Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Melty Butter]

@Null

I don't want to edit the featured post more than I already have. Here are various additions for your own edification in case you discuss it on MATI or care to add to the post.

1. Masterson's coverage of Aaron's arrest with Vito several months ago. Nothing of note but I thought I'd mention it bc you love Dick so much.

2. Kino Casino's recent coverage of Nick's latest appearances on Camelot's show and Nick calling into Melton's show. It's not directly related to Aaron's RP charge but it's very amusing. KC got the facts correct this time. It's patently ridiculous that Rekieta is claiming that the church-goers didn't report concerns about drugs. Officer Nester's report said they mentioned Nick frequently leaving the pews (to do coke, we know now), Kayla's weight loss, etc.


This is from Detective Pomplun's search warrant.

3. @Potentially Criminal covered the RP plea in the first 30 min of his show.

4. This post features Nick's recent coping about his non-addiction on Twitter. Again, not related to the RP case, but it's absurd and funny nonetheless.

5. This post features Nick's reaction (in Melton's chat) regarding Aaron's plea deal.

6. Nick is still planning on attending Hackamania with the Dabbleverse degens in Vegas in May. He has asked the court to attend on the Thursday and Friday before Mother's Day weekend (his daughters also have a recital on Saturday - he's mentioned that). He may be trying to extend that visit to the Saturday and says that he can be drug tested in Vegas if necessary.

7. It's hard to exactly explain how disgusting Nick has been wrt sex. He's discussed bloody sheets (from stretching April out; Aaron's penis is small supposedly), Aaron licking Nick's cum off April, and holding April's hand while Nick was railing her. Here's a small selection of his chats:




At 14:00 in this clip Nick describes Aaron holding April's hand while she was having sex with Nick. (Aaron claims it's all bullshit, unsurprisingly.)

 

[AnOminous]

If "dissemination" was not defined in the statute, you would be right that we would use the plain meaning of the word.

Not necessarily, although that's the default. If binding case law had specifically interpreted it in another way, it would be interpreted that way. And in constitutional interpretation, the jumping off point is usually what the word would have meant to the drafters of the language.

(Incidentally, I do not like or approve of this redefinition of "disseminate" or think the "dissemination" of a single photo to a single person with no overtly malicious intent apparent is something the state should even be bothering with.)

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

The definition of "disseminate" is whatever the statute says it's defined as in its definition section.

Right, I forgot that leftist lawscribes like to change the meaning of words.
My bad.

 

[not william stenchever]

If Nick came from a poorfag family, he'd probably be sucking dick on the streets of Houston or MSP right now.

Don't threaten lil' Nikki with a good time.

At least Matt Jarbo actually went out in the fields to pick up heavy boulders and got a decent workout.

Boulder King is a much more distinguished title than Skelly Fag.

 

[TherapyMan]

Not necessarily, although that's the default. If binding case law had specifically interpreted it in another way, it would be interpreted that way. And in constitutional interpretation, the jumping off point is usually what the word would have meant to the drafters of the language.

Yeah, my comment was overly reductionist. I should have said something along the lines of "the ordinary meaning will control unless some other canon of statutory construction applies," but didn't want to go down that rabbit hole.

 

[ChromaQuack]

KAYLA'S EXPOSED TITS FOR TEN. WHORLE. SUBS. WOOOOOOOOOOOOO BEEEEEEEJAMS.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

describes Aaron holding April's hand while she was having sex with Nick. (Aaron claims it's all bullshit, unsurprisingly.)

Didn't someone recently point out that Aaron previously described Nick trying to hold hands or holding hands during Sex during 2024 already, only that it was Nick doing it?

In typical balldo fashion he once again inverted the people involved, which means he practically admitted to being the gay handholding faggot.

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

Didn't someone recently point out that Aaron previously described Nick trying to hold hands or holding hands during Sex during 2024 already, only that it was Nick doing it?

In typical balldo fashion he once again inverted the people involved, which means he practically admitted to being the gay handholding faggot.

When Aaron jumped on the Casino he claimed that Kayla tried to involve Nick while she was screwing around with Aaron.

To which Nick had to run away screaming, “I’m not into that!”.

 

[Vibralldo]

When Aaron jumped on the Casino he claimed that Kayla tried to involve Nick while she was screwing around with Aaron.

To which Nick had to run away screaming, “I’m not into that!”.

Nick means he isn't into pussy and wanted Aaron to himself

100% Aaron's story is closer to the truth. Nick's done nothing but talk about Aaron's cock and explicitly saying "I'm gay" over and over. He always uses humor to hide his true intentions.

 

[AnOminous]

Right, I forgot that leftist lawscribes like to change the meaning of words.
My bad.

It's literally any legislator at all. Otherwise billions more would go down the toilet as every single case turned into arguing about what critical words mean. I said "billions more" because they already do.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Nick Rekieta: " I want you to put Aaron Imholte under the jail."
D.A. Kari Dahlen: "Are you fucking kidding me?"

Rekieta: "He violated my wife's honor"

D.A. Kari Dahlen: "Aaron slept with Kayla?"
Rekieta: "Uhhh...yes, but that's not the point. He insulted her. He showed an image to a friend of ours."

D.A. Kari Dahlen: "What was it?"

Rekieta: "What. My words not good enough? My parents donated millions to hospital wards!"
D.A. Kari Dahlen: "Not if you want him under the jail"

Rekieta: "He...showed Geno, an image of her washed up body"

D.A. Kari Dahlen: "It's an off-colour image, it was highly inappropriate. If you want, I'll fine him $50. But under the jail, no".

Rekieta: "$50 to insult my wife!? What is this?! He gets to fuck her AGAIN for a $100!?"

 

[Retink Retunk]

The judge has deemed Kayla a slatternly woman of low value.

 

[Maldavius Figtree]

If you think being 5 feet from boomers fucking all day with nothing but a curtain between you is "cozy" then by all means, go get a pilot's license and live your dream. I'm not even going to try and decipher the rest of your autistic rant about hotels.

I will dumb the hotel analogy down for you: well adjusted people are unbothered by the fact that others who they cannot see nor hear are having sex in their vicinity. Even if it happens regularly in their workspace.

It's interesting, to say the least, that the only reactions you can imagine someone might have when confronted by the possibility that someone might be having sex in an enclosed space near them is 1) being overcome by shame or 2) masturbating.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

Steel tube boys stay winning how the hell do you get a misdemeanor for that isn't that a felony

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

It's literally any legislator at all. Otherwise billions more would go down the toilet as every single case turned into arguing about what critical words mean. I said "billions more" because they already do.

You are right, but I think it is a bad habit to use words that have a specific meaning and changing it to fit what you want it to mean.
They could literally use "share with a third party" and it would be specific and clear.

If it is possible to say the same thing without butchering the English language it would be better.
Just look at this case and how often people get things wrong because the words do not mean what they actually mean, but a faggy interpretation some lawnerd made up.

 

[Berrakh]

Presumably the fine was lowered because nobody would really get off seeing her nudes.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

You are right, but I think it is a bad habit to use words that have a specific meaning and changing it to fit what you want it to mean.
They could literally use "share with a third party" and it would be specific and clear.

If it is possible to say the same thing without butchering the English language it would be better.
Just look at this case and how often people get things wrong because the words do not mean what they actually mean, but a faggy interpretation some lawnerd made up.

The whole purpose of defining words in statutes is to minimize a billion “it means this, no it means that, no it means the other.” Let’s say you picked another word like distributes or shares and did not provide a specific meaning. Endless and irregular interpretation battles (“no, yer honor, “shares” in today’s world means hit the share button/arrow and it’s misleading to interpret that more broadly so the statute should be declared unconstitutionally vague”) and some judge is going to agree but some other judge won’t - so then you have years of irregular outcomes until it goes up on appeal after appeal - much of which could have been avoided by clear definition in the statute in the first place. Moreover, specific definitions, even if atypical for casual use, prevent legislative intent being completely subverted when other jurisdictions have different interpretations of an undefined word.

Tl; dr: the word and its definition is perfectly clear and unobjectionable.

 

[Major]

I assume because it just once and maybe the PI Aaron hired (supposedly) found out she had little expectation of privacy, like posting on swinger forums....I'm convinced it's out there somewhere.

 

[Journoscum]

I've had a speeding ticket before and it was more than $50. And that's just something you pay online, there's no trial needed. Imagine leaning hard on the prosecution and they are offering a plea deal that is less of a financial burden than a speeding ticket. Going 80 in a 70 is worth more than the dignity of your significant other. Isn't that sad?

 

[Nigger Word Sayer]

legally ruled that her nudes are only worth 50 bucks lmfao brutal btfo