Debate @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST on the slippery slope of making loli porn illegal - At the user's own request.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Define "many", it's kind of a vague term.

Yeah I do remember that one time, and how does that reflect on the "many" times that isn't the case?
A lot of lolicon artists use real children as references. In fact, the pioneers of lolicon involved or were inspired by real children. That's a huge problem - in this case, it's not drawings, it's straight up child pornography. They're taking images of innocent children and sexualizing them, twisting them into their sick desires.
 
A lot of lolicon artists use real children as references. In fact, the pioneers of lolicon involved or were inspired by real children. That's a huge problem - in this case, it's not drawings, it's straight up child pornography. They're taking images of innocent children and sexualizing them, twisting them into their sick desires.
"A lot"
"Many"
Vague terms that don't mean anything without the numbers to back them up. Even if, hypothetically, 95% of lolicon was traced off real kids, that wouldn't mean the remaining 5% are immoral or wrong.
What intent is behind a drawing of a child engaged in sexual activity?
Probably to jerk off, which is not predatory behavior.
 
nigger you are the one who is defending cp here
I fail to see how pointing out that real life child abuse is worse and should be held to a more severe regard than a drawing of child abuse is 'defending cp', let alone necessarily defending either to begin with-
Vague terms that don't mean anything without the numbers to back them up. Even if, hypothetically, 95% of lolicon was traced off real kids, that wouldn't mean the remaining 5% are immoral or wrong.
Probably to jerk off, which is not predatory behavior.
Holy fuck, I take it back. Face the wall.
 
Normally I'd say that what people do in their privacy isn't my business, but many lolicons do, in fact, make it other people's business by being very public about it.
I am very much pro-free expression under the NAP but jesus some of you faggots are unpleasant and annoying with how proud you are of that fact.
 
Even if, hypothetically, 95% of lolicon was traced off real kids, that wouldn't mean the remaining 5% are immoral or wrong.
If that was the case, then it would be perfectly reasonable to outright ban lolicon and consider it a felony to possess it. We don't know the numbers yet, but we know some artists are sick enough to draw stuff out of real kids and others do groom children with them.
 
Vague terms that don't mean anything without the numbers to back them up. Even if, hypothetically, 95% of lolicon was traced off real kids, that wouldn't mean the remaining 5% are immoral or wrong.
I was going to write a response to all of your points in response to my arguments but then I read ahead, saw this, and realized that I’d just be wasting my breath. Holy fuck you’re delusional. You claim that I’m the insane one for comparing loli and CP, and then you claim that it would be ok if it was just straight up CP?!

You should seek professional help
 
If that was the case, then it would be perfectly reasonable to outright ban lolicon and consider it a felony to possess it. We don't know the numbers yet, but we know some artists are sick enough to draw stuff out of real kids.
Yeah I would be fine with banning it if that was the case for practical reasons, but the cases not involving any kids would still be morally sound.
if you jerk off to women, would not be unreasonable to assume you're going to want to graduate to having sex with women one day?
If you're jerking off to real women, yeah. Although if you pay any attention to the porn addict corners of the web you'll see an increasing amount of them becoming "pornsexuals" in which even though they jerk off to real women, they have no interest both mentally and physically in actually having sex with real women. Sexuality is a lot more nuanced than people think. But if you're jerking off to drawings I wouldn't say it means you want to fuck the real thing since unless it's a hyper-realistic art style (which 98% of anime isn't) it simply doesn't look the same.
was going to write a response to all of your points in response to my arguments but then I read ahead, saw this, and realized that I’d just be wasting my breath.
Yeah, that's a cope. You have nothing.
and then you claim that it would be ok if it was just straight up CP?!
How did you get that from what I said? I think your schizophrenia is acting up.
 
I sincerely appreciate the irony a website that not too long ago had to fight tooth and nail just to exist because most of society sees it as weird, degenerate and toxic is full of people who are fine with the principle of censoring and outlawing things they don't like as long as it's in the right direction. The history book on the shelf is always repeating itself.
It's unfortunate you view real children and drawings on equal footing, but instead of owning people you don't like on the internet all it does is trivialize actual child abuse and the trauma they suffer from it. You can even see it here, the term "legit pedophile" becoming more common because now when people hear pedophile or child porn they have to second guess "Wait, do they mean actual children or just drawings?"

Nothing passive aggressive about it, but using words and terms correctly seems to be a challenge for you doesn't it, little guy?
False equivalence. Weird how even Null has told previous defenders to kill themselves. Maybe this website isn't for you?
 
Back