Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Hey dipshit, maybe you don't realize this probably because you're an anime coomer yourself but the government is going to censor whoever the fuck they want no matter what. Pedofaggot cocksuckers who jerk off to japanese cartoons of little girls getting raped just happen to be on the receiving end of it this time. If that makes you angry, good. Cope, nigger
Oh so just because the government does something it's suddenly acceptable? I'm sure you fucking loved WACO and Ruby Ridge then?

When the Farms was implicated for doxing a sitting US State Rep, would you be happy if the government censored the Farms because of it? Allowing the government to have a sword of damocles dangling above the entire internet is retarded
 
Since when was crankin’ it to kiddie porn a political issue?
Broadly? Pretty much since
image-1-1024x576.webp
 
How will the gooner sites respond? What are they going to do? Block Texas IP's?

We might see a few Texas v. Tranime lawsuits.
I don't think image boards/hosting sites will be affected by this. This only affects those who have it (maybe downloaded, depending on the interpretation of the bill) and distribute it.
 
I don't think image boards/hosting sites will be affected by this. This only affects those who have it (maybe downloaded, depending on the interpretation of the bill) and distribute it.
I decided to read the bill and accessing is specifically covered, although it requires intent which may be hard to prove.

Either way this is an interesting development.
 
Last edited:
I don't think image boards/hosting sites will be affected by this. This only affects those who have it (maybe downloaded, depending on the interpretation of the bill) and distribute it.
Distributing it is probably the big one. I don't know how Texas is planning on policing people who just save images found on a booru site or generate images locally using comfyUI.
 
Oh so just because the government does something it's suddenly acceptable? I'm sure you fucking loved WACO and Ruby Ridge then?

When the Farms was implicated for doxing a sitting US State Rep, would you be happy if the government censored the Farms because of it? Allowing the government to have a sword of damocles dangling above the entire internet is retarded
Imagine actually believing Kiwifarms was the last bastion of free speech and conservatives are the free speech party.
 
i don't like VTubers as much as the next guy, but that just feels like it would harm streamers that aren't VTubers more than anything
Hmm...honestly you can't apply laws fairly anyways. Still also surprising how so many people are spamming dumb and autistic stickers here. Tells me that those are lolicon defenders themselves.
 
Ah yes, people clapping like seals as the government slowly pushes the censorship door open more and more because THIS time it's something you don't like.

Do you honestly trust anyone in the government to not weaponize this law against people they don't like as they turn a blind eye to people they do like?

You should want government to have less power, not more.
They have literally always been able to do this with existing obscenity laws. In fact, anyone who pays attention could tell you there was ALREADY A LAW THAT COVERS THIS AT THIS AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, it's called the 2003 Protect Act, and it made drawn and computer generated kiddy porn (see: lolis, anime, etcs whatever degenerate name you want to give it) illegal to possess anywhere in all 50 states. They're just not enforced because unlike eurofaggots that thrive off of punishing thought crimes, our cops have better stuff to do 100% of the time - so they are always, ALWAYS tacked on to go after people who actually have real CP or harmed real kids.

I can only think of three cases in the last 30 or so years that involved no one actually being harmed.

1) Actually involves the aforementioned protect act. Some guy imported "japanese comics" containing child rape and bestiality, a customs official that was probably a boomer saw it and naturally got very very upset, and police got involved. He actually had several comics/anime groups offering lawyers to defend him pro-bono, but he copped a plea and spent 6 months in jail instead.

2) A Texas guy by the name of Thomas Alan Arthur ran a website that charged money to read stories about children being tortured and raped and look at drawings of the same. I hate including him here, since it's widely believed they went after him after actual women came forward and said 'yeah he molested me when I was a kid' when police were looking into it, since this would fall under my 'tacked on to get an actual pedo rapist' category. However, this was never proven, so technically the guy got 40 years jail time for running a website with disgusting vile stories on it.

That's right, 40 years for obscenity charges.

3) Max Hardcore - he just made adult porn videos so vile a fed prosecutor showed them to a Florida jury after a LA jury declined to find him guily and everyone on it said 'yeah you're going to jail kiddo.'
 
>GUYS THE GOVERNMENT JUST BANNED HEROINE USE. THIS IS SO FUCKED... NEXT THEY'LL BE COMING FOR METH USE, CRACK USE, AND BEFORE YOU KNOW IT YOU'LL PROBABLY BE PLACED ON A WATCHLIST FOR EVEN USING COUGH SYRUP. WHICH IS WHY WE NEED TO MAKE HEROINE USE LEGALIZED AND DISTRIBUTED FREELY TO THE MASSES!!!
This is what some of you niggas are sounding like rn.
Ok, but at least with legalised heroin the trash takes itself out.
 
>GUYS THE GOVERNMENT JUST BANNED HEROINE USE. THIS IS SO FUCKED... NEXT THEY'LL BE COMING FOR METH USE, CRACK USE, AND BEFORE YOU KNOW IT YOU'LL PROBABLY BE PLACED ON A WATCHLIST FOR EVEN USING COUGH SYRUP. WHICH IS WHY WE NEED TO MAKE HEROINE USE LEGALIZED AND DISTRIBUTED FREELY TO THE MASSES!!!
This is what some of you niggas are sounding like rn.
As a certified libertarian retard, I genuinely care significantly more about legalizing heroin than the loli shit. I don't think obscenity should be illegal (CSAM unequivocally should because it creates a black market for production in poor countries) but this is at the bottom of my list of things I care about. Yeah yeah I know, libertarian retard, I've got a hole in my head or something. The arguments for decriminalizing all drugs are salient and, even if you disagree, at least are founded on the belief that decriminalizing/legalizing heroin would reduce a lot of suffering in the world. I've never heard a lolicon ever argue that loli reduces harm in the world in some way, outside of the certifiably incorrect belief that it is an "outlet for urges" (when we know that frequent porn usage leads to addiction, a stark contrast to outlets for violence like exercise which DO reduce aggressive behaviours), and they only ever argue that it is a principles thing, or a "slippery-slope". Like nigger have you EVER in your life been penalized for standing up for someone else's speech when it would only harm you? No? Then shut the fuck up. Can't fucking stand lolicons. I've had real consequences for standing up for free speech in various circumstances, and it's only ever caused me harm, and I won't stop, but I'm so fucking sick of this issue that I genuinely care about being leveraged opportunistically by Discord-coomers and conservitards.
 
Last edited:
A Texas guy by the name of Thomas Alan Arthur ran a website that charged money to read stories about children being tortured and raped and look at drawings of the same. I hate including him here, since it's widely believed they went after him after actual women came forward and said 'yeah he molested me when I was a kid' when police were looking into it, since this would fall under my 'tacked on to get an actual pedo rapist' category. However, this was never proven, so technically the guy got 40 years jail time for running a website with disgusting vile stories on it.
I thought they went after him for distribution because he was selling the obscene material? That is the major difference between his website and something like All the Fallen.
 
Ah yes, people clapping like seals as the government slowly pushes the censorship door open more and more because THIS time it's something you don't like.
Sorry to say this, but you're extremely dumb if you believe that a bill targeting people who are in possession of AI-generated CSAM is somehow going to lead to total government censorship of everything you know and love. For the love of Christ, read the bill before you start sperging out about how the government is overreaching. It is very clearly stated in the very first page of the bill that its about AI-generated CSAM.

"A person commits an offense if the person knowingly possesses, accesses with intent to view, or promotes obscene visual material containing a depiction that appears to be of a child younger than 18 years of age engaging in activities described by Section 43.21(a)(1)(B), regardless of whether the depiction is an image of an actual child, a cartoon or animation, or an image created using an artificial intelligence application or other computer software."

And don't make the pedantic argument that it also mentions "computer software" and "a cartoon or animation". It's very clearly referring to AI generation software and its capability to produce said imagery, and to animate it.
 
Sorry to say this, but you're extremely dumb if you believe that a bill targeting people who are in possession of AI-generated CSAM is somehow going to lead to total government censorship of everything you know and love. For the love of Christ, read the bill before you start sperging out about how the government is overreaching. It is very clearly stated in the very first page of the bill that its about AI-generated CSAM.

"A person commits an offense if the person knowingly possesses, accesses with intent to view, or promotes obscene visual material containing a depiction that appears to be of a child younger than 18 years of age engaging in activities described by Section 43.21(a)(1)(B), regardless of whether the depiction is an image of an actual child, a cartoon or animation, or an image created using an artificial intelligence application or other computer software."

And don't make the pedantic argument that it also mentions "computer software" and "a cartoon or animation". It's very clearly referring to AI generation software and its capability to produce said imagery, and to animate it.
Nobody fucking cares about legislation that seems morally, legally, and logically sound -- leave the man alone now, he just wants to COOM without the M A N censoring us all.
 
Back