In many cases they've wound up being one and the same, but you do raise a valid point. Still an open season on them for being vehemently retarded.People that defend loli porn may not be pedophiles. They could just be retarded. Maybe I'mbut I want to avoid calling these people pedophiles until there is more proof.
More like they're sorting through the sheer number of pedophiles outing themselves. I wouldn't know. I just know that I haven't noticed any of my posts getting nuked.
Or maybe they're trying to figure out how things got so retarded in the first place. I can't possibly think of who might have helped kickstart that matter and continues to perpetuate it even now.
It's a good thing you're not Null. It's also a good thing Null has very little tolerance for lolicon defending.
Has the thread ever been populated by lolicons? It looks more like a hugbox for people who hate them. Most people aren't as autistic as myself, entering a thread about a topic and expecting nuanced discussion vs. people patting each other on the back over how offended they are by drawings.
How bold of you.
We have, in fact, had plenty of retards come in and out themselves, some people even making accounts purely for the sake of outing themselves, especially as of late.
There have been a few including you.
People don't like pedophiles wow how dare we.
You are defending cows in a thread dedicated to them.
I'm banned from the thread, but reading through the last few pages I'm now seeing people call the CBLDF a lolicon defense force and gems like this:
I'm not a lolicon. I'm also not in the KKK despite advocating for the freedom to say slurs like nigger or jew. Accusing everyone who disagrees with you of shit like this is retarded.
Lolicon should be a HUGE red flag that someone likes little kids. Getting it banned is a good thing and causes these people to go to jail sooner and for longer.
Alright, so what makes you think that HASN'T happened yet? South Park is a long-running, once incredibly controversial series, after all.
It's a crude and humorous cartoon, not a high-effort animation of a 12 year old girl getting raped. Big difference
No, getting it banned is not a good thing. Obscenity laws are a massive gray area and terrible at what the public believes they exist to do. Banning drawings because they portray something you personally dislike is retarded. Arguments to the contrary typically boil down to equally as retarded ideas like "lolicon art encourages people to become pedophiles!", as if people are binary robots and could be programmed to kill by playing Grand Theft Auto.
If you don't determine the difference legally, there will be no difference. A drawing of a 12 year old getting fucked in the ass is still a drawing of a 12 year old getting fucked in the ass. Currently, it doesn't matter if the drawing looks like South Park or something drawn by Miyazaki. You're trying to involve the law in determining art. You'll kill a lot of art doing that.
Well why not? There's no slippery slope here. If this were the 1970s, you'd be advocating for the repealing of the Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977 because muh slippery slope and muh freeze peach or some shit.
True! It's a good thing most of us are advocating for it because it's depictions of minors being engaged in sexual conduct, then! That's a thing we can universally agree there's no grey area in that, is there?
Weird how it was pointed out to you repeatedly that there's vastly different chemical reactions in the brain between experiencing violence and experiencing sexual gratification.
You should have a tag that says the most retarded kiwi.
You're equating real life child abuse to drawings.
There it is! The prime lolicon arguement calling out to their bullshit. Your freeze peach mask dropped completely.
Remind me again what you think you're accomplishing at this point by retreading old talking points that have already been thoroughly addressed and broken down?
To be fair, he made the same arguments when he was shitstirring in the Loli/Shota Defenders thread as well. He was also thoroughly proven wrong in that case, but he's trying to repeat his case to what he thinks is a fresh audience.
get rid of sexually suggestive and sexually explicit media containing children? sounds like a win-win to me.
what thread