Debate @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST on the slippery slope of making loli porn illegal - At the user's own request.

There it is! The prime lolicon arguement calling out to their bullshit. Your freeze peach mask dropped completely.
The post immediately under yours expresses the exact same sentiment I'm warning people about.
get rid of sexually suggestive and sexually explicit media containing children? sounds like a win-win to me.
The above quote refers to South Park. This neo-puritan faggotry spreading across social media is so gay. I'm glad this thread exists to showcase it.
 
If you don't determine the difference legally, there will be no difference. A drawing of a 12 year old getting fucked in the ass is still a drawing of a 12 year old getting fucked in the ass. Currently, it doesn't matter if the drawing looks like South Park or something drawn by Miyazaki. You're trying to involve the law in determining art. You'll kill a lot of art doing that.
can you please explain to me the artistic expression of a 12 year old getting fucked In the ass and why it's actually a net positive for society?
This neo-puritan faggotry spreading across social media is so gay. I'm glad this thread exists to showcase it.
you're just a pedophile
 
The post immediately under yours expresses the exact same sentiment I'm warning people about.
The post in question:
1742064889141.png

Thanks for admitting you have me on Ignore, you thin-skinned bitch. :story:

This is why you should be laughing at @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST as much as possible instead of taking his arguments seriously. He's THIS retarded and THIS mad.
 
can you please explain to me the artistic expression of a 12 year old getting fucked In the ass and why it's actually a net positive for society?
No. I'm just going to put a couple of pink sign-up dates on ignore, since I've already made my point in other posts and there's no discussion left to be had. You retards actually believe in a direct correlation-causation relationship between drawings and abusing children. At least some of you believe shit like South Park should be declared obscene (and thus illegal) because you're epic tradcath, or whatever. You can mald about all this along with @Gravemind who started this entire argument in the first place. Maybe post some soyjaks and spam stickers until you all feel better.
 
Im late. I also don't care.
Has the thread ever been populated by lolicons?
If only you fucking knew.
It looks more like a hugbox for people who hate them.
If by that you mean we don't allow niggery and lolicon cope, than sure
Most people aren't as autistic as myself,
HAHAHAHA
entering a thread about a topic and expecting nuanced discussion vs. people patting each other on the back over how offended they are by drawings.
Discussion? Let me explain the discussion and answer to you:
an5fn01qv6e51.png
 
No. I'm just going to put a couple of pink sign-up dates on ignore, since I've already made my point in other posts and there's no discussion left to be had. You retards actually believe in a direct correlation-causation relationship between drawings and abusing children. At least some of you believe shit like South Park should be declared obscene (and thus illegal) because you're epic tradcath, or whatever. You can mald about all this along with @Gravemind who started this entire argument in the first place. Maybe post some soyjaks and spam stickers until you all feel better.
Lmao even
 
People that defend loli porn may not be pedophiles. They could just be retarded. Maybe I'm :optimistic: but I want to avoid calling these people pedophiles until there is more proof.
Without a doubt I’m at the very least suspicious of anyone who defends lolicon. Dying on that hill for free speech is just not worth it.
You're trying to involve the law in determining art. You'll kill a lot of art doing that.
If “art” is killed by this law, then it’s not really art.
 
Why is everyone losing their minds over this pretty mild take? Like, whether you agree with him or not, all he’s saying is that banning one type of speech sets a precedent for banning others. That’s been a basic free speech argument since forever. Are people just desperate to virtue signal on the internet e-celeb gossip forum?
 
If “art” is killed by this law, then it’s not really art.
May as well size yourself up for a Quaker outfit if that's what you truly believe. Clearly it's not enough to say "I think this is disgusting so I won't support nor look at it", we have to fall down the entire stairwell of censorship. I don't think these people understand that I agree with them on lolicon art, but have no interest in likening it to real CSAM.
 
No. I'm just going to put a couple of pink sign-up dates on ignore, since I've already made my point in other posts and there's no discussion left to be had. You retards actually believe in a direct correlation-causation relationship between drawings and abusing children. At least some of you believe shit like South Park should be declared obscene (and thus illegal) because you're epic tradcath, or whatever. You can mald about all this along with @Gravemind who started this entire argument in the first place. Maybe post some soyjaks and spam stickers until you all feel better.
The lolicon defender coward, when thoroughly back into a corner, kicks the dirt and goes "Ugh. You're all retarded and blocked. I'm right. You're wrong. Mald and seethe about it from behind the block..." :story:

Also, yes, I definitely started this argument. It definitely wasn't you who came into the Loli/Shota Defenders thread bitching at everyone about "muh free speech absolutism".

It also definitely wasn't you who threw a fit about me quoting some of your cringe replies to me in the Spiderman faggots thread then challenged me to make a Mass Debates thread for you because of it.

Play stupid games.
 
Back