Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Wait, what? I feel like I've heard of something like that before for advertisers but for fans and oilers to post on your account? That sounds like a weird arrangement but anything for a dollar I suppose. Shouldn't that have some kind of disclaimer attached?
Some people were spamming clips of him on twitter and he decided to get them to do it on his main account. They normally tag themselves when they upload an edit:
1742077230661.png
Erudite leaning into:
"I'm going to wait until all the facts come out, but also, please remember a horse kicked me in the head, and I could be mental."
She is doing this, but she's also doing the "heh, if only you knew the real FACTS about what's going on like I do...." thing, which is a lot worse.
I created a document that pairs the statements from Pxie's complaint with Destiny's responses.
The GOAT.
1742077332590.png
What is he even denying here? Can he just deny shit that's true? The only thing I can imagine is the reason for the twitch ban, but he himself said it's for hateful conduct:
1742077420633.png

1742077453626.png
https://imgur.com/KyWM3ly / https://archive.ph/wip/13e7j
1742077485917.png
Denying that she's 19 are we?
 
The reality is Erudite put personal profit above her supposed principles
At this point I'm starting to doubt that her involvement was some pragmatic career move. I think she's unironically in love with this guy. She's faced so much backlash, her career has been nuked but she's still defending him, still banning people who shit on him, and she's adopting even more of Destiny's mannerisms.

It's certainly no coincidence that she had a coming to Jesus moment in regards to "forgiving" people and openly rejecting cancel culture. She knows it will look bad if she gives Destiny an exclusive free pass so she decided to restructure her entire world view to one where she simply doesn't have to disavow Destiny. Even if it means granting "forgiveness" to other lunatics and sex pests, giving them a clean slate is a worthy sacrifice as long as Destiny is also forgiven.
 
So I'm just finding out now she's dating some swedish actor. The only article I can find about the both of them mentioned Destiny and that he and Melina had an open relationship.
Melina is his swedish ex-wife that left him for a twink tik-toker (they've since broken up). Valter is the son of Stellan Skarsgard and the brother of Bill Skarsgard. She's said she wants to pursue acting so I'm sure that factors into this relationship.

Kyla Turner aka NotSoErudite (who is referenced in your quote) is a failed streamer whose entire life revolves around gaining approval from Destiny and in the past ~1.5 years her career has also been centered around this cum goblin.

Kyla =/= Melina just so you know.
 
My theory is that they want Destiny to talk about her and say as much vile shit as possible without any remorse because it can be used against him easily and he is only digging himself a deeper hole.
They couldn't have picked a better strategy to use against someone who loves to hear themselves talk.
 
Denying that she's 19 are we?
How could Destiny('s legal assembly) possibly defend denial of such an innocuous claim? Discord obviously retains the messages. The only denial I can comprehend here is in the case that "began conversing" I may be making a mistake with the tense here. English ;( as false due to perhaps getting his discord ID elsewhere?
 
The GOAT.
View attachment 7096835
What is he even denying here? Can he just deny shit that's true? The only thing I can imagine is the reason for the twitch ban, but he himself said it's for hateful
He does have only 839K Youtube Subsribers left :story:

View attachment 7096856
Denying that she's 19 are we?
The ages are not correct. Destiny is born December 1988. They started conversing in 2019. That would make Destiny 30 years old.


Pxie's case is very weak with all her public engagement. She shouldn't have publicly thanked people for covering it. And having only proof of him sharing the video once in April 2022 and them lying in the complaint saying it was October will hurt them as well. This case might actually get dismissed.
But none of this will work with Stasia. The issue with Stasia is that she isn't really negatively impacted by the leak.
 
How could Destiny('s legal assembly) possibly defend denial of such an innocuous claim? Discord obviously retains the messages. The only denial I can comprehend here is in the case that "began conversing" I may be making a mistake with the tense here. English ;( as false due to perhaps getting his discord ID elsewhere?
Part of the denial is based on what could be factual errors (the witness is unreliable) and the other part of the denial is based on the clip of 29 year old Destiny saying that 19 year olds are "like children" to him.

Pxie was born in July 1999. Pxie started her streams circa early summer 2019 which would make her 20. Her first known public contact with Destiny is November (or October) of 2019 which would mean she was 20. For Pxie's claim to be true she would have had to begin communicating with Destiny before July 2019. The objection could also be to whether they started talking on Discord or some other app but that's and even weaker objection
 
How could Destiny('s legal assembly) possibly defend denial of such an innocuous claim? Discord obviously retains the messages. The only denial I can comprehend here is in the case that "began conversing" I may be making a mistake with the tense here. English ;( as false due to perhaps getting his discord ID elsewhere?
My guess it's a strategy to bury the other side in paperwork / busy work.

The more time pixies lawyers have to respond to shit like her age on a specific date, it's just wasted time and money.

Destiny just clicked deny all to everything, pixies team has to go back and elaborate further and provide evidence for their claims.

Maybe some legal fags can chime in and tell me if I'm way off base or not.
 
"...cast the billionaire class as an evil class that is forcing people into horrible things"
However we don't live in a fantasy world the billionaires lobby the government in order to increase the wealth at the expense of the lower classes
In Destiny's views, even without the billionaires people would still be making bad choices because the only variable remaining is the person making the bad choices. Because this is a "free market" and should remain that way, protecting consumers from themselves (via legislation, watchdog groups) violates the principles of a free market.
Free market capitalism doesn't work neither does state control of capital funny enough the middle solution where you have market regulation and free enterprise is the best system.
just like when brothers and sisters fighting their parents has to be in uninterested third party to settle disputes the state tax in that fashion when it comes to disputes labor disputes of property disputes intellectual property etcetera etcetera free market capitalism is a retarded philosophy that was created by a bunch of Jews who have never worked a day in their lives.

Also we don't live in free market capitalistic systems if we did I could openly say I do not hire blacks and open up a bank with zero hassle.
It's the same reason payment processors don't want the government to make it very easy to transfer funds between accounts because then they can no longer take the 3 per cent cut
 
And having only proof of him sharing the video once in April 2022 and them lying in the complaint saying it was October will hurt them as well. This case might actually get dismissed.
If she was lying in that allegation, why didn't Destiny or his lawyers address the claim and directly disprove the lie?
 
When the judge says motion to dismiss denied (in part or in full), we are proceeding to the discovery phase. If Tiny is 1% as smart as he thinks he is, he will settle if that's what the judge says. A lot of the time civil suits get settled as soon as it is ruled discovery is next on the agenda
It'd be a bit odd for the judge to deny a motion to dismiss, given that one hasn't been filed. And it's too late to file a motion to dismiss based on some of the affirmative defenses asserted in the answer, as technically such a motion would have to be filed BEFORE filing an answer.
 
Last edited:
While Destiny is a degenerate retard piece of shit (who should kill himself), I think a substantial part of his process in determining a position is just pure contrarianism.

- Defending Jeffrey Epstein
- Defending billionaires
- Defending health insurance companies
- Defending sexual relationships with 14-17 year olds
- etc etc

I really believe that for a lot of his positions he just starts at "what is the opposite of popular opinion?" and works his way backwards from there. Part of it is probably his cuck/humiliation fetish and part of it is probably a boost to his ego when he takes an unpopular position and gets his virgin fan club to jump on board with it.
 
What is he even denying here? Can he just deny shit that's true? The only thing I can imagine is the reason for the twitch ban, but he himself said it's for hateful conduct:
Yeah, probably going to fight on the "hateful conduct" as they are probably going to try to present Destiny as this upstanding citizen.

Can any Americans tell me how civil court works? I watched the Johnny Depp trial, and a lot of stuff was included from both sides, but that was a personal (ex-wife/ex-husband) relationship, so I guess I can't really base anything for this Pxie case from that.
How much will Pxie's lawyers be able to include about Destiny and his behaviour? hypothetically, if Destiny's lawyers use his "rape reviews" and covering of Me Too allegations to try to present him as some sort of "ally to women", and his canvassing events to present him as some sort of upstanding citizen, will Pxie's lawyers be able to include all the times that Destiny confessed to genuinely planning on killing a kid, and justified it multiple times (still to this day), and even clarifying that he wasn't being edgy or joking, that he really thinks he would be morally justified?
Genuinely curious how much of Destiny's baggage can make it into the case to prove how mentally unstable, impulsive, and self centered he is, as I genuinely think this secretly recording people, spreading porn without consent, and spreading his tapes and audios like they were candy (even when the girls didn't ask him for anything, he just offered it) seems to be some sort of exhibitionism fetish or something.

How could Destiny('s legal assembly) possibly defend denial of such an innocuous claim? Discord obviously retains the messages. The only denial I can comprehend here is in the case that "began conversing" I may be making a mistake with the tense here. English ;( as false due to perhaps getting his discord ID elsewhere?
I believe Code Cave is making a joke about Rose being 17, don't see Destiny and his side fighting on Rose being 19, as the only options are that she was younger, as supposedly Destiny believed Rose to be 18 and later turned 19, but Solo alleges that she was actually 17 turning to 18 instead.

At this point I'm starting to doubt that her involvement was some pragmatic career move. I think she's unironically in love with this guy. She's faced so much backlash, her career has been nuked but she's still defending him, still banning people who shit on him, and she's adopting even more of Destiny's mannerisms.

It's certainly no coincidence that she had a coming to Jesus moment in regards to "forgiving" people and openly rejecting cancel culture. She knows it will look bad if she gives Destiny an exclusive free pass so she decided to restructure her entire world view to one where she simply doesn't have to disavow Destiny. Even if it means granting "forgiveness" to other lunatics and sex pests, giving them a clean slate is a worthy sacrifice as long as Destiny is also forgiven.
Yep, I'm leaning on it being in love + braindamaged. It being career motivated doesn't make sense anymore imo.
She kept moving the goalpost to what she thought would be "enough" to cut someone off, as Destiny very likely kept lying to her about how much he had done.
Now that the standards are on the bottom she has moved to "I'm over it", and I think you can kinda see spite/hate towards Pxie starting to come out. She had to correct herself after saying she didn't give a shit about the cases anymore, to saying that she did care but thinking there's more important stuff. Not that it wasn't obvious before as I've been saying from the start, Pxie and Lonerbox are genuinely retarded if they think Kyla is on Pxie's side at all, she has acted as an obstacle from the very start.

Her trying to pivot towards "male loneliness" or "male suicidality" again alluding towards "Think about Steven guys, think of his feelings, he's just this little broken puppy, I can fix him".
Her staying in touch with him, and continuing to help him, and not criticizing how Destiny has weaponized any of the screenshots of statements against Pxie.

I genuinely think it's simply that the braindead moron is actually retarded, and in love with the phimosis penis.
I do think they've fucked before tho, not that it was debated much in the thread and by other users, but her behaviour is genuinely unhinged and only matched by pretty much only by the other girls that Destiny has fucked and kept close with him.

I mean just think about it. It's very clear that Dan realizes what Destiny is. He almost certainly knows that all the allegations are true (honestly wouldn't even be surprised if he was who recommended him those lawyers), Dan is acting maliciously trying to save his friend who he knows is in the wrong, and because he's tied financially to him.
From the start Dan made it clear by making the comparison to his kids, that if one of them ended up killing a person, he would help them hide the body/crime. Saying he would do the same for Destiny, Erudite would never use that comparison because she's completely deluded, which is why she also self admittedly refuses to watch/listen, or read, any of the primary sources of leaks. She can continue living in fantasy land if she only listens to what Destiny tells her happened.

Erudite, from all I've seen, genuinely seems delusional in a very different way to Dan. And it works so easily because she's genuinely braindamaged.

(Has no one found the clip I talked about? I'm pretty certain that during one of their first talks she told Destiny that she has had multiple concussions, not only the horse one, and that it's quite common that once you suffered one you will suffer many more throughout your life. She's genuinely retarded at this point.)

My guess it's a strategy to bury the other side in paperwork / busy work.

The more time pixies lawyers have to respond to shit like her age on a specific date, it's just wasted time and money.

Destiny just clicked deny all to everything, pixies team has to go back and elaborate further and provide evidence for their claims.

Maybe some legal fags can chime in and tell me if I'm way off base or not.
Don't know anything about law, but that's also the vibe I'm getting.

I think his recent confidence, even tho some of it is clearly fake, is because he sees that Pxie's crowdfund has stalled.
Genuinely don't know how she can make it happen, but I think she should genuinely act pathetic, and try to beg Hasan, or some sort of big content creator to get her on stream and promote/crowdfund her case.
Hasan is going to continue to be called and presented as spiteful by Destiny, no matter what, so I genuinely don't get why he doesn't try to play as the villain that Destiny says he is.

If Hasan was actually even 10% as spiteful as Destiny says he is he could bury Destiny's career. On the other hand, I wonder how it would look in court as Destiny's weasel lawyers would probably associate all the awful stuff Hasan has said to Pxie (again I don't know anything about law, all I've understood from people explaining it here is that you can include way more shit in civil cases).

Either way, Pxie genuinely needs to work on gaining more funds. There's so much evidence against Destiny, you just gotta find a way to get it there. Where there's a will there's a way tho, if she somehow doesn't manage to make it happen I will blame it on her not being motivated enough.

Bob7, Tiny's former enemy, has returned to the internet. At the 10-second mark, a short clip of one of his conversations with Melina plays in the background.

Oof. I'll level out my recent sexism of analyzing Erudite's extremely tiny eyes, and masculine long horse face, by saying he's looking rough, that hairline has moved a lot since last time I saw it.

Kinda crazy how long ago the Bob7 drama was, doesn't feel like it.

He does have only 839K Youtube Subsribers left :story:


The ages are not correct. Destiny is born December 1988. They started conversing in 2019. That would make Destiny 30 years old.


Pxie's case is very weak with all her public engagement. She shouldn't have publicly thanked people for covering it. And having only proof of him sharing the video once in April 2022 and them lying in the complaint saying it was October will hurt them as well. This case might actually get dismissed.
But none of this will work with Stasia. The issue with Stasia is that she isn't really negatively impacted by the leak.
Like clockwork. idreamofpikas comes into the thread to defend his e-daddy.

1742093297485.png
Go argue about the Beatles some more lil pup. Your team is shit.
 
It'd be a bit odd for the judge to deny a motion to dismiss, given that one hasn't been filed. And it's too late to file a motion to dismiss based on some of the affirmative defenses asserted in the answer, as technically such a motion would have to be filed BEFORE filing an answer.

A prayer for relief in the form of dismissal (among other things) is indeed also a motion to dismiss
 

A prayer for relief in the form of dismissal (among other things) is indeed also a motion to dismiss
No, it isn't. Then, his answer would also be considered a "motion for attorney's fees," but it isn't that either. But, hey, if you're right, we should be expecting the court to rule on this "motion" before issuing a scheduling order. I wouldn't bet on that though.

Edit: Even if the answer was construed as a motion seeking dismissal, it'd be properly construed as a "motion for judgment on the pleadings," not a "motion to dismiss" because, again, a motion to dismiss based on some of the affirmative defenses he raised needs to be raised prior to filing an answer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12.
 
Last edited:
Back