US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of my foundational memories are going to the library with my mom once or twice a week. I'd rent out the max amount allowed for kids, read them all, and go back for more.
We'd spend hours there if it was a weekend, and it was one of the coziest places in my entire memory. They had a giant circular fireplace thing surrounded by comfy chairs too so I'd read a lot there especially in winter.
I decided a long time ago I needed to live somewhere with a really cozy library I could bring my kids to.
It’s really sad seeing what passes for “libraries” now in the large liberal city I live in. There’s like, a giant anime section, an even larger chink language section, and then like 8 stacks of actual human books, and that’s it. The rest is computers for homeless pedophiles to use.

At least my public elementary school library was carpeted, and had this pyramid of giant steps you could lounge on and lots of little nooks to sit for hours.
 

Attachments

My fondest memories from my time in the concrete jungle were just going to the library alone and finding good stuff to read, away from my judgmental CUNT teachers.
Mine got some stupid idea about how you had to read a small book a week, like 50-100 pages, from second grade and that they each had a 'difficulty tier' which you must read a certain number of before being ALLOWED to read more advanced books. Me being an earnest reader from early on to today found all the stuff in the lower tiers completely boring and I'd just ignore it and go raid the school library for the fifth-grade section fantasy books at recess to take home. They'd then get annoyed I wasn't reading lmfao
I get the drive to get kids to read, and to learn to read, but to stifle people who enjoy it probably did far more harm than good. Also the books for this was in its own area away from the library and each tier was something like 25 books all told so if you didn't like any of them you're shit out of luck, which probably put some kids off reading entirely.
 
Every day i think to myself - im tired of winning, it just cant get any better, its all downhill from here - then god emperor trump surprises me with more and more gifts straight from the heavens. May God bless our troops - especially all seamen in and around the red sea!
 
Mine got some stupid idea about how you had to read a book a week from second grade and that they each had a 'difficulty tier' which you must read a certain number of before being ALLOWED to read more advanced books.
This type of shit is the absolute worst. My school had a system where you could only take books at your grade level or one grade above. They wouldn't even let you bring in your own books from home (even with parental permission) because they "couldn't vet it".

I was reading 3 or 4 grade levels higher and was bored out of my fucking skull due to this system during any reading time at school. In my opinion if a kid can tell you what's happening in the book and are engaged in the story, they're reading the right "level" for them even if they may not be picking up all the nuances an older reader might be able to.

Schools really need to make room for advanced readers or they run the risk of turning them off reading entirely. Luckily, I had other book sources to read instead, but if others didn't have parents who had time to take them to the library they would be shit out of luck.

Same for math and other subjects honestly. I knew other family members (cousins etc) who got into trouble at school because they would get bored. The teachers would be teaching to the lowest common denominator leaving the smart students unchallenged and miserable. It's a serious problem especially nowadays.

A lot of methods for example make the "method to use if the student isn't naturally good at it/a quick learner" the standard. It might help some slower students but leaves everyone else bored as fuck and unengaged. I'm a big proponent of the idea that if it's not genuinely fun or interesting, learning is more difficult. See: common core.
 
Mine got some stupid idea about how you had to read a small book a week, like 50-100 pages, from second grade and that they each had a 'difficulty tier' which you must read a certain number of before being ALLOWED to read more advanced books. Me being an earnest reader from early on to today found all the stuff in the lower tiers completely boring and I'd just ignore it and go raid the school library for the fifth-grade section fantasy books at recess to take home. They'd then get annoyed I wasn't reading lmfao
I get the drive to get kids to read, and to learn to read, but to stifle people who enjoy it probably did far more harm than good. Also the books for this was in its own area away from the library and each tier was something like 25 books all told so if you didn't like any of them you're shit out of luck, which probably put some kids off reading entirely.
Great idea from the department of education. The gamification of reading is so annoying, it’s worse than not encouraging it at all. You breed a bunch of snobs who see reading as a status symbol, the “I read 200 books a year” kind of faggots who don’t even give a shit what they’re reading, don’t think or analyze it, they just speedrun it so they can add it to their goodreads list and show it off to others. They proudly display their books on their shelves in color-coded order to make it as aesthetic as possible. I like to re-read my favorite novels over and over, discovering new layers each time, and to these people it’s pointless because it’s not about knowledge or even enjoyment.
 
I can't find it in print anymore (did Encyclopedia Britannica get gutted by Venture Capitalists?) but I did find this bundle of the books referenced that are public domain now: https://standardebooks.org/collections/encyclopaedia-britannicas-gateway-to-the-great-books

Looks like they were available up to last year. $290 for the 10 book set ($29 a book isn't horrible) new, or ~70-100 for vintage versions off eBay. Hm.
Archive.org has them available for check-out on their Open Library. Annas-Archive.org has downloadable PDFs.

Standardebooks.org is similar to Project Gutenberg (gutenberg.org) in that they only host public domain content. Standard E-Books put effort into formating their collection to look aesthetically pleasing and professionally laid out. They have fewer books. Gateway to Great Books is not in the public domain (not until 2059).

If you want a physical collection, I would personally buy used (pre-owned). I wouldn't trust modern editors not to meddle. You could probably buy a set for $50. Library sales and estate sales will keep the secondary market saturated for a while.
 
Mine got some stupid idea about how you had to read a small book a week, like 50-100 pages, from second grade and that they each had a 'difficulty tier' which you must read a certain number of before being ALLOWED to read more advanced books
Think mine had that, but I can't recall the details. All I recall about reading in my youth in terms of school books was taking out the Garfield Comic collections, a suspense/horror anthology book, and some book that featured a wimpy kid(not that one) who moved and joined the wrestling team to improve himself.
 
The problem is that you can't directly leverage that with money, offering cash to universities just engenders fraud. The real problem is that they want a bunch of compliant low-IQ niggercattle, or maybe East Asian bugmen, these types of people do not produce good science. Only free men of White stock are capable of scientific innovation.

The problem is that only one in ten people can be in the top 10%. Giving everybody a university degree doesn't change that.
 
This type of shit is the absolute worst. My school had a system where you could only take books at your grade level or one grade above.
Same with ours. I just ignored it lmao and read the most advanced books I could find from the moment I had access to the library in first grade.
The library was split into an upstairs and downstairs section and anyone grade 3 or under couldn't go to the upstairs section, but I just did it when they weren't paying attention. We didn't even have a check-in-check-out system either, it was just trusted that you'd bring the books back to the return pile as each book was labelled with its Dewey number for easy filing (guess the ethnic makeup of the school) and so it was pretty easy to get away with.
Once again, the bureaucrat stands in the way of the human. Maybe Kafka made a few salient points.
 
been a little out of the loop lately, are there proggie bosses talking about how few people they have to staff their manufactured protests?
there was an article posted here after doge razed usaid about an america hire a protest organization running out of money, during blm we read about a large group of antifa that travel to different cities to stoke riots and then act blue got caught funding 4 groups for the telsa riots. those protests aren't inline with the views of the regular democrat.
 
Chicka Chicka Boom Boom is the best book ever written and I defy anyone to prove me otherwise.
Good kids book. Will there be enough Room?
Think mine had that, but I can't recall the details. All I recall about reading in my youth in terms of school books was taking out the Garfield Comic collections, a suspense/horror anthology book, and some book that featured a wimpy kid(not that one) who moved and joined the wrestling team to improve himself.
I remember my teachers made me read some non Star Wars books in 4th or 5th grade. I was just reading adult Star Wars books and comics. Honestly the only books that were made for my age group at the time I actually read on my own volition was Diary of a Wimpy Kid.

Thank god my mom was a librarian.
 
Yes, but it was Spy - quite a funny magazine back in the day. IIRC their sobriquet for Trump was "stubby fingered vulgarian." My, how times haven't changed.
Small correction, but it was short fingered, which is actually just a way to call someone a cheapskate, rather than a dig at his actual hands, being an allusion to a man who can't seem to reach the coins at the bottom of his coin purse.

And Trump is absolutely positively a cheapskate.
 
Still a nice read though. Better than some gay new age shit like The 48 Laws of Power.
Do schools teach the 48 laws of power? I like it when people read books, but beyond that, I don't really care how dumb people choose to be. Imo, that's all it is, a choice. Smaller class sizes, parents having an academic presence, and good teachers help, but if a kid doesn't want to learn, you can't make them.
-----------
In order to avoid double posting...
-----------
The majority of the population attends public school. By the numbers, it doesn't seem like there are more democrats as a result of public education, at least in a significant proportion compared to any other point in the last 50 or so years. College attendees tend to be more left leaning, but I don't know how those numbers shake out after graduation. I didn't go to college, so I could give a fuck.

Regardless of what I feel or think, it appears we are about to find out wether less administration and funding makes for better education. Time will tell.
 
Back