It's been, like, forty-five minutes. I guaran-fucking-tee you there is not going to be a random page that says plainly "THE REAL PERSON WHO SHOT JFK IS....". It is going to be hundreds of pages of fedboys trying to prove they were here or there or so and so was spoken to and said he didn't say this thing that he actually said. Expect a lot of fed boys subtly snaking on each other or trying to prove who wasn't involved in the assassination. Much of it probably isn't even going to be about that event itself, but rather the entire geopolitical landscape surrounding the Cold War.
A lot of it was also scanned in with dogshit 1960's technology, pulled and reviewed, scanned back in again, several times. A lot of those pages aren't even going to be legible. Also, in a time before modern computers when people were storing things like this in boxes you have to assume the feds at points replaced pages or just straight up doctored them. We couldn't even do modern CSI until, what, the eighties?
If these are just scans we in the thread would have had no real way of knowing about false documents being subbed in, and since what we have are apparently just scans it's not as if we can perform modern techniques to determine if we're looking at are the real deal or phonies (i.e. comparing pages of a single report and discovering one was randomly printed on paper whose material (paper, ink, etc) was newer or not of the same composition as the other pages; something we do for detecting art forgery). That's something you'd have to have the physical reports to suss out.
