lily have to sell her house to buy Joe a cozy little place to hide from La Migra? Sounds like he's sulking because somebody's failed to take his starring as the fragile victim of deterntions and deportations seriously enough.
Funny to reflect on my birthday last year, when I felt certain I would remain in NYC forever.
Save this for the next time one throupling or another makes out that the move to Lansing was anything but a rout.
 
Back