UK Shakespeare’s birthplace to be decolonised after ‘white supremacy’ fears - Shakespeare can't be great. White men can't be great. Western civilization can't be great. Thanks for reading.

Article|Archive

William Shakespeare’s birthplace is being “decolonised” following concerns about the playwright being used to promote “white supremacy”.

Shakespeare’s Birthplace Trust owns buildings linked to the Bard in his home town of Stratford-upon-Avon. The trust also owns archival material including parish records of the playwright’s birth and baptism.

It is now “decolonising” its vast collection to “create a more inclusive museum experience”.

This process includes exploring “the continued impact of Empire” on the collection, the “impact of colonialism” on world history, and how “Shakespeare’s work has played a part in this”.

The trust has stated that some items in its collections and archives may contain “language or depictions that are racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise harmful”.

The process of “decolonising”, which typically means moving away from Western perspectives, comes after concerns were raised that Shakespeare’s genius was used to advance ideas about “white supremacy”.

The claims were made in a 2022 collaborative research project between the trust and Dr Helen Hopkins, an academic at the University of Birmingham.

The research took issue with the trust’s quaint Stratford attractions, comprising the supposed childhood homes and shared family home of Shakespeare and Anne Hathaway, his wife, because the Bard was presented as a “universal” genius.

This idea of Shakespeare’s universal genius “benefits the ideology of white European supremacy”, it was claimed.

This is because it presents European culture as the world standard for high art, a standard which was pushed through “colonial inculcation” and the use of Shakespeare as a symbol of “British cultural superiority” and “Anglo-cultural supremacy”.

Veneration of Shakespeare is therefore part of a “white Anglo-centric, Eurocentric, and increasingly ‘West-centric’ worldviews that continue to do harm in the world today”.

The project recommended that Shakespeare’s Birthplace Trust recognise that “the narrative of Shakespeare’s greatness has caused harm – through the epistemic violence”.

The project also recommended that the trust present Shakespeare not as the “greatest”, but as “part of a community of equal and different writers and artists from around the world”.

The trust then secured funding from the Esmee Fairbairn Foundation
, an organisation that finances projects that boost diversity and inclusion, to help make the collection more international in its perspective.

As part of its commitment to being more international in outlook, the trust has so far organised events celebrating Rabindranath Tagore, a Bengali poet, and a Romeo and Juliet-inspired Bollywood dance workshop.

The trust will continue looking at updating the “current and future interpretation” of objects in its collection. It will also explore how objects could be used as the focus for new interpretations which tell more international stories, in order to appeal to a more diverse audience.

It has additionally pledged to remove offensive language from its collections information, as part of a “long, thoughtful” process.

The collections contain not only some of the limited contemporary documents linked to the Bard, but archived material, literary criticism, books linked to Shakespeare and gifts from around the world offered in honour of the writer.

The ongoing closing of sites linked to Shakespeare comes following a trend for more racially-focused criticism of the playwright in the wake of Black Lives Matter protests in 2020.

The Globe Theatre in London ran a series of seminars titled Anti-Racist Shakespeare which promoted scholarship focused on the idea of race in his plays.

Academies taking part in the series made a number of claims, including that King Lear was about “whiteness”, and that the character of Prince Hamlet holds “racist” views of black people.

A statement from the trust said: “As part of our ongoing work, we’ve undertaken a project which explores our collections to ensure they are as accessible as possible.”

Properties run by the trust, including his family home New Place, are not original buildings Shakespeare would have known, but later reconstructions.

Dr Hopkins has been approached for comment.
 
I can only imagine some historian in 3025 teaching a class... "In the early twenty first century the new ruler of the United British Emirates had all traces of the previous dynasty erased. Nobody knows for sure the reason why, but most believe the new Sultan worshiped a different God than his predecessor..."
 
If this means we get to see niggers on stage recreating Shakespeare's works, translated to Pidgin, then im all for it.

romeo, romeo, wey b di romeo
to be, or no to be, dat de question.
wi di stab o di thumb, sumtin bad dis way come.
alas poor...wah di fuq is diz word? we be knowin dem well.

Tell me, in your heart of hearts that you wouldn't want to watch that.

EDIT: To be or not to be soliloquy translated into pidgin:

“to be, or no bi be: dat na di kweshion:
weda 'tis nobler for di mind to suffer
di slings and arrows for outrageous fortune,
or to take arms against a sea for troubles,
and by opposing end dem? to kpai: to sleep;
no bi; and by a sleep to tok we end
di heart-ache and di thousand natural shocks
dat flesh na heir to, 'tis a consummation
devoutly be wish'd. To kpai, to sleep;
to sleep: perchance to dream: ay, dia's di rub;
for for dat sleep for death wetin dreams fit com
wen we get shuffled off dis mortal coil,
must find we pause: dia's di respect
wey dey help calamity for so long life;
for who would bear di whips and scorns for taim,
di oppressor's wrong, di proud man's contumely,
di pangs for despised love, di law's delay,
di insolence for office and di spurns
dat patient merit for di unworthy takes,
wen im imsef might im quietus mek
wit a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
to grunt and sweat under a weary life,
but say di dread for sontin afta death,
di undiscover'd kontri from whose bourn
no traveller returns, puzzles di go
and de make we rather bear dos ills we get
than fly to odas wey we sabi no bi for?
na im make conscience does mek cowards for we all;
and na im make di native hue for resolution
na sicklied o'er wit di pale cast for think,
and enterprises for great pith and moment
wit dis regard dia currents turn awry,
and lose di name for action. --soft you now!
di fair ophelia! nymph, for thy orisons
be all mai sins remember'd!”
 
Last edited:
As part of its commitment to being more international in outlook, the trust has so far organised events celebrating Rabindranath Tagore, a Bengali poet, and a Romeo and Juliet-inspired Bollywood dance workshop.

The irony (lost on these people) is that educated-in-Britain Tagore's fame was entirely the result of western white patronage. In particular the awarding of the nobel prize to him. He also married a ten year old girl. Wikipedia, being culturally sensitive, points out that marrying ten year olds was completely common at the time.
 
If this means we get to see niggers on stage recreating Shakespeare's works, translated to Pidgin, then im all for it.

romeo, romeo, wey b di romeo
to be, or no to be, dat de question.
wi di stab o di thumb, sumtin bad dis way come.
alas poor...wah di fuq is diz word? we be knowin dem well.

Tell me, in your heart of hearts that you wouldn't want to watch that.
You just reminded me of cringey 2000s humor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
You just reminded me of cringey 2000s humor.
View attachment 7100551

Just in case you think I'm trying to be racist-edgy, I'm not, it's a real thing. Here's a quote from the nightclub fire:

At least 34 pipo don died for US - including 12 for Missouri alone - after deadly tornadoes tear through some south-eastern states, destroying cars and pipo homes.
For Kansas, at least eight pipo die after more dan 55 vehicles bin dey involved inside one crash due to dust storm.
 
This is pretty crazy.

Even if you don't want to give Shakespeare full credit for the body of work that is attributed to him (some scholars dispute he was able to crank out so many plays), the actual impact the works attributed to him have had on the English language is immense, the cultural impact has resonated with folks for literal centuries, and he was a genius, regardless of the actual volume of his work or the fact that he used black characters like Othello (oh, wait...) as villains.

Yeah, there is 'problematic' issues in Shakespeare's work. But there's already been a ton of academic work examining that sort of shit. Like mountains of. There isn't a need to 'decolonise' Shakespeare aside from insufferable cunts disguising their racism with supposed noble intentions.

I don't understand why everything has to be torn down. I mean, yeah, I know why -- zealous progressive politics like this are inclined to destroying things -- but you don't have to denigrate Shakespeare in order to 'elevate' crap from around the rest of the world.

Black Myth: Wukong is a good example of taking a celebrated work and bringing it to Western audiences.

Fuck, I preferred it when the fringe academic bullshit was given a small bit of columnspace in the newspaper for everyone to laugh at. Shit like Shakespeare was a closeted homosexual or that he was black. Now they're actually being taken seriously and given the means to let their bullshit propagate.
 
Back