Debate @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST on the slippery slope of making loli porn illegal - At the user's own request.

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

But 100% are pedophiles

I hope the drawings are getting counseling and all the support they need after being abused.

 

[Gunslinger Spawn]

Oooh mr putting everyone he disagrees on ignore is here! Open room for his twitter safe space people!

 

[lolcow yoghurt]

I hope the drawings are getting counseling and all the support they need after being abused.

Nigger how many times you have to be told that people who create and enjoy lolicon art are pedophiles who pose danger to real children? If someone jerks off to sexual depiction of children, they are a pedophile. It's all that simple.

Also don't pull the "historical art has depictions of naked children" card next for the thousandth time.

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

Nigger how many times you have to be told that people who create and enjoy lolicon art are pedophiles who

I've stopped caring, it's been two days and you have a sub-brick intellect. Drawings are free speech. If you think the drawing is ugly or degenerate (kind of like your avatar) just ignore it.

 

[A Very Big Fish]

I've stopped caring, it's been two days and you have a sub-brick intellect. Drawings are free speech. If you think the drawing is ugly or degenerate (kind of like your avatar) just ignore it.

MLP avatar criticizing other's avatars.

k.

 

[lolcow yoghurt]

I've stopped caring

Yet you keep sperging.

Drawings are free speech

There's nothing being spoken in sexualised illustration of children.

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

MLP avatar criticizing other's avatars.

k.

My avatar is actually Tamers, who is the best content creator on the internet. Every time someone fails to recognize him I'm justified in infantilizing their opinions.

 

[Inco G. Nito]

My avatar is actually Tamers, who is the best content creator on the internet. Every time someone fails to recognize him I'm justified in infantilizing their opinions.

Okay well I was going to point out that @lolcow yoghurt's pfp is cropped furry porn and yours isn't but I take it back lmao

 

[DoNotFeedTheSneed]

Drawings are free speech

There are limits. You should draw your avatar threatening the president of the United States. See how that goes over.

 

[SmallKiwi]

You should draw your avatar threatening the president of the United States. See how that goes over.

Not to defend the guy but that happens everywhere on the internet. Bonus points if you're non-American.

 

[draggs]

My avatar is actually Tamers, who is the best content creator on the internet. Every time someone fails to recognize him I'm justified in infantilizing their opinions.

>tamers
>who is the best content creator on the internet

 

[DoNotFeedTheSneed]

Not to defend the guy but that happens everywhere on the internet. Bonus points if you're non-American.

To be fair, my point was rhetorical. I just wanted to point out that there is limits to the first amendment, such as fedposting regarding politicians. Mostly stuff that causes harm.

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

>tamers
>who is the best content creator on the internet

Calling me a pedophile, wasting my time by being dumb and threatening to murder me with a wood chipper is one thing. But talking shit about Tamers?

I hope you wear a gas mask at all times. You're about to be subjected to more fumes than a crowd at NASCAR, bitch.

 

[draggs]

Calling me a pedophile, wasting my time by being dumb and threatening to murder me with a wood chipper is one thing. But talking shit about Tamers?
View attachment 7099123
I hope you wear a gas mask at all times. You're about to be subjected to more fumes than a crowd at NASCAR, bitch.

how many times a day do you get off to filly trixie lulamoon's extremely protuberant tamers-given butt

or any of the ponies' extremely protuberant tamers-given butts since he gave them all extremely protuberant butts

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

Alright, I'm out. @Null woke up from his shotacon goonsesh and the thread is full of people who are genuinely angry at drawings (including Null.) Red strikethrough or not, this has all gotten way too dumb for my tastes. inb4 "You've never contributed to the site GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT" garbage post by dear feeder.

 

[DoNotFeedTheSneed]

Calling me a pedophile, wasting my time by being dumb and threatening to murder me with a wood chipper is one thing. But talking shit about Tamers?
(image removed because the pedo apologist didn't thumbnail it)
I hope you wear a gas mask at all times. You're about to be subjected to more fumes than a crowd at NASCAR, bitch.

I'm very sorry that someone criticized your prepubescent horse porn

 

[Null]

Alright, I'm out. @Null woke up from his shotacon goonsesh and the thread is full of people who are genuinely angry at drawings (including Null.) Red strikethrough or not, this has all gotten way too dumb for my tastes. inb4 "You've never contributed to the site GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT" garbage post by dear feeder.

"Oh yeah? You disagree with me? Well you're the REAL pedophile."

bye retard

 

[Gravemind]

You're right, but I also believe you're going to want to do the exact same thing I did once you realize logical essays and appeals to reason don't work on him.

You have no logic nor reason for making the arguments you've been making. Hang it the fuck up already, retard. Even Dear Feeder is hitting you with the actual logic and reason, and telling you to kill yourself.

EDIT: Did not see Null's post ITT before making this.

 

[Pro-Islam = Anti-Woman]

Oh, he got banned? Cool

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

This isn't even correct. If we took every single person who produces lolicon drawings or looks at them, the amount who go on to abuse children is probably less than a single percent.

His claim wasn't that all lolifags abuse children, it was that they're all pedophiles (and virtually all of them would if given the opportunity, some only not due to fear of punishment or such). You can disagree with that premise if you want, but you're currently arguing around him.

I've said this previously in the thread, I liken lolicon to the Grand Theft Auto games and believe it's the same phenomenon.

It isn't, that's apples and oranges, only at a very surface level observation is it true. Violence and sex are intrinsically different and therefore generally treated differently both at the individual level and societally. People play sex games almost exclusively for arousal, to satisfy a base urge. Violent games broadly do not serve an equivalent purpose; I don't play GTA to curb my violent desires.

If things don't serve the same purposes then it's a false equivalence. Furthermore, society treats these issues differently. Many parents let their kids consume very violent content, even realistic violence which is why toys and games were marketed to children based on stuff like Terminator, Predator, Robocop, etc. You can say maybe they shouldn't but that's reality. It's also why fantasy violence is acceptable to almost all of them even if they're not okay with realistic violence, not a soul alive honestly opposes Super Mario Bros. because you jump on Goombas, outside some fringe PETA loons.

On the other hand, nobody is okay with showing them sexual material outside of a school setting strictly for educational purposes (which is still bad and unnecessary), excluding far-left degenerates obviously. That goes for both realistic and fantastical sexual material, that's why there's no such thing as safe, family-friendly fantasy sex content, but there is for violence. Ratings boards do not let sex into G rated films/E rated games, but they do allow violence.

So, no, the go-to loli=GTA argument is weak at best.

I figure the same is true of lolicon until evidence suggests otherwise.

No, while evidence may not yet suggest otherwise, logic certainly does, as illustrated above.