EU New report from European medical orgs declares unwavering support for gender-affirming care - The report also slammed the UK's controversial Cass Review.

1.png

A new report from a slate of European medical organizations emphasizes the importance of gender-affirming care for transgender youth. It also condemns the UK’s controversial Cass Review that claimed gender-affirming care is dangerous for young people.

The new 400-page report, released last week and written in German, included 26 medical and psychotherapeutic professional organizations from Germany,
Switzerland, and Austria. According to an analysis and translation by transgender journalist Erin Reed, the guidelines recommend puberty blockers for trans youth, as well as individualized care.

The report adds, “If, in individual cases, the progressive pubertal maturation development creates a time pressure in which health damage would be expected due to longer waiting times to avert irreversible bodily changes (e.g. male voice change), access to child and adolescent psychiatric or psychotherapeutic clarification and medical treatment options should be granted as quickly as possible.”

The report also slams the Cass Review for recommending psychotherapy as a treatment for gender dysphoria rather than gender-affirming care, since “none of the studies included in the review in question were able to show a reduction in gender dysphoria through psychotherapy.”

The Cass Review is a 400-page review of oft-cited research on gender-affirming care for minors. The review concluded that there’s little reliable evidence showing positive outcomes from such care and urged “extreme caution” before giving minors puberty blockers or hormone replacement therapy. It also said that “life-changing” decisions on gender-affirming care should be put off until adulthood since the brain continues maturing into the mid-20s.

Outraged trans activists said the Cass Review excluded hundreds of studies showing the critical benefits of gender-affirming care for youth. Reed eviscerated Cass’s findings at the time of its release, saying the report included concepts rejected by more than 60 mental health organizations, including the American Psychological Association.

Reed said the new guidelines from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria “mark a significant advancement for transgender healthcare in those countries, reinforcing a growing trend in Europe toward expanding, not restricting, access to gender-affirming care.” Its recommendations, she added, “dismantle the false narrative that Europe is ‘pulling back’ on transgender care. In reality, it is the United States that stands as an outlier, with its regressive policies placing it far to the right of much of the Western world.”

She also called out the media for ignoring the new report recommending gender-affirming care despite publishing piece after piece on the Cass Review.

She wrote on Bluesky, “Anyone find it funny how when the UK releases the Cass review to ban trans care, we get everything ranging from New York Times push notifs to op-eds in every major US paper… But when Germany, Switzerland, and Austria release pro-trans youth care guidelines, not a single article anywhere but mine?”

2.png

Article Link

Archive
 
The west existed before ww2, stop treating it as a origin / foundation myth. And find another war to compare everything to, if you absolutely have to drool and compare wars every time a country does something you don't like.
The irony is I just came out of a WW2-ish thread, but WW2 happening doesn't mean these kids deserve this shit. Not one bit.

>She wrote on Bluesky, “Anyone find it funny how when the UK releases the Cass review to ban trans care, we get everything ranging from New York Times push notifs to op-eds in every major US paper… But when Germany, Switzerland, and Austria release pro-trans youth care guidelines, not a single article anywhere but mine?”
Because the Cass review goes against the current zeitgeist* and outlines what we knew since fucking prehistory: mutilating children is wrong. Children cannot consent to permanent, life-changing decisions because they're not adults. They don't know any better. These so-called procedures are no better than lobotomies, and if anything's regressive, it's them.

*The "excluding" wording is rather funny because the Cass review specifically reviews pro-mutilation studies, as "Molly Sprayregen" admitted in this article, hence the term, "review." You don't need to review 500 studies saying, "People in their honeymoon period don't regret the decisions that led to it" if you already did 100.
 
Last edited:
Germs are not white because they are not people. They are prooving this daily with nonsense like this.

Well it was nice of non whites to help drive out the Muslims in the battle of Vienna.

The irony is I just came out of a WW2-ish thread, but WW2 happening doesn't mean these kids deserve this shit. Not one bit.

the everything-is-ww2 mentally is in many ways just another form of slavery guilt. Something that happened an extremely long time ago means the descendants deserve whatever bad thing happens to them. Especially since, functionally, there is zero difference between conservative boomers who does so and liberals.

They both basically subscribe to this since they don't have a larger reference than anything Germany = Nazis and ww2

1742280450669.png

I just won't feel bad when third-world Islamist invaders set off nukes in all the European capitals.

If they do that, they'd even turn the demographics back significantly since those very islamists live mostly in the capitals. Please ISIS help out
 
Well it was nice of non whites to help drive out the Muslims in the battle of Vienna.
Nice of you to remember germ involvement during the siege. Sadly the same non-whites only few hundred years later decided to invite muslims own their own accord and then scream when white countries refuse to take them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussianBlonde
Nice of you to remember germ involvement during the siege. Sadly the same non-whites only few hundred years later decided to invite muslims own their own accord and then scream when white countries refuse to take them.

That's a long way to say "the non-whites delayed the Muslim takeover for 300+ years" and its incredible that those non-whites are so powerful that only screaming forces other white countries to take them in. Surely other countries has some agency just like Germany does.
 
The report adds, “If, in individual cases, the progressive pubertal maturation development creates a time pressure in which health damage would be expected due to longer waiting times to avert irreversible bodily changes (e.g. male voice change), access to child and adolescent psychiatric or psychotherapeutic clarification and medical treatment options should be granted as quickly as possible.”
" health damage" due to "progressive pubertal maturation development"
this is fucking insane to refer to perfectly normal changes one goes through during puberty
 
I am disappointed Austria and Switzerland also supported this. Can kiwis from those 2 countries tell me if this is govermental support or just fringe researchers? @Helvetia @Trennschleifer
 
Last edited:
even if I was, so what? Is being white bad now?

>WW2 bad
>Everything is traced back to WW2
>White people are so evil for wars started 80+ years ago
>Ethnic replacement is good because of WW2
>the root of the western world is ww2
>This country does something I don't like? Let's compare it to ww2.

You really need to read up on western history before ww2, your brain is melted boomer. You only knowing WW2 is forcing you to support certain policies and you don't even see it.

Being white isn't bad, but being a Kraut is.

Kill yourself.
 
I'd be suspect - and in fact downright doubtful - that an interpretation by a pro-trans activist actually tells the tale of what was in the report and its conclusions. In fact, I'd almost entirely dismiss it as cherry picking interpretation and bin it altogether.

But who is going to read a 400 page report in German and give the real analysis? Not a fucking trans journey that's for sure.
 
UK, Finland, Sweden Norway and Denmark have all put more restrictions on handing out hormone blockers as if they are candy because the dangers and side effects outweigh the potential benefits.

The Scandinavians specifically are the most progressive and see that this shit is going badly so it speaks for itself.

Just because some pozzed institutions are panicking that they might lose their government shekels and victims money does not mean they are making troonshine and other shit more accessible.

Find some other coping mechanism to deal with your cult losing their sponsorship you dumb troon, yeah?
 
Back