UK Shakespeare’s birthplace to be decolonised after ‘white supremacy’ fears - Shakespeare can't be great. White men can't be great. Western civilization can't be great. Thanks for reading.

Article|Archive

William Shakespeare’s birthplace is being “decolonised” following concerns about the playwright being used to promote “white supremacy”.

Shakespeare’s Birthplace Trust owns buildings linked to the Bard in his home town of Stratford-upon-Avon. The trust also owns archival material including parish records of the playwright’s birth and baptism.

It is now “decolonising” its vast collection to “create a more inclusive museum experience”.

This process includes exploring “the continued impact of Empire” on the collection, the “impact of colonialism” on world history, and how “Shakespeare’s work has played a part in this”.

The trust has stated that some items in its collections and archives may contain “language or depictions that are racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise harmful”.

The process of “decolonising”, which typically means moving away from Western perspectives, comes after concerns were raised that Shakespeare’s genius was used to advance ideas about “white supremacy”.

The claims were made in a 2022 collaborative research project between the trust and Dr Helen Hopkins, an academic at the University of Birmingham.

The research took issue with the trust’s quaint Stratford attractions, comprising the supposed childhood homes and shared family home of Shakespeare and Anne Hathaway, his wife, because the Bard was presented as a “universal” genius.

This idea of Shakespeare’s universal genius “benefits the ideology of white European supremacy”, it was claimed.

This is because it presents European culture as the world standard for high art, a standard which was pushed through “colonial inculcation” and the use of Shakespeare as a symbol of “British cultural superiority” and “Anglo-cultural supremacy”.

Veneration of Shakespeare is therefore part of a “white Anglo-centric, Eurocentric, and increasingly ‘West-centric’ worldviews that continue to do harm in the world today”.

The project recommended that Shakespeare’s Birthplace Trust recognise that “the narrative of Shakespeare’s greatness has caused harm – through the epistemic violence”.

The project also recommended that the trust present Shakespeare not as the “greatest”, but as “part of a community of equal and different writers and artists from around the world”.

The trust then secured funding from the Esmee Fairbairn Foundation
, an organisation that finances projects that boost diversity and inclusion, to help make the collection more international in its perspective.

As part of its commitment to being more international in outlook, the trust has so far organised events celebrating Rabindranath Tagore, a Bengali poet, and a Romeo and Juliet-inspired Bollywood dance workshop.

The trust will continue looking at updating the “current and future interpretation” of objects in its collection. It will also explore how objects could be used as the focus for new interpretations which tell more international stories, in order to appeal to a more diverse audience.

It has additionally pledged to remove offensive language from its collections information, as part of a “long, thoughtful” process.

The collections contain not only some of the limited contemporary documents linked to the Bard, but archived material, literary criticism, books linked to Shakespeare and gifts from around the world offered in honour of the writer.

The ongoing closing of sites linked to Shakespeare comes following a trend for more racially-focused criticism of the playwright in the wake of Black Lives Matter protests in 2020.

The Globe Theatre in London ran a series of seminars titled Anti-Racist Shakespeare which promoted scholarship focused on the idea of race in his plays.

Academies taking part in the series made a number of claims, including that King Lear was about “whiteness”, and that the character of Prince Hamlet holds “racist” views of black people.

A statement from the trust said: “As part of our ongoing work, we’ve undertaken a project which explores our collections to ensure they are as accessible as possible.”

Properties run by the trust, including his family home New Place, are not original buildings Shakespeare would have known, but later reconstructions.

Dr Hopkins has been approached for comment.
 
I went to Helen Hopkins profile expecting to see some putrid jewess. Nope, just your average liberal white cunt:
1742168960866.png

Who needs Kikes when you have Whites like this?

Oh, is she trying to learn the dark arts though:
1742169054657.png
 
Translation: "He was too good/successful and it makes white hating elite whites feel uncomfortable with themselves."

We need to get important historical things like this out of the hands of trusts and family in the modern era. Laws forcing public consensus before shit like this at the very least.

This is the true face of the ongoing anti-intellectualism in the western world.. particularly among modern western "intellectuals."
 
Last edited:
I mean more in the way of "nothing ever gets done" kind of consensus. Super consensus, everyone needs to agree type of shit.
The current system of govenance and administration is built on the concept that - contrary to the claimed goal of 'everyone has a voice' - high or even full participation of the citizenry and electorate in every single decision is undesirable. If the plebs knew what the people in charge really thought about them, and provided they had the means to hold them accountable, clownworld would be over by next week.
 
Haven't JUST STOP OIL been destroying painting and other art for a good while now? This isn't anything new.
UK has no culture, it has no history, it's cities belong to invaders and their children either get raped or turned into kebab(or both) and neither the police nor politicians nor it's people will ever do anything about it. This is a conquered culture, maybe if it was more worthwhile I would be grieving it but the late British Empire has to the most pathetic display of degeneracy I have ever seen. Just end it, finish it, leave nothing behind. They don't deserve it, turn it into an open caliphate and rename London to something arabic already instead of just teasing me.
 
The trust then secured funding from the Esmee Fairbairn Foundation, an organisation that finances projects that boost diversity and inclusion, to help make the collection more international in its perspective.
How? How does a nonprofit get so hungry for funds from a DEI grant… that they effectively destroy everything that merited funding from grant agencies that place a value on Shakespeare?!

Can any UK kiwis with familiarity on the subject confirm if the Shakespeare trust might actually have been tight enough on cash to need to do this?? Is historical funding in the UK fucked? Or is this just another case of some frustrated weirdo at the Shakespeare trust going rogue and tanking their charity with their DEI bad ideas?
 
I went to Helen Hopkins profile expecting to see some putrid jewess. Nope, just your average liberal white cunt:
Nah, you can see that they very carefully dance around issues of anti-antisemitism. probably because this cunt has a watermelon emoji on their twitter profile. Shylock good, racist Hamlet bad.

Beyond Shakespeare's views on the Jews, there's also the issue on how he was unfairly depicting his fellow white people. Some of his historical plays depict certain members of the monarchy in a less than flattering light, largely because it benefited the current powers that be to do so.

And granted, this is nothing new. How many biopics have people seen where they take liberty with the historical record for a 'better' story?

The other thing that these absolute turds don't stop to think about is whether or not Shakespeare was offering up some form of social commentary in his works. Progressive types like the one above like to think 'social commentary' or 'examining society' were things that seemingly sprung forth in the 1990s (or whatever) instead of it being a thing for as long as we stopped worshipping rocks and eating dirt. Or characterization. Just because a character is racist or has bad qualities doesn't mean that the author is espousing those views.

I can sense the tophat appearing above my head, so I'm just gonna leave it at that. I hate what should be an essential field of study (writing, reading, analysis, critical thinking, etc.) has turned into such utter crap littered with charlatans and grifters on one side and people who shit on the value of developing such skills on the other.
 

Just in case you think I'm trying to be racist-edgy, I'm not, it's a real thing. Here's a quote from the nightclub fire:
I saw people talking pidgin on Facebook, which is already low IQ enough, and it's worse than when you stumble on people typing American black gibberish.
 
UK has no culture, it has no history
The UK Economic Zone doesn't, but England used to light the world (and even get a dig in edgewise at the jews)

This royal throne of kings, this scepter’d isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
This nurse, this teeming womb of royal kings,
Fear’d by their breed and famous by their birth,
Renowned for their deeds as far from home,
For Christian service and true chivalry,
As is the sepulchre in stubborn Jewry
Of the world’s ransom, blessed Mary’s Son,
This land of such dear souls, this dear dear land,
Dear for her reputation through the world​


Is now leased out, I die pronouncing it,
Like to a tenement or pelting farm:
England, bound in with the triumphant sea,
Whose rocky shore beats back the envious siege
Of watery Neptune, is now bound in with shame,
With inky blots and rotten parchment bonds:
That England, that was wont to conquer others,
Hath made a shameful conquest of itself.
Ah, would the scandal vanish with my life,
How happy then were my ensuing death!​

 
Back