Debate @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST on the slippery slope of making loli porn illegal - At the user's own request.

[taxisguy]

No. I'm just going to put a couple of pink sign-up dates on ignore, since I've already made my point in other posts and there's no discussion left to be had. You retards actually believe in a direct correlation-causation relationship between drawings and abusing children. At least some of you believe shit like South Park should be declared obscene (and thus illegal) because you're epic tradcath, or whatever. You can mald about all this along with @Gravemind who started this entire argument in the first place. Maybe post some soyjaks and spam stickers until you all feel better.

Your faggot and not even a man. Gays are more manly then you will ever be pussy

 

[Abella]

The lolicon defender coward, when thoroughly back into a corner, kicks the dirt and goes "Ugh. You're all retarded and blocked. I'm right. You're wrong. Mald and seethe about it from behind the block..."

Also, yes, I definitely started this argument. It definitely wasn't you who came into the Loli/Shota Defenders thread bitching at everyone about "muh free speech absolutism".

It also definitely wasn't you who threw a fit about me quoting some of your cringe replies to me in the Spiderman faggots thread then challenged me to make a Mass Debates thread for you because of it.

Play stupid games.

Funny enough, this guy also was one of the people sperging out over a thread about the vtuber pipkin pippa and her degenerate fans.

May as well size yourself up for a Quaker outfit if that's what you truly believe. Clearly it's not enough to say "I think this is disgusting so I won't support nor look at it", we have to fall down the entire stairwell of censorship. I don't think these people understand that I agree with them on lolicon art, but have no interest in likening it to real CSAM.

Dawg I hope they give you the injection.

 

[Osama Bin Laden]

You retards actually believe in a direct correlation-causation relationship between drawings and abusing children.

Yeah, because they're pedophiles.

At least some of you believe shit like South Park should be declared obscene (and thus illegal) because you're epic tradcath, or whatever

I find it extremely interesting that you resort to calling anyone who disagrees with you a purtian tradfag, but I'm not even THAT right wing nor religious. Like people have said before, context matters. If South Park had a sexually charged theme with children, I'm more sure it's to tell a story, to give their take on a current topic, or to provide comedy.

weird how the autistic liberal weeb is pro-lolicon lol

I have never seen Matt Stone and Trey Parker make South Park for the purpose of making lolicon or making smut material for TV.

The lolicon defender coward, when thoroughly back into a corner, kicks the dirt and goes "Ugh. You're all retarded and blocked. I'm right. You're wrong. Mald and seethe about it from behind the block..."

Also, yes, I definitely started this argument. It definitely wasn't you who came into the Loli/Shota Defenders thread bitching at everyone about "muh free speech absolutism".

It also definitely wasn't you who threw a fit about me quoting some of your cringe replies to me in the Spiderman faggots thread then challenged me to make a Mass Debates thread for you because of it.

Play stupid games.

but he's not mad tho.

Funny enough, this guy also was one of the people sperging out over a thread about the vtuber pipkin pippa and her degenerate fans.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers that.

but have no interest in likening it to real CSAM.

lolicon is one step below CSAM, and you know this

 

[WelperHelper99]

The lolicon defender coward, when thoroughly back into a corner, kicks the dirt and goes "Ugh. You're all retarded and blocked. I'm right. You're wrong. Mald and seethe about it from behind the block..."

Remember what I said on how the Ignore button is scientificly proven to shrink your penis? This is the proof. In my experience, if you're blocking people on the Farms, you've fucking lost

 

[Abella]

I just can’t help but notice the correlation between them people and the ones trying to defend lolicon.

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

Why is everyone losing their minds over this pretty mild take? Like, whether you agree with him or not, all he’s saying is that banning one type of speech sets a precedent for banning others. That’s been a basic free speech argument since forever. Are people just desperate to virtue signal on the internet e-celeb gossip forum?

They're waiting for some slip-up or self-own because they aren't going to win the big internet fight through reasonable discussion of this topic. If you get someone to talk for long enough, you'll probably some petty thing to latch onto and embellish into a big problem. At least one of them is probably combing every lolicon website they know of (for some reason), desperately pleading with God to find someone with my username. Unfortunately all they'll discover is I'm a member of the Sonic Underground, and the day I see any of them wearing a modern Sonic shirt I'm going to beat their ass in a cornfield.

 

[Osama Bin Laden]

I just can’t help but notice the correlation between them people and the ones trying to defend lolicon.

BUT IT DOESN'T EXIST, CHUD. JUST BECAUSE I HAVE A TERABYTE OF QUESTIONABLE ANIME ON MY HHD DOESN'T MEAN IM WEIRD

At least one of them is probably combing every lolicon website they know of (for some reason), desperately pleading with God to find someone with my username.

yeah, it's me. I'm backtracing your IP address and I see that it's in California.

Remember what I said on how the Ignore button is scientificly proven to shrink your penis? This is the proof. In my experience, if you're blocking people on the Farms, you've fucking lost

If this was Internet Bloodsports, I'd be watching everyday with popcorn in hand

 

[Sooty Soot]

I'd like to just post this here

 

[Gunslinger Spawn]

challenged me to make a Mass Debates thread for you because of it.

He waited until people lost interest and joined when the other degens started a circlejerk. Now he is trying to create a safe space again by just putting everyone on ignore who disagrees with him. And hopes new people will hop on his bandwagon. Pathetic really.

Glad we are calling him a retard while he is living in his dreamland!

 

[Pro-Islam = Anti-Woman]

Why is everyone losing their minds over this pretty mild take? Like, whether you agree with him or not, all he’s saying is that banning one type of speech sets a precedent for banning others. That’s been a basic free speech argument since forever. Are people just desperate to virtue signal on the internet e-celeb gossip forum?

It's not speech

 

[Neodanthril]

banning one type of speech sets a precedent for banning others

banning fistfights sets a precedent for banning other physical interactions. is there a slippery slope from outlawing fistifghts to outlawing hugging? this type of argument is just libertarian context free mental masturbation and most people are over it and would prefer enforcing their worldview on society and, heavan forbid, engage in politics.

 

[Osama Bin Laden]

He waited until people lost interest and joined when the other degens started a circlejerk. Now he is trying to create a safe space again by just putting everyone on ignore who disagrees with him. And hopes new people will hop on his bandwagon. Pathetic really.

i didn't know being anti-lolicon is a bad thing

 

[Chudborean]

You retards actually believe in a direct correlation-causation relationship between drawings and abusing children

No way he just pulled out that card

 

[bear hammer]

It's not speech

Drawings are a from of speech. Are political cartoons, editorial comics, and basically all art with a message don't count as expression either? Or is it just the stuff you personally don't like? Either it’s all speech, or you’re just making arbitrary exceptions based on your feelings.

banning fistfights sets a precedent for banning other physical interactions. is there a slippery slope from outlawing fistifghts to outlawing hugging? this type of argument is just libertarian context free mental masturbation and most people are over it and would prefer enforcing their worldview on society and, heavan forbid, engage in politics.

That doesn't really make sense because it conflates speech with physical actions that directly harm others. The difference between banning fistfights and banning certain types of speech is that one involves direct bodily harm, while the other is about regulating ideas or artistic expression.

Also, the idea that people should just “enforce their worldview on society” without concern for principles like free speech is exactly why slippery slope arguments like his exist. Everyone likes censorship when it benefits their side, until the pendulum swings the other way. If you create a precedent that allows the government to ban content you don’t like, you better be prepared for when they use that same power against things you do like.

 

[Pro-Islam = Anti-Woman]

Drawings are a forum of speech. Are political cartoons, editorial comics, and basically all art with a message don't count as expression either? Or is it just the stuff you personally don't like? Either it’s all speech, or you’re just making arbitrary exceptions based on your feelings.

OK, are you a free speech absolutist? Also I think you mean form.

 

[Kovachs]

Im late. I also don't care.

If only you fucking knew.

If by that you mean we don't allow niggery and lolicon cope, than sure

HAHAHAHA

Discussion? Let me explain the discussion and answer to you:
View attachment 7096166

Didn't Joseph Smith marry a 14 year old as a 37 year old man?

 

[Osama Bin Laden]

Drawings are a forum of speech. Are political cartoons, editorial comics, and basically all art with a message don't count as expression either? Or is it just the stuff you personally don't like? Either it’s all speech, or you’re just making arbitrary exceptions based on your feelings.

do political cartoons or comics feature sexualized children? oh no? then it's free speech

 

[Hitchhiker]

They're waiting for some slip-up or self-own because they aren't going to win the big internet fight through reasonable discussion of this topic. If you get someone to talk for long enough, you'll probably some petty thing to latch onto and embellish into a big problem. At least one of them is probably combing every lolicon website they know of (for some reason), desperately pleading with God to find someone with my username. Unfortunately all they'll discover is I'm a member of the Sonic Underground, and the day I see any of them wearing a modern Sonic shirt I'm going to beat their ass in a cornfield.

Why not just leave the thread then? You're saying that they are waiting for you to slip up so they can get a gotcha moment, so why not just make one final post saying that you aren't into lolicon but you believe it's a free speech issue and you won't be discussing the matter anymore.

It would be the best solution for you and the only reason I can think that someone wouldn't do that at least 10 pages ago is that they're clinically retarded or have a vested interested in lolicon not being considered pedophilia.

 

[Osama Bin Laden]

You're saying that they are waiting for you to slip up so they can get a gotcha moment

there have been multiple

@COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST did you ignore me because I called you a pedophile

 

[bear hammer]

do political cartoons or comics feature sexualized children? oh no? then it's free speech

So the government gets to decide what kind of drawings are acceptable based on taste? That's the whole point of the slippery slope argument. Today, it’s "obviously le bad" drawings, tomorrow it’s whatever else they decide is too offensive. The second you let them pick and choose, free speech stops being free.