General GunTuber thread

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
but he’s still so retarded that he knew the government was after him so he went out to seek services from a literal prostitute?
That's my big problem, if the feds are really after you they will do literally anything to get you and he wasn't even basically careful. I still think it was a setup, but he was being so retarded he practically deserved it.
 
Okay argue Cory got set up by the government with an underaged prostitute… Sure but he’s still so retarded that he knew the government was after him so he went out to seek services from a literal prostitute? Makes no sense and makes him appear even dumber.

That's my big problem, if the feds are really after you they will do literally anything to get you and he wasn't even basically careful. I still think it was a setup, but he was being so retarded he practically deserved it.
Screenshot_20250313_093150.jpg
Screenshot_20250313_093221.jpg
Screenshot_20250313_093403.jpg

The first step you have to do in order to not make a bad peepee (and therefore life) decision is follow the golden formula: X÷2+7

Fail to do this simple but ingenious task and you probably deserve whatever consequences happen.
 
Last edited:
Didn't the girl use a fake ID? The sugar baby website "confirmed" her age so even if she was "22" it was a lie but the guy is liable because he assumed her to be a legal consenting adult? I have no dog in this fight but I don't think the guy should be punished because a girl lied about her age, did the website owner get in trouble due to facilitating the underage girl to Cody?
 
Didn't the girl use a fake ID? The sugar baby website "confirmed" her age so even if she was "22" it was a lie but the guy is liable because he assumed her to be a legal consenting adult? I have no dog in this fight but I don't think the guy should be punished because a girl lied about her age, did the website owner get in trouble due to facilitating the underage girl to Cody?
It was determined that he knew, the website is said to have been commonly used for that sort of thing but depending on their terms of service she may have violated they would not be considered at fault.
 
Another reason I hate the 2A4all faggots. “Oh you don’t think trannies who say they want to kill every transphobe, black nationalists who say kill all whites, or Marxists should have guns? That means you’re not really pro 2A.”
I've said it before: the 2A reinforces the God given right (or natural right, whichever someone prefers) to defend yourself, family, community and property with arms. That applies to those "people," but that doesn't mean I'm obligated to help them acquire firearms, ammo, firearms accessories, training, etc. I don't have to advocate for their rights, either. Considering how many of them are violent criminals or incredibly mentally ill, no thinking individual would say "yeah, I think these freaks should have access to firearms."
 
Another reason I hate the 2A4all faggots. “Oh you don’t think trannies who say they want to kill every transphobe, black nationalists who say kill all whites, or Marxists should have guns? That means you’re not really pro 2A.” It’s like critical thinking goes out the window.
I've said it before: the 2A reinforces the God given right (or natural right, whichever someone prefers) to defend yourself, family, community and property with arms. That applies to those "people," but that doesn't mean I'm obligated to help them acquire firearms, ammo, firearms accessories, training, etc. I don't have to advocate for their rights, either. Considering how many of them are violent criminals or incredibly mentally ill, no thinking individual would say "yeah, I think these freaks should have access to firearms."
I think the central concept of 2A4all was hijacked and overwritten a la Operation Wall Street, because it was originally just outright support for gun rights against gun laws by even lefties that quickly twisted into a hard focus upon race and trannies openly LARPing about shooting people like the right-wing, totally not FBI-infested militia craze of the 80s.
 
2A4All is shitty left-wing logic trap bullshit to attempt to force people to say they support trannies.

2A is explicitly for all American citizens, and Pro-2A is against gun laws and restrictions.

So 2A4All is dogma trap of "So if you think everyone should have gun rights, do you think trannies should have gun rights too?!" as a shitty gotcha to force people into either voicing direct support of trannies or supporting gun laws.

It's a shitty trick. It's not a binary choice, but they want to frame it as such.
 
2A4All is shitty left-wing logic trap bullshit to attempt to force people to say they support trannies.

2A is explicitly for all American citizens, and Pro-2A is against gun laws and restrictions.

So 2A4All is dogma trap of "So if you think everyone should have gun rights, do you think trannies should have gun rights too?!" as a shitty gotcha to force people into either voicing direct support of trannies or supporting gun laws.

It's a shitty trick. It's not a binary choice, but they want to frame it as such.
It's the same shit as #BlackLivesMatter. When you go one step up and say #AllLivesMatter, they get really pissy because you're not saying their specific protected group matters.
 
2A4All is shitty left-wing logic trap bullshit to attempt to force people to say they support trannies.

2A is explicitly for all American citizens, and Pro-2A is against gun laws and restrictions.

So 2A4All is dogma trap of "So if you think everyone should have gun rights, do you think trannies should have gun rights too?!" as a shitty gotcha to force people into either voicing direct support of trannies or supporting gun laws.

It's a shitty trick. It's not a binary choice, but they want to frame it as such.
So what you're saying is that trannies should have their citizenship revoked...
 
Didn't the girl use a fake ID? The sugar baby website "confirmed" her age so even if she was "22" it was a lie but the guy is liable because he assumed her to be a legal consenting adult? I have no dog in this fight but I don't think the guy should be punished because a girl lied about her age, did the website owner get in trouble due to facilitating the underage girl to Cody?
If you're in your thirties and think a 16 year old is definitely 22, you're lying. "She tricked me!" You're like twice her age
 
I Said it before. I think that gun control is an infringement on the second amendment. I don't believe in discrimination for laws.

However, just because you can buy a gun does not mean that the gun community needs to help you train. give you advice or anything. Gatekeeping works. I go on far left and even somewhat left subreddits and other groups all the time just to see what they're up to. a consistent theme is that they always ask about gun stores that are not "pro-trump" or aren't politically biased. They will not shop at any stores that are. The reason why these people haven't gotten into guns sooner is because of the gate keeping and it generally being seen as right wing.

I might applaud that these people are getting into guns because it might make them not vote for someone that pushes gun control, which is majority Democrat. But the DNC just doubles down on gun control eternally. It's proven that they don't think that way, they'll complain about something, but they won't not vote for someone because of that. It's even exacerbated because a lot of them know that the legal system is on their side so they don't care about these laws that are getting passed because in their mind they're fighting fascism and they'll just be let off the hook or something. Like seriously go on the liberal gun owners subreddit and see just how many of these people in their title talk about killing Nazis with their guns. The only time I see people talking about killing Communists or socialists with their guns on Reddit is if it's a period type historical firearm that did such a thing. Not a Glock 19. Look at the patches they put on their kit. It's all heavily pro killing people for politics themed stuff.

Gatekeeping has got to increase. If you see somebody that's like that asking for gun advice, don't help them or give them bad advice on purpose. You're not infringing on anybody's right by not helping them or them not being smart enough to see that your fucking with them. I see tons of posts of these people who won't go to ranges or will stop going to ranges because there's "trumpers" there. When's the last time somebody that disagrees with you politically being somewhere has stopped you from practicing an important skill? These people are lunatics.
 
Looks like some discussion on 2AFORALL has spread to more media, while not directly with Karl of IRTV, there has been some criticism of it.

TL;DR: In a video by Glow So Bright; he tries to look into the meaning and history of 2A4ALL, summarizes Karl's videos on the topic from early 2025, talks about the history and philosophy behind classical liberalism and early American history. He then shits on communism, expands that 2A4ALL is used only by the Liberal Gun Club, the Socialist Rifle Association, and Karl and his unhinged associates (Tacticool FF and Queer Armorer who support the SRA). Glow So Bright then states that no one wants to use 2A4ALL because of these associations. He then talks about how the SRA and notable supporters (Queer Armorer), brand anyone who is not them fascists and nazis and want to disarm and destroy them. He then talks about Karl's negative interactions with Polenar tactical, Ian, and Varusteleka; and many others who feature firearms content.


A few weeks later they now go and respond to people in the comments section of GSB's video.

Such as Russel Phagan responding to obvious troll comments, confusing racist ideas with fascist ones.
1.png

Karl responding to the comments section:

2.png

3.png

Seems Karl is missing the point on why people don't want to use the phrase 2AFORALL. Seems to be a similar stance to the above posts in the thread, GSB's video, as well as the non-socialists in the comments section.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Karl responding to the comments section:
1741986302444.png
I so badly want to ask Karl when his video about the fall of Rhodesia is coming out...I suspect he'd reply saying that only certain people can be "marginalized" and being a tiny minority sanctioned by the entire world doesn't count.
Such as Russel Phagan responding to obvious troll comments, confusing racist ideas with fascist ones.
You don't look exactly white yourself. I'm sure you appreciate having your civil rights.
On the contrary, he's been granted Honorary Aryan status. His rights aren't in any danger because he's a person, not a commie.
This is a fascist position. You also have people saying Jews and homosexuals don't have rights either. But somehow people concerned about racism and fascism are out of line? Your audience is right here endorsing it.
So when your SRA buddies say that "fascists" or "nazis" shouldn't have gun rights, I'm sure you immediately tell them that the Second Amendment is for everyone, right?
I'm not an SRA member, but I'm not afraid to talk to them. They can barely organize a news letter let alone a revolution. The MN chapter was widely criticized after those posts were made.
They have literally murdered people unlike the "racist fascists".
I'll sell to anyone who isn't a criminal.
So you don't sell to the SRA, which is a terrorist organization whose members have committed numerous crimes? Oh wait, not only do you sell them arms, you actively solicit them.
Why don't you also sell arms to the cartels and Hamas? 99% of them have never been convicted of a crime. You wouldn't want to be prejudiced, would you? The Second Amendment is for everyone.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 7092938
I so badly want to ask Karl when his video about the fall of Rhodesia is coming out...I suspect he'd reply saying that only certain people can be "marginalized" and being a tiny minority sanctioned by the entire world doesn't count.


On the contrary, he's been granted Honorary Aryan status.

So when your SRA buddies say that "fascists" or "nazis" shouldn't have gun rights, I'm sure you immediately tell them that the Second Amendment is for everyone, right?

They have literally murdered people unlike the "racist fascists".

So you don't sell to the SRA?
At the risk of powerleveling, you could have a better way for answers to your comments by commenting in the YouTube video. Over here is preaching the the choir.
 
A bit of an update on the Fudd Buster's v. Cody Wilson case. Potentially Criminal covered it today. The bulk of the stream can be summarized as, "the judge is retarded and hasn't read most of the filings when she denied his motion to stay." Mr. Fudd Buster sent Potentially Criminal a copy of the discovery request, Potentially Criminal states that within the request his attorney makes a series of overly broad and vague requests for production. As well, many of the requests may be partially or entirely privileged and the requests may not have any relevance to the case at hand.

Below I have partially transcribed the discovery request because it is juicy regardless of you watching Potentially Criminals coverage (though I'd recommend it). Numbered omissions are due to Sean scrolling too fast past the numbered requests. I shortened some of the language used for brevity, I hope it doesn't confuse what is being asked for.

Partial transcription said:
1-4 wants shit related to any expert witnesses that will be called (Fudd Buster will call no experts)
5-8 Any material relating to DEFCAD, Cody Wilson, Defense Distributed, and Dioskouri.
9. Any communications between counter defendants (Fudd Buster and friends)
10. Any material relating to the word "Gatalog" & Gatalog Foundation
11. Communications regarding litigation hold notices issued in this case
12-13 Any business relationships or employment relationships between the counter defendants individually or collectively
14. Any material relating to the gatalogs file submission approval process, legal reviews and bounty payments
15. Wants all ITAR regulations, including compliance policies (noted in stream: this is vague, whose ITAR regs? the Gov? Mr. Buster's personal ITAR regs and compliance policies?)
16. Mirrors 15 but for EAR regs.
17-18 Any information relating to the websites "www.thegatalog.com" and "chat.deterrencedispensed.com"
19. Any material relating to Fuddbuster's Discord, including private channels that include any Counter defendant
20. Any material relating to the publication of digital firearms data on Odysee
21. Any material on "beta rooms" or private chat rooms operated by you or any counter defendant including membership records, file transfers and message content
22. And material relating to websites where anyone hosts 3D gun files
23. Any material relating to any servers owned/managed by anyone to discuss or distribute 3D printable gun files
24. Any material identifying any policies and procedures on any website or chatroom about what can be posted
25. Any material relating to the word "FEDCAD"
26. Any posts you've made about "FEDCAD" in the last 5 years
27. Any material relating to the publication of the "RGB Crescent" files, including any condition or coordination surrounding their release.
28. Like 27 but for the "Rogue 9."
29. Like 27 but for the "FNT.3" and "FTN.4."
30. Like 27 but for the "Uratau."
31. Any material relating to any digital forearm file transfer to or coordination with, including payments to, foreign entities or individuals, including but not limited to communications with or regarding Myanmar, ZeCarioca, ImmortalRevolt, and Jstark,
32. Any evidence supporting claims that DEFCAD did not properly encrypt or securely store its data.
33. Any material relating to any evidence you use to support your claim that DEFCAD "has been hacked and dumped multiple times."
34. Any materials relating to the creation of the FEDCAD meme.
35. Any materials relating to the promotion of MAF, gatalog, ctlrpew, Fuddbusters or any site used by you or counter defendant regarding 3D printable gun files.
36. Any materials relating to the selection and delegation of responsibilities to Rocketchat server administrators and beta managers including "Freeman1337" "Dr. Death" "UberClay" and "Pla.boi"
43. Any materials relating to David Gringras' website, including but not limited to communications discussing how that website could be disrupted
44. Any material relating to statements made by you concerning this lawsuit
45. Any material related to any copyright claim to the 3d printable gun files hosted on DEFCAD asserted by you or any counter defendant
46. Any material related to your contention that DEFCAD stole from you or any other counter defendant
48. Any material relating to the management, deletion, or alteration of record or communications during the 6 months preceding the filing of this lawsuit
49. A complete backup of the gatalogs rocketchat server and communications, including private and admin messages, predating Peter Celentano's Sep 20 2024 deletions
50. Any material relating to Peter Celentano's possession of restricted firearms or machine guns
51. Any material relating to any interactions with gov agencies related to digital firearms information
52. Any material relating to the psuedonymous figures Pla.boi, Dr. Death, UberClay, ArmedJ0y, and Pablo Diaz / Bloblems
53. Any material relating to any communications between any plaintiff/counterdefendant and any defendant/counterplaintiff.
54. Any material relating to any communication between you and the defendant's employees, including but not limited to Garret Walliman
55. Any material relating to any 3rd party's use of DEFCAD website, including but not limited to FFFTech and Unseenkiller
56. Any materials relating to the Everytown for Gun Safety v. DEFCAD lawsuit
57. All communications related to developing, printing or sharing NFA items, including but not limited to communications between you and any other counter defendant and and Freeman, Zecarioca, and Pla.Boi
58. Any material related to any communication between you and Elik regarding the development any/or creation of any file involved in the copyright suit, including but not limited to the MP99, Amigo Grande, and Hitchhiker
Cody's lawyer is requesting some very sus shit that, if Cody were a malicious actor, could be used to seriously fuck with people, some of whom aren't directly involved in this case. Sean believes he should be seeking a protection order so Cody can't leak shit, and if he did it'd fuck his case. He believes if Mr. Fudd Buster appeals/objects (I don't know the legalese here) to the discovery request the judge will likely still allow it.

Anyways, if you want to hear Sean's commentary and a summary of the last three months of case development you can do so here:
 
I'm going to go out on a limb here, and take the controversial stance that the 2nd amendment wasn't written with degenerate would be tyrants in mind. And as a matter of fact, anyone who favors marxism, socialism, communism, doesn't have a right to a firearm in a nation of free men. It took eight years for the people of this nation to throw off one collection of tyrants headed by a crown wearing one. They have no obligation to furnish to those who would enslave them once more, with the tools to do it.
 
Back