Look at how they flip flop between “Trump is the peace president” and “He’s gonna show those yemenis their place!”. And supposedly “pro-west” while supporting intra-west trade wars.
It's incoherent retard babble from a group that gets their foreign policy from Fox News talk show hosts. Pete Heggseth wouldn't be the alcoholic Secretary of Defense if he weren't a Fox News commentator and host first.
Funny thing that no one has brought up yet. Elijah Schaffer was the only person to face no charges for Jan 6th that was inside the Capitol building itself. He took pictures of Pelosi's emails:
I didn't realize the extent of his actions. He did mention his time in Australia was to make it harder to be prosecuted for J6.
If you point this out, they will protest under 15 layers of irony about how the Talmudic Network is a figment of your imagination and that this is a completely organic loose collection of Twitter anons that just happen to have connections to elite institutions and think tanks and actually they WISH Peter Thiel would throw some of his money their way because it’s absolutely preposterous to believe any of these guys are taking money from anyone even remotely in the orbit of Thiel. What are you, a conspiracy theorist?
I believe the excuse is that Elijah had a valid press pass on that day. I feel like I’ve heard of others with press passes getting caught up in charges so not sure what to really believe here.
The tranny-chasing aspect of this reminds me of when he met up with Aella. The two interact very often.
And here's the blogpost, which on top of pretty definitively linking Crémieux to Lasker, also links him to a Reddit account called TrannyPornO, which contains exactly what you think it does
(https://archive.is/j5HPM)
I was about to say, I thought it was Lomez that said that Cremieux was a "very beautiful woman" on the timeline a few months ago. Not really sure where the meme began, but as they say, many truths are said in jest.
Ancient post I know, but I wish to add for context that seems to be missing in this altercation. BAP is definitely using Gobineau for things he didn't mean, there's really no reason for Gobineau (he misspelled it as Goblineau) to hide his inclinations considering where he's from and he is a professed Christian. You are right to notice how he's framing this, because it's entirely out of context. These types don't really consider that secularism is a corruption of Christian ethics, they don't really engage with that frame of view at all. They acquiesce to the idea 16th century puritans are more correct than Nicene or Apostolic fathers. Or Leo Tolstoy's Christianity is more correct than theirs. They have a hard time grasping on how hypstarians formed naturally, or don't even engage with the idea of why Romans were seeking out syncretism everywhere they looked. Maybe like Nietzsche they blanket kneejerk blame Socrates, but it's obvious ressentiment over their preferred aesthetics and reimagining of the past failing.
It's complete projection because if anyone is the "inorganic op" it's the guys who took the Thielbux and shilled relentlessly for Trump for the past two years to the point that the Vice President ran with one of their media campaigns and amplified it into the national sphere. There probably is some degree of influence that is being directed to amplify anti-Trump right voices, but frankly when your "side" owns the fucking platform that you're shilling on, when the Administration campaigned on talking points sourced from you, you can't really call other people "inorganic ops."
They're getting it straight from the White House, or rather, whoever is in charge of the White House. BAP is part of the general campaign to "dial back" some of the excess radicalization that has taken hold of the right wing since 2020. Better to have them debating about how fat is too fat on women, or if homosexuality is based and trad, rather than any of the real issues.
At this point the only way to know for certain what really went down with everyone involved, including but not limited to Fuentes and Schaffer is if the entire J6 files are released in a totally unredacted way, which will never happen.
In what universe would Australia not simply extradite his ass or send ASIO to have a little "chat" with him? They, like all the Anglosphere countries, have hilariously broad anti-terrorism laws.
Frankly all of these guys might as well be center-right since they're "limited hangouts" and are primarily engaged in bringing the disaffected "young white man" back into the fold to be mobilized for the GOP, which remains institutionally center-right, and it is indisputable that regardless of how much guys like Trump or Vance or Elon jingle the keys in "hiding-my-powerlevel" fashion to this faction, they are likewise center-right or at least more center-right than "far-right."
It is very, very important that whites do not get a racial consciousness and try to work for their own interests because it means a lot of special interest groups will start losing because the grift is up. It's also very, very important that marxist infested libfeminism that allows so much modern rot isn't pushed back against in any real way either since again it allows for special interest grifting. If droves of young men, specifically young white men, said they didn't want to play with you anymore and actually meant it, it would spell disaster for the accrued power of a lot of people.
The point is that there's a chance they don't just sit back and play vidya and let the world pass them by. That there's a chance, however small, that the radicalization that took hold in the past few years continues to grow. I know that these things can be a bit discounted, but think of just how widespread the basic-bitch entry-level "anti-Semitism" is now. Basically everyone knows and accepts that Israel has undue influence on our Government, and that Jewish influence is being more openly discussed than any time after 1945.
I would say it breeds degeneracy and nihilism, but it is not inherently deradicalizing in the way Trumpism or “ironic” philosemitism is.
